The Unfortunate Truth About Moving Home
We’ve collected thousands of real home-moving complaints and horror stories from everyone involved in the home buying process. These are the frustrations, losses, headaches and awful scams that happen in the current system. Read the posts to educate yourself - as forewarned is forearmed!
Select your profile to see what WiggyWam can do for you
A live picture of where property transactions keep breaking down across the UK.
This wall brings together real experiences from home movers, professionals and others involved in buying and selling property. By sharing what happened, contributors help expose problems many agents, solicitors and service providers still underestimate, giving consumers, journalists, researchers and the people trying to fix the system clearer evidence of the scale, patterns and pressure points that need attention.
After the PM Law group collapse, we learned the SRA had stepped in and taken over client files and accounts. As sellers we still don’t know when we’ll see our sale proceeds.
Seller says a lender-panel surveyor report was so alarmist that their sale nearly collapsed, triggering renegotiations and delays.
They highlight that even if the purchase price looks attractive, big annual fees can make a property much harder to resell and knock thousands off its market value.
We instructed Gaddes Noble after a bereavement to sell my gran’s house. They requested deeds and searched the wrong property, ignored calls and emails and added to the stress at every stage.
They said it felt like signing a blank cheque to a management company, and they weren’t prepared to risk being unable to sell later.
Agents told to shape material information guidance. The industry says the rules are confusing, so we bought in a grey zone with hidden facts.
Endless delays, lies and inefficiencies.
We completed our sale through a PM Law firm just before the collapse, but the proceeds never reached us. That money was supposed to fund our next purchase and now both moves are on hold.
The watchdog says ground rent is not legally or commercially necessary, yet thousands remain stuck in contracts with rising charges.
One HomeSellingExpert guide estimates nearly a third of sales fall through and says many buyers are shocked to discover their mortgage offer doesn’t protect them from that risk.
They stress you must disclose any serious dispute on the TA6 form or risk a misrepresentation claim later if the buyer discovers how bad things really are with the neighbours.
Our conveyancing through Angela Viney Conveyancing Services stopped overnight. We’ve got buyers, removals booked and a mortgage ready, but nobody answering.
Our buyer’s buyer pulled out the day after the stamp duty holiday ended; nobody would say why and their solicitor just signed off with a casual ‘sorry’.
Three separate chains collapsed for different reasons and every time we had already paid survey, searches and legal fees which we never got back.
A neighbour’s extension had crept over the boundary years ago and nobody said anything; our buyers walked as soon as the title plan and reality didn’t match.
Some owners end up effectively paying to keep an empty flat going each year, slowly burning through their inheritance while the property sits on the market.
The same buyer says their mortgage offer expires mid-December and they’re panicking about whether they need an extension because no one will confirm what’s holding things up.
The Financial Times is now actively asking readers for ‘house moving horror stories’, saying recent research shows huge numbers of failed transactions and chains collapsing.
Our house sale fell through because the buyers suddenly ‘had concerns’ about the separate garage, even though it was clearly on the title and had been used that way for years.
We are mid property transaction and the service is worse than useless. Endless delays, lies and inefficiencies.
“Did not pay final ground rent and service charge… debt collection threats.”
Repeated spam calls from multiple numbers, despite never requesting contact—felt like harassment and possible data misuse.
A home-selling guide says many collapsed sales come down to the same problems: mortgages falling through, bad surveys, slow solicitors and buyers or sellers simply changing their minds.
Another Ombudsman case involved a conveyancer whose poor communication and delay meant a sale fell through; the clients said they’d never understood what was going wrong until the buyer walked.
I’d already mentally moved; now I’m back in the same house, surrounded by boxes and constant anxiety about ever escaping this process.
We’re trying to sell and the buyer’s survey has thrown up a laundry list of alleged defects. Some are flat-out wrong, but it’s enough to make them hesitate and threaten to pull out.
A mortgage advice article warns that when an offer expires mid-transaction, it can knock over multiple linked sales and cause a chain to collapse completely.
Waiting months for a certificate of deeds needed to complete a flat sale.
One Redditor said their ‘useless’ solicitor took ages to acknowledge a complaint and then the sale fell through, leaving them paying for work they felt had been badly handled from day one.
This must be the worst legal firm in the country. They just cause endless delays.
Victims of Friday afternoon fraud describe losing life savings due to email interception.
“Consistently sat on our case… lied about what work had been done… rarely responded.”
They argue the solicitor handled sensitive information too lightly by not verifying the details properly, and note the fallout can drag on for months.
Sometimes it took over a week to get any answer to urgent questions about the purchase.
We were hit with an insurance loading because the property had a historical subsidence claim, something we only discovered after paying for searches.
Buyer says their solicitor keeps blaming ‘missing paperwork’ but won’t specify what’s missing, delaying exchange indefinitely.
The HomeOwners Alliance points out that the largest number of Legal Ombudsman complaints relate to residential conveyancing – especially poor communication and delay.
Another thread describes a buyer’s survey throwing up ‘alleged issues’ that the sellers dispute, but the buyer still uses it to renegotiate and delay the sale.
Our sale fell apart because the buyer’s mortgage valuation came in way under; there was too big a gap for them to make up.
An Everys Solicitors article on the ‘hidden costs’ of leasehold says some owners face escalating ground rents and service charges that make it difficult to sell or remortgage at all.
One poster said the worst part was having no binding commitment until exchange – months of work can vanish with a single phone call.
Our sale fell through a couple of times during COVID; each time the solicitors seemed to drag things out while everyone’s circumstances kept changing.
The HomeOwners Alliance say retirement flats can be nightmare to sell on because service charges creep up over time until they look eye-watering to new buyers.
HomeOwners Alliance similarly notes that many complaints about solicitors relate to conveyancing, especially where clients feel they’re left chasing updates themselves.
In ‘Has my mortgage broker been negligent?’, an MSE user says their broker didn’t warn them about key affordability issues, leaving them with a mortgage offer that later fell apart.
We found out by email while we were on holiday that our buyer had backed out – it completely ruined the trip and we still haven’t resold.
They contrasted that supportive approach with other agents who disappear once a ‘sold’ board goes up and do little to rescue a wobbling chain.
A Trustpilot reviewer for British Homebuyers says their high street estate agent produced ‘no progression’ on their sale, which pushed them to look for an alternative route to sell.
my solicitors have said that they WILL NOT under any circumstances, issue draft contracts until the registration has been made
Our leasehold flat has ground rent clauses that double every ten years; multiple buyers’ solicitors have now advised their clients not to proceed.
They point out that when a solicitor stops communicating, chains wobble and clients start imagining the worst, even when problems could be fixed with a frank update.
“The whole process of buying a house has been painful… largely down to our solicitor.”
After spending money on valuation and legals, we had to abandon the purchase because cash buyers were our seller’s only hope.
The previous sale on the house collapsed after the buyer’s lender down-valued it; we had the same problem and couldn’t bridge the gap either.
On MSE, a buyer says their ‘new build long stop’ has come and gone with no completion, leaving them stuck waiting while the developer keeps pushing dates back.
Our shared ownership flat has a £5,600 annual service charge we were never warned could increase this much.
HomeSellingExpert say surveys show the average amount lost in fees after a sale falls through is roughly £2,700–£2,900 in England and Wales.
We sold our house before it even went on the open market in a really popular area where nothing needs doing. The surveyor has picked up some minor things but has valued it nearly £50k below the agreed price.
Posters reply that if you downplay or hide a dispute, you risk serious trouble later – including claims for misrepresentation if the buyer finds out.
Our neighbour started threatening legal action over a shared driveway right in the middle of the sale, spooking the buyers into walking away.
They only sold once a local high-street agent took over, knew the patch and actually progressed the sale rather than just listing it.
Selling a leasehold: charged hundreds for standard enquiries and slow responses risk collapsing the chain.
I was told I should not expect replies the same week because they were so busy.
Buyer view: estate agent demanded address certification by a solicitor — extra cost and hassle.
Used a quote-comparison site and then received persistent contact (texts/emails/calls) that felt like harassment.
We realised just how unhelpful our original selling agent had been once we worked with a more proactive firm.
We had a viewing last week from a cash buyer and have heard nothing back. The agency keeps saying they will chase but I feel they are not really trying because we are changing estate agents when the contract expires. This was our first viewing in 13 weeks and apparently the viewer loved the house.
They describe the weeks after the fall-through as ‘very stressful’, with constant fear the rest of the chain would collapse before a replacement buyer was found.
We tried an online agent for the lower fees but service was so poor we moved to a local high street firm instead.
The buyer isn’t responding much, and my estate agent is not helpful
The whole chain is ready but we’re told the funds can’t be released in time. Bank and CHAPS delays are now threatening completion.
Our house sale fell through because the freeholder’s agent took six weeks to answer a basic enquiry from our solicitor – by the time they replied, our buyer had lost patience and walked.
The survey uncovered serious structural movement and damp; our lender still valued at the asking price but we decided the risks were too high and walked.
One reviewer says their conveyancer’s lack of contact left the lender and the seller’s solicitor exasperated and dragged the whole process out.
A buyer asked online whether their seller’s lack of response to basic enquiries was a red flag – weeks had passed, no documents had come back, and their solicitor was warning the chain could fail.
I was told it was a fixed-fee job with nothing to pay if the sale failed, then hit with a huge invoice when the buyer pulled out at the last minute.
Our buyer’s lender decided late in the day that the property was 'unmortgageable' due to its condition, and the quick-sale company had to pass us to a different team.
“Been waiting over a month for an insecure and dangerous front door… to be repaired.”
Our lender’s valuation came in far below the agreed price; the seller wouldn’t negotiate and the whole purchase collapsed.
We had three different estate agents over two years and still no completed sale; every chain seemed to fall apart over someone else’s paperwork or finances.
Searches came back early August, enquiries sent late August — no response until early September, and still no update.
Our buyer pulled out because the leasehold house had escalating ground rent; their solicitor warned it could make the place unsellable in the future.
We had a £45k down-valuation on a shiny refurbished place – the lender’s surveyor decided it wasn’t worth anywhere near what we’d agreed and the sale collapsed overnight.
Homeowner says the warranty felt pointless because every issue raised was refused or deflected, even when problems persisted.
Our neighbour started harassing viewers whenever we had a viewing booked – shouting over the fence about parking and noise.
We’d paid survey and solicitor fees only to have the seller pull their house from the market a week before we were due to exchange.
It’s maddening that a survey can kill your sale yet there’s so little transparency about what was actually written or whether it was fair.
The estate agent and our buyer’s solicitor have both gone quiet for weeks. We’re stuck in limbo with no idea what’s outstanding.
Our sale fell through because the buyers ‘suddenly realised’ the house doesn’t have a driveway – after two viewings and two months of back-and-forth, they just walked away over something that obvious.
“Dragged out the whole conveyancing process… exasperation of my lender and seller’s solicitor.”
Gaddes Noble took over two years to complete a simple conveyancing matter and still failed to secure legal title. Documents were lost, excuses made and we felt pushed from one unqualified person to another.
“The buying experience was slow and stressful… communication was appalling.”
We got almost no proactive contact; everything had to be chased repeatedly.
Our buyer’s mortgage fell through and the agent called to ask if we’d still be interested at our original price, but by then we’d lost faith in the whole process.
Seller says they lost a buyer because the firm took too long to respond to routine queries.
They say the previous agent ‘did no marketing’ and the experience taught them how much chain progression and chasing really matter.
Solicitor accidentally sent confidential documents to the wrong estate agent, breaching GDPR.
As a broker I’m seeing more surveyors slash valuations so much that buyers can’t bridge the gap, forcing entire deals to be abandoned.
They say nobody will give them straight answers about what is outstanding, leaving them feeling helpless in the middle of the transaction.
A seller says they needed a management pack for a sale and waited weeks while getting little help or clarity.
Broker claimed our mortgage was guaranteed and encouraged us to book surveys. The lender declined days later leaving us £700 out of pocket.
They misread the seller’s TA6 and failed to notice the property had an unresolved insurance claim. Our lender refused to proceed once the issue finally surfaced.
In the same Reddit thread, another person said their purchase fell apart when the surveyor reported structural movement and the lender refused to lend without expensive remedial works.
She felt the story about a previous sale collapsing ‘for no reason’ didn’t add up and suspected there were undisclosed problems the sellers weren’t being honest about.
We were told everything was 'standard' and not to worry about the service charge level. A later review by another adviser highlighted escalating costs and minimal reserve funds which should have been flagged at the outset.
Mortgage application stalled because the surveyor insisted a loft room wasn’t a ‘real bedroom’ despite council documentation.
“It took them 5 months… to send initial enquiries.”
The lack of any joined-up system meant the broker blamed the solicitor, the solicitor blamed the agent, and we were just left with a failed sale.
We’re up against a fixed-rate deadline and facing the prospect of an unsellable flat just as our mortgage costs are about to jump.
An advice site reminds buyers that if they feel an estate agent has misled them about why a previous sale fell through, they can escalate the complaint to the Property Ombudsman.
An article on claim delays notes that many home insurance customers are left waiting so long for decisions and repairs that their lives are effectively on hold.
its almost 15 weeks and our lawyer has advised us application for adverse possession and indemnity insurance
We were supposed to complete on Friday. Instead, we’re in a short-term let with our furniture in storage because our conveyancing firm shut overnight and nobody can tell us when we can actually move in.
Quick Move Now warn that unresolved neighbour rows – noise, harassment, anti-social behaviour – can seriously hamper a sale or force big price cuts just to get someone to buy.
Eric Robinson Solicitors explain that failing to disclose an ongoing dispute with neighbours could count as misrepresentation and land you with a big compensation bill after completion.
The survey report contained statements that felt wildly exaggerated, creating alarm for the buyer and putting the sale under threat.
Ground rents have become controversial — we thought we owned the freehold when in fact we had little control and large escalating fees on house we bought.
If we have to reapply, the new rate will cost thousands more over the fixed term – all because the process drifted and nobody took responsibility.
In our chain, one link used a PM Law brand. Several families have already moved out or given notice, and there’s real anxiety that some of them could be left without anywhere permanent to stay.
Buyer believes an estate agent lied about speaking to the seller, rejecting their first offer within minutes, then going silent for days when they increased it, leaving them feeling manipulated and mistrustful.
We’re months in and still waiting for replies. I’m permanently stressed because every update takes forever.
Material information guidance says lease length, charges, ground rent and building safety issues all need to be up front in listings.
A move was held up while waiting for the managing agent to provide a sales pack; the silence dragged on for weeks despite chasing.
Buyer reports discovering after completion that the loft conversion had no building regulation sign off and says neither the estate agent nor their conveyancer clearly explained the risks during the purchase.
I’m so stressed – the sale fell through and I feel like we’re stuck in limbo, unsure whether to relist, rent or just give up.
Another Reddit user complained that service charges in London new builds are outrageous and predicted many of these flats will be very hard to sell in future.
Impossible to contact… after my money was paid.
No communication at all… relentlessly chase my solicitor for updates.
They say this cautious approach fuels fall-throughs when sellers refuse to drop to the survey figure and buyers can’t stretch further.
We were stunned to learn that until exchange, either party can just walk away; months of work and money can vanish with one email.
Buyer's solicitor has gone quiet for over two weeks, causing the seller to panic that the chain will collapse.
They explain their solicitor originally told them completion would be March with a long-stop in September, but they’re now being told it could be April the following year.
So slow we lost our buyer. After over 180 days of waiting... our buyer finally pulled out and I don't blame them.
Between two failed sales and one abandoned purchase, we reckon we’ve thrown away more on fees than we saved from years of careful budgeting.
A seller says they’re 9 weeks in and their buyer’s solicitor appears to have done almost nothing, ignoring repeated chasers, and they fear the onward seller will pull out due to lack of progress.
The Law Gazette reports that solicitors can face sanctions even when delays are caused by third parties if they fail to manage expectations or keep clients informed.
They say the agent applied intense pressure to complete quickly and chased them daily, then the purchase fell apart and left them in a housing scramble.
“I have no idea where the house sale is as no one is contactable.”
Quick Move Now’s data shows nearly three in ten UK property sales failed to complete in 2024 – buyers dropping out, finance issues or chains breaking apart.
They warned the OP that once charges hit a certain level, you’re competing with houses and cheaper flats and may have to discount heavily just to get any interest.
Can't give zero otherwise I would.
Ground rent terms looked small at first, but the doubling clause made the flat borderline unmortgageable once our lender saw the detail.
They say they only learned the mortgage offer still wasn’t in place via a solicitor letter over a bank holiday, and believe the agent knew earlier but didn’t tell them.
A buyer says they paid thousands in a modern method of auction reservation fee, completed everything on time, but the seller dragged their heels until the reservation period expired — then sold to someone else.
We were pressured into using the in-house mortgage adviser and felt it affected how seriously our offer was treated.
I had my offer accepted in early July. I have still not completed the purchase. …passed to 3 different solicitors
Signed deed of variation promised ‘shortly’—then no progress and no proper responses.
Invoice demanded for ‘opening a file’ despite the person saying they never engaged them.
Their guidance says firms could avoid a lot of this anger simply by agreeing realistic timescales and sticking to regular updates.
We’d finished searches, survey and enquiries, ready to move, and then found out we’d pay about £17k more because the chain couldn’t hit the tax deadline.
We are first time buyers and had an offer accepted on 30 October. A week after instructing solicitors I rang for an update and was told the person listed as our solicitor is not actually acting and the real one is on annual leave. His secretary will not accept calls or reply to emails. Our broker also called in sick so our mortgage application has been delayed and we are worried the sellers will think we are dragging our feet.
Knowing a deal had already failed once because of the survey made us suspicious there were serious hidden problems, even though we loved the house.
Our first sale fell through due to mortgage valuation issues and we had to accept a lower price with the next buyer to keep things moving.
Our buyer used Angela Viney and the file moved at a snail’s pace. Emails were ignored, they posted documents instead of emailing and the whole thing was a mess from start to finish.
As a broker, it felt like constant back-and-forth with repeated requests and slow progress—seriously delayed cases.
We used Butterworths / PM Law for both our sale and purchase and were just about to exchange and set a completion date when we discovered the doors locked and a notice saying they could no longer trade. Both sides of our move are now at risk of collapsing.
Some leaseholders have discovered that a big chunk of their buildings insurance costs is hidden commission, adding to the sense that they’re paying too much to live in a place they can’t easily sell.
We discovered on the day of exchange that our lender wouldn’t draw down until an obscure wording in the lease was amended, which added weeks and cost us the buyer.
I thought ‘no move, no fee’ meant exactly that, but when the sale collapsed I was handed an £800 bill for an insurance policy I didn’t even know I’d supposedly agreed to.
The valuation visit felt rushed and incomplete, yet the report still managed to create problems that slowed our mortgage progress.
We’d planned everything around completing before the stamp duty deadline. When the chain broke the day after, we were left paying higher tax and facing a collapsed sale at the same time.
Avoid. I contacted them on 19th June to say our "seller" had withdrawn the property we were buying
Our buyers pulled out four days before exchange. The property opposite came on the market later and we ended up buying that instead – in better condition.
In ‘House sale collapse’, a seller says their buyer’s sale collapsed and the buyer immediately relisted with the same agent, but they were never told why it fell apart.
Our chain collapsed after five months when the vendor at the top lost their onward purchase and the agent kept quiet about it for weeks.
Once our mortgage term neared its end, we were bombarded with persistent calls and emails. It felt like pressure tactics rather than helpful advice.
They say the flood risk wasn’t flagged in the report at all, and they only caught it by reading through the documents themselves right before exchange.
Our tenants have moved out, we’ve moved out, and the person we’re buying from has also packed up. The only thing missing is completion, and that’s blocked because our PM Law firm no longer answers the phone.
During a remortgage, the service left me frustrated and chasing; it felt like poor handling of a basic process.
Many say the moment the lender’s number comes back, negotiations turn sour and one side walks away, killing the deal.
They advise keeping a clear paper trail of what’s happened, because serious long-running disputes can knock a significant amount off the sale price.
Only discovered late the lease was 79 years — this triggered lender advising us to renegotiate or face higher interest.
Our buyers pulled out after their broker finally admitted he’d put them with the wrong lender for our property type, and their new bank wouldn’t lend enough.
Wasted 4 months of my life.
It’s frustrating that when a sale collapses you rarely get a straight answer; as the seller you are just told the buyer has withdrawn and you’re left guessing what put them off.
Consistently sat on our case with no action... lied about what work had been done... rarely responded.
“Connells never respond to email enquiries.”
Leaseholder says trying to pay ground rent was made unnecessarily difficult, with limited payment methods and failed attempts.
Our first buyer pulled out saying the solicitor was taking too long; we then lost a second buyer for similar reasons because the lawyer rarely replied to calls or emails.
Conveyancers still in the dark on material information: guidance withdrawn and sellers unsure what must be disclosed.
Allegation of gazumping being encouraged/handled badly, making the purchase feel insecure.
As a Butterworths client I was never clearly told they’d become part of PM Law. Only after the social media posts did I spot a quiet change in the email footer. Now the firm has shut, my will and other documents are locked away and nobody is replying to requests for them.
I only had 2 offers both fell though one kept me holding on for 6 months…
Our buyers’ solicitor said they couldn’t get any replies from Latimer Lee; in the end the sale fell through because communication was so poor.
Agents say prospective purchasers now walk away as soon as they see the service charge schedule, leaving some flats effectively unsellable unless prices are slashed.
We’re totally broken by the market – we’ve done everything right and still ended up with no house and a pile of invoices.
Agents in our area are warning that any chain touching a PM Law brand could be at risk. Some buyers have drawn down mortgage funds, but completions can’t happen while the regulator sorts through the firm’s accounts.
A Trustpilot review says their house was under offer but progress was extremely slow and their case handler didn’t respond to emails or calls for long periods.
They describe emails going unanswered for weeks and only finding out about issues after repeatedly chasing.
Another MSE thread describes a seller whose buyer’s own purchaser pulled out a week before exchange, leaving the entire chain at risk.
We were stunned that you can get all the way to the finish line and still lose the sale in a single phone call.
They ignored my broker completely and refused to talk to anyone but me by email.
They did not respond even to a solicitor's letter, which tells you everything about their attitude.
Estate agents told us the ground rent ‘issue’ had been fixed, but the updated terms still looked risky once our solicitor explained them.
“After 8 weeks of torture… I decided to go to a real conveyancing firm.”
The Legal Ombudsman described a buyer whose sale collapsed over a title issue; they were told they could use indemnity insurance, but nobody explained it properly until it was too late.
Our conveyancer never clearly explained that we’d be responsible for insuring the property from exchange, which nearly delayed things when the lender checked the policy details.
A valuation report was seen as careless and contradictory, creating weeks of delay while the buyer and lender tried to make sense of it.
Paid for documents but received the wrong ones and then emails were ignored; no clear complaints route.
We did not get a drain survey and the house surveyor failed to identify cracks and movement that were caused by a collapsed drain. We have now discovered the problem and want to know where we stand since the issue was completely missed before purchase.
In ‘House buying hell – is there anything I can do?’, an MSE user describes months of silence and delays from their solicitor while their purchase slowly unravels.
I pay a management fee so the letting agent can manage my property, but they barely inspect it, never spot issues and communication is dreadful.
It underlines how much power a survey report now has: one pessimistic comment and a deal months in the making can vanish overnight.
In ‘Neighbours hindering sale... what can we do?’, posters warn that once you make a formal written complaint about neighbours, you must declare it when you sell.
They warn that an expired offer can mean more credit checks, new valuations and the risk of being offered a worse rate than before.
Our estate agent kept telling us everything was ‘progressing nicely’ while the buyers’ mortgage offer quietly expired in the background.
A family received post suggesting the property might still be registered to the previous owner months after purchase, triggering alarm.
The lender insisted on re-running affordability twice due to ‘system errors’. Each delay pushed us closer to losing the house.
We went ahead with leasehold and now feel trapped by high service charges and little control – we underestimated how bad it could be.
Another Guardian story describes ‘affordable’ shared-ownership buyers seeing service charges rocket by hundreds of percent, to the point they can barely stay afloat.
“Constant delays… risk of unnecessary stamp duty costs.”
Our rental property sale fell through twice in a row. Each time we paid for more solicitor work and never got close to exchanging contracts.
Firm dragged out conveyancing so badly it frustrated the lender and the other side’s solicitor.
The same police warning highlights how payment-diversion fraud hits right near completion, when people are under pressure and moving large sums—exactly when a collapse can be financially devastating.
It’s now been over a year since we engaged Let Property to purchase a property - only the seller to withdraw during completion.
nearing completion I was being fobbed off all the time
They feel totally in limbo – trapped paying for a home neither they nor anyone else really wants at that level of ongoing cost.
Our buyer pulled out after seven weeks, right after their survey, and never gave a clear reason. We were first-time sellers and had no idea this happened so often.
“Overstate value then get you to reduce.”
MoneySavingExpert users share stories of down valuations where surveyors shave tens of thousands off agreed prices because local comparables haven’t caught up.
Chasing for updates felt like a full-time job – emails ignored, calls not returned, and then a casual ‘oh, yes, I’ll order that today’.
The experience left us feeling that many of their positive reviews were not reflective of reality.
They give examples where failure to chase other parties or explain slow progress left clients convinced their lawyer just didn’t care.
Clients visiting Butterworths in Carlisle found a notice saying PM Group firms could no longer trade. Staff hadn’t been warned, and buyers and sellers were left standing outside with no idea what would happen to their moves.
