2 minutes reading time
(388 words)
A Discussion with AI on Zillow's Liquidation Decision
This morning, I engaged in a discussion with a machine learning system that attempted to justify Zillow's decision to liquidate its portfolio of 3,032 properties. This decision resulted in a $304 million write-down, which I found perplexing given my experience in the property industry. The AI system initially echoed the company's rhetoric, which emphasized immediate financial stability and operational challenges.
Initial AI Justifications:
Immediate Financial Stability: Liquidation provided immediate cash flow and reduced operational costs.
Market Volatility: The unpredictability of the real estate market post-pandemic added to the uncertainty of holding onto the properties.
Operational Complexity: Managing a large portfolio of rental properties was deemed outside Zillow's core competencies.
My Perspective:
I offered an alternative view based on my industry experience. I argued that holding onto the properties could allow Zillow to benefit from market appreciation and rental income, potentially recovering losses within a relatively short period. Larger real estate firms manage much larger portfolios effectively, suggesting that Zillow's decision might have been shortsighted.
Financial Analysis:
I asked the AI to calculate the losses and gains of two scenarios over the two years since the liquidation:
Scenario 1: Liquidation and Reinvestment
Cash Released: $2.736 billion (90% of the original $3.04 billion value).
Financing Costs: Approximately $304 million over two years.
Reinvestment Earnings: Assuming a 7% return, earnings would be about $383.04 million over two years.
Net Gain: $79.04 million.
Scenario 2: Holding the Portfolio
Annual Appreciation: 5%.
Net Rental Yield After Management Fees: 7.2%.
Total Annual Return: 12.2%.
Future Value After Two Years: Approximately $3.83567 billion.
Net Gain: $795.67 million.
Revised AI Understanding:
The AI recalculated based on my input, recognizing that the potential net gain from holding the properties ($795.67 million) was significantly higher than the net gain from liquidation and reinvestment ($79.04 million). This analysis highlighted that the decision to liquidate was financially unsound and driven by short-term pressures.
Key Takeaways:
AI Learning: Initially, the AI returned a summary aligned with the company's position. However, when presented with an alternative view and detailed financial analysis, it adapted its understanding.
Importance of Comprehensive Data: Machine learning systems should incorporate long-term financial projections, market trends, and strategic patience to make sound investment decisions.
Experienced Insights: Integrating industry experience and robust data analytics can help avoid financially unsound decisions, as illustrated by the revised understanding of Zillow's situation.
Stay Informed
When you subscribe to the blog, we will send you an e-mail when there are new updates on the site so you wouldn't miss them.
Comments