We’re FTB with no chain but our solicitor replaced halfway through the process and now exchange looks six months away.
A mortgage valuation was booked but the company couldn’t provide a sensible time slot. Seller felt messed around during a live transaction.
Our agent seemed more interested in protecting their relationship with a pushy developer than in being honest with us about why our sale had collapsed.
My previous purchase collapsed after searches and the solicitor charged me the full amount again for the new one.
A relative of ours is sleeping on a blow-up bed because her purchase money is stuck in a PM Law client account. She’s technically completed on a sale but has nowhere permanent to live right now.
Average service charges for flats have risen to £2,300 a year, outpacing wages and inflation.
The typical fall-through now costs movers around £3,400 in wasted fees.
A mortgage broker explained that when a sale falls through, most lenders will transfer a mortgage offer – but buyers still face another valuation and fresh paperwork all over again.
A first-time buyer says their conveyancer is ‘ghosting’ them: good comms with broker and agent, but repeated emails to the solicitor get no reply and it’s making them anxious.
At Lang Town & Country, a reviewer talks about an ‘exhausting 11-month journey’ where their chain collapsed several times before the team finally got it over the line.
Complaints route feels like a loop: told to complain again rather than fix the underlying problem.
We went with British Homebuyers after a previous sale using a local agent fell through, and just wanted a route that would actually complete.
We’ve lived in limbo for months, paying for a house we no longer want to be in while the chain repeatedly falls apart around us.
On Trustpilot, a seller said William H Brown took days to arrange viewings, failed to tell a tenant about an appointment and then broke promises about how offers would be handled.
They advise taking complaints all the way to the Legal Ombudsman if internal procedures don’t fix things, because poor conveyancing is a major source of consumer harm.
One poster said their house sale fell through a week before completion and they ended up suing the buyers for breach of contract to recover some of their losses.
Some buyers only discover after purchase that their flat’s service charges make it almost impossible to sell on at a fair price.
We were told the surveyor was independent, but the valuation matched the mortgage offer almost exactly and left us unable to renegotiate a clearly over-priced house.
The HomeOwners Alliance warns that a down valuation can completely upend a sale, because buyers suddenly can’t borrow enough to stick to the agreed price.
We only realised after moving in that the previous owners had constant rows with the neighbours about noise; none of it was mentioned on the TA6.
A Trustpilot review for Lang Town & Country describes an eleven-month journey with multiple chain collapses before the buyers finally secured the house they loved.
A First Time Buyer Facebook group member said their seller had ‘probably pulled out’ but neither the agent nor solicitor would give them a straight answer for days.
Sale for seller collapsed — review alleges they weren’t told for weeks that the sale had failed.
Even then, the rest of the move was a slog of chasing solicitors and waiting on paperwork – it feels like the whole system is built on delay.
The property was marketed as ‘no onward chain’ to secure a quick offer, but later turned out not to be true—costing the buyer dearly.
The Advisory’s guide to conveyancing complaints notes that common problems include slow progress, poor communication, unexplained extra fees and buyers or sellers feeling ignored at key stages.
The new agent actively marketed the flat and coordinated buying and selling when the earlier attempt had just drifted until the chain collapsed.
After a two-year buying journey, it’s exhausting to still be asking whether the sellers actually have authority to sell or if we’ll be back to square one again.
They said each collapse cost them more in fees and they were starting to think the only option was selling to a quick-sale company just to escape.
A buyer on Facebook said their chain collapsed because the bottom of the chain couldn’t get a mortgage, leaving everyone above stranded and scrambling to renegotiate with builders.
The company defrauded me of £6,000
We had to walk away from a house we loved after our mortgage broker told us the new lender stress tests meant our original agreement in principle was useless.
The sellers said the buyers didn’t even have the decency to pick up the phone, leaving everyone to piece things together from silence.
It’s brutal that you can get that close to exchanging and still have everything fall apart with a single phone call.
Campaigners say buyers were lured in with low initial estimates and only later discovered the true cost of living there.
“So slow we lost our buyer… over 180 days… our buyer finally pulled out.”
The HomeOwners Alliance notes that average service charges for flats hit around £2,300 in 2024, up 11% in a year – and that this is now putting buyers off.
They say the only reason they stuck with the process was because the branch kept explaining what was happening each time another link failed.
Our flat’s high service charge meant even cash buyers tried to knock tens of thousands off the price to compensate for the annual costs.
A whole new level of deception in the property investment industry to say the least.
We were using PM Property Lawyers to buy our first home. I’ve already paid thousands in fees and extra for a fire risk assessment. Now the firm has collapsed mid-transaction and I’m stuck in limbo, anxious that all that money and the purchase itself could be lost.
A long list of survey issues, from damp to missing structural support, led the buyer to demand a huge discount and effectively killed the deal.
A Guardian piece reports that average service charges for leasehold flats have jumped to around £2,300 a year, with many owners now paying more in charges than in council tax.
Our flat has been on the market for ages but the massive service charges scare away every buyer, leaving us trapped and unable to move on with our lives.
Slow slow and slow… Searches done after two months… It’s been 3 months and we don't even have exchange.
Our house sale has now fallen through three times. Each buyer had a different excuse and we’ve lost patience with the whole system.
I complained that my conveyancer never returned calls; by the time the firm apologised, the chain had already fallen apart.
Our flat has been back on the market for four weeks with only two viewings. Last year our agent left the listing live on Rightmove for eight months without telling us and we worry this has made buyers think something is wrong with the flat.
After 11 months and several chain collapses, we finally completed. Our latest agent actually returned calls and emails, which shouldn’t be rare but apparently is.
They said emails went unanswered for weeks, buyers lost patience and withdrew, and now they’re being chased for a full fee on a failed transaction.
The HomeOwners Alliance notes that the biggest share of complaints to the Ombudsman now come from residential conveyancing – buying and selling homes.
One avenue of complaint to the Legal Ombudsman involved a solicitor who left a client unclear about a buyer’s intentions; by the time they realised there was a problem, the sale had already fallen through.
Another commenter replied that they’d personally avoid buying in that block because high charges and future increases would make it very hard to sell on.
They say undisclosed disputes can come back to bite you if the buyer later finds old complaint letters or council reports you never mentioned.
Buyer alleges aggressive chasing for business via calls/texts/emails felt like harassment after requesting quotes elsewhere.
We had to pay for a second opinion just to prove the house wasn’t falling down, and by then the original buyers had gone.
Our move date was sprung on us with only a day to prepare because no one updated us.
A buyer describes being stuck for weeks with no clear answers while their conveyancer appeared disengaged.
Another MSE thread describes a buyer whose solicitor wasn’t approved by the lender, forcing them to apply to join the panel and delaying the mortgage offer for weeks.
Solicitor did not inform the buyer about a bankruptcy restriction on the title until days before exchange.
A Trustpilot review for SmoothSale said their previous sale collapsed and threatened their whole chain, but the company got the property re-listed and sold again within a week.
Another ReviewSolicitors page shows a reviewer calling Harrisons Thames Valley Solicitors ‘poor communication, slow to act and completely unprofessional’.
Shocked to be basically 'scammed' by this firm.
On r/HousingUK, one buyer asks why their conveyancing solicitor never gives updates – calls go unanswered and they feel like their purchase has just been forgotten.
One British Homebuyers review said the first estate agent went quiet after a ‘sale’ was agreed; when the buyer pulled out, there was no plan B.
The seller in that thread says they are close to exchanging on their onward purchase but stuck waiting for the buyer’s lender to sort its panel problem.
A Sun investigation showed leaseholders billed ridiculous amounts for simple jobs like changing light bulbs, with hidden insurance commissions baked into already-high service charges.
The piece warns that hiding rows with neighbours can easily lead to fall-throughs or legal claims once buyers discover the truth.
Our sale fell through because we couldn’t agree on who would repair a dangerous retaining wall; neither side wanted to inherit the liability.
They worry that future buyers will take one look at the bill and either demand a big discount or walk away altogether.
A buyer warns that in the modern method of auction they paid thousands in a reservation fee, the seller ‘dragged their heels’, and after the 56 days the seller sold to someone else while the fee stayed non-refundable.
They underline how a single missed deadline can ripple up an entire chain and kill multiple linked transactions.
On Reddit, a leaseholder described their annual service charge making the flat ‘impossible to sell’ – buyers are put off before they even step through the door.
I found out today that my solicitor from the PM Law group has gone under a week before completion. My £50,000 deposit is now in limbo and even the SRA can’t give me a straight answer about what’s happening or when this will be resolved.
I feel like I’m one admin delay away from homelessness: my tenancy ends, my PM Law firm has closed and the regulator is dealing with ‘thousands of files’ before even getting to my case.
I posted that the vendor for a probate sale was not willing to pay for a gas safety check even though there was no history. After pushing, they finally agreed to fund it and the gas fire was found to have a gas leak and was condemned. It could have been very dangerous.
We’re stuck wondering whether to start again with another buyer or gamble on them fixing their finance before everyone in the chain walks away.
We’d already paid removals, searches and legal fees when the buyers walked away on completion day, leaving us with nothing and no comeback.
Complaint about returning key documents: slow, unhelpful, and felt like no one owned the issue.
We nearly lost our deposit after fraudsters spoofed our solicitor’s email and changed the bank details.
The lender agreed a short extension, but that meant a frantic race to exchange and complete within days to stop the whole chain collapsing.
Our chain collapsed after the builder admitted the property we wanted was not actually available; by then our buyer was threatening to walk as well.
Seller felt misled about service length; poor disclosure meant extra costs later to re-list elsewhere.
Near exchange but buyer’s solicitor won’t respond to emails; sale has already dragged on for months.
A reviewer describes worrying defects and frustration, saying the protection didn’t operate as they assumed it would.
We had one purchase fall through because of cladding, got gazumped on the second, and are now on a third house where probate questions are dragging on and on.
With Gaddes Noble we felt like a nuisance for asking simple questions. Deadlines slipped, key documents were wrong and our completion was delayed, leaving us out of pocket.
They described the journey as ‘painful’, with months of uncertainty and repeated collapses before a determined solicitor and agent team finally made it happen.
We’ve got a mortgage offer expiring soon, but PM Property Lawyers, who were meant to handle our purchase, have closed and nobody has told us what happens next.
They said it felt like signing up to an open-ended liability, and they didn’t want to end up with a flat that would be hard to sell on for the same reason.
We discovered on the survey that the loft conversion had no building regulations approval; the lender refused to treat it as habitable space and our sale died overnight.
We discovered after instructing solicitors that the loft conversion had no building regs sign-off; our lender refused to lend and the deal died.
On HousePriceCrash, posters said many central London flats with £2,000-a-year service charges and hefty council tax are just sitting on the market because buyers don’t want the ongoing cost burden.
MoneySavingExpert users discuss reusing previous buyers’ searches where possible after a fall-through, hoping to avoid paying twice for the same local authority checks.
I’m here to warn others who might be thinking about using this company who ultimately cost us the sale of our property.
A leaseholder said a simple request to pay in instalments was refused and escalated into extra charges and debt collection fees.
We wasted months on a house only to discover via searches that a major new road scheme was planned at the end of the garden.
I’ve missed out on a house because of them.
We only discovered previous subsidence after our insurer ran checks; no one had mentioned it at viewing, and it changed everything.
The conveyancer waited until the file had gone cold to send their invoice for a failed sale, ignoring how their delays had contributed to the collapse.
We’ve packed up our lives, kids and pets ready to move, only to be told our PM Law firm has closed and the completion can’t happen. We’re effectively homeless until someone new picks up the file.
A seller describes a failed completion day where the buyer’s solicitor suddenly asked for AML/source-of-funds documents at the last minute, even though the funds were already with them from a previous sale.
The reviewer tells others to avoid them ‘for your own sanity’, feeling stuck and unable to move forward with the extension.
I felt rushed and pressured into signing the entire time. Ended up changing solicitors.
Our surveyor down-valued the house by £30,000 compared to the agreed price; the lender refused to budge and the seller wouldn’t negotiate.
Leaseholders saddled with cladding bills say they face thousands in costs they were never warned about.
Buyer’s premium refused even after the purchase attempt fell apart.
I was told that I couldn’t relist the property...
Citizens Advice say they see cases where buyers’ deposits aren’t returned promptly when a sale falls through, leaving people out of pocket and unable to move on.
One reviewer wrote that after ten months waiting, their simple complaint still hadn’t been looked at, calling the service ‘useless’ for small landlords.
A recent Legal Ombudsman data release shows residential conveyancing still tops the list of most-complained-about legal areas, with poor communication a leading issue.
We had to drop out after our buildings insurance quote doubled when the insurer saw the flood risk, which nobody had mentioned before.
By the time we saw the old structural report, we’d already spent money on our own survey; we felt misled and dropped out on principle.
There was almost no communication between seller and agent which made it impossible to judge the situation.
The HomeOwners Alliance guide to the TA6 form underlines that feuds with neighbours, noise issues and other disputes must be spelled out clearly.
I watched a whole chain fall apart when the buyer’s mortgage offer expired just before exchange; without a valid offer they simply couldn’t proceed.
Commenters say they’re seeing more properties ‘bounce back to market’ after surveys, as buyers use the report to get to a realistic price and sellers dig their heels in.
Another r/HousingUK post asks why conveyancing solicitors are so uncommunicative, complaining of unanswered emails, calls going nowhere and weeks passing with no sense of progress.
Off-plan delays left us paying for temporary accommodation far longer than budgeted.
They see more and more cases where buyers only discover noise or harassment problems after moving in, then regret not asking harder questions.
A broker site warns that if your mortgage offer expires before completion, you may have to reapply, redo credit checks and risk losing the original interest rate entirely.
On another MSE thread, a buyer said their purchase might collapse because the tenant wouldn’t respond about moving out – they feared the eviction problems would kill the sale.
Another reviewer says their purchase was ‘painful’ largely due to their solicitor, describing long waits and slow movement that made the whole process feel like it was going nowhere.
The idea of instructing my solicitor to chase the buyer for costs just adds another layer of stress after an already horrendous moving experience.
We could never get a straight answer on what local search indemnity actually covered, which made us nervous about going ahead after the first sale failed.
The amount of delays, no communication and me chasing them is utterly unacceptable!
The message is that ‘it’s the council’s fault’ isn’t enough on its own – clients still expect clear timelines and honest updates while they wait.
One Reddit user describes finding out about flood risk only through environmental searches, not from the original listing.
My sale fell through before exchange after six months on the market. Now we’ve got two weeks to get another buyer or we lose our onward purchase and thousands of pounds in fees.
On r/HousingUK, one leaseholder says annual service charges have made their flat ‘impossible’ to sell – first-time buyers can’t afford it and landlords can’t make the numbers work.
On ReviewSolicitors, a GloverPriest client says buying their first property was a poor experience, with constant delays, very few responses and even lost documents.
“Aggressive and bullied me throughout the whole time.”
A Trustpilot reviewer says a Countrywide survey ‘down-valued and ridiculed’ their home when they were trying to borrow more, leaving them angry and stuck on their existing mortgage.
The whole experience of losing a buyer, losing the house we loved, then starting again has put us off moving for a decade.
Lender’s valuation unexpectedly downvalued our home by nearly £20k, forcing us to renegotiate and nearly losing the purchase.
I accepted an offer a week ago and was told the estate agent would run affordability and other initial checks before marking the property as sold subject to contract. A week later I have had no update and no response to my email, and I am starting to worry about the lack of communication.
Every time the chain moved an inch, someone’s solicitor raised a new ‘urgent’ enquiry and then took two weeks to send a two-line reply.
The solicitor’s advice seemed more focused on generating extra fees than getting the deal done, and they made no effort to stop the sale collapsing.
They specialise in ‘hard to sell’ flats where cladding, insurance and service-charge problems scare away normal buyers and mainstream lenders.
Shared-ownership leaseholders quoted in The Guardian describe service charges up to £8,000 a year on homes originally advertised as ‘affordable’.
A Reddit user describes a Skipton mortgage valuation coming in well below both the price and estate agent valuation, and says Trustpilot is full of similar complaints about the same surveyor firm.
They’d done everything on time, but repeated delays and poor communication from the other side’s conveyancer meant the whole transaction was hanging by a thread.
Leaseholder says they paid a non-returnable deposit for a lease extension with an agreed timeline, but progress and communication collapsed.
Another Conveyancing Direct customer calls their experience ‘dreadful, unhelpful and depressing’, saying the lawyer did nothing for over a month then wrongly blamed them for delays.
We discovered there was still ground rent on what we thought was a new ‘peppercorn’ lease – the charges weren’t obvious at the start.
Every potential buyer baulks at the fact the service charge can be increased without any cap; they don’t want to sign a blank cheque for the freeholder.
I only discovered how toxic my ground-rent clause was when my neighbour’s sale collapsed because their buyer’s solicitor advised them not to touch it.
We’re in limbo because the management company is dragging its feet over paperwork and no one seems to be pushing them.
On r/HousingUK, one poster recalls a chain collapsing because their buyers ran into problems with their flat which the estate agent and solicitors never shared in time.
I tried to buy a house but got so frustrated with the estate agent's anti-money laundering checks that I pulled out. They refused to accept any bills or statements that were not posted on paper and kept sending me away after three weeks of trying.
A seller describes a Barclays mortgage being delayed for months due to extra lender queries (including boundary paperwork and a management-fee question), and says they’re at their wits’ end.
They claim they were asked for the same information multiple times and felt the firm lacked basic urgency — but a new solicitor completed the sale in 10 weeks.
After months of chasing, our solicitor still hadn’t raised basic enquiries; the buyers’ patience finally snapped and they withdrew their offer.
They’re left wondering if they can withhold payment while they wait, and whether the dispute will scare off future buyers if they try to sell.
Buyer says estate agent communication failures added cost and hassle (extra solicitor certification demanded).
We were told the buyer had walked away due to our solicitor’s delays, but the firm still insisted on charging almost the full fee even though we never completed.
A 2021 MSE thread titled ‘Seller lied on TA6 form’ involves buyers discovering noisy neighbours after moving in and worrying the house will be hard to resell honestly.
We have viewers but no serious buyers because everyone is scared of the lease and potential future costs; it’s like trying to sell a ticking time bomb.
We’re executors trying to sell a flat from an estate. One sale has already collapsed and the whole process has been dragging on for ages.
I’m a first-time buyer using a PM Property Lawyers brand and haven’t heard anything directly from them about the closure. Everything I know has come from news sites and a Facebook group, while the house I’m buying is now stuck.
The solicitor didn’t realise they had been emailed the contract pack. They blamed the estate agent until the seller forwarded proof it had been delivered ten days earlier.
Many examples involve buyers and sellers who didn’t realise how badly their matter was drifting until deadlines were missed and transactions collapsed.
Another seller says buyers keep backing out of their leasehold sale as soon as they see the £3–6k annual service charges in the paperwork.
A LegalAdviceUK poster said their house sale was on the verge of falling through because the seller’s solicitor was so slow that everyone else in the chain was losing patience.
Our buyers had lined up an affordable insurance quote, then the underwriter changed their mind when they saw old subsidence notes; their lender pulled the plug.
Our buyer’s lender refused the mortgage after seeing the valuation report, and there was nothing we could do but wait for a new buyer and start again.
A SmoothSale customer said their previous sale fell through, threatening the entire chain, until the company relaunched the listing and secured a new buyer within a week.
My house sale fell through twice and both times I could pinpoint the moment it went wrong: the buyers suddenly went quiet and stopped replying to messages.
They guessed the first-time buyers had offered more than they were comfortable with, then panicked once reality and the survey costs hit.
A reviewer says their sale nearly collapsed and they felt forced to repeatedly check and correct the legal work themselves.
MoneySavingExpert forum users discuss riverside flats where huge service charges meant values lagged far behind other blocks; owners struggled to sell even when the wider market boomed.
They say after agreeing a further £30k reduction out of desperation, it still didn’t sell, leaving them angry and feeling misled.
The same reviewer frames it as being pushed into repeated price cuts rather than getting an honest strategy to actually sell the property.
Another Mumsnetter said their house sale fell through twice and they were back on the market while the property they wanted to buy waited in limbo for them.
Advice pieces on selling land with boundary issues say that in many cases only specialist cash buyers or auctions will touch it, which limits options and drives down the achievable price.
Another poster described a buyer dropping out on the day of exchange for vague ‘personal reasons’, after everyone had booked removals and arranged time off.
“Undisclosed leasehold complications… made it unmortgageable.”
A buyer says the title plan didn’t match what was on the ground and their solicitor suggested adverse possession and indemnity insurance, while the lender decision dragged on.
We’re paying council tax and utilities on an empty house we sold weeks ago because the mortgage wasn’t redeemed before the collapse. We’re scared of enforcement letters turning up for a place we no longer live in.
They say the undisclosed arrangement destroyed trust and made them feel the agent lacked transparency with money flows and agreements.
Had to chase by phone constantly because email contact went nowhere; the online portal was unreliable and seemingly never updated.
The Law Society explains that the Legal Ombudsman mainly handles complaints about poor service – things like delayed or unclear communication and billing problems.
Agent allegedly overvalued the property then pushed for price reductions, with promised interest/open days not materialising.
After our buyer pulled out just before exchange we discovered we weren’t insured, so all the upfront survey and legal costs were money down the drain.
User says they ordered title documents from a site that looked official, then learned it was a paid third-party service and struggled to get support.
Seller says simple enquiries were left for weeks, creating a chain-wide delay and extra moving costs.
Lender kept asking for the same bank statements over and over, saying their system couldn't open PDFs. Caused huge delays.
We kept renewing our mortgage offer while chains kept failing further up; after the third collapse we finally walked away, thousands of pounds lighter.
Solicitor forgot to send the mortgage deed to the lender until the buyer chased, delaying mortgage funds.
As a seller, I now always ask why the previous sale fell through. Solicitors even raised it formally in their additional enquiries on my current flat.
A user asked whether they could re-use searches from a previous failed purchase on a nearby house, saying they were already down hundreds of pounds from the first one collapsing.
Cunningtons say if a seller misleads you about problem neighbours or disputes, you may have a claim for misrepresentation once the reality comes out.
“It is impossible to speak to someone directly.”
After our buyer pulled out at the last minute, the agent pushed us toward a quick-sale company that wanted a huge discount on the property’s value.
In a warning about property-transaction scams, police say Action Fraud recorded 143 conveyancing-fraud cases (Apr 2024–Mar 2025) with £11.7m total losses, mostly in residential deals.
They say many disputes reach the tribunal when leaseholders feel charges are unreasonable or poorly explained, which can itself delay sales.
They said the idea that someone can buy your freehold as an investment and then strip your disposable income through escalating charges is exactly why they’d never touch a leasehold flat.
Another contributor replies that regular updates are a basic part of the job, and that most complaints they see in similar industries stem from not keeping clients informed.
I keep refreshing Rightmove wondering how we’re meant to find a new buyer in two weeks just to keep our onward purchase alive.
The mortgage in principle looked fine until full underwriting; then the lender suddenly decided my overtime couldn’t be counted and the whole purchase collapsed.
They say poor communication and lack of UK-law knowledge led to confusion, mistakes and a feeling that nobody had ownership of the transaction.
Despite paying Gaddes Noble in full, including a duplicated £300 fee, our case dragged on with missing paperwork, excuses about Covid and the Land Registry that turned out not to be true.
One angry customer talks about ‘rogue reports’ and asks where the accountability is when a single survey can derail a remortgage and future plans.
The conveyancer was so slow and unresponsive that not only did we lose a cash buyer, we also had to start over with a new solicitor halfway through.
A previous buyer offered to share their survey results after their sale collapsed, which shows how desperate people are not to waste yet more money.
I asked to renegotiate after new information came to light during the buying process and the estate agent became extremely hostile, saying it is wrong to try to renegotiate at any point.
A Which? survey found that 84% of people whose sale fell through lost money, with an average loss of nearly three grand in fees and costs.
They now feel completely misled, stuck living next to someone the previous owner apparently ‘absolutely hated’ but never mentioned during viewings.
Buyer says the conveyancing fee list feels like paying for every tiny step, adding stress immediately.
Threatening letters and ‘anticipated charges’ tactics — feels designed to fine people rather than help.
Buyer alleges their transaction would have collapsed without constant chasing because nothing moved proactively.
The Guardian reports average service charges for leasehold flats rising 11% in a year to £2,300, with over half of leaseholders now paying more in service charges than in council tax.
They highlight cases where clients thought they had a fixed fee, only to find extra charges added when a sale dragged on or fell through.
A MoneySavingExpert user had their sale fall through and then discovered their conveyancer still wanted the full fee, helped by a referral kickback to the estate agent.
Process dragged on for months with radio silence and a clunky online portal.
We had TR1 forms signed and were agreeing a completion date with PM Law at the end of January. Days later the firm disappeared and now we have no idea who to contact, what’s happening with our file, or how to get the purchase moving again.
Quarterly Legal Ombudsman data shows that almost half of accepted complaints are about poor communication or delays, with over a third relating to residential conveyancing alone.
Our flat has been on the market for five months with only occasional viewings despite lowering the price by 23k. We are close to negative equity and cannot afford to reduce the price further. We are worried the flat will never sell.
The Ombudsman reports hundreds of complaints where consumers say missing or unclear information would have changed their decision to proceed.
A homeowner complains that their second set of buyers pulled out after a title defect was discovered — something their own solicitor hadn’t spotted earlier.
They’re worried that arguing over historic bills might come back to haunt any future sale or cause problems with buyers’ solicitors.
We picked this company on price alone and soon found we'd made a terrible mistake!
Leaseholder alleges months waiting for a certificate/deeds item needed to complete a sale of a recently purchased flat.
We were supposed to complete months ago but a problem at the top of the chain ruined everything, leaving us paying rent and storage.
No one ever answers calls; complaints get no response; basic communication is nonexistent.
One MSE user said their home insurance claim turned into a nightmare – months of strip-out, repeated flooding and almost no progress from the insurer or builders.
Action Fraud describes a case where a man lost £67,000 after fraudsters hacked email accounts and diverted a property purchase payment.
The first buyer walked away as soon as they realised there was a management company fee on top of the service charge; they said it felt like paying twice.
Another buyer posts that the sellers keep delaying and their mortgage offer is about to run out, meaning a replacement deal would cost thousands more.
Unfortunately, my experience as a seller ... there was almost no proactive communication.
My solicitor uses only email but doesn’t check their inbox. If I ring I get told ‘we will email you’ but I don’t get one.
Felt bullied and pressured throughout the sales process by an aggressive staff member.
We had buyers and then lost them because communication between the two conveyancers was non-existent; each side thought the other was dealing with key issues.
A Law Gazette summary of Ombudsman guidance reminds firms that they can still face criticism if they fail to manage expectations around third-party delays.
Ongoing false promises and constant chasing over months, with the paying customer feeling ignored.
They say they’d already paid for a valuation and searches and were devastated to lose the house with no warning.
Seller felt the buyer’s panel conveyancer model artificially extended the process and risked costly errors.
Over the years several estate agents have given such poor service that they really damaged the industry's reputation.
A payments glitch on moving day left one family homeless and paying for hotels and removal firms twice.
A buyer alleges an estate agent didn’t disclose a severe flood risk (level 3) before they offered — and they only found out weeks before completion via solicitors, after spending thousands.
Our solicitor somehow managed to miss a major planning application behind the house; when it cropped up late in the process, the whole deal fell through.
Which? highlight that the main reasons house sales fall through are buyers changing their minds, bad surveys, mortgage problems, chains breaking and legal delays – and most of that is outside your control.
The agent did almost nothing to manage expectations in the chain; buyers were allowed to drift for months and then pulled out without penalty.
A lender-appointed surveyor refused to value the property due to proximity concerns after a short visit, stalling the mortgage and piling on stress.
We’d booked removals and arranged child care, then got a call at 4pm saying completion wouldn’t happen because funds hadn’t been released in time.
Our first attempt to sell a rental property fell apart; the second buyers also dropped out and we ended up storing everything while we sold with no onward purchase.
We relied on a mortgage illustration to secure a property and paid a holding deposit, then after weeks of delays and repeated document requests they suddenly refused to proceed due to an internal restriction.
Our home was marketed as ‘affordable’, but sky-high service charges mean it’s now almost unsellable; every attempted sale fizzles out when buyers do the maths.
Their behaviour around access and viewings showed no regard for privacy or basic professionalism.
Seller says their sale fell through after the company took around six weeks to answer a solicitor enquiry needed to proceed.
“I was told I couldn’t relist the property.”
Our sale fell through and the ‘no move, no fee’ deal turned out to be an insurance policy that cost us nearly £800 for a move that never happened.
tell them your mortgage offer is about to expire and demand to understand what's causing the delay.
A buyer says they were effectively punished with a very late viewing date after refusing the agent’s mortgage adviser.
Before completion I paid my share of the annual estate maintenance fee to my solicitor, who sent it on to the seller's solicitor. Four months later the managing agent has written to me saying I still owe the amount, and the seller's solicitor is not responding, leaving me stuck in the middle.
Felt pressured into using the in-house mortgage adviser rather than it being a genuine option.
Our purchase is stuck because Butterworths Solicitors – part of the PM Law group – closed with only a handwritten notice on the door. We were expecting to exchange within days and now have no idea who holds our file.
Our late relative’s bungalow sale almost failed after the first buyer dropped out; without a proactive agent it would probably still be languishing on the market.
Seller: multiple buyers pulled out in a row; huge stress, delays, and costs mounting each time.
They describe missed timescales and difficulty getting through to the solicitor, with calls and emails often not returned when promised.
Another ReviewSolicitors complaint about Cunningtons says the client’s formal complaint took over a month to be answered, citing staff absences as the reason.
The government’s plan to move towards commonhold is partly a response to years of complaints that the current system is outdated, unfair and actively damages the resale prospects of some flats.
The poster says the neighbour only fixed the problem after the sale collapsed – they lost the buyer but finally got some peace and quiet.
“Lost two buyers due to lies he told our buyers.”
A Times article on conveyancing says the system is ‘organised chaos’, with one in three transactions falling through and average timescales stretching to around 185 days.
Seller says their solicitor held onto signed documents for a week before posting them, without explanation.
We had an offer accepted on a house that needs a fair bit of work because of damp. We thought we could get a damp survey after agreeing the price, but were then told there was already a damp report that should have been sent with the home report and we never received it. Now we have finally seen it and want to lower our offer because of the extra cost, but we are not sure where we stand.
We were told we’d pay a modest service charge, but years later the numbers have crept up so much that it’s scaring off potential buyers.
The agent was more interested in chasing new listings than dealing with our complicated chain; once it wobbled a bit, they let it collapse instead of fighting for it.
On our first purchase attempt the lender pulled the mortgage after a change in policy; we’d already paid for survey and legal work.
Booked viewing then cancelled shortly before; travel wasted and no proper handling.
Attempts to get any sense from the managing agent about future costs went nowhere; we didn’t want to buy into a blank cheque so we withdrew our offer.
When we complained about the filthy carpet, the agent offered a spray rather than doing the clean they had promised in writing.
Even if they price the flat aggressively, they worry buyers will run a mile once their solicitor points out the service charge history.
“Once the deal collapsed… repeatedly refused to refund the money.”
A lender-arranged mortgage valuation slot was booked, the estate agent waited at the property, and nobody arrived. Then we were told nobody was available.
We were eight weeks into selling and buying when our buyers pulled out over a personal issue – the agent for the house we want has given us two weeks to find someone new.
The buyer says the down-valuations and collapsed sales have left them feeling totally broken by the current market.
Felt like the default outcome was to down-value, regardless of evidence. It caused stress and threatened the mortgage offer.
Agents quoted in the article say high charges are reducing buyer demand and forcing sellers to drop prices just to get interest.
Survey flagged serious structural movement and other major issues. Buyer felt trapped after paying around £700 and feared the deal collapsing.
Endless delays and being asked to review documents that were never actually sent.
A Guardian feature on a cladding-blighted block describes residents living for years under scaffolding and blue netting, with flats practically unmortgageable.
They’re blunt that hiding it is not an option: if the buyer finds out later, you could face claims, legal fees and a nightmare dispute of your own.
On Trustpilot, a mortgage-broker service from Sequence/Sequencehome is called ‘a total waste of time’ – the reviewer says after a 90-minute call, they got a hard sell on insurance instead of helpful advice.
After getting the keys, we discovered the seller had replaced all the downstairs switches and sockets with cheap white ones despite signing to say all fixtures and fittings would stay. They also left two light fittings incomplete. We want the original fittings back but do not know how enforceable this is.
Buyer experience: keybox code missing, no one showed up, long holds on phone, blamed everyone else.
NetLawman explain that neighbour disputes cover everything from boundary rows and blocked driveways to noise and anti-social behaviour – all of which must be disclosed on the TA6 when you sell.
I have paid for searches again and my solicitor keeps adding admin fees for every small thing.
Totally incompetent - they should pay me. I have to constantly chase them to do their job. Expensive and happily miss deadlines.
Another commented that every time they spotted a listing reappear, they assumed the previous buyer had discovered something nasty in the survey or lease.
Our solicitor sat on the management pack request for nearly a month. The delay pushed our buyer to withdraw, costing us the entire chain.
They warn that on top of daily stress, unresolved rows can make selling harder and encourage buyers to chip away at the price.
Broker claimed a buy-to-let mortgage was arranged, took money, and then nothing progressed. Looked and felt like a scam operation.
The whole chain was hanging on one vendor buying a place with solar panels and non-standard construction; when that got rejected by their lender, everyone else’s sale collapsed too.
The conveyancer changed half‐way through and the new person inherited zero briefing. We got no handover and no update for weeks.
“Buyer’s solicitor didn’t like something on the title… waiting weeks.”
The reviewer says the delays exasperated their lender and the seller’s solicitor and that they would never consider using the firm again.
A Mumsnet thread about buying a leasehold flat pointed out that high maintenance fees and the fact you don’t own the land can make resale much harder than people expect.
We were advised to be vague about why the last buyer pulled out, but that just made new viewers even more nervous and slowed everything down.
On r/HousingUK, people were saying that leasehold flats with short leases, cladding or sky-high charges are already cash-buyer only and hard to sell even then.
One comment notes that if a bad survey causes a fall-through, at least the buyer hasn’t also paid for searches on a property they’ll never own.
They describe being devastated after paying for searches, legal work and removals planning, only to see months of preparation vanish overnight.
A PistonHeads thread about a flat service charge warns that if the bill isn’t paid, you can end up unable to sell at all because the arrears hang over the property.
By the time the surveyor had finished listing every minor defect as a potential hazard, our buyers had completely lost confidence and pulled out.
Our solicitor misfiled our ID verification forms and asked us to repeat the entire onboarding process two weeks before completion. The mistake cost us our removal slot.
A service-charge article points out that high annual fees can seriously shrink the buyer pool; lots of people simply will not touch a flat where the running costs eat half their disposable income.
They say some delays are avoidable with better communication, but others stem from a system still reliant on post, paper and overworked local authorities.
They felt stuck between overpaying for a risky property or walking away and losing their survey and legal costs, eventually choosing to withdraw.
Mid-purchase, told property would stay on market, then someone else bought — feels mishandled.
Appalling communication and customer service. Our buyers have used this solicitor and we're currently a month delayed.
Our leasehold flat has a service charge so high that no first-time buyer can afford it and no investor can make it stack up – we’re just stuck.
Estate agents are warning that multiple chains have at least one PM Law-linked firm in them, multiplying the risk that a single collapse could create dozens of failed sales.
Resident complains a big service-charge increase and poor responsiveness left an entire estate frustrated.
The report contained basic factual mistakes about safety items that were clearly present, undermining trust and complicating the transaction.
We had packed up the whole house when the buyer pulled out; we lost around three and a half thousand pounds in fees with absolutely no recourse.
Chain stalled: poor competence and communication; lender and other solicitor exasperated by delays.
We switched to Movuno after the first sale fell apart, and the difference in day-to-day updates and effort to get us sold was night and day.
Seller states their solicitor failed to mention a disputed right-of-way, now causing legal threats from neighbours.
Says high charges on leaseholds don’t match service; described as extortionate.
A 2025 article says the Legal Ombudsman now stresses that even if delays come from lenders or local authorities, law firms must still keep clients updated and explain what’s happening.
We instructed Gaddes Noble Law for a straightforward sale and purchase. Now, after the PM Law collapse, we’ve been left with no updates and no idea who holds our deeds.
They were described as an unhelpful lender with very high rates; we felt trapped paying more than expected.
Another Ombudsman case about subsidence shows an insurer refusing to fund preventative stabilisation work until the service intervened and ruled the policy should cover it.
A HousingUK user asked whether you can ever find out the real reason a buyer pulled out, because their agent just shrugged and said ‘they changed their minds’.
We have a very unusual property to sell in Cambridgeshire, with features like a built-in sauna, and it is not comparable to anything nearby. We have tried various agents but they do not give feedback, the auction route has not worked, and although viewers say there is nothing wrong with the house, nothing is selling in our area. I keep being told the market is fine, but we feel completely stuck and poorly supported by the agents.
One agent attempted to enter my home without proper notice, leaving me feeling unsafe and disrespected.
Our buyers chose a solicitor based in Asia and the time difference meant nothing ever got done; weeks slipped by with no replies until the whole sale fell through.
Buyer complains that their solicitor failed to catch an issue with unadopted road access before exchange.
A government consultation on material information notes that missing or unclear details in listings can badly affect buyers’ decisions and lead to wasted time and money.
The system lets sellers and buyers walk away after months, leaving people like us broken, out of pocket and still without a home.
A separate thread shows a buyer whose mortgage offer expires in five days and they still haven’t exchanged – they feel the whole move hangs on one date.
They repeatedly asked for documents we had already uploaded to their portal weeks earlier. It became obvious they were not reading anything properly.
The sellers converted the cellar into a habitable room without building regulations approval and there is no FENSA certificate for the window. They only offer an indemnity policy. We are unsure of the long-term risks for lending and resale.
This has to be the most unprofessional company ever... lost numerous important documentation.
Service felt inconsistent compared with prior experience—left us disappointed mid mortgage journey.
We didn’t realise we had to disclose our dispute with the management company; once it surfaced, the buyer demanded compensation and then pulled out anyway.
As a first time buyer my solicitor did not flag anything from the searches, even when there was an issue that could affect the mortgage or insurance. I only found out about the implications myself before exchange and feel the solicitor has not been useful at all.
Chaos… the reason our property sale fell through in the end.
We lost our buyer when the landlord demanded a huge premium for extending the short lease and refused to negotiate.
Some have dropped the price repeatedly yet still get no serious offers, because the service charge figures look terrifying on paper.
Another lender guide says if your offer expires before completion, you could face extra legal and valuation costs on top of a higher interest rate.
Our completion nearly failed because the solicitor sat on the file for weeks right as the mortgage offer was about to run out.
A seller says their buyer’s mortgage was withdrawn due to lease ground rent terms, and they’re scrambling to fix it with a deed of variation to save the sale.
Our solicitor at Proddow Mackay stopped answering calls after the closure notice. The phone is constantly engaged and the website has vanished.
TaylorMade Finance note that if your mortgage offer expires, you might suddenly need to find a completely new deal or face your purchase collapsing at the last hurdle.
It showed us how much difference proper case tracking and communication makes when you’re trying to keep a chain from collapsing again.
Our first buyer walked away after their solicitor raised concerns about a garage that was on a separate title; nobody had warned us it might be a problem.
Our sale was held up because the freeholder’s managing agent took nearly six weeks to answer basic pre-sale enquiries.
Avoid like the plague! Very poor competence and communication.
They also mention sellers who believe their home was under-sold because the agent mishandled offers, leaving lingering resentment after completion.
We’re out of pocket on valuations, legals and searches and the lender just walks away. It makes you feel like the whole process is stacked against ordinary buyers.
Analysts say in many cases, service charges are now the second-biggest household bill after the mortgage, and that buyers factor this in when deciding whether to proceed.
They stress that brokers can do everything right and still see clients’ purchases put at risk by other parties in the process.
Another poster with a long-running home insurance claim said they felt completely stuck while repairs dragged on and they lived in a building site for months.
We are buying our dream home but the survey found that the neighbour's trees are damaging an outbuilding on the boundary wall. The estate agent is minimising the issue and suggesting the sellers will not fix it, which feels like pressure to proceed regardless.
We bought a council flat and later realised the service charges made it really hard to sell on; most people just want security for life, not an asset that other buyers will avoid.
LandlordZONE reports landlords struggling to sell leasehold flats because charges have climbed above £2,000 a year, making the numbers unworkable for many buyers.
After spending significant money on survey and conveyancing, the buyer discovered the chain situation wasn’t as advertised.
Not even 1 star... Absolute ridiculous service. I would never want anyone else to go through the same experience.
Pinney Talfourd note that the new TA6 puts even more weight on accurate answers – incorrect or missing information can now more easily lead to misrepresentation claims.
The Legal Ombudsman’s latest data shows complaints about residential conveyancing still centre on poor communication and delay, often tied to missed purchase or sale deadlines.
The Housing Ombudsman recorded a complaint where a shared-owner disputed being billed for a whole year of service charges despite only buying late in the year.
HousePriceCrash users complain that surveyors are down-valuing homes by around ten percent as standard, effectively hiking the deposit buyers need to find.
I would NEVER have given my business knowingly to a company with such poor reviews!
Which? even lodged a ‘super-complaint’, saying some insurance customers found dealing with insurers more stressful than the incidents that caused the claims in the first place.
Buyer describes in-house broker delays after paying upfront, claiming months passed with little progress.
After a very long 5 months in a 4-property chain, our buyer's solicitors have repeatedly delayed exchange because they keep getting the mortgage agreement number wrong. We are supposed to complete on Friday and I am completely stressed.
We had to rely on the buyer's agent to get information because our own agent did not do their job.
I am a 74-year-old buying a flat in Tower Hamlets and had already transferred around £350,000 when PM Law shut suddenly. I’ve been left in limbo not knowing when, or if, I’ll get my money or my home.
The estate agent insisted the property was ‘chain free’, then months later we discovered the seller still hadn’t found anywhere to buy.
We’re paying for a short-term rental an hour from the kids’ school because our sale completed but the purchase can’t go through until the PM Law situation is sorted. We did everything right and still ended up effectively homeless as a family.
So slow we lost our buyer.
We believe we paid for something that didn’t deliver: the process felt like an upsell with little value, and we came away feeling fleeced.
I felt completely broken when the vendor pulled out; the sale falling apart knocked my mental health far more than I expected.
I have a maisonette with only 65 years left on the lease. I cannot afford the cost of extending it and do not want to spend money I will not recover. I owe 52k on the mortgage and need around 75k from the sale but interest from buyers is minimal.
Buyers in the support group talk about having their life savings locked away while still paying rent or a previous mortgage, burning through emergency funds each week this drags on.
One couple interviewed described moving out of their home, sending completion funds and then discovering their law firm had closed, leaving them effectively homeless for the time being.
The owner felt the surveyor had massively over-interpreted minor issues and spooked the buyers into walking away.
A buyer says they transferred a large sum to their solicitor after being told the account details never change, then was told the details were wrong.
Our first sale fell through and SortRefer’s recommended conveyancers got everything picked back up quickly so the next sale didn’t drag for months like the first one.
The estate agent added nothing but stress. Constant chasing, contradictory updates and no real sales progression. Selling a house felt like a scam.
Avoid like the plague! Very poor competence and communication. Dragged out the whole conveyancing process to the exasperation of my lender.
Chased them… 6 times… not had a response.
As a broker I constantly see deals fail because conveyancers don’t realise how hard mortgage offer expiry dates are; they treat them like suggestions, not deadlines.
Agent says they’ve tried ringing the vendor’s solicitor four times this week. No answer, always voicemail. We’re at risk of collapsing.
A buyer says their solicitor later told them the property had been sold to someone else via a ‘contract race’ that neither the buyer nor the solicitor knew was happening.
In Scotland I had an offer accepted and the schedule said four bedrooms with three spacious doubles, but one so called spacious double is under 10 square metres. The listing also mentions a log burner which on inspection seems to be a bio ethanol stove. I am worried the property has been misrepresented.
After the second failed attempt to sell our rental, we started questioning whether the UK system is just designed to waste landlords’ time and money.
“After 8 weeks… I decided to go to a real conveyancing firm.”
My service charge jumped from £125 to £417 a month plus a £2,200 deficit bill. None of this was disclosed.
Our sale collapsed because the electrics and fire doors in the block weren’t up to standard; the surveyor flagged serious safety concerns the seller hadn’t mentioned.
We’re in limbo: campaigning with the MP and media, but in the meantime our lives are on hold because nobody wants to buy into this mess.
I once offered over asking on a house and ‘won’ because I was proceedable. Then my own sale fell through and the property later sold to someone else.
We have leasehold garages with a peppercorn rent but the freeholder repeatedly enters the garages, complains about what we store, and insists we should be paying rent. After 14 years we have now received a solicitor's letter demanding insurance and rent payments, which feels like continued harassment.
Our buyers suddenly pulled out six weeks in, after the survey, and refused to give any explanation at all; we could only assume they’d spooked themselves.
A seller says their house sale fell through for the second time right before completion, and they blame the estate agent for saying the buyer’s mortgage was sorted when it wasn’t.
A Mumsnet poster asks if they’re being unreasonable not to disclose a long-running neighbour dispute, despite twenty years of noise complaints and council involvement.
The advice everywhere is to look very closely at lease length and ongoing service costs, or you risk being stuck with something buyers keep walking away from.
They described eight months of uncertainty with buyers dropping out, saying they genuinely didn’t know how they’d survived financially.
We gave notice on our rental because Butterworths told us we were on track to complete. Then the office shut with a sign on the door saying they can no longer trade, and now we’re stuck between homes.
They ask whether there’s any accountability when a surveyor’s report kills a sale and appears to be completely wrong.
A buyer says their conveyancer warned them their email had been intercepted and that scammers swapped bank details — the email and attached letter looked completely convincing.
We’re buying a new build and the developer’s timetable means our mortgage offer will run out before completion – we’re terrified we’ll be forced to reapply on worse terms.
My purchaser used these guys. Slow and misinformation to say the least... No sense of urgency what so ever!!
The housing association kept sending ‘revised’ service charge estimates after we’d found a buyer; by the third increase, they pulled out.
We were told we still owed Yopa their fee even though the buyer walked away and the sale never happened, just because of the small print in their agreement.
The fixtures and fittings list arrived with a price next to almost everything, including old curtain poles and garden planters; it felt like being shaken down.
We did everything on time but you can’t complete a sale when the management company just sits on emails and ignores reminders.
Industry pieces stress that councils, leases and charges are now considered core facts – not nice-to-have extras – in listings.
Connells is the worst estate agent I've dealt with. Just pure harassment start to finish.
A Ryder & Dutton customer described three separate house sales collapsing through no fault of their own before they finally completed on the fourth attempt.
They say the financial adviser blames audits and random checks, but nobody gives a firm answer about when the mortgage offer will actually appear.
On a first-time buyer group, someone discovered their flat’s service charge had more than tripled from £60 to over £200 a month, and was told it might now be hard to sell without cutting the price.
Another lender guide says once your offer’s expiry date passes before completion, the bank no longer has to provide the funds – you may need to reapply from scratch.
We want to buy a house but the agent or auction company wants 6500 pounds upfront because the house is going to auction. The house has a serious internal wet wall issue and we would only get a survey after paying the fee. We were told we would not get the money back if the report is bad.
“Funds sent in May 2025 weren’t paid to management company until July 2025.”
On LeaseholdersForum, one owner complains about ‘excessive’ service charges for a basic block with no lift or facilities, saying they feel ripped off every year.
A ground floor apartment was flooded with sewage after a soil pipe blockage in the underground car park. Building insurance is being very slow because of poor communication with the contents insurer.
They estimate the wider economic cost of failed transactions at up to £1.5 billion a year, which is insane when you remember every collapse is someone’s real life on hold.
One seller describes being “pretty stressed” with half the house packed because the buyer’s solicitor raised a last-minute lender/lease issue and then went completely silent.
Guides warn that if your mortgage offer expires before completion you’ll usually need to reapply, with fresh credit checks and no guarantee your lender will offer the same deal again.
We are buying an older house and noticed a roof tile with a large hole and several slipped tiles, on top of already needing substantial work to the outbuildings. We want to know whether the survey will give us grounds to negotiate repairs or a price reduction.
Our sale collapsed after six months, just before exchange. Now we’ve got two weeks to find another buyer or we lose our onward purchase and thousands in fees.
Our mortgage offer was pulled after we changed car finance and the lender decided our affordability had dropped; the entire chain collapsed.
A Pattinson review says the original sale fell through and the seller was then pushed towards auction, with the agent suggesting they list 20% below market value.
The figures match what home movers say online: nobody minds waiting as much as being ignored and left guessing whether the deal is alive.
We’re starting to think our flat just isn’t sellable – the service charge is just under £300 a month and every buyer disappears once they see the numbers.
A Times piece described a family who’ve spent around £43,000 just keeping their late mother’s retirement flat while they struggle to find a buyer because of huge annual charges.
The Guardian reports shared-ownership leaseholders facing service charges up to £8,000 a year, leaving many trapped in homes they can’t easily sell.
Our house sale fell through at short notice after six months because the buyers suddenly decided the separate garage on the title was an issue, even though it had been there from day one.
The problems were endless: poor communication, wrong details in the advert and they even failed to secure the property properly. We refused to pay their fee in the end.
They stress that buyers must watch expiry dates closely or risk losing both the property and the money they’ve spent on legal work.
A poster lists ‘classic estate agent lines’ like minimising service charges or blaming the previous collapse entirely on the buyer — implying key costs and reasons are often glossed over.
More than a year after the transaction fell apart, the firm suddenly chased us for a conveyancing bill we’d never agreed, adding to the frustration.
My mortgage offer actually expired once before and the lender kindly extended it, but I know others whose whole chain collapsed when that didn’t happen.
A lender’s survey knocked ten thousand off our home’s value despite recent renovations, and the buyers walked away rather than renegotiate.
Communication was well below expectations and we got almost no notice of completion.
Our house sale fell through at the very last minute but, to be fair to the agent, they had viewings and a new offer arranged within days.
Seller alleges key documents were misplaced, forcing re-sends and delaying an estate sale.
Seller alleges the firm didn’t answer emails, the portal wasn’t updated, and all chasing had to be done by phone.
After our chain fell apart, the agent still tried to charge a withdrawal fee even though the collapse was nothing to do with us.
Two buyers pulled out and the conveyancer billed for each aborted sale, so we paid hundreds for transactions that never completed.
Our whole life was packed into a removal lorry when the buyers suddenly backed out; I’d already moved 300 miles with four kids and a business to restart.
They say the freeholder has stated there are no plans to obtain the form, leaving them unable to progress and fearing the buyer will walk away.
Just for the sake of getting his commission
One MSE user considered suing after their sale fell through right before completion, but was warned that legal action is slow, expensive and rarely fixes the emotional damage.
They say their solicitor claims the buyer’s solicitor hasn’t even contacted the lender properly, and they can’t tell if they’re being fobbed off or the case is genuinely stuck.
A Reddit user says their house sale didn’t complete as planned because the buyer pulled out around exchange, leaving them suddenly back at square one.
We’ve got a neighbour from hell and were told we must disclose any formal complaints to future buyers. I’m terrified it will scare people off and make the house unsellable.
We had to chase Gaddes Noble constantly for updates. After weeks of barely any response they suddenly said they could no longer handle our straightforward purchase.
One comment there says it’s not just the time taken, but the sense of incompetence and clients being left to do all the chasing themselves.
One article urges sellers to understand new material information rules or risk buyers walking away when hidden costs emerge.
They’d already mentally moved to a new village to be near friends, only to find themselves stuck in limbo while chains collapsed around them.
On a motorbike forum, a seller said their sale fell through because the buyers only noticed two months in that the house had no driveway and needed obvious updates.
Communication was terrible and my solicitor went weeks without replying to anything.
Just about lost our buyers but thankfully things fell into place after about 9 months.
We pointed out the surveyor had inspected the wrong building, but she dug her heels in. You realise one incompetent report can kill a sale and there’s almost nothing you can do.
Listed a house no lender will offer mortgage on due to spray foam insulation rotting risk to the roof timbers.
Campaigners say buyers were lured in by low initial estimates and only discovered the true costs later, when charges had already soared.
Reported a dangerous front door issue and said it took far too long to address, leaving residents feeling unsafe in the meantime.
They warn owners that spiralling charges are increasingly reflected in lower offers and longer times on the market.
We were gazumped after having our offer accepted and paying for searches; the sellers took a higher bid and we were left out of pocket with nothing to show for it.
NetLawman warn that unresolved neighbour disputes can put buyers off completely or force heavy discounts, especially when rows have already escalated into legal action.
They describe the system as paper-based, slow and overly complex, with average transactions taking around 200 days from offer to completion.
On Reddit, a seller describes being gazundered on exchange day: the buyer dropped their offer at the last minute, putting huge pressure on them to accept or see the whole deal collapse.
Spent months with little progress on the mortgage side despite fees paid upfront. Communication was weak and we were left chasing constantly.
We’d already agreed a long completion because we were relocating to Scotland, and suddenly our whole move was on ice with no clear plan B.
On r/HousingUK, a seller asks if they’ll ever find out the real reason their sale fell through – after three years of trying to sell, they feel like the system is stacked against them.
My solicitor is pushing me to sign the exchange and completion statement this week even though I will not move in for another three weeks. I do not understand if that means completion will already have happened and what risk I take if something goes wrong before I get the keys.
Between our sale and our daughter’s sale both collapsing, plus other family problems, it honestly feels like life has been on hold for months.
They’d booked surveys and searches, taken time off work and mentally moved in, but were now staring at the possibility of starting again because of conveyancing delays.
They describe leaseholders who only discover, when trying to move, that the small print of their lease and charges has turned the flat into a financial millstone.
Our house sale fell through at the very last minute, but the agent had new viewings lined up within days and found us another buyer quickly.
A remortgage valuation seemed fine in person, then came back downvalued afterwards—felt like a bait-and-switch.
An estate agent told us bluntly that if our transaction can’t be rescued quickly, they’ll have to remarket the property and we’ll need to reapply for a mortgage from scratch.
Local agents reportedly tell them it’s the high ongoing costs that put buyers off – not necessarily the asking price itself.
Another buyer in the same thread describes everyone in the chain throwing extra money at solicitors and working late nights to hit a hard mortgage deadline.
I was told the solicitor would call me back today. It’s now 10pm and I haven’t heard a word.
As a Butterworths client we were never clearly told they’d been absorbed into the PM Group. Only when the closure hit the news did we realise our wills and documents were locked away with no response to our emails.
An estate agent review site article notes that one in three UK house sales falls through, often because a single weak link in the chain collapses and drags everyone else with it.
A Trustpilot review for Avenue Road Estate Agents says the first buyer dropped out, leaving the sellers distraught until the property was quickly re-marketed and sold again.
They regularly hear from people who only found out about noise and harassment problems once they’d already moved in.
We had to abandon the purchase when we realised the loft conversion had been done without proper building regs; the solicitor advised it would cause problems if we ever sold.
Cancelled within cooling-off period: ‘No marketing, no board, no photos’ — still waiting for refund.
Flood risk only came up in the environmental searches. No mention in the listing that the house backs onto a flood zone.
Losing that house meant losing our onward purchase as well; the developer couldn’t wait for us and we watched our ideal new build go to someone else.
My daughter’s flat sale has fallen through twice now – once two years ago, and again with buyers who said they were ‘in love’ with it right up until they backed out.
They worry that any future buyer’s survey will raise the same red flags, making it hard to achieve the original agreed price.
PLS Solicitors describe neighbour disputes ranging from boundary lines to threatening behaviour, and say they’re becoming more common in property litigation.
MoneyHelper explains that mortgage offers can expire simply because the legal work takes too long, leaving buyers scrambling for extensions or entirely new deals.
They say the delays and lack of urgency have made them furious and anxious because the buyer is getting frustrated and likely to walk.
A bank error on moving day meant extra hotel bills and a second removals booking we could barely afford.
Our sale fell apart when the buyer realised their buy-to-let mortgage needed a higher rental coverage; the numbers just didn’t stack any more with rising rates.
We booked removals, took the children out of school for moving day and cleared our old house. Because the PM Law firm in our chain shut overnight, we spent that night on friends’ sofas with no idea when we’d have a home again.
Overall bill was other £1000 more than I was told it would cost.
The reviewer praises their own lawyer’s persistence, saying without constant chasing they might never have reached exchange at all.
Buyers often assume sellers have all the paperwork ready, but in reality a simple missing certificate can add weeks of delay and push nervous buyers to look elsewhere.
Martin & Co’s survey of 500 homeowners found many had experienced down valuations, sometimes forcing them to renegotiate or abandon their purchase altogether.
By the time we dropped the price repeatedly and paid all the ongoing fees, the investment had turned into a financial drain the family couldn’t escape.
Shocked to be basically 'scammed' by this firm.
No communication... No work done on the file. 30 days lost out of 56 days for one purchase.
We’ve sold our home and given notice on our rental, but because PM Property Lawyers have collapsed, the purchase side has stalled completely. Our agent says the whole chain could now fall apart.
A HousingUK thread has leaseholders saying annual charges are making their flats ‘impossible to sell’ because no first-time buyer can afford them and investors can’t make the numbers work.
On a leaseholder forum, one owner complains they feel ripped off paying over £1,200 in service charges for a small block with no lift and minimal services.
Our conveyancer allowed exchange to take place without confirming that a key indemnity policy was actually on risk. When the defect later surfaced, we had to spend weeks proving cover had finally been put in place.
Webuyanyhome say that when your sale falls through you’re often left out of pocket and emotionally drained, yet most of the reasons are completely outside your control.
I thought helpful until our buyer pulled out due to his survey.
They’re now worried buyers will spot the same problem instantly when they try to sell on.
Complaint about upfront commission ‘incentive’ pressure and lack of proactive communication when selling.
Two valuations cost nearly £2k and the reports were described as copy-paste. The customer felt they paid a fortune for low-quality work.
The reviewer calls the experience extremely slow-moving and blames the solicitor for a highly stressful purchase.
One Redditor says they are ‘exhausted and heartbroken’ after their chain collapsed for the fourth time, each failure triggered by a different weak link.
Our buyers are using this shambolic firm... now in month 6 of a simple conveyancing empty house no chain.
The solicitor incorrectly told us our property did not require a deed of variation, even though the lease contained a defect. The lender refused completion until the error was corrected.
Slow, understaffed and liars.
Buyers used a ‘case handler’ model; seller says delays are built in and chain almost collapsed.
Had we known there was no completion certificate for the extension, we’d never have spent months and hundreds of pounds on surveys and searches.
Paid the broker fees, then got ghosted for weeks. We missed deadlines and the purchase nearly collapsed because nobody would give an update.
“Transferred £60k via CHAPS… then told the details were incorrect.”
They say the buyer chased their own solicitor and it still took over a week to get any response, while both sides’ solicitors claim different things are happening.
Customer said they paid for multiple valuations and got ‘zero valuation’ outcomes, making it feel like they were charged for nothing.
They’d lined everything up for moving day, then watched it collapse in a single phone call – no compensation for the lost time and money.
Unable to set up simple payment methods; the systems fail and support is difficult to reach.
We were due to complete when our buyer’s mortgage offer expired; instead of moving, we’ve been left with an empty house and mounting costs.
We lost our buyer three months into the process when our own purchase was ready to exchange. Thankfully the property was desirable enough to attract new offers quickly.
They said all the stories they hear from agents locally are about high-fee flats sticking on the market while houses and low-charge properties still move.
Weeks of silence on enquiries — we asked for status, got none. The lack of information is the worst part.
The article notes that insurers may load premiums heavily or even refuse cover after a flood, making the property harder to sell and more expensive to own.
Seller complains about high fees for answering standard sale enquiries and slow turnaround from the managing agent.
The new broker tried a different lender but because rates had climbed, their affordability didn’t work any more and our home was back on the market.
Some buyers say the jump in charges has wiped out any sense of affordability and made their homes unattractive to future purchasers.
One branch staff member was incredibly pushy and even failed to turn up for a booked second viewing in my lunch hour.
Reviews of the Property Ombudsman itself include landlords saying their complaints about agents took a year or more to be dismissed, leaving them feeling the system doesn’t protect them either.
The Legal Ombudsman’s ‘delays outside a firm’s control’ case study still upholds a complaint where a conveyancer failed to chase missing documents for nearly two months.
The damp report read like the house was falling apart even though we’d never had issues; the buyers didn’t even ask to renegotiate, they just disappeared.
They warn that buyers may pull out or seek compensation if they later uncover disputes that weren’t declared before exchange.
The lease was described as defective by the buyers’ solicitor after six months of conveyancing, and our onward purchase collapsed with it.
They warn that reapplying mid-chain can delay completion, change affordability and, in the worst case, collapse the whole sequence of linked sales.
They feel trapped, facing huge remediation and insurance costs while knowing that most buyers will avoid a block without a clean fire-safety certificate.
They wanted hundreds of houses at knock-down prices to move tenants out of London, and we felt squeezed and powerless for months while the sale dragged on.
They specifically highlight how rare it felt to get honest, detailed updates in a system where so many people complain of being left in the dark.
Don’t go by the cheaper price! …I can not express the delays…
For those sellers, the difference was someone moving fast and explaining options clearly instead of just shrugging when the first buyer walked away.
Readers report paying removal companies twice and covering hotel stays due to delayed mortgage funds.
Solicitor misread the lender’s mortgage conditions, resulting in extra documentation and delays close to completion.
We learnt most about our sale directly from the buyers until they pulled out
User alleges they received an unexpected invoice to 'open a file' despite not knowingly instructing the firm.
A long-running MSE topic ‘Selling house with noisy-ish neighbours’ includes a story where a sale fell through because the buyer couldn’t tolerate the loud TV of the deaf neighbour.
A simple mapping error between the Land Registry plan and what was actually fenced meant we’d either have to give up part of the garden or give up the house; we chose to walk away.
An ‘Any House Wanted’ article points out that roughly one in three UK property sales fall through before exchange – often after buyers have already spent money on searches and surveys.
Our flat sale fell through when we discovered the RTM company hadn’t been set up properly and the buyer’s solicitor raised serious concerns about who controlled the building.
A resident says communications were ignored and service levels deteriorated while costs rose sharply.
When we replaced an old fence after clearing overgrown garden areas, we discovered extra land that was not shown on the title plan. The title plan shape differs from the fenced boundaries. We are worried neighbours may dispute the boundary when we come to sell.
JBear Properties note that average service charges rose around 11% in a year, widening the gap between what flat and house owners can achieve when they sell.
How this company has more than one star is baffling!!
“Very aggressively asking me to pay £3K… asked to view… refused.”
They say they’re trapped in a flat they can’t comfortably afford and can’t sell, with family plans on hold because there’s literally nowhere to move on to.
It’s gutting to realise that in England you can get right to the brink of exchange, have the other side change their mind and you simply eat the costs.
Despite clear comparable sales, the valuation came back lower and created a mortgage gap we had to fight to resolve.
We had an offer accepted but the lender down-valued the house by £12,500 and the survey found damp, roof repairs, vermin, brickwork problems and a full rewire needed. We asked to renegotiate and after almost three weeks the sellers still have not responded.
Buyer says solicitor ignored multiple warnings from the surveyor about structural defects and didn’t raise enquiries.
Our buyer’s mortgage offer expired because they didn’t get it sorted until late in the process. Their lack of commitment took the whole chain down.
Posters swap stories of new-build flats that shed value fast and then sit on the market while owners are stuck paying high charges.
Conveyancer took a week to pass on key info — when quick replies were crucial to keep dates.
I have zero idea of a timescale. I would just like to know if I need to start applying for a mortgage offer extension
“Property had discrepancies… tenant had left… seller eventually withdrew.”
YOPA set the wrong price, failed to review the market as promised, and took weeks to respond to simple questions.
Our buyers got spooked when the management pack listed a huge ‘reserve fund’ contribution for cladding works that nobody had ever mentioned.
I would give zero stars... delays, no communication and me chasing them... almost losing my flat.
One Sun article follows a couple whose service charges shot from under £3,000 to £7,500 a year – they’ve slashed the price, but still no buyer wants the liability.
Another ReviewSolicitors entry for Gilson Gray describes ‘communication consistently poor’, with phone calls rarely answered promptly and emails often waiting days for a reply.
We considered buying the previous buyer’s searches to save time, but the whole idea highlighted how fragile the process is when one failed sale already sits behind you.
They say that in some blocks, inflated fees and looming major works have knocked tens of thousands off what owners can realistically achieve when they finally find a buyer.
The broker kept promising our application was with the underwriters, but weeks went by with no update and the sellers eventually gave up on us.
Our mortgage offer expires in mid December.
My house sale fell through and the place I was buying was taken off the market a week before completion – I feel like my whole life’s on hold again.
Movuno only got involved after our first agent let the sale drift for four months and then it collapsed without any real explanation.
Delay is built into the system.
One commenter said reading about failed sales on HousingUK made them realise how extreme the stress can be when your home move falls apart.
Our buyer’s lender down-valued the house; we couldn’t afford to drop the price by that much and they didn’t have the cash, so the deal just died.
Our own sale fell through twice during Covid when buyers changed their minds; solicitors were dragging their feet and everything took forever.
It highlighted how unfair charges and opaque insurance kickbacks can push annual costs so high that flats become unattractive to buyers and lenders.
A Mumsnet user has been trying to sell their flat but says buyers are scared off by service charge bills of £3,000–£6,000 a year, with one year hitting £10,000.
Trying to move house but stuck for weeks waiting for Remus to respond; formal complaint ignored.
Our mortgage broker missed a default on my partner’s file and put us in for a lender who was never going to accept us – that decline killed our chain.
Seller says a survey appointment was cancelled at short notice, wasting time and increasing the risk of a chain collapsing.
They’d paid for surveys and solicitors on their onward purchase and said they were so angry they ‘could throttle’ the would-be buyers.
Our mortgage broker charged the full fee even though the chain collapsed and we never got the house.
On r/HousingUK someone said you can start with a flat that has a modest £50 service charge and £100 ground rent, only to watch a new freeholder hike both to the point the flat becomes almost unsellable.
Seriously harmful estate management: my complaints were met with contempt and I was blamed for their failures.
We’ve had two sales fall through and I’m starting to feel physically ill with worry. Every time we get close to exchange, someone else in the chain pulls out.
A ReviewSolicitors entry for a large conveyancing outfit describes a client waiting six weeks just to have a solicitor allocated after they’d already signed up.
Buyer discovered a conditional mortgage just before exchange — chain chaos and collapse risk.
A buyer on LegalAdviceUK said their purchase was in danger because the seller’s conveyancer simply wasn’t responding, and everyone in the chain was losing confidence.
Conveyancing fraud victims say once the money is transferred to criminals, recovery is almost impossible.
When we bought, nobody really hammered home how much the service charge could jump; if we’d known, we’d never have touched the place.
My sale fell through and the conveyancers at Dee & Griffin barely communicated – it felt like I was just a walking bank account rather than a client they cared about.
A Trustpilot reviewer complains about an auction-selling service recommended after a failed sale; they say they were pressured to price 20% below market and then urged to drop it even further with promises it would sell immediately.
A leaseholder on a landlord forum says buying leasehold was one of the biggest mistakes of their life – the management company keeps hiking service charges and won’t explain the numbers.
Failure to disclose key details can be an unfair trading practice under consumer law, with serious penalties for agents.
Four buyers in one chain—multiple fall-throughs before finally completing months later.
They’d already switched to a different onward purchase once, so when this chain collapsed as well, they were left wondering if moving was even worth the stress.
Our estate agent never called unprompted; every update came only after chasing.
Despite paying the broker fee upfront, we spent 11 days with no update on our decision in principle while the seller grew impatient.
A Yopa reviewer says their house sale initially fell through with one buyer, but the agent quickly found another and kept them informed throughout the rescue process.
Leaseholders complain of being charged £150 ground rent plus hundreds in late payment fees, with the structure of fees not properly explained.
A poster summarises a case where a solicitor emailed for bank details, fraudsters intercepted the chain, and the solicitor sent sale proceeds to the fraudster’s account — leaving the seller without £62k for a time.
In ‘Selling has pulled out of house sale not once but twice’, a buyer describes a nightmare vendor who keeps changing their mind and wasting everyone’s time.
Client reports their solicitor kept ‘forgetting’ to send replies to enquiries, causing weeks of delays.
Seller alleges a surveyor significantly undervalued their property without clear reasoning, jeopardising the buyer’s lending.
Because the title plan didn’t match the garden fencing, our buyer’s solicitor insisted on corrections at Land Registry; the backlog meant our sale missed the stamp duty deadline and collapsed.
Buyers pulled out after a survey that we believe was inaccurate, with basic items seemingly missed or misreported. The chain collapsed because of it.
A new-build homeowner says they believe clear defects were dismissed or limited by technicalities, leaving them to shoulder the impact.
A HousingUK user said their flat’s annual service charge is now close to £5,000 and they ‘can’t see how anyone will ever buy it’ at that level.
They describe expired offers as a ‘domino effect’ risk – one missed deadline can destabilise everyone up and down the chain.
We had one buyer pull out over personal circumstances, another over valuation issues, and another who just vanished; after that many failures we questioned whether moving was worth it.
It shows how some chains only survive multiple collapses when at least one professional is relentlessly chasing and reassuring everyone involved.
A seller says their estate agent pushed the ‘modern method of auction’ with claims of no legal or estate agency fees (buyer pays via reservation fee), but they felt it sounded too good to be true and confusing.
On Mumsnet people describe sales falling through at every stage – after offer, after survey, even on the day of exchange – you’re never safe until the money moves.
One person’s sale fell through three weeks before completion when the buyer suddenly decided they didn’t like the area, after months of faffing about.
Our agent seemed resigned to the collapse; they didn’t have the reach to generate enough viewings quickly, so our whole chain was at risk.
We were shocked to discover that most people lose thousands when a sale collapses and that we were just another statistic in a broken system.
Residents in ‘affordable’ shared-ownership homes say service charges shot up by hundreds of percent compared with what they were led to expect.
Our house sat on the market for weeks with almost no viewings and the agent did not seem proactive at all.
The conveyancing factory missed every timescale they’d promised, raised new enquiries after agreeing a completion date and almost caused the whole chain to fall apart.
We have a viewing arranged at short notice but cannot fully clear the garden of dog waste because of disability and recent surgery. We are worried it will put buyers off.
A Trustpilot review for Agent & Homes describes switching agents after an initial sale fell through; the new agent actively marketed the property instead of just relying on a big brand name.
LawHive’s guide on neighbour disputes says if the seller lied on the TA6 form about trouble next door, buyers may have a misrepresentation claim once they discover the truth.
Citizens Advice list cases where buyers lost deposits or sellers lost out on thousands because estate agents mishandled funds when a sale fell through.
Northern flat owners have seen service charges rise by over 50 percent in five years.
Paid an upfront conveyancing fee, then was told they couldn't act; refund promised but hard to obtain.
A HousingUK user said they feel ‘trapped in a leasehold flat’ where service charges shot up while owners of neighbouring luxury units pay far less per square foot.
Buyer says the agent marketed a property as having no onward chain, but later they discovered that wasn’t true after spending on surveys and conveyancing.
Described as an ‘omnishambles’: huge delays nearly caused mortgage offer issues and completion ran hours late.
Another review of a mortgage broker told how the adviser guided first-time buyers with poor credit through the process and helped them get a mortgage quickly after a stressful search.
I’m 74 and have already transferred around £350,000 for a flat in London. With the firm shut, I’m effectively £350k down and still living in temporary accommodation while this is untangled.
“Because of their delays… I had to stay… a full year… cost me over £4000.”
They’re left wondering how something so fundamental could be missed when every link in the chain depends on that finance being in place.
Another thread talked about £6,000-a-year service charges on a £400k flat, with people saying it would be incredibly hard to resell and that they’d run a mile from that development.
NetLawman say unresolved neighbour disputes – from boundaries to noise – must be disclosed when selling, and can make buyers walk away or demand heavy discounts.
Our house sale fell through before exchange after six months; now we’ve got two weeks to find a new buyer or we lose our onward purchase and thousands in fees.
In another older thread, a buyer walked away from a flat when they discovered the lease allowed big service charge increases at the freeholder’s discretion, with no real cap.
Staff did not get back to us, we were always chasing them, and they never seemed to know what was going on.
They highlight buyers and sellers left in limbo when key dates slip, with nobody clearly owning the delay or explaining what is going wrong.
We were buying via a SIPP and two sales fell through before we finally completed; each collapse meant more legal fees and reports with very little to show for it.
The process of buying a property has been quick but emails are never answered, you cannot get through to anyone on the phone and the final costs were significantly higher than originally quoted.
A 2008 thread titled ‘Fuckity fuckity fuck’ describes a sale collapsing right near the end after the buyers vanished, leaving the sellers over a thousand pounds out of pocket.
They accepted a lower price in return for certainty, which tells you how much damage repeated fall-throughs can do to people’s appetite for risk.
Our solicitor at Wilsons Solicitors was holding sale proceeds when PM Law shut. We’re now stuck waiting for the regulator to untangle it.
Another Guardian piece profiles residents facing service charges up to £8,000 a year and planning legal action because their ‘affordable’ homes have become unaffordable.
We were due to exchange and complete this week, but our PM Property Lawyers file has been frozen and nobody can tell us when or if we can move.
It’s soul-destroying to keep paying mortgage, bills and legal fees while chains keep collapsing around you.
Citizens Advice couldn’t really help; we were told buyers can just walk away pre-exchange, leaving us to swallow the costs and start again.
NetLawman explains that when you sell, the TA6 form requires you to disclose any neighbour disputes – current or historic – not just the ones you think are ‘serious’.
They complained that between valuation fees, surveys and legal bills, every failed purchase was like setting fire to another month’s salary.
On Digital Spy, someone wrote that they were ‘so stressed’ after their sale fell through on the day they should have been completing and handing over keys.
Our buyers used PM Property Lawyers and what should have been a simple sale is now months late. Every document supposedly takes a week to ‘process’ before anyone even looks at it.
The market is so flat that even good, well-presented houses just sit there, leaving chains stuck and sellers in limbo.
We used a budget online firm and it was such a relief when the sale fell through because dealing with them had been a nightmare from day one.
Our house sale fell through the day before exchange – one email from the buyers’ solicitor and months of planning just evaporated.
House sale held up for ten weeks waiting for a management pack; no phone contact and slow email replies.
A cash buyer alleges the agent misled them and pushed them to look elsewhere, calling the conduct unprofessional.
A right-of-way article points out that unresolved access disputes and unclear easements can seriously put off buyers and push sellers towards auctions or cash-only buyers.
A Connells report nearly derailed our sale by flagging lots of serious issues as high risk, which didn’t align with reality.
Our house sale fell through and I was devastated. We’d spent months planning the move and even chosen the house we wanted to buy next.
My conveyancer would not pick up the phone and barely answered emails for days.
Buyer says the estate agent repeatedly claimed there were other higher offers and pressured them to bid up, but later they discovered no other offers had ever been recorded.
Cost me thousands… sale fell through… they kept the deposit from the buyer.
Buyer says solicitor mixed up their file with someone else’s, sending incorrect documents and causing major confusion.
Action Fraud warns criminals hack or spoof email chains between buyers/sellers and their solicitors/agents, then strike near completion by claiming bank details have changed at the last minute.
We still drive past the original house that fell through and take a grim sort of satisfaction that they haven’t sold it yet in this broken system.
Even if the asking price is tempting, big annual fees and vague wording about increases can knock thousands off what buyers are willing to offer.
A MoneySavingExpert user said the sellers’ previous chain had collapsed late on, yet their solicitor still took seven days just to send basic contract papers, making the new buyers fear another collapse.
“Offer accepted on property early April 2025… told by agent… complete mid July.”
The mortgage surveyor mixed our flat up with a neighbouring new build, declared it in poor condition and the buyer’s lender refused to proceed.
Would give zero stars if possible. Completely missed deadline to complete by over a month.
Being gazumped after paying legal and mortgage fees is brutal; we basically sponsored someone else’s price rise.
I have found my dream house and had my offer accepted, but the estate agents are insisting I pay them a 5% deposit, about £10,000, before any survey or legal work. They say it is partly non-refundable if I pull out without a 'good reason'. Their reviews are poor and I know this isn’t standard practice in the UK, so I am worried about being scammed or ripped off.
They needed the money to move on but were stuck deciding whether to keep waiting politely or escalate into a formal complaint.
the conveyancers of our buyer were changing the person in charge of account several times
Digital Spy has threads where people say they’re ‘so stressed’ after sales collapse, wondering if the next buyer will stick around any longer.
They’re advised to consider replacing the managing agent or going to a tribunal, but in the meantime the charges keep mounting month after month.
A Guardian feature on a cladding-affected block in London describes residents unable to sell, facing mould, scaffolding and unresolved fire-safety issues for years.
Another buyer discovered a planned new road close to the garden via local plan documents, not mentioned anywhere in the marketing details.
An MSE poster nearly at exchange is told someone in the chain has let their mortgage offer expire – nobody had spotted the date until the last moment.
As first-time buyers we chose Angela Viney for their high rating but our solicitor was nearly impossible to reach, took weeks to reply and sent bundles of paperwork without any clear explanation.
We bought our terrace and quickly discovered both neighbours are extremely noisy; the seller had ticked ‘no disputes’ on the TA6 despite years of complaints.
The worst part is the double-mortgage risk: some of us in the Facebook group have already drawn down funds for the new place but our old loans haven’t been cleared because everything went through a PM Law firm.
Avoid like the plague! Very poor competence and communication.
had to give it up as a bad job.
Raised an easement/boundary-related dispute and only received automated replies; no complaints procedure provided.
The mortgage adviser never checked the lease length properly; their chosen lender refused it at the last minute and the whole deal died.
Our chain stalled because the solicitor insisted a document was missing that had already been provided twice. They later admitted it had been sitting in their spam folder.
Every time I email my conveyancer I get a two-line reply or never hear back at all. It’s been months and I’m still waiting for basic updates.
By the time the chain finally collapsed, we’d spent thousands on surveys, searches, arrangement fees and rent on a temporary place.
They said the charges were effectively suppressing values in that block compared with similar homes without those ongoing costs.
Another guide said if your mortgage offer expires before you exchange, your lender can simply withdraw it and you risk the whole purchase falling through unless you secure a new deal quickly.
Avoid like the plague! Very poor competence and communication... to the exasperation of my lender and the seller’s solicitor.
Leaseholders allege the agent would not provide proof of buildings insurance, forcing a change of managing agent and escalating dispute.
Buyer says they were brushed off and blocked from viewings/offer discussions after refusing the agent’s mortgage broker.
“No communication since 30 October. Calls and emails all unanswered.”
This company will jeopardise your sale or purchase… false information shared to estate agent/other solicitors.
Unfortunately, the sale fell through… costing me almost £2,000…
Mortgage offer expired; all they managed was searches and silence.
We had to walk away after learning our lender treats anything above commercial as ‘high risk’; nobody warned us when we first viewed the property.
They say the bank told them they’d seen the same scam recently and stopped it in time — and they could have lost a six-figure sum at the point of completion.
Some house sales don't happen, sad but things happen
They quote stats that around 60% of Britons have had some kind of neighbour dispute, and many say they’d think twice about buying next to one.
A 2025 thread ‘House sale fallen though, gutted and totally fed up’ talks about how people end up with solicitor bills and fees to pay every time a buyer pulls out.
Complaint about an agent’s omission and ‘hold ups’ linked to chain information not being disclosed clearly.
We completed our sale through a PM Law firm but never received the balance of our sale proceeds before the collapse. That money was supposed to fund our next purchase and without it we can’t move forward.
They warn the reservation contract is written to protect the seller and the fee is non-returnable, meaning you can pay thousands and get nothing back.
They also highlight complaints where properties were sold for less than they were worth, with sellers blaming poor advice and weak negotiation from their agents.
One seller posts that their buyers did all the paperwork and searches, they’d signed contracts, and then the buyers suddenly pulled out just as they approached exchange.
Another thread highlighted how buyers can be scared off when there’s no clear history of service charge accounts and the lease hints at big upcoming works.
The buyer says the process feels like a marathon with vague explanations and no clear timeline for when anything will actually complete.
Our contract with the estate agent was ending just as the sale collapsed; we’d already lost six months and now had two weeks to find a new buyer or lose our onward purchase.
Offer accepted months ago and we’re still nowhere near exchange. Every time I ask, it’s ‘we’re waiting on the other side’.
“I would rather do it myself than use an incompetent conveyancing firm.”
Sold.co.uk reviews describe long, difficult chains where the agent’s sales progressor had to constantly chase solicitors and buyers to stop the transaction falling apart.
They specialise in buying ‘hard to sell’ flats hit by cladding, insurance hikes and inflated service charges – the stuff that makes normal buyers and lenders walk away.
The buyer’s solicitor questioned whether the service charge was reasonable and hinted at a tribunal; rather than fight, the buyer pulled out.
One judge effectively said the only way to resolve the dispute was to force the sale of her home, which shows how catastrophic neighbour fights over boundaries can become.
I am trying to agree a completion date but my removals company can only do one date in November and that is the day before my buyer’s mortgage offer expires. Exchange is likely one to two weeks before completion and the buyers cannot renew their offer. They are very nervous that completion is only one day before expiry and want me to change the date, but I have already used the packing boxes and I am worried everything could fall apart at the last minute.
At one point, the seller was close to pulling out because my solicitors failed to progress the case or respond promptly.
We agreed a sale and the buyer’s surveyor claimed there was dry rot in the loft; a second survey found nothing, but the buyer had already walked away and the chain was dead.
Two sales fell through and we have paid for surveys twice and searches twice.
Our first buyers pulled out a few days before exchange, saying their circumstances had changed – we’d already packed half the house and now we’re back at step one.
Thankfully we hadn’t shipped our furniture yet, but the shock of losing the sale overnight was awful.
Ready Steady Sell’s advice is blunt: if you’ve got nuisance neighbours, you still have to disclose them – and failure to do so risks legal trouble.
Chain almost collapsed because the buyer’s ‘case handler’ setup built delays into every step.
The solicitor acted as if the sale was progressing but had never opened the management pack. Three weeks later we learned they had not even downloaded it from the portal.
On ReviewSolicitors, a client of Bates Solicitors says nearly three years dealing with a family estate has been ‘painful’, with poor communication, delays in even simple tasks and calculation errors that caused extra hassle.
I was at the final stages of my purchase, getting ready for exchange and completion. I rang for an update and instead discovered the firm had shut overnight. I have to leave my rental soon, can’t stay on, and now I’m genuinely worried about becoming homeless.
Very poor service: they sold our house but did not chase the chain or keep us updated, and gave incorrect advice.
Our flat’s annual service charge is so high that even local agents have quietly admitted it’s going to be hard to sell without a serious price cut.
Valuation for a buyer’s mortgage looked rushed and didn’t properly check rooms or outside areas. Seller felt the process was careless.
They say many buyers only discover the full picture after moving in, when unmentioned problems start to cost serious money.
“Mortgage offer expired… all they managed to do was make searches.”
The conveyancer failed to notify us about a boundary dispute raised in the seller’s TA6 form. We only became aware when the neighbour's solicitor contacted us directly.
Huge delays to the point that as sellers we almost lost our mortgage offer.
The Times reported a family who’ve spent more than £43,000 on service charges and council tax while struggling for five years to sell a retirement flat they inherited.
Truly incompetent, work missed deadlines, almost caused chain to collapse.
Our mortgage broker never mentioned that the product fee was non-refundable if the purchase fell through; losing that money stung almost as much as losing the house.
They admit they didn’t fully grasp the leasehold pack at purchase and now feel misinformed about what the charges would become.
We were told the buyers had pulled out over the garage, but nobody could explain what their actual concern was. It’s on the deeds and has been used that way for decades.
Bettermove are clear that you legally have to declare neighbour disputes, and hiding them can lead to the sale collapsing or a claim for compensation.
Our broker keeps asking why we haven’t completed, but the answer is simple: our conveyancer at a PM Law brand doesn’t exist any more and we’re at the back of the queue to be reallocated.
We felt pushed to accept this surveyor via the lender, then got an experience of poor communication and avoidable hold-ups.
Even with a proactive agent, we still had a long, stressful journey wrestling with buyers and solicitors before we finally completed.
Brokers call the situation ‘chaos’, saying buyers suddenly face five-figure shortfalls or have to walk away after months of work.
Client says the solicitor made errors in the TR1 form and needed it signed again, delaying exchange.
By the time the full picture emerged, we’d already spent a lot on surveys and legal fees and had to decide between walking away or pursuing a misrepresentation claim.
“I hope these kind of firms are regulated… complaint dealt with by a 3rd party.”
Our sale failed because the buyer’s lender didn’t like something in the searches and we never really got a clear explanation of what the issue was.
Our broker and solicitor keep saying completion ‘should’ be fine, but there’s no guarantee – one delay and we could lose the rate and the house.
I was forced into meeting the in-house mortgage adviser and felt it affected the fairness of the buying process.
We’d accepted an offer from an investor but after months of silence their solicitor suddenly said they no longer wanted another rental; the sale just died.
We justified the service charge when we moved in, but years later it’s higher and our flat just isn’t shifting – it feels like we’ve paid to make our own home harder to sell.
Frettens LLP has a one-star ReviewSolicitors comment saying communication was poor, the work was overpriced and invoices felt out of proportion to what was actually done.
Developers forced her to exchange while the property was still unfinished because they knew the mortgage offer was ticking down.
They noted how proactive sales progression and frequent updates made the difference compared with their first, failed attempt.
Refusing the in-house mortgage broker made the buyer feel frozen out of viewings and offers, like access was being used as leverage.
They describe being in limbo while residents contact MPs and the media, with no guarantee anything will change.
Using PM Law has been one of the worst legal experiences I’ve ever had. Years of poor communication, unanswered calls and the feeling they simply didn’t care what happened to my case.
Solicitor said they would act for me on conveyencing.
A buyer says their own solicitors ignore calls and emails despite knowing they have a hard deadline to move out, leaving them panicking with no idea where the transaction stands.
I don’t mind them lining up more viewings, but the agent could at least confirm if the offer is rejected instead of leaving us hanging.
Survey was arranged via a lender panel, but booking and communication were chaotic. The customer said it added avoidable mortgage delay.
Our initial sale fell through because of leasehold complexities. When we moved to a new firm, they immediately highlighted problems our previous solicitor had missed.
Buyer’s solicitor has barely replied for two months. Everyone is ready, but we still don’t have an exchange date.
We’re cash buyers and had already transferred the full purchase price when our PM Law solicitor disappeared from contact. Now the money, the keys and the title are all in limbo and nobody can tell us when this will be fixed.
Another broker warns that solicitor delays, chain problems and new-build hold-ups are all common reasons mortgage offers expire before completion.
constant phone to pay the buyers premium while staying on the call.
Buyer was told by the estate agent that their solicitor was refusing to take calls, slowing the whole chain.
PM Property Lawyers harassed me after I asked for comparison quotes – constant emails, texts and calls pushing me to sign up, even though I hadn’t chosen them.
We are currently a month delayed… every document takes a week to “process”.
The management pack revealed pending major works that would add thousands to the service charge, but this had never been mentioned in any of the marketing.
We’re terrified someone will lose patience before we ever get to exchange – months of work could vanish overnight because there’s nothing binding until the very end.
Our buyer’s lender changed their criteria partway through the process and suddenly wouldn’t accept self-employed income the way they had before, so the chain fell apart.
The first buyers pulled out after survey, and now every new viewer wants to know what was in that report, even though we never got a copy ourselves.
They described waiting eight months for a deal that never happened, saying they didn’t know how they coped financially or emotionally.
That reviewer also alleges a conflict of interest because the conveyancer was recommended by the estate agent, leaving them feeling the buyer’s interests weren’t protected.
We hadn’t realised it counted as a ‘dispute’ that had to be declared, but the paper trail of complaints to the council said otherwise.
We paid for two valuations and the reports felt copy-pasted and poor quality, leaving us out of pocket and no clearer.
The conveyancer failed to identify that the property was in a flood-risk zone requiring specialist insurance. Our lender refused to proceed three days before exchange.
One leaseholder forum user reports a sudden £6,000 heating and gas bill on top of day-to-day service charges, with little explanation from the managing agent.
I paid nearly £2,500 to PM Property Lawyers for my first home purchase and now the firm has collapsed with my case in limbo.
They believed their broker had been told the mortgage offer could be transferred, but later found the lender disagreeing on what had been promised when the first deal fell apart.
They talk about months of uncertainty, rearranged moving plans and money wasted, all because their original buyer pulled out at the last minute.
We only found out after exchange that the previous owners had multiple escape-of-water claims, which made the building almost uninsurable at renewal.
We offered end of June, had mortgage in July — by September our solicitor still hadn’t issued enquiries. We feel stuck.
This has to be the most unprofessional company ever! …lost numerous important documentation…
They say it was the first time they realised high charges can stop a lender or broker from approving a mortgage at all.
In a ‘spotlight’ article, the Ombudsman stresses that even if delays are caused by third parties, solicitors still need to keep clients properly updated.
On MoneySavingExpert, someone asked whether they could switch agents once their contract ended because the current one had failed to generate interest and allowed a six-month sale to die.
Communication was poor to non existant
They ask whether it’s worth pursuing compensation because they feel the agent’s behaviour contributed to the collapse and they want their money back to go elsewhere.
We’d lined up a chain of three and were ready to move when the buyer just pulled out with no reason given, leaving us completely stuck and having to start again from scratch.
Completion chaos and long delays created serious mortgage timing pressure for the sellers.
Our buyers simply didn’t turn up to complete, and we were told the only way to recover our wasted costs would be to sue them.
Calls went to voicemail, emails ignored, I had no idea what stage my purchase was at.
Another ReviewSolicitors profile shows glowing feedback for one conveyancer, but notes that many people come to them after bad experiences with other firms’ slow progress and poor communication.
“Final request… included unspecified additional charges… first correspondence I had received.”
It was sobering to hear the property described as too risky for a mortgage; we’d thought of it as a bit tired, not effectively unsellable.
Our buyer pulled out because our solicitors weren’t doing their job; every time the agent chased, they complained the lawyer never returned calls.
At Avenue Road Estate Agents, one seller said their first sale fell through but the negotiator was constantly on the phone, keeping them calm and getting it sold again quickly.
Another r/HousingUK post tells of a house down-valued by £170,000; when the sellers refused to renegotiate, the buyer simply walked away.
A leasehold specialist says cladding issues, huge remediation bills and inflated service charges have created a whole class of ‘hard to sell’ flats that ordinary buyers and lenders avoid.
I ended up calling the partner at the firm because my case‐handler wouldn’t answer email or phone. After that things moved a bit quicker.
The Legal Ombudsman’s 2023/24 annual data shows residential conveyancing accounts for about a third of all new complaints they accept.
They pointed out that buyers might ignore the price and fixate on the annual charges instead, especially when they see how quickly they’ve already gone up.
They now feel misinformed, realising the ongoing charges dramatically change what they can afford each month.
A Yopa customer wrote that their house sale fell through at the last minute, but their local agent had new viewers through the door within days and it soon resold.
The bungalow we’re buying has just been valued £10k below our offer. The last sale at a higher price collapsed when that buyer’s chain fell apart.
Homeowner says multiple defect claims were rejected or delayed, leaving them feeling exposed after buying a new build.
Cunningtons highlight misrepresentation claims over hidden disputes, flooding and missing planning consents, all of which can derail sales or trigger compensation claims.
We only learned the lender had pulled the plug when the buyers rang us in tears to say they couldn’t afford the new rate.
“Endless delays, lies and inefficiencies… asked to review documents they have not sent.”
They’re told that if the council holds a record of the complaint, it’s safest to update the buyer, even if the issue is now technically resolved.
Buyer pulled out because it took too long and the other solicitor couldn’t get responses.
The valuer noted knotweed within three metres of the boundary and our lender wouldn’t lend until it was fully treated; the seller refused, so we bailed.
Lockings Solicitors list slow mortgage valuations, late survey bookings and missing paperwork as classic conveyancing bottlenecks that can stall a chain for weeks.
A week after our offer and the estate agent still had not even confirmed they had received it.
Customer service disgraceful.
They recommend regular, proactive updates so buyers and sellers are not left guessing about what’s happening with their transaction.
A Times piece asks whether you can really trust property listings, highlighting missing or inaccurate details on cladding, service charges and even whether a property is genuinely available.
Several viewings ended with the same feedback: people loved the flat but were nervous about what else the managing agent was failing to do.
They point out that as well as losing their finance, buyers may incur extra legal and valuation fees and face higher interest rates when reapplying, all because timelines drifted.
Seller complains the agent overvalued to win instructions, then pushed for reductions after weak demand.
Our mortgage offer was withdrawn just days before the current deal ended, leaving us scrambling for a worse rate. No clear explanation was given and nobody would discuss it with our broker or solicitor.
A LawHive article explains that if a seller lies about neighbour problems on the TA6, the buyer can potentially sue for misrepresentation once they discover how bad things really are.
Leaseholder says they made numerous calls just to sort out service charge arrangements and still lacked promised documents.
We’re devastated because the vendors of the house we love have only given us a short grace period to rescue the chain, and finding a new buyer that fast is unlikely.
After submitting an offer and returning to view the house again, we found cracked windows inside and out, damp upstairs and downstairs, patched repairs everywhere, and bubbling wallpaper. I am worried about repair costs and unsure whether to proceed with a survey.
The buyers pulled out because their buildings insurance quote came back sky-high once the postcode showed repeated flood alerts.
Our conveyancer left a Land Registry issue unresolved for years; by the time I fixed it myself we’d lost the buyer and still couldn’t sell.
One poster says they read about someone whose sale fell through five times and asks how anyone is supposed to afford repeated legal costs like that.
The agent said searches usually take a couple of weeks but our solicitor warned that some councils are taking up to 13 weeks, which can quite easily cause a sale to fall through.
A Times piece on retirement flats showed one family spending over £43,000 on service charges and council tax while they struggled for years to sell their late mother’s apartment.
A MoneySavingExpert user paid over £300 to their conveyancer for initial work, only for their buyer to pull out the day before final procedures.
Sold, then the buyer’s buyer pulled out; says nobody told them and they lost their onward purchase.
They say buyers are understandably wary of inheriting an ongoing feud next door – it can lengthen the sale and seriously reduce what the property is worth.
A ReviewSolicitors user says Stuart & Co were so slow and unresponsive that their buyer eventually pulled out, leaving them to lose the sale entirely.
The surveyor wrote such a negative report that the lender insisted on expensive structural work before completion, which neither side could afford.
The process took nearly 200 days, and by the time surveys and legal checks were done, one buyer further up the chain had already dropped out.
Another Times investigation into retirement flats finds many have dropped in value, with families losing tens of thousands while still paying hefty anual charges.
Getting really fed up of them hassling me for my business.
We’re waiting for an insurance certificate to progress issues; experience shows why reform is needed.
Our solicitor assured us the property had no boundary issues, but the seller’s responses clearly flagged a long-running dispute. It had been overlooked entirely.
A HousingUK thread about leasehold flats warns that service charges and ground rents can balloon to the point where you’re left with something you ‘can’t sell’.
They say the bank insisted they phone the conveyancer to verify the details, and the conveyancer told them to stop the transaction because scammers had changed the account number.
We completed on a freehold purchase but HM Land Registry still has not updated the registration around eight months later. Our solicitor says the application is in but nothing is moving and we do not know whether this delay is normal or how to escalate it.
First-time buyer says solicitor put them under pressure to exchange without resolving outstanding enquiries.
We discovered our solicitor wasn't cc’ing us into emails with the other side. We asked why. No answer.
“The system feels incredibly slow and opaque… no one can give a timeframe.”
Conveyancer delayed the whole chain because they insisted on sending everything by physical post rather than email.
A buyer notes their solicitor never discussed the ground rent escalation at all, which they now see as a serious oversight.
Our first buyer walked when their online mortgage broker disappeared mid-application; by the time they switched advisers, they’d decided it was all too stressful.
The solicitor did not review the management pack for almost three weeks. Once they finally did, they found issues requiring further enquiries, delaying exchange significantly.
I’m meant to be moving in with my partner once his house sale completes, but his solicitor is one of the PM Law firms. With the closure, the sale has stalled and we have no idea when—if ever—it will finish.
We were shocked to hear the place we’d lived in for years described as very poor condition, effectively limiting us to cash buyers only.
A buyer says completion was blocked because a managing agent didn’t provide the required leasehold pack despite multiple chasers.
One buyer said their heart sank seeing properties pop back on Rightmove with ‘sale fallen through’ – it felt like a huge red flag that something was wrong.
One seller says their house sale fell through while they were on holiday – they only found out via email and still haven’t managed to resell.
Home House Buyers tried to purchase our property but the deal collapsed when the surveyor classed it as unmortgageable and in very poor condition.
A quick-sale firm cited HomeOwners Alliance research suggesting about half of sellers who lose a buyer are left out of pocket by nearly £2,700 when a sale falls through.
1. Excessive and Unjustified Delays… 2. Persistent Failure to Communicate…
Another review for the same lender mentions rushing a case through to offer in 48 hours to stop a client’s chain from collapsing completely.
“The conveyancer was appalling… ignored instructions and cost us money.”
We are about to complete on a band G council tax property but are worried the budget may double council tax. The chain is pushing for a completion date and we are unsure whether to delay.
Our conveyancer didn’t spot that the right-of-way to the parking space wasn’t properly registered; the buyers’ solicitor raised it late and everything ground to a halt.
We had to abandon the purchase after discovering the lease had less than 70 years left and the freeholder wanted a fortune to extend.
User says they paid for title deeds believing a third-party site was the official Land Registry, received nothing, and had to seek a refund via their payment method.
I would give zero stars if I could. The amount of delays, no communication and me chasing them is utterly unacceptable!
Our first sale fell through and the agent’s only suggestion was to list the house at a bargain price and see what happened at auction.
Avoid like the plague! Very poor competence and communication.
She said each collapse cost them more money and made their listing look ‘tainted’ every time the SSTC tag disappeared and it went back on the portals.
A conveyancing complaints guide lists big red flags: slow responses, difficulty getting hold of anyone and reviews mentioning constant delays and errors.
Contracts arrived showing the house is leasehold, not freehold — total shock when the listing said ‘detached house’ without clarity.
The whole chain is now at risk because our solicitor with a PM Law group firm shut without warning—our buyers are getting impatient and may pull out.
I am selling a family property owned since 1964 and have been told the garage appears to encroach on council land. The buyer's solicitors refuse to accept an indemnity policy and want me to obtain adverse possession, which could take months and might still be refused. Nobody can even say by how much it encroaches because the Land Registry plan is not to scale.
They describe the leasehold system as ‘unregulated and vile’, with no real way out once the annual costs have spiralled.
We discovered that our solicitor had been on holiday for ten days without arranging proper cover for our file. During that time, the buyer's solicitor chased repeatedly and warned they were considering withdrawing from the purchase.
Our house sale fell through the day before we were supposed to complete – one phone call and months of planning, surveys and legal work just vanished.
We’re stuck between pushing the sellers to hurry up or accepting that we’ll pay higher monthly payments for the exact same house.
We sold our Maidenhead home through Proddow Mackay and were in the middle of buying the next place when the firm suddenly shut, leaving us homeless and living between relatives and hotels.
On Gransnet, posters suggest keeping a property ‘open to viewings’ until the chain looks solid, because so many offers crumble before survey or mortgage approval.
Our family has been split up while we wait for a new solicitor to be appointed. I’m staying with one child near the old school and my partner is in a different town with our other child so we can juggle work and childcare until we finally complete.
They explain that fragile chains lead to huge wasted spend on surveys, legal work and mortgage fees whenever a buyer or seller drops out.
We dropped the price by tens of thousands, but the heat-network service charges are so high that buyers either walk away or their lenders refuse to touch it.
Before we switched agents, we went through several failed chains where nobody seemed to coordinate the move properly, leaving us stuck in limbo.
The reviewer had already been burned by one collapse and praised having a team that moved fast enough to keep the rest of the chain intact.
Our sale completed and we’ve moved out, but the onward purchase can’t complete because the conveyancer has shut down. We’re living out of boxes with family and don’t know how long this limbo will last.
The reviewer says they’re considering legal action because the delays cost them a buyer and wasted months of time.
final request for payment of £242.28 for the service charge for 2025
The report he produced undervalued my home by almost £100,000, which caused major issues with my mortgage.
We picked this company on price alone and soon found we'd made a terrible mistake!
Our sale fell through because the leasehold dispute with the management company hadn’t been resolved and the buyers didn’t want to inherit the fight.
We’d paid for searches and surveys before anyone mentioned that some lenders simply won’t touch that type of construction at all.
Twice we got to the point of almost exchanging, and twice different buyers pulled out at the last minute – it’s soul-destroying watching months of progress vanish overnight.
We’re starting to think our flat just isn’t sellable – the service charge is just under £300 a month and every buyer disappears once they see the numbers.
An industry article reminds sellers they must be ready to provide lease details, restrictions and charges or risk breaching regulations.
They say they’re trapped in a flat they can’t afford and can’t sell, with their life plans on hold because nobody wants to take on the charges.
we are dealing with a similar situation and potentially loosing a lot of money to this scam company..
A buyer says an estate agent handling a previously failed sale allegedly didn’t reveal that a 2023 extension has no building control sign-off — and they only found out deep into the process.
The advice was basically ‘relist and hope someone else isn’t scared off by the same thing’, which hardly feels like a robust system for transactions this expensive.
They’re left unsure whether the weak marketing or the fragile buyers are to blame, and worry about losing their onward purchase.
Our survey highlighted dangerous electrics and missing fire doors in the block; we walked away because nobody would confirm remedial plans.
How this company has more than one star is baffling!! Consistently sat on our case with no action being taken, lied about what work had been done.
Buyer complains their conveyancer went silent for over a month, ignored emails and calls, and only admitted at the last minute that they had not even ordered searches, putting their onward chain at risk.
“Worst conveyancer I ever dealt with. Extremely slow… Poor communication.”
A reviewer alleged money being taken and described the experience as fraudulent with serious financial harm.
Their message to solicitors is blunt: start searches early and communicate clearly, or risk chains collapsing while everyone waits for paperwork.
“We had to chase and chase; nobody takes ownership.”
The poster describes the emotional toll of thinking a dream move was happening, losing it, then going through the stress all over again with a second buyer.
They feel like the file is just sitting on a desk somewhere while the chain slowly loses confidence around them.
By the time our sale finally went through, we’d already paid surveyors and solicitors for two separate failed purchases and were nearly out of savings.
They give examples where noisy or aggressive neighbours have derailed sales and left buyers feeling misled about what they were really moving into.
Our house sale didn’t complete on the day it was meant to because the other side hadn’t transferred the funds; we spent the day surrounded by boxes, going nowhere.
Others advise total honesty, but warn that some purchasers will walk away the moment they hear ‘formal complaint’, whatever the context.
Three fee-earners cc’d on emails, none ever respond. I don’t know who is in charge of our case.
My buyer pulled out because of the time taken.
Our previous sale fell through and SortRefer plus their panel solicitors picked things up on the new transaction and actually kept us updated for a change.
Seller says their solicitor refuses to call the buyer’s solicitor and insists everything must be by email, causing huge delays.
They explain that when offers lapse, buyers can lose both the deal and the money already spent on legal work and valuations.
Our sale fell through on the Thursday morning, but Parkers had it back on the market by Friday and sold again by Saturday, which literally saved our chain.
The retirement flat seemed like a sensible investment, but high service charges and exit fees have made it unbelievably hard to sell on.
Paid ‘over the odds’ repeatedly because of incompetence. Customer said service was non-existent and the process kept getting blocked.
The agent promised a professional carpet clean before we moved in but it was clearly just hoovered and left mouldy.
The agent pressured us by claiming there were other higher offers. Later it became obvious this was not true and they had been bluffing to push us up.
Some say the unpredictability makes it harder to sell because buyers don’t trust service charge forecasts in the legal pack.
By the time our sale collapsed we’d spent nearly three thousand pounds on fees and reports, which is apparently close to the average loss when a transaction fails.
A first-time buyer Facebook group post says their service charge jumped from £60 to £180 a month; they admit they didn’t really understand the leasehold pack at the time of purchase.
Solicitor kept asking for documents already sent and claimed files were ‘mislaid’, stalling progress.
A Sun investigation found service charges have jumped by around 11% in a year on average, with some leaseholders paying thousands and even discovering hidden insurance commissions in their bills.
Our first sale collapsed when the buyers couldn’t get a mortgage approved, and another property in the chain also failed because their funds fell through.
I paid nearly £6,000 in auction fees only for the sale to collapse. None of it was refundable.
One poster said auctions are often where ‘doer-upper’ properties end up after regular buyers can’t stomach the cost and hassle of refurbishing them.
“We had no sales negotiator… had to chase every email.”
The seller we were buying from turned out not to own the house. We lost hundreds in fees.
The redemption/settlement figure on an equity release product was described as spiralling, leaving people feeling trapped.
Your emails being answered after a week or two and don't not bothered about the service you receive then this is your company!
JMP Solicitors received a review from a client whose sale fell through twice; they praised the firm for staying on top of things and pushing both sets of lawyers so the eventual purchase didn’t drag forever.
The buyers fell in love with the house, then pulled out when they realised the garage was legally separate and could, in theory, be sold off on its own.
Guidance stresses sellers and agents must share all they know about a property; buyers have the right to these facts before committing.
One buyer lost £67,000 after sending funds to scammers posing as their solicitor.
Scammers created a fake law firm website so the buyer unknowingly sent their full house deposit to criminals.
A very old Mumsnet thread simply begins ‘Our house sale has fallen through’ and goes on to describe young ‘property developers’ who ghosted both the agent and their own solicitor.
In ‘Lost our buyer – need advice!’, a seller says they only had three viewings in six weeks and the third buyer backed out after an argument between themselves.
A poster calls a ‘reservation agreement’ product a “complete scam and unfit for purpose”, saying it was sold as protection against buyers pulling out, but left them feeling mocked by the outcome.
Our buyers are using this shambolic firm... now in month 6 of a simple conveyancing... no chain.
Our solicitor failed to notice that the seller did not have rights of access across a private lane. The lender withdrew days before completion, collapsing the chain.
I’m almost losing my flat with the slow process…
By the time we heard the valuer wasn’t comfortable, the buyer had already instructed their solicitor to pull out and we’d wasted months.
My builder cut into my neighbour’s patio tiles during construction and agreed to reinstate them. The builder then walked off the job. I arranged repairs at my cost, but the neighbour demanded additional work that was not my responsibility and threatened legal action when I refused.
Our buyers’ mortgage offer is due to run out in days and the seller’s side keeps delaying; we’re terrified the whole chain will collapse because of unnecessary hold-ups.
The Times reported a surge in complaints to the Solicitors Regulation Authority, with property work singled out as a growing area of consumer frustration.
They suggest checking reviews and credentials early because once you’re mid-transaction, a bad choice can be very hard to undo.
They also say local authority searches and unresponsive lawyers can cause such extreme delays that frustrated buyers start viewing other properties instead.
Our flat’s service charge is now so high that every serious buyer disappears as soon as their solicitor sees the figures.
The agent seemed far too busy and just left our listing to go stale without any real effort.
The invoice turned up more than a year after the deal collapsed, for an amount we’d never agreed, and I’m now arguing about paying for a sale that never completed.
On Mumsnet, a buyer says the bank’s surveyor down-valued their chosen house by £60,000 – they’re left asking ‘now what?’ after already starting conveyancing.
Laceys Solicitors warn that poor flat management and escalating service charges don’t just make life miserable for residents – they also make flats much harder to sell because buyers don’t want the hassle.
Clients say the difference is simply being kept in the loop – emails answered the same day and clear explanations of what’s needed to get to exchange.
“Calls, voicemails, emails… all ignored for days.”
The managing agent wanted hundreds of pounds for the leasehold information pack, and by the time it arrived the buyer had completely lost interest.
Property for sale: poor feedback and ‘always in a meeting’ — seller can’t get hold of the right person.
Our leasehold flat has been on and off the market since 2021 – high service charges and a saturated local market mean every buyer eventually walks.
They say the buyer’s solicitors stopped responding to everyone — their own client, the estate agent, and both sides’ solicitors — leaving the chain helpless.
The Sun tells the story of a couple whose service charge jumped from £2,800 to £7,500, leaving them unable to sell or afford a larger home for a growing family.
Paid for a supposedly ‘lifetime’ mortgage service but still faced extra charges each time, even when we found the deal ourselves. Felt like paying twice for the same thing.
Buyer reported that their solicitor failed to verify crucial planning documents and only noticed after exchange.
We actually had to write to the agent to insist they stop lying about why we’d withdrawn – subsidence isn’t something you can just gloss over.
Incredibly slow start to conveyancing process: a month in and we’ve had no contact from the seller’s solicitor yet.
Appalling communication and customer service.
We did not get a drain survey and the surveyor failed to spot cracks and movement caused by a collapsed drain. Now that we know the drain has collapsed, we want to understand where we stand legally.
We have been going through this sale since August 2024, with a second set of buyers and solicitors who are not responding. We have to move before our buyer's mortgage offer expires and I am at the end of my tether trying to get the solicitors to communicate.
I had to threaten to complain before anyone from the firm finally called me back.
We were with a big-name agent who went silent the moment the ‘sold’ board went up; four months later the sale fell through and we realised they hadn’t lifted a finger to keep it together.
They say their only ‘weapon’ is threatening to pull out, but they’re trying not to go nuclear while the chain drifts with no clear end-point.
Gaddes Noble handled a very simple, no-chain house sale but repeatedly asked for documents we’d already sent months earlier and then ignored emails showing this. No apology, just silence.
I am trying to sell a one bed flat in West Greenwich that I bought as a single professional. I expected similar buyers but there has been very little interest and I am struggling to understand why singles and first time buyers are not viewing or offering.
We’ve already had one subsidence claim refused and now we’ve got a mortgaged house with no buildings insurance, untreated movement and cracked walls – how on earth do you sell that?
Offer accepted on our purchase late May
We lost our buyer because they decided they’d overstretched themselves and could no longer afford the offer they’d made in all the excitement.
On ReviewSolicitors, one client sums up their experience with a conveyancing firm as ‘poor communication and lack of clarity throughout’, saying the file even moved between lawyers without them being told.
Angela Viney accepted our purchase, delayed for weeks then finally admitted they weren’t taking on instructions. They’d wasted two months and left us scrambling to find another solicitor.
Our house sale fell through and I felt the solicitor was partly to blame; they were slow, unresponsive and seemed to let issues drift until the buyers walked.
The communication throughout this process has been absolutely appalling — in fact... no communication at all.
The Housing Ombudsman’s guidance on insurance-related complaints notes that residents often feel left in the dark when landlords, insurers and loss adjusters don’t explain who is responsible for what.
Our sale fell through about six weeks in, just after the survey, and the buyers refused to give any explanation at all.
Our buyers walked away after eight weeks blaming a ‘personal issue’ – we’d already mentally moved and now we’re starting from scratch again.
Buyer says England’s house-buying process is ‘broken’, citing poor communication from both estate agent and solicitor.
A Trustpilot reviewer says their chain-free sale dragged on for over 180 days and then their buyer pulled out, which they say was totally understandable given the lack of progress.
Upfront fee paid; property didn’t sell; says advert was pulled after six months and terms were ambiguous.
We are mid-transaction and PM Property Lawyers feel worse than useless: repeated lies about what has been done, no documents sent and we’re constantly asked to check papers that never arrive.
Solicitor failed to warn that the loft conversion didn’t have building regs, now leaving buyers with a compliance mess.
The freeholder’s quote to extend the lease was so outrageous that our solicitor advised against the purchase; it turned a ‘bargain’ flat into a ticking time bomb.
I always ask why the previous sale fell through, but you never really know if you’re being told the whole truth or just a vague story about 'personal circumstances'.
The top of our chain fell through, we found another buyer, then the next chain collapsed; eventually our mortgage offer expired and we had to walk away.
The Law Society warns that if you receive a message saying bank details have changed, you should question it and verify using the firm’s published contact details because law firms rarely change bank details mid-transaction.
Valuer seemed positive in person for the remortgage, then later down-valued the property. It caused shock and immediate mortgage stress.
They were aggressively pushing their in-house mortgage adviser and it felt like you needed to comply just to proceed.
An agent repeatedly allowed misleading marketing about 'no onward chain' and the ombudsman process felt useless.
Deed of variation updates were ‘coming shortly’ but follow-ups hit automated replies; worries it endangered the sale.
The buyers admitted later they’d got carried away and offered more than they were comfortable with; once they saw the survey, they panicked and withdrew.
Our RTM company has told us to replace our flat front door and frame to comply with fire regulations, but the lease does not clearly say whether the door is part of the demised premises or the freeholder's responsibility. I do not want to be accused of overstepping if I arrange and pay for it myself.
NetLawman reminds sellers that any neighbour dispute, even a past one, must be disclosed on the TA6 form or they risk misrepresentation claims later.
An Alexander Grace Law client complained that when their initial sale fell through, the firm still charged the full amount even though the transaction never reached exchange.
Posters describe feeling like they have to chase every small step themselves or risk the file just sitting at the bottom of a pile for days.
They took money for multiple valuations and repeatedly came back with zero value outcomes, forcing us to go elsewhere.
The same guide lists common reasons for fall-throughs – mortgage problems, broken chains, survey issues, gazumping and conveyancing delays – all of which can leave sellers out of pocket.
Letting agent recommended lawyers whose communication with me was described as terrible.
The first online agent overvalued our property and then gave months of poor service before we sacked them.
Kept waiting for callbacks that never came; the lack of continuity made the sale feel chaotic and out of control.
“Only thing we are awaiting on is the management pack… everyone has chased.”
A buyer recounts almost losing their purchase when their lender belatedly flagged unacceptable ground rent escalation terms.
A seller says their chain is at risk because their buyer’s solicitor appears to have done “not a single thing” after 9 weeks, despite being chased repeatedly for initial enquiries.
They recommend running from any firm that is hard to contact at the enquiry stage, as that often foreshadows problems later in the transaction.
Our buyer pulled out in November and we got through a further 3 buyers
A valuation came back tens of thousands under expectations on a modern home, throwing a mortgage valuation into chaos.
They note that slow paperwork, searches and unresponsive lawyers can drag things out so long that nervous buyers simply walk away.
Another leaseholder on MoneySavingExpert is begging for help after service charges on their flat ballooned, saying they can barely afford to stay and are scared it’s now unsellable.
Endless delays, lies and inefficiencies… mid property transaction.
we are frightened to complain as last time we did so she replied very rudely
I bought a two-bed flat and was told the service charge was about £60 a month; it’s now £180 and I feel completely misinformed about what I was committing to.
We paid for a search and expected the results. Our solicitor didn’t send them until after we cancelled the deal.
As of today, I still have not received my refund.
Action Fraud warns criminals hack or spoof email chains between buyers, solicitors, and agents, then apply urgency and last-minute ‘bank detail changes’ to steal large transfers.
Our buyers walked away because they suddenly didn’t like that the garage was on a separate title. It had been on the deeds the whole time yet they only panicked six months in.
Guidance for home sellers highlights that hiding or glossing over major costs can amount to mis-selling under consumer law.
Fixed-rate mortgage was set up without the customer signing the paperwork. A serious issue that had to be raised as a formal complaint.
The valuation undermined the deal even though the buyer was comfortable; it created uncertainty that threatened the entire transaction.
A sale process was described as painfully slow and bureaucratic, with the customer feeling like they weren’t valued at all.
Some managing agents invoice for services that were never carried out and cannot be verified.
Our solicitor took so long and communicated so little that the whole chain collapsed, leaving us feeling ignored and completely in the dark.
On LegalAdviceUK, a buyer discovered after moving in that the seller had ticked ‘no disputes’ on the TA6 despite having reported the neighbour to the council several times.
A Law Society Gazette piece summarises Ombudsman findings: nearly half of upheld complaints are again about poor communication and delay.
So slow we lost our buyer. After over 180 days of waiting for CDPLL to process the sale of our chain free home our buyer finally pulled out and I don't blame them.
Someone in our local group warned people not to use a particular auction agent after their first sale fell through and they were pushed into a heavily discounted auction that still didn’t achieve a sale.
They also warn that if sellers failed to mention disputes and you only discover them after moving in, specialist legal advice may be your only route to redress.
Undisclosed leasehold complications… made it unmortgageable.
A recent Legal Ombudsman update reported a ‘significant rise’ in people asking for help, with conveyancing complaints often about missed purchase deadlines.
This is holding up the sale of my property, and ... I am worried they may withdraw from the purchase.
Throughout my property purchase, communication was almost non-existent, emails were repeatedly ignored for days or even weeks.
After a bad experience with a big-name agent, we went to a smaller firm. Our first sale had fallen through but the new agent actually picked up the phone and rebuilt the deal.
My son spent three years saving for his house deposit and now finds himself caught up in this collapse. As a parent it’s heartbreaking watching him face losing his dream home while the regulator offers almost no information or reassurance to clients.
Our sale fell through but the solicitor still billed us, which I later discovered is extremely common. Most people lose thousands when a sale collapses.
They described the stress as ‘horrendous’, with constant anxiety that the vendors of their onward purchase would run out of patience and pull the plug.
The Ombudsman found that the poor communication left the client confused, out of pocket and unsure what had actually gone wrong until it was too late to rescue the sale.
An article on poor communication by a legal complaints firm advises clients to keep a log of unanswered emails and calls when their conveyancer goes quiet for weeks.
It took them 5 months after instruction to send initial enquiries.
They’d already spent on mortgage and survey and were now stuck wondering whether the seller could ever deliver vacant possession in time for completion.
Seller says their solicitor didn’t chase the buyer’s solicitor for weeks despite repeated promises to do so.
Unresponsive in replying to emails PLUS added on a new 'additional' charge virtually every day!
The engineer’s report said the retaining wall was unsafe and likely to fail; the seller thought we’d still proceed if they knocked a little off the price. We didn’t.
It confirms what many buyers and sellers feel – that the process is still too slow, opaque and stressful despite years of promised reform.
Fraudsters impersonated our solicitor and we sent thousands of pounds of deposit money to the wrong account.
A reviewer says they paid for a search thinking it was official, then realised the pricing was inflated compared with the real service.
Forum user says their conveyancing solicitors kept cashing cheques and progressing a purchase even though they knew the user’s own house hadn’t sold.
Our children have started at the new school near the house we’re buying, but we’re still sleeping at a relative’s place because our completion money is stuck with a law firm that’s shut down.
On ReviewSolicitors, a Gilson Gray client says communication was ‘appalling’, with questions ignored for months and phone calls never answered.
My house sale just fell through and I’ve discovered home seller protection insurance might have covered some of the wasted costs – nobody mentioned it at the start.
Their house was half-demolished for nearly a year and they were living in a few rooms, saying the whole ordeal with the insurer and surveyor felt worse than the original leak.
Several of my clients have seen deals collapse because surveyors knocked tens of thousands off agreed prices and sellers refused to negotiate.
They couldn't be any worse if they tried. It took them 5 months after instruction to send initial enquiries.
My solicitor told me the apartment I am buying is subject to a Section 106 and that it could cause significant future financial implications. I am now extremely worried and trying to understand the risks.
The so-called no-sale-no-fee firm still invoiced us for searches and Land Registry costs when the sale collapsed, and hounded us for payment.
The Times reported on a family who have spent roughly £43,000 on service charges and council tax while trying for years to sell their late mother’s retirement flat with no success.
Our buyers’ buyers dropped out two days before we were meant to exchange – we got the dreaded email saying the ‘bottom of the chain has collapsed’.
They add that the seller is threatening to pull out because four months without progress on a supposedly chain-free purchase feels unreasonable.
They explain they’ve been paying rent in one place and half a mortgage on another and now face even more months of double housing costs.
Our solicitor failed to chase the freeholder for basic leasehold information, even though we had paid for the management pack. Weeks passed while they blamed 'third parties' instead of acting.
Avoid like the plague if you actually ever want to buy or sell.
A newly renovated home was valued significantly under the agreed price, putting us straight into renegotiation and delay.
The purchase should have been straightforward, but delays from the buyer’s conveyancer dragged it out so long the whole thing nearly collapsed.
Relatives say they feel trapped between dumping the flat at a huge loss or continuing to bleed money on charges for an empty property.
Didn't put up a for sale sign, no proactive communication.
Ive had so many agents like to me throught this process, i am at breaking point.
We did everything promptly but their lawyer was asleep when ours was working and vice versa – by the time anyone realised how bad it was, the chain had collapsed.
The seller insisted the parking space was ‘understood locally’ but the title plan said otherwise; our solicitor advised us not to touch it.
Valerie Holmes Law has been promoted as part of the PM group, but some online reviewers mention shaky starts and communication issues before things eventually got back on track.
They also warn that vague wording about future increases can be a deal-breaker when buyers realise costs could soar after they move in.
Our sale fell through before exchange after six months; we were told we might lose our onward purchase and ‘thousands of pounds’ in the chain if we didn’t find a new buyer in two weeks.
Our conveyancer never clearly explained why we still had to pay them when the sale fell through; we only found out from an online guide that this was common.
The lawyer never explained that I’d still have to pay hundreds of pounds if the sale didn’t complete; when it fell through, I got a bill I wasn’t expecting.
Searches and mortgage offer were all done weeks ago but we still haven’t had draft contracts from the sellers’ solicitor.
I assumed the big fee was only payable on completion – turns out it was added to the loan and still due once the offer was issued.
A subsidence claims advice site lists common reasons insurers reject property damage claims, from alleged pre-existing damage to technical policy wording that ordinary homeowners struggle to understand.
They’re worried about paying so much for communal services that don’t necessarily add value when it’s time to resell.
The landlord’s buyer pulled out and they tried to raise our rent to cover a surprise extra service charge; it felt like their failed sale was being taken out on us.
Estate agent knew more about my file than my own solicitor ever told me.
The last-minute gazundering attempt left us with no sale, no new home and a big stack of invoices from surveyors and solicitors.
We’re now onto a second buyer after the first one walked away just before exchange; both times we paid for searches that effectively ended up in the bin.
We’ve cut the asking price repeatedly but it still feels basically unsellable while the annual charges look like a second rent.
We’re buying with no chain and it’s still taking forever. I’ve heard almost nothing from the solicitor in months.
LandlordZONE reports landlords stuck with ‘unsaleable’ leasehold flats as service charges climb above £2,000 a year and buyers balk at the costs.
We’re being told Land Registry is so backed up that registration might take a year. It leaves us stuck when trying to remortgage.
A Bates Solicitors client says nearly three years of dealing with them over a family estate has been ‘painful’, citing lack of communication, simple tasks delayed and errors in calculations.
They recommend running from any firm that is hard to contact at the enquiry stage, as that often foreshadows problems later in the transaction.
Our conveyancer misread the freehold title and failed to notice a third-party charge which had to be cleared before completion. The issue surfaced on the day funds were due to be sent, forcing a last-minute delay.
Santander’s delay left us paying for removals, storage and hotels while our belongings were stuck in a van.
Our survey found an issue that will cost a significant amount to fix and I want to renegotiate the price, but the estate agent refuses to discuss it and is acting like it is wrong to even ask.
They now face the prospect of covering the cost of those extras while scrambling to find a new buyer fast enough to keep their plot.
Simple sale… fell through due to the poor quality of my solicitors.
On Trustpilot, one conveyancing client says poor competence and communication from their solicitor ‘dragged out the whole process’ to the exasperation of their lender and the seller’s lawyer.
We were four weeks from completion on a house when the seller’s sale fell through further down the chain, so everything collapsed for us on the final day.
A Facebook post from an accidental landlord says their sale fell through two days before they moved abroad, so they ended up letting the house rather than selling it.
They were surprised that what felt like a one-off row could follow the property around and potentially put future buyers off.
After the first sale fell through I turned to a different law firm, and the contrast showed just how badly the first solicitor had handled things.
On Gransnet, a mum said her son had two flat sales fall through at the point of exchange, with boxes packed and everything ready to go.
Consistently sat on our case with no action being taken, lied about what work had been done
They note that buyers may just withdraw if they think they’re walking into a war zone, which is why many sales with neighbour issues crumble late on.
Buyer reports persistent delays and ignored emails/calls on a chain-free purchase that ran far beyond expected timescales.
Our buyers pulled out late when their solicitor noticed a search result showing possible contaminated land; we had never been told anything about it.
I am buying a buy-to-let in a high flood risk area with a history of flooding. The current owners use Flood Re but landlords cannot, and I am struggling to find future-proof insurance cover at a reasonable cost.
Our chain collapsed when the seller at the top was refused buildings insurance due to a history of subsidence claims on that postcode.
A purchase in Scotland was derailed by a ‘nil value’ decision that felt discriminatory versus other valuations we’d seen.
The solicitor exchanged emails at random times but never told us when the next step would happen. We were always chasing them.
They note that in badly managed blocks, owners often have to accept lower offers or sit on the market for months because buyers are wary of taking on unpredictable costs.
They felt powerless watching weeks go by with no progress, wondering if the whole thing would be lost because one lawyer wouldn’t pick up emails.
A week later the cash buyer pulled out by email... He didn't have the cash.
They said the real pain is psychological – doing the whole mortgage application process twice because somebody else changed their mind.
The conveyancer ignored repeated requests for confirmation of funds. Without that, we could not exchange and missed our original moving date entirely.
It underlines how often home movers feel left chasing updates, unclear about timescales and worried their transaction might quietly stall or collapse.
They’ve slashed the asking price by tens of thousands, but high charges and exit fees make buyers wary and the flat still hasn’t sold.
It’s now been over a year since we engaged Let Property to purchase a property - only the seller to withdraw during completion
We discovered after completion that our solicitor never checked whether building regulations approval existed for the loft conversion. The council later issued a notice.
On Property118, a leaseholder fears their aggressive freeholder is deliberately hiking service charges to make flats unsellable except to them.
We only avoided a total collapse because one mortgage offer was about to expire and everyone threw money at their solicitors to rush exchange through.
Our mortgage offer is about to expire before completion because everything has dragged on so long – if we miss the deadline we may have to start the whole mortgage process again.
One Reddit post says the sellers kept delaying completion while the buyer’s mortgage offer ticked towards expiry, potentially adding thousands in extra interest if they had to reapply.
The same article quotes a buyer who found multiple homes listed as ‘for sale’ that were already under offer – a tactic he believes was used to pull in more applicants.
The buyer calculates that if they miss the deadline, the higher-rate replacement mortgage will cost them around £5,400 more over the fixed term.
Eric Robinson Solicitors define neighbour disputes as anything that causes ongoing distress or frustration, from overgrown hedges to regular noise – and remind sellers these issues must be declared.
Seller says a chain-free sale ran for roughly six months with minimal progress until the buyer finally withdrew.
They highlight that disputes can range from trivial-sounding noise rows to serious, long-running harassment – but either way, they can kill a sale once a buyer hears the full story.
We want to buy a property that has spray foam insulation in the roof and are worried about getting a mortgage approved, even though our loan to value would be under 50 percent and we have funds to remove and replace the roof after completion.
The reviewer says emails were ignored and the online portal didn’t reflect reality, leaving them feeling the transaction was unmanaged.
Seller alleges they lost at least two sales because required pre-sales information wasn’t issued to solicitors despite repeated chases.
“It’s been with The Property Ombudsman… huge backlog.”
A leading property law firm wrote that flat owners facing excessive and rising service charges can find it very hard to sell because buyers don’t want to inherit those bills.
Zapperty warn that missing documents – things like completion certificates, warranties and building regs sign-off – can delay or even derail a sale because buyers’ solicitors won’t sign off without them.
They doubt they’ll ever sell for a fair price because any buyer will see they’re subsidising the entire development’s running costs.
This has to be the most unprofessional company ever!
Server outage at the solicitor’s office left the chain stuck for nearly a week before they resolved their IT issues.
They say they also lost their onward purchase and had to take the property off the market to fix the defect, which took 12 months.
Several guides point out that missing documents like building regulation certificates and warranties can stall a sale completely while sellers scramble to find or replace paperwork.
Seller says the managing agent repeatedly failed to reply to solicitors during a sale, delaying completion and increasing stress.
The brochure missed key leasehold info. We discovered late the term was under 80 years and had to renegotiate everything.
Another MSE thread, ‘Delay in exchange, I don’t understand why?’, shows a buyer confused about why nothing is progressing and why no one will commit to an exchange date.
On r/HousingUK, a seller says their buyer pulled out just two days before exchange, and they are ‘absolutely gutted’ after months of planning a move back home.
Our first purchase fell through when the bank rejected the property after valuation; we’d already paid the full survey and legal fees.
The estate agent assured us previous sales had only fallen through for ‘personal reasons’, but the survey revealed historic flooding they hadn’t disclosed.
When the sale fell through the estate agent held onto the buyer’s deposit instead of refunding it promptly, leaving both sides arguing over who’d lost out.
We offered on a flat that was marketed with an EPC C rating, but the official report is actually F. The agent says they took the seller's word for it.
The sale eventually collapsed because the buyer at the start of the chain was never really serious and delayed arranging their mortgage until the last possible moment.
Experts warned that high ongoing costs can stall price growth and leave flats languishing unsold while nearby houses continue to move.
Repeated late-night messages and demands from the buyer’s side turned the whole transaction into a toxic slog, and we eventually pulled out for our own sanity.
Our buyers’ solicitor at KB Property Law shut overnight. We’re being told by our estate agent that nobody can get through and the chain is stalled.
Our buyer pulled out on the eve of exchange citing ‘service charge concerns’ despite knowing about them for months; seven months of conveyancing gone overnight.
Even after large price cuts the flat still hadn’t sold, and high ongoing charges plus exit fees made it deeply unattractive to potential buyers.
When a buyer’s mortgage problems surfaced, the agent appeared unwilling to keep marketing properly, increasing the risk of the sale collapsing.
They sent one line emails with no explanation and then disappeared again.
On MoneySavingExpert, a seller says their second buyer pulled out six weeks in after getting the survey back – no negotiation, just a flat refusal to proceed.
A leaseholder on a legal forum says charges in their block became ‘untenable’ after fire-safety issues were discovered and the building failed an EWS1 assessment.
Our previous buyer’s finances fell apart right before completion, so when our solicitor mentioned agreeing a completion date this time my first thought was: what if it all falls through again?
Despite hefty price cuts, high fees and exit charges have left them effectively trapped, watching the inheritance shrink while the flat sits unsold.
By the time they resurfaced, the seller was threatening to remarket because they thought we weren’t serious.
If someone had clearly outlined the indemnity option earlier, we might have saved the sale instead of losing the buyer over a relatively minor legal defect.
I accepted an offer on my apartment in July 2025
We felt utterly drained after yet another chain collapse; I genuinely don’t think the general public realises how often this happens until it happens to them.
They say agents should properly check how secure a buyer’s position is – chains, finance and timescales – instead of just declaring ‘sale agreed’.
Willans Solicitors explain that ticking ‘no disputes’ on a TA6 when you’ve actually had rows with neighbours can be misrepresentation.
On ReviewSolicitors, a client of Kelly Groves says a supposedly simple, no-chain, no-mortgage conveyance was very slow, mainly due to their solicitor having too many cases.
In another review, someone said their sale fell through twice for different reasons, and leasehold complications made the final successful sale ‘fraught’ from start to finish.
Our earlier buyer pulled out, putting the whole chain in danger. SmoothSale stepped in, put the property back on the market and had it sold again within a week.
Vendor-side: no communication with the other side’s solicitors and long periods with no visible work on file.
We turned to a ‘we buy any home’ style company after a traditional sale fell through and we were simply too worn down to risk it happening again.
Buyer says buying was blocked because the company would not respond in a way that let conveyancing move forward.
Deal collapsed because key information wasn’t disclosed upfront.
As first-time sellers we were devastated when our only buyer pulled out after four weeks for no clear reason, just as we were about to offer on our next home.
Our chain finally collapsed when the buyer at the top decided they were no longer comfortable borrowing so much with interest rates rising.
We put our house on the market, found buyers and had an offer accepted on the place we wanted, only for everything to fall apart weeks later.
Banks report a rise in conveyancing fraud, with buyers losing their entire deposit before completion.
Claims the site impersonates Land Registry and targets bereaved people searching for deeds.
A ReviewSolicitors complaint about Fishers Solicitors says communication was poor and mistakes were made, leaving the client very dissatisfied with how the conveyancing was handled.
We’d been on the market for ages and when we finally accepted an offer, the buyer pulled out because they suddenly realised there was no driveway.
We submitted an offer but the agent insists on checking finances before passing it to the seller. We have had no confirmation that the offer was even communicated despite the agent telling us our figure was reasonable.
We had to complete and put our belongings into storage because the purchase side couldn’t keep pace, which added even more cost and stress.
Don't go by the cheaper price! I can not express the delays in a three person chain that this firm caused.
“They strong-armed me… to taking a review down… won’t give the other.”
A Facebook leaseholder group is full of people saying they’re struggling to sell because high service charges and cladding issues scare off buyers and lenders.
The council lost the first search request and mis-processed the second; after three months of chasing we decided the universe was telling us to walk away.
A Mumsnet user said their sale fell through about six weeks in, just after survey, and the buyers wouldn’t even say why – they simply disappeared via their solicitor.
Fresh Legal Ombudsman data for 2025/26 shows almost half of accepted complaints are about poor communication or delay, and a third concern residential conveyancing.
The same FT piece notes that failed purchases cost movers an estimated £560m a year in wasted surveys, valuations, legal fees and other costs.
Felt pushed between staff with delays and no urgency; lender and seller’s solicitor reportedly frustrated.
They felt the landlord had ignored multiple queries and left their service-charge account in limbo for months.
A reviewer says their chain-free transaction still dragged on for months and took far longer than expected.
We were given a 5-day deadline to complete after the lender took 7 weeks to issue the offer. Almost lost the whole chain.
They see buyers who only discover old complaint letters and council reports after moving in, then wonder if they can undo the deal.
A r/HousingUK user says their conveyancing solicitor ignores emails from both them and the seller’s side, and the seller is threatening to pull out because nothing seems to be moving.
The buyers said they only just noticed obvious defects like old carpets and a dated kitchen, even though the price reflected that; they walked and we were back to square one.
We have just moved into our house and builders at the property behind are using our boundary wall as storage. Our deeds say we are responsible for the wall and our survey already flagged it as needing attention, so I am worried their work will make it worse but I do not want to cause a big neighbour dispute.
One buyer says they only realised how harsh their lease terms were after joining online forums and reading other leasehold horror stories.
We timed our move so the kids could start at their new school right after half-term. Our PM Law firm shut the week we were due to complete and we’ve ended up living out of suitcases at my parents’ house with everything in storage.
My solicitor changed handlers three times and each time I got the same story: ‘we’ll update you soon’. Weeks passed.
Fraudulent Business Practices & Scam Warning If you are considering doing business with Let Property, READ THIS FIRST before handing over your money
They worry the high charges and lack of maintenance are systematically undermining the property’s value.
They’ve seen cases where charges started at a few hundred a year but climbed close to a thousand a month, making the flat virtually unsellable without huge discounts.
Our solicitor misinterpreted the lease clause about ground rent escalations. The error only came to light when our lender rejected the property, collapsing the chain.
A PM Property Lawyers review warns to ‘avoid like the plague’, complaining of very poor competence and communication that dragged out the whole conveyancing process.
Our first house fell through the same week we got our mortgage offer, but our broker managed to transfer it to a new property a month later.
Once you’ve had one sale collapse, every delay – a missing search, a slow response – feels like the moment the whole thing might unravel again.
Mortgage adviser pushed us into a product that wasn’t even available. When the lender refused it, they blamed us for ‘choosing too slowly’.
Mid-transaction: long delays, inconsistent updates, and being asked to review documents that hadn’t been sent.
CDPLL do nothing, you have to chase them by phone because they do not answer emails.
They are painfully slow to respond, regularly ignored my emails, and never pushed the buyers for updates.
Broker was biased and unhelpful, and we felt judged rather than advised. We switched brokers and passed checks elsewhere.
MoneyHelper points out that mortgage offers can and do expire thanks to conveyancing delays, changes in credit status or issues with the property itself.
A Times summary of the same Santander report says roughly one in three transactions still fail after an offer is accepted, largely due to delays and issues uncovered late in the process.
Our first-time buyers backed out once their parents saw the fixtures and fittings list and accused us of nickel-and-diming over curtains and light fittings.
Our buyer pulled out for the second time in a year, saying the survey showed ‘too much damp’; it felt like a convenient excuse to back away.
The buyer’s solicitor asked for documents that had already been supplied twice. Each time they ‘couldn’t locate the file’, and the buyer nearly withdrew in frustration.
We feel trapped by a lease where rising service charges make the flat unaffordable to keep and virtually impossible to sell on.
Appalling communication and customer service. Our buyers have used this solicitor and we're currently a month delayed.
The conveyancer's emails were so vague that we never knew what stage we were at. When we finally obtained the file from them, key letters from the other side had never been answered at all.
We pulled out of a house because of subsidence, but later found the estate agent telling another buyer that the sale had fallen through for completely different reasons.
We had to pull out of a purchase because of a massive unforeseen issue affecting the whole area around the house. We lost our sale as a result and now the vendor is asking for our level 3 survey to help them re-list. We are unsure whether to sell it to them and what downsides there might be.
Our chain collapsed after five months when the top property fell through; nobody seemed to have a backup plan and we had to start completely from scratch.
“The amount of delays, no communication and me chasing them is unacceptable.”
My mortgage offer was approved, but I still feel sick every time there’s a delay; our last purchase fell through right at completion stage.
We were eight weeks into selling and buying when our buyer’s ‘personal issue’ killed the deal – the agents for the house we wanted gave us two weeks to find someone new.
When our first sale collapsed, Jennifer at Avenue Road stayed calm, put the house straight back on the market and quickly found us another buyer.
Our previous sale fell through but the mortgage broker stepped in again and sorted a fresh deal without fuss when we found another property.
We felt pushed towards a fire-sale rather than being given sensible advice about how to actually get sold without throwing away tens of thousands.
By the time the third buyer completed, the family had lost all faith in the process and were just relieved to be out.
Citizens Advice couldn’t tell us who was really at fault; our buyer blamed the solicitor, the solicitor blamed the lender, and we were left with a collapsed sale.
Our sale collapsed when the buyer’s mortgage broker suddenly realised the flat was above a takeaway and their chosen lender refused to touch it.
They recommend doing the legwork on insurers in advance, otherwise you risk a sale falling through just because buyers panic when comparison sites decline to quote.
I am selling my leasehold flat and the estate agent is unhelpful, avoids phone calls, and gives no guidance on the selling process. It is my first time selling and I feel completely unsupported.
We were given one price by the agent, then they quietly changed the terms and tried to blame the landlord.
They only replied after I threatened to complain formally about the lack of communication.
By the time the sale fell through I was dreading every call from the agent or solicitor, convinced it would be another demand or ultimatum.
When the first buyer dropped out they just shrugged and said ‘these things happen’ instead of fighting to keep the deal alive.
Mortgage offer took so long the seller lost patience. We lost the house after chasing constantly with no clear answers.
It warns that these rising charges can slow or even reverse price growth, leaving flats stagnating while houses in the same area continue to sell.
We only found out about historic boundary disputes with the neighbour after our buyer’s solicitor raised it; they walked away immediately.
Customer warned others their home was undervalued by tens of thousands, and only a second valuation fixed it. Felt like cowboy practice.
A mortgage guide warns that once an offer expires, the lender is no longer obliged to lend – buyers may have to start again, often on worse terms than before.
The new firm stepped in after that collapse, found another buyer and actually kept the seller updated throughout negotiations.
Years of poor maintenance effectively blocked us from becoming owners because no lender would accept the condition of the property.
Search providers and local authorities have such a backlog that people are literally losing houses because the paperwork can’t be done before mortgage offers expire.
Slow slow and slow. Searches done after two months and waiting on them
The seller refused to drop their price, so we had no choice but to walk away and swallow the costs we’d already racked up.
“Our buyers are using this shambolic firm… month 6… no chain… at a complete loss.”
They allegedly open with misleading claims to bait you into giving personal details about insurance and finances.
Days passed between replies; I felt like my case was always at the bottom of the pile.
We were trying to sell a retirement flat and paid tens of thousands in service charges and council tax while it sat unsold for years.
The client notes that clear communication during negotiations made a big difference compared with their earlier failed attempt to sell.
A ReviewSolicitors page for one firm includes multiple complaints about poor communication, with clients saying they constantly had to chase for basic updates.
Communication was awful; we were constantly chasing and still got incorrect information.
Our buyer’s solicitor is one of the PM Law brands. They moved out with their children ready for completion, but with the firm shut the agent says they’re effectively homeless while everyone waits to see what happens with the funds.
The Law Society explains that the Legal Ombudsman mainly handles complaints about poor service – things like delayed or unclear communication and billing problems.
As sellers, we’d already moved out when Proddow Mackay’s office closed. All our documents and the purchase file are locked in a building we can’t access.
We received a large inheritance specifically to buy a home, but the house purchase fell through and the money ended up sitting in savings instead of getting us moved.
Our home in Kent has been on the market since September at what the agent says is the right price. We are chain free and motivated to sell but still have not sold and I am getting really anxious.
terrible comms from day 1; no replies to requests to amend my ad.
Refund disputes after cancellation: seller says nothing was done but still had to chase for money back.
Our neighbour’s buyer walked away when they saw how the ground rent doubled; it spooked us about our own chances of ever selling.
We’ve spent over £43,000 on charges and council tax trying to sell Mum’s retirement flat for years, and it’s still on the market for far less than we first listed it.
The buyer couldn’t understand how three estate agents thought the price was reasonable while the surveyor saw it as significantly over-valued.
Our mortgage offer expired because the legal work dragged on for months; by the time we got to exchange the new rate was hundreds more a month.
They are told repeatedly that the other side’s solicitor is ‘waiting on something’, but nobody can clearly explain what or how long it will take.
They’ve reduced the asking price again and again, but every buyer’s solicitor flags the charges and the deals keep collapsing.
The buyer pulled out the day before exchange claiming they had found another property; we were packed and ready to go and suddenly everything collapsed.
Valuer reassured us during the visit, then submitted a lower figure afterward which derailed our remortgage expectations.
I am honestly terrified the house will collapse. There are cracks everywhere and we’ve had insurance issues because of suspected subsidence, but nothing has been properly fixed.
They say they only found out the truth via solicitor correspondence late in the process, and felt the agent’s updates had been misleading.
We are mid property transaction and the service is worse than useless.
The owner said if they’d known charges would explode like that, they’d never have bought in the first place.
I have zero idea of a timescale
We asked the completion date three times. No answer, then a last-minute demand for extra funds. No prior warning.
We’re stuck in a flat with service charges that keep climbing and every buyer backs out once they see the annual bill.
The seller says they can’t even discuss completion dates until the lender’s solicitor is satisfied, leaving the whole chain stuck in limbo.
After terrible experiences with a previous solicitor and the housing association, having someone actually return calls and push the transaction forward was a relief.
The solicitor forgot to send the TA10 form to the buyer’s side. Without it, exchange could not happen and the buyer almost walked away from the chain.
The amount of delays, no communication and me chasing them is utterly unacceptable!
I ended up selling my home at a loss because the agent allowed awful tenants and ignored my concerns.
In two years we’ve had three purchases collapse after mortgage or valuation problems, losing hundreds of pounds each time on searches and surveys.
After the buyer backed out just before exchange we were left with thousands spent on solicitors and searches and no compensation at all.
We’re buying a house where the last sale fell through because of damp. The seller already has a £10k quote for works and everyone is nervous the whole thing will collapse again.
Leaseholder says they still couldn’t get an online account set up after years, despite emails and calls.
On r/HousingUK, a flat owner said their annual service charges had risen so much that buyers now walk away as soon as they see the numbers, making the place ‘impossible to sell’.
Six weeks into the process our second buyer pulled out after their survey, but nobody would share details so we had no idea what scared them off.
Every time a sale falls through, you’re just throwing survey and legal money down the drain; after our second collapse we started to question the whole system.
Agent pushed hard to list, then failed to tell the seller the buyer chain collapsed; onward purchase lost.
Our chain broke because the buyers at the bottom decided not to complete before the SDLT deadline – everyone else in the chain is now facing thousands more in tax and interest.
Some shared-ownership leaseholders face five-figure service charges making their homes unsellable.
I’ve boxed everything up and arranged childcare around our completion date. Then I found out on social media that my Butterworths/PM Law solicitor had effectively disappeared. I’m trying not to think about the fact I may soon have nowhere to live.
Leaseholder alleges the company gave incorrect info during a payment call and then refused to correct/refund the mistake.
Buyer says their solicitor failed to notice incorrect boundary lines on the title plan, now causing a dispute with neighbours.
Some solicitors will waive fees if a deal collapses and you stick with them, but others bill you for every failed attempt on top of the stress.
Our house sale fell through the day after the stamp duty holiday ended because our buyer’s buyer dropped out. Nobody would give us a proper reason, just a brief ‘sorry’ from their solicitor.
Buyer says their solicitor brushed off concerns about a shared septic tank and only after exchange did they learn it failed current rules and would need an expensive new treatment plant.
They also say their solicitor won’t really ‘advise’ when they question the risks, leaving them feeling exposed at the point everything matters most.
Our buyers are using this shambolic firm… month 6… no chain.
The post sales adviser never once called me back despite being my named contact.
We carefully lined up sale and purchase for the same day so our two young children wouldn’t have to move twice. Our PM Property Lawyers branch closed without warning and we ended up in an Airbnb with no idea when we’d actually get the keys.
Santander research reported in The Times describes the home-buying process as ‘antiquated’, saying more than 500,000 transactions collapse each year and buyers collectively lose hundreds of millions in sunk costs.
Our first buyers pulled out months into the process; the agent had to run an open day to find a new buyer so we didn’t lose our onward purchase.
One poster said they’d had multiple failed buyers on the same property, each collapse triggered by a different problem: survey, mortgage, then a change of heart.
We listed our house, got an offer and then watched the sale crumble. We were back on the market ranting about the whole thing just weeks later.
We were only told after offer that this property was non-standard construction. That should have been in the listing but wasn’t.
Emails bounced between teams and nobody actually answered my questions.
“My conveyancer advised the property was not registered in my name.”
I inherited my aunt's house which has been rented out for years, but it turns out the garage encroaches onto council land. I can prove the garage has been there since 1964 but as I have not owned it for 12 years, I do not know if I can apply for adverse possession.
Our solicitor didn’t warn us about the ground rent clause at all – we only saw the details after completion when the demand arrived.
Our buyers pulled out when they realised the house had historic subsidence; the insurer wouldn’t give them cover on normal terms and their lender refused to proceed.
The Leasehold Advisory Service warns that if the freehold company gets struck off, the building effectively has no manager and it can be very hard to sell any flat there.
Our estate agent never properly explained why the previous sale had collapsed, which made us suspicious there was more wrong with the place than they were letting on.
Our conveyancer is impossible to get on the phone and rarely answers emails. We wanted to exchange next week but can’t even get an update.
A conveyancing firm warns that if your mortgage offer expires before completion, reapplying usually means more paperwork, extra fees and potential delays to your move.
My offer on a tenanted flat was accepted at the end of July but we still have not completed because the tenants are still in place. I want to know how long other buyers in the same situation have had to wait for completion with sitting tenants.
BetterMove’s blog explains that high service charges can put buyers off straight away and reduce the pool of people who can afford to run a flat, not just buy it.
I’d paid upfront for a full building survey and then spent a month chasing the surveyor for a firm date, worrying the seller or lender would lose patience again.
Our buyers backed out when they learned about historic arguments with the freeholder; their solicitor said taking on an active dispute was too risky.
Average service charges on flats jumped by around 11% in a year to over £2,000, putting extra strain on budgets and widening the gap with freehold houses.
We feel like prisoners in our own home – constantly tidying for viewings and checking our emails, yet nothing ever seems to actually move forward.
Service charges ‘expected’ then surprise demands later — stressful, unclear, and impossible to get answers.
Quick Move Now say you can sell with an ongoing neighbour dispute, but only if you declare it – otherwise you risk misrepresentation claims.
Clients with Butterworths in Cumbria say they only discovered the closure when they went to sign documents and saw a printed note on the door, despite being days from exchange.
They say some sellers only realise at the eleventh hour that they’ve lost key paperwork, then spend weeks chasing councils and builders while buyers lose patience.
Spent nearly an hour stuck in a queue trying to reach the mortgage team. No urgency, no support — just wasted time when deadlines matter.
Urban Jungle’s guide bluntly says lenders can withdraw an offer right up until completion, leaving you without finance even after you’ve spent money on surveys and legals.
The Law Gazette reports that nearly half of complaints to the Legal Ombudsman involve poor communication and delay, with conveyancing a repeat offender.
We lost our buyer when their lender declined the application; the agent immediately went back to previous underbidders, which shows how fragile every sale is.
In Parliament, one MP told of two sisters trying to sell their late father’s flat – bought for £150,000 but now worth so little that auction bids dipped below £20,000.
They concluded that even when third parties are slow, clients deserve proactive chasing and clear communication instead of being left in the dark.
It really opened our eyes to how high ongoing fees can scare off future buyers, even if the flat itself looks like good value.
They felt the agent wasn’t big or proactive enough to rescue the chain in time, and were weighing up the risk of dual fees against the risk of losing their onward purchase.
Communication was terrible; I constantly had to chase for any kind of update.
First-time buyer complains about their estate agent’s poor communication after exchange, questioning what value the agent added.
it was the buyers solicitor who has pointed this out.
One Reddit user asked how to stop their sale falling through for a third time, after two buyers had already pulled out and they were emotionally shattered.
They say that if they’d known charges could get this high, they would never have bought the property in the first place.
A guide on why flats aren’t selling in 2025 points to cladding, short leases, high service charges and poor management as recurring reasons buyers walk away.
Our house sale collapsed purely because the management company took six weeks to answer a straightforward solicitor enquiry that was needed for the transaction to proceed.
Estate agent promised fast sale; repeated confidence claims, but vendor complains of poor follow-through.
Conveyancer delays are costing us thousands in rent and storage while we wait to complete.
Hearing that a property has already been under offer and fallen through makes you wonder what the survey or searches turned up that you’re not being told.
They stress that buyers should check the TA6 carefully, as it’s the main place where sellers must spell out any history of rows with neighbours.
My solicitor refuses to send me copies of communications with the buyer’s side. I feel I have no control or visibility.
Several of us in the Facebook group are at different stages of selling or buying – some have exchanged, some are pre-exchange – but all of us have the same problem: our PM Law firm shut and nobody is telling us how or when our home moves can be rescued.
Our sale fell through maybe six weeks in, just after survey, and the buyers refused to give any reason at all; we think they simply got cold feet about how much they’d offered.
When our first sale fell through, the solicitor didn’t reduce their fees at all, even though half the work had to be repeated from scratch.
The estate agent kept the auction deposit when the sale fell through. We still lost money overall.
A Trustpilot review for a national conveyancing firm praises them for being proactive and communicative, while noting that the biggest complaint people usually have about conveyancers is lack of updates.
Even after dropping the price further by tens of thousands, the property still didn’t sell, leaving the owner feeling cornered and undervalued.
Some owners were never warned they might face six-figure bills when their lease approaches expiry.
Whitegates explain that when a surveyor values a property below the agreed price, the buyer may have to find a bigger deposit or the deal can fall apart.
They stress that what’s written on the TA6 becomes part of the contract, so glossing over serious neighbour issues can come back to bite sellers badly.
A reviewer alleges serious compliance failures and says the situation created chaos for residents and contractors.
Our house sale is in danger of falling through because both firms of solicitors are so slow and unresponsive.
Very, very pushy - and a liar. … supposed to meet me… I waited for 20 minutes…
Complainant says their case sat for months with little communication, adding to the frustration after losing money in a failed purchase.
Our buyer’s solicitor is part of the PM Law group. They’ve already moved out of their place based on the agreed completion date and are now stuck staying with relatives because nothing can progress.
A recent article notes a ‘significant rise’ in people seeking help from the Ombudsman, with conveyancing complaints heavily focused on missed purchase deadlines.
We walked away from a purchase after discovering long-running arguments with neighbours over fences and access that nobody had mentioned upfront.
One seller said their chain collapsed three times over 19 months; only their final agent really pushed things along and got them over the line.
Shared-ownership residents in one Guardian piece were paying up to £8,000 a year in charges and said buyers simply wouldn’t touch their ‘affordable’ homes.
I am worried they may withdraw from the purchase
Our sale fell through eight weeks into selling and buying because the buyers had a personal issue, and we were given two weeks to find a replacement or lose the house we wanted.
It summed up the whole experience as ‘stress, delays and financial uncertainty’ – exactly how most people describe a chain once it starts wobbling.
“Been trying to get through to this outfit for ten days with zero response.”
Selling leasehold: huge fee demanded just to answer standard enquiries by email.
We viewed a probate property twice, told the agent we really liked it, then saw on Rightmove it had been taken off the market without anyone telling us. We were never even given a courtesy call.
Sold.co’s own guidance on neighbour disputes says properties with an ongoing row next door are simply ‘less valuable’ because buyers have to take on the hassle.
after we pulled out of a sale due to unforeseen circumstances, totally unreasonable.
They describe trying again with a new buyer and still being stuck in stalemate because lenders keep insisting on documentation the freeholder won’t provide.
Some buyers say the jump in charges has wiped out any sense of affordability and made their homes unattractive to future purchasers.
Another Times piece notes that conveyancing costs have climbed to over £2,400 on average, even as the service gets slower and more stressful for consumers.
It feels surreal that a decision completely outside my control could cost me my mortgage deal and months of extra waiting.
They realised only afterwards how little the first agent had done beyond sticking a board up and listing the property online.
The buyer demanded thousands off the sale price for every minor issue on the survey and sent daily threatening emails; eventually we cancelled the sale for our own sanity.
Buyer describes an estate agent failing to coordinate viewings and not explaining that sellers could only do limited times.
Soaring service charges mean our ‘affordable’ shared-ownership home is now almost impossible to sell, with would-be buyers put off as soon as they see the annual costs.
Ten days of trying: no calls answered, no emails replied to, and chats ignored.
The couple loved the house but panicked when they saw a separate garage title on the deeds; instead of asking questions, they simply withdrew their offer.
We were told to avoid certain conveyancers because they ignored clients completely.
They point out that if rates or lending criteria change while you’re stuck in delays, the same buyers can suddenly no longer afford the property they were approved for.
We’ve lost our dream home because our buyers walked away and our sellers wouldn’t wait. We’re back to square one and hundreds of pounds lighter for surveys and legal fees.
They contrasted the previous ‘list it and hope’ approach with proactive chasing of solicitors and buyers, which shows how much difference the right agent can make after a fall-through.
Our first sale collapsed at the last minute. We’d already done all the legal work and then had to start again from scratch with new buyers.
We had to pay two sets of mortgage product fees because the first house fell through, which wiped out a big chunk of our savings.
By the time our second purchase fell through we’d already paid a mortgage broker fee, survey and solicitors twice, with nothing to show for it.
A buyer alleges an estate agent failed to disclose a severe flood risk until their solicitors raised it close to completion, after they’d already spent thousands and given notice to their landlord.
A trustpilot reviewer says their chain-free home sale took over 180 days with almost no progress, and the buyer finally pulled out because conveyancing was so slow.
She blamed slow, uncooperative solicitors on both sides for letting the chain drift until buyers lost patience and dropped out.
We had to ditch the cheap panel conveyancer because they were impossible to contact, and by then the chain had already fallen apart.
Portal/communications blamed: buyers and sellers left chasing basic updates to keep the chain alive.
A Legal Ombudsman case study described a conveyancing firm that repeatedly failed to update a client about a buyer’s intentions; by the time they realised the sale was in trouble, it had already fallen through.
Claims emails went unanswered and the portal wasn’t updated, forcing constant phone chasing.
They’re stuck between selling at a painful loss or holding onto a property they no longer want and can barely afford.
They note that long chains are particularly vulnerable when one down valuation knocks out a buyer’s finance and the shock travels upwards.
The condition rating didn’t match reality after major refurbishment, and it undermined confidence in the mortgage process.
They feel trapped because it wasn’t a voluntary change of heart — they just couldn’t progress — yet the fee still wouldn’t come back.
We were told the solicitor had ordered searches, but when we checked with the authority the request had never been submitted. Our mortgage offer nearly expired waiting for them.
The buildings insurance quote nearly doubled after we declared past movement; our broker said some lenders would flat-out refuse, so we withdrew before it got that far.
The conveyancer missed a clear warning in the searches about a proposed major road scheme behind the property. We only discovered the plan after completion when public notices went up on our street.
Abysmal and shocking service: if they treated buyers properly they might finally get some genuine positive reviews.
Poor communication and delay are again flagged as the most common issues for home movers frustrated by how long a ‘simple’ sale can take.
Seller says the agent mishandled their sale over many months and the buyer walked away the day before completion.
By the time we finally moved, we’d lost all faith in the system and were just relieved not to be starting from scratch again.
Claims of organised scammers and review suppression; alleges genuine reviews flagged and removed.
Felt like they charged heavily for routine paperwork while providing slow responses, risking the sale and increasing stress for everyone.
A reviewer says they requested a refund after a failed search result and were met with silence.
Terrible comms from day 1… 2 weeks after my sale fell through.
An e-surv article says nearly 29% of property sales fell through in 2024, with the single biggest trigger being buyers withdrawing or cutting their offer after seeing the survey.
A Trustpilot review for Conveyancing Expert complains that communication was poor, updates were hard to get and speaking to a conveyancer felt like an uphill struggle.
The estate agent repeatedly reassured us the chain was solid when in reality they hadn’t spoken to anyone above our buyers for weeks.
Our flat sale fell through just before exchange when we discovered the managing agent had invalidated all the EWS1 forms; suddenly nobody’s lender would touch the block.
We’ve completed on the sale of our old house but can’t complete on the purchase because our PM Law firm shut. For now we’re living in an Airbnb, paying far more than our old mortgage.
Seller dealing with probate says they’d already paid for searches, struggled to get written updates, and felt left in the dark for weeks.
I have lost the house I was buying
We are mid property transaction and the service is worse than useless. Endless delays, lies and inefficiencies.
A mortgage valuation by Countrywide undervalued my property by £50k.
The agent’s marketing was basically just listing it online; when things got difficult, there was no real strategy to rescue the sale or find better buyers.
A seller on GetAgent said their sale unfortunately fell through near completion, but their new agent quickly found another buyer and kept them better informed throughout.
Even when I phoned the firm they could not tell me who was handling my file. That lack of clarity is infuriating.
After our house sale fell through just before exchange, Spring stepped in with a guaranteed purchase so we could still move and not lose our new home.
Leaseholder says they had to phone daily for a basic update about building works, with poor follow-up.
The Law Society says residential conveyancing makes up about a quarter of the Legal Ombudsman’s caseload, with delay, failure to progress and poor communication top of the list.
They claim the conveyancer did very little unless chased, didn’t respond to emails, and the online portal either didn’t work or never reflected the real status.
After our original sale collapsed, our previous agent’s only idea was to shove us into a low-reserve auction, then asked for another huge price cut when that didn’t work either.
Source-of-funds/source-of-wealth checks took longer than expected and delayed answers.
He said buyers wouldn’t touch the flat because of the service-charge liability and management issues attached to it.
After selling, says they dragged their feet closing the account and removing name from liability.
Our lender’s valuation came back £45,000 under the agreed price; the seller refused to budge and the purchase collapsed.
A Trustpilot reviewer for SAM Conveyancing explained that their first sale fell through at the last minute and the second buyers were awkward and slow because they were buying via a pension.
They highlight that most of that loss is on surveys, searches and legal work that must be repeated from scratch if you try again with a new buyer or new property.
It still meant another valuation, more paperwork and weeks of delay, all because somebody else’s side of the deal collapsed.
“Outstanding support… during two disastrous house selling experiences… one buyer pulled out.”
The SRA reminds consumers they can report solicitors for serious breaches of conduct, but that most day-to-day service issues like delay go to the Legal Ombudsman.
When our sale fell through, Parkers had more potential buyers lined up and got fresh viewings booked quickly rather than letting the property sit and go stale.
Buyer discovered their solicitor never ordered searches even though they were paid for six weeks earlier.
Hosted viewings unavailable for 24 days; complaint ended in a token refund offer.
Paid a large fee expecting a smooth mortgage and insurance setup, but advisers kept changing without handover, the lender wasn’t responded to, and insurance arrangements were wrong or not put in place.
A MoneySavingExpert seller says their cash buyers pulled out after the survey with no attempt to renegotiate, even though they were willing to discuss a reduction.
Waterstone Legal says slow conveyancing is often down to lack of communication between parties and not having finances fully in place before starting the process.
In another case, neighbours spent more than £200,000 fighting over a 16-inch strip of land – money that could easily have been the difference between moving and being stuck.
Campaigners say buyers were lured in by low initial estimates and only discovered the true costs later, when charges had already soared.
The SRA’s thematic review of residential conveyancing found firms providing ‘slow and inefficient’ services with poor communication and inadequate updates for clients.
Our seller’s identity checks dragged on for weeks. We’re now dangerously close to our mortgage offer expiring because of the delay.
Our buyer vanished after their mortgage valuation came back with ‘too many issues’ – nobody would tell us exactly what, just that the lender was no longer happy.
Leaseholder says getting routine pre-sales information from the agent was a 'nightmare' with emails and calls ignored.
A Times feature described leaseholders effectively trapped in retirement schemes where high service charges and exit fees make resales painfully slow and very expensive.
We lost money on a failed sale after the estate agent held onto the buyer’s deposit longer than they should and both sides argued about who’d lost out.
They said their solicitor remained calm and supportive despite the chain changing repeatedly and the lease throwing up problem after problem.
The same article notes that chains are fragile at the best of times – one nervous buyer or slow solicitor and the whole thing can unravel.
A Mumsnet thread listed all the usual reasons sales collapse – survey results, scary searches, down-valuations, buyers losing their mortgage or just changing their mind after months of waiting.
The agent was fine at sticking us on Rightmove but not proactive enough to generate the viewings we needed to rescue the chain in time.
On Trustpilot, a Springmove reviewer says their house sale collapsed just before exchange and they were exhausted from a year-long selling process before being referred to a quick-sale firm.
We lost our dream home because our buyer’s mortgage offer expired after months of chain problems; the lender wouldn’t redo the application on the same terms.
We ended up lowering the price by thousands just to get out, because after the failed sale and delay we couldn’t face months of marketing again.
People keep saying ‘don’t buy a leasehold’ because of hidden management charges and ground rents that buyers only appreciate after moving in.
The solicitor charged us for searches twice after misplacing the originals. They insisted it was unavoidable even though the delay was their own fault.
The buyers conveyancers, a 'tick box' firm said nothing and the deal progressed
We had to renegotiate our sale price when the survey valued the place £25,000 lower than agreed because of roof issues.
An article on inefficient conveyancers lists tell-tale signs: slow responses, poor communication and little use of technology – all of which can stall a transaction.
Our neighbour started parking across our drive once the For Sale sign went up and shouting at viewers about noise and bins.
“No one can provide any form of timescales for a resolution.”
Months of poor service from the first agent left our sale in limbo until a different firm took over.
The lender’s surveyor misidentified a hairline crack as structural movement; our buyers pulled out and refused to share the report so we could challenge it.
People keep telling us that high service charges put buyers off SO flats, so even if we find a buyer they’ll probably chip us down on price.
They felt the agent’s poor communication and attempts to spark a bidding war actually cost them the house they wanted.
Our buyer’s mortgage offer ran out because of endless delays and awkward responses from the seller’s side; the bank refused an extension and the chain collapsed.
By the time they’d argued over indemnity insurance and who should pay, the buyers had lost patience and pulled out.
The Sun highlights a couple whose service charges jumped from £2,800 to £7,500 a year, leaving them unable to sell and delaying plans to grow their family.
The conveyancer waited until the last moment to tell us they had not received the signed transfer deed. It had been sitting in their post room for a week, unopened, while everyone in the chain assumed we were ready.
We were relying on our sale proceeds held by a PM Law brand to redeem our existing mortgage and complete a new purchase the same day. After the shutdown, we’re now stuck between houses with no clear timetable for resolution.
Our buyers chose PM Property Lawyers via an online introducer and now we’re six months into what should have been a straightforward no-chain sale. Our own solicitor and agent don’t know how to get the deal through.
We lost the house and a non-refundable booking fee because the application was never realistic in the first place.
Management company is claiming I owe for the rest of the year... can't add the new leaseholder until I've paid.
They also warn that repeated fall-throughs can make a property harder to sell because future buyers worry something is wrong with it.
Estate Agent Today reported that nearly one in five sellers admit they haven’t disclosed neighbour disputes to buyers, even though doing so risks the sale collapsing later.
They said they felt misled about the true level of charges and worried they’d be trapped in a flat that future buyers would avoid.
Once we saw the schedule of works, it was obvious why the current owner was so desperate to sell.
Our flat has been on the market for months with hardly any interest. Shared ownership places like ours seem especially hard to sell right now.
The solicitor acting for our buyer refused to answer simple pre-contract queries for 19 days. The estate agent confirmed they weren't even reading their emails.
They feel completely trapped – not just by the size of the bills, but by the stigma those charges create when the flat is marketed.
A previous buyer pulled out after paying for searches, and now we’re trying to buy the same property. Our solicitor is talking about ‘buying’ their searches, which feels like a minefield.
A Guardian investigation into ‘affordable’ homes says some shared-ownership residents have seen service charges increase by up to 400%, leaving them effectively trapped.
Sale needed a management pack; two months of chasing with no meaningful response.
Our lender has warned that if we miss the completion window because of the PM Law collapse, they may withdraw the offer altogether. Months of stress and surveys could be written off overnight.
Their guide shows how slow updates and surprise bills can leave buyers and sellers feeling let down even if the sale eventually completes.
We asked directly whether there had been any neighbour disputes and were reassured there hadn’t – only after moving in did we learn about years of complaints to the council.
Then the mortgage lender to him and his brother refused to release him, killing the entire transaction!
A Facebook first-time buyer posted that their mortgage offer was due to expire the following month and the seller still hadn’t even filled out the property information forms.
A specialist buyer said they focus on ‘hard to sell’ flats with cladding issues, high service charges or niche financing problems that normal buyers can’t get mortgages on.
Another solicitor warns that once a mortgage offer expires before completion, there’s no guarantee your lender will issue the same terms again – or offer at all.
Ground rent rules are unfair — lenders got nervous when they saw doubling clauses that weren’t clear in the purchase packs.
Some firms never returned my calls or emails when I tried to instruct them.
“The chaos they caused was the reason our property sale fell through.”
SearchFlow point out that property searches can take anywhere from a couple of days to six months depending on the council, putting huge pressure on chains and tempting buyers to drop out.
They described months of chasing for updates and a final bill that didn’t reflect the lack of progress or explanation before everything fell apart.
They say the buyer’s own lawyer couldn’t even get hold of their client, leaving the property technically ‘sold’ but with no progress and no explanation.
A landlord alleges a lack of transparency by their letting agent after discovering the tenant was paying a higher amount via a third party, while the agent only disclosed the lower figure used for their commission calculation.
They only realised how poor the previous service was once they saw what active sales chasing and communication looked like.
By the time we completed, we’d lived through two collapsed sales and a third stressful one; the only positive was having a solicitor who actually kept us in the loop.
An equity release referral left us warning others—felt like a bad outcome and poor handling of a sensitive finance product.
Our buyer pulled out after survey but refused to share the report. We know something spooked them, yet we’re going back to market blind about what future buyers might also pick up.
Another buyer only discovered they were scammed when the real solicitor chased for payment.
The Guardian reports brokers seeing surveyors shaving 10% or more off agreed prices in some areas, with entire deals collapsing as a result.
“Work did not begin on my case for a month.”
The more I look into it, the more I realise how little protection there is if a survey is inaccurate but still ends up sinking your sale and devaluing your property.
Nobody would give us a straight answer for hours; we eventually found out our buyer’s side simply hadn’t got the money together.
A Webuyanyhome guide says nuisance neighbours can sabotage a sale by putting washing out during viewings, making noise or even warning buyers not to move in.
A reviewer complains that slow replies meant properties were effectively gone by the time anyone responded.
We’d spent thousands on legals and surveys only to be told that, without valid cladding paperwork, our only realistic option was to find a cash buyer at a big discount.
Two interested buyers said they loved the house but wouldn’t live next to that level of hostility.
Our cash buyer walked away after weeks of silence from the seller’s solicitor, who wouldn’t answer basic questions or return calls.
It shocked them that something they saw as a one-off row could end up following the property around and scaring off future buyers.
In the PM Property Lawyers support group, hundreds of buyers and sellers say they were days from completion when the shutdown hit, leaving them stuck with packed boxes and nowhere to go.
Because of cladding paperwork problems we’ve had one sale fall through and another buyer walk away, leaving us stuck paying a mortgage on a flat nobody wants.
Management pack chased for 2 months; hung up on repeatedly when trying to get the sale moving.
Our first-time buyer mortgage offer has an expiry date and most of the time has already been eaten up by delays. Now our PM Property Lawyers firm has shut, we’re terrified the offer will lapse before a new solicitor even gets the file.
Our house sale fell through right near exchange and I felt physically sick; we’d mentally moved out and suddenly had to go back to endless viewings.
Charged me for sales packs… they never even requested.
User complains about repeated nuisance calls asking about a sale even after being told it had completed.
“My file hadn’t even been updated 50 days in.”
They felt uncomfortable that their transaction could be used as leverage to push extra fees onto third parties in the chain.
Selling agent called ‘totally incompetent’; after 6+ months the buyer pulled out the day before completion.
We’d trusted them with all our documents, so it was galling to be blamed for ‘inaccurate information’ when the mistake was theirs.
Goodlord’s material information guide says key details like tenure, ground rent and service charges must be prominent and not hidden or ambiguous in listings.
They warn that some disputes never really end, and buyers need to know what they’re walking into before committing their life savings.
We now have two sets of housing costs: rent on the place we’re stuck in because we can’t complete, and storage plus hotel bills for the dates we’d booked around completion.
“Not notified staff left… wasted time emailing someone who had left.”
Our buyer pulled out in November and we got through a further 3 buyers... completed 28th March 2025.
Our initial sale fell through, so we asked Rav at Agent & Homes to handle things. He managed both the new sale and our onward purchase far more smoothly.
After my original sale fell through, the agent pushed me into an auction at 20% below market value, then asked for another £30k reduction and it still didn’t sell.
Our buyer’s lender pulled out because the ground rent rises with the property’s value – we had no idea until the last minute.
We’re mid-sale with Butterworths Solicitors and now rely on an intervention agent we’ve never met to pick up our file and somehow rescue the transaction.
Our first sale collapsed when the estate agent failed to pass on vital information about a historic flood; the buyers found out from their own searches and lost all trust.
Seller threatened to pull out because conveyancing ‘dragged’; poster later complained and received compensation.
They contrast months of stagnation with the traditional agent against a much faster sale once they switched, highlighting how weak progression leaves chains vulnerable to collapse.
MSE’s ‘Gazumped & angry’ thread centres on buyers losing a house after months when a rival offer came in, leaving them devastated and starting again from scratch.
A Singletrack forum post tells of a sale agreed at £5k over asking, only for the surveyor to down-value by £10k and throw the whole deal into doubt.
Even if the asking price looks good, big service charges and looming major works can knock thousands off what buyers are actually willing to pay.
Trying to settle a lifetime mortgage after bereavement felt like an endless loop of requests and delays, with no clear resolution.
The buyers’ solicitor is being painfully slow. We’re in a three-property chain and starting to wonder if we should just relist.
Solicitor gave inaccurate advice about stamp duty relief, costing the buyers several thousand pounds.
My conveyancer says everything on my sale is complete and they have what they need for my purchase except one query about building regulations for a garage infill. They asked me to come into the office to get signed up. Does this mean contracts are being prepared for exchange and how long might it take from here?
A Reddit thread asks if anyone has sold successfully with a formal noise complaint recorded on the TA6 – the seller is anxious it will scare off all buyers.
Some property lawyers argue the revamped property information form is unworkable but it does force more detail on flood risk and charges upfront.
LawHive’s guide says the first step after a sale collapses is to insist on a straight answer from your agent or solicitor about exactly why it failed.
I’ve seen people trapped for years in leasehold properties they can’t sell because of service charge hikes and nightmare managing agents.
We were told we could ‘probably sort it out later’, but no buyer wanted to take on a potential boundary fight.
The reviewer says they work with many firms and that in most cases, silence during the process is what drives clients to complain.
In another MSE thread ‘Disputes when selling a home’, people warn that failing to disclose noisy neighbour problems on the forms can count as fraud.
The emotional toll of the sale collapsing was brutal; months of planning and packing vanished in an afternoon phone call from the agent.
MoneySavingExpert users discuss a flat that won’t sell, with the owner suspecting the near-£300 per month service charge is putting every buyer off.
The buyer says flood risk wiped tens of thousands off the value of a home they loved once they discovered recent serious flooding in the street via a local Facebook group.
In a first-time buyer Facebook group, someone says their solicitors take up to two weeks to answer each email, causing huge stress and slowing the purchase right down.
Houses usually sell quickly in our village but our agent could not generate interest or keep us informed.
Buyer alleges their conveyancer failed to send initial enquiries for months after instruction.
Our landlord kept putting up the service charge but basic repairs never got done – buyers asked why the block looked so run down if we were paying so much.
Appalling communication… our buyers have used this solicitor… delayed.
The worst estate agent ever: they placed tenants who used my property for illegal activities and destroyed it.
Survey described as substandard and missed obvious issues. The customer said the complaints route was stressful and overwhelming.
Our conveyancer only flagged local search issues very late in the process, and the buyer decided the planning and flood risks weren’t worth the hassle and withdrew.
They stress that buyers can even refuse to complete if they discover major omissions about a property’s history or disputes before the money changes hands.
A first-time buyer with a mortgage offer expiring in five days said they hadn’t even exchanged yet and were frantic that one missing bit of paperwork could blow the whole deal.
High charges and hard-to-reach support made routine admin feel like deliberate obstruction.
On ReviewSolicitors, clients of ONP Solicitors complain about unacceptable delays and poor communication, saying they felt constantly left chasing for updates.
I received a letter from RMG, dated 13 Feb 2025
Let Property refused to refund my Buyers Premium
We were eight weeks into selling and buying when our buyer’s ‘personal issue’ killed the deal – the agents for the house we wanted gave us two weeks to find someone new.
On Gransnet, a widow said her sale fell through twice during Covid, delaying her plans to move back near friends and leaving her stuck and grieving in the old house.
Our buyer's buyer pulled out, breaking the chain. The agent suggested giving them two weeks to find a new buyer, but we are unsure whether that is reasonable or too short.
The completion date on our move keeps slipping. Every delay means more storage, more rent and more stress.
They’re clear that hiding a live row is likely to end in either a fall-through or a nasty legal fight after completion.
Another Times investigation into retirement flats finds many have dropped in value, with families losing tens of thousands while still paying hefty anual charges.
Our sale fell through when the buyer’s solicitor queried building safety costs and we couldn’t get a straight answer from the managing agent about future service charge rises.
Having a broker platform that actually chased things and kept us informed made a huge difference compared with the radio silence we’d had previously.
We were told the house had ‘no issues’, then discovered in the searches that there were historic enforcement notices and a flood risk nobody had mentioned.
The seller tried to insist we re-used an old set of searches from a previous buyer to ‘save time’, which just made us worry about what they were hiding.
A Facebook post celebrates finally getting the keys after a first house sale fell through – proof that even when a chain dies, people sometimes have to pick themselves up and start again.
Our buyer’s solicitor is one of the PM Law brands. We were meant to exchange this week, but nobody can confirm who holds the file or where the money will go, so the chain is hanging by a thread.
Buyer says emails, phone calls and even live chat got no reply for over a week while a move deadline loomed.
Seller alleges repeated disputes over unexpected charges attached to selling a leasehold property.
Our house has already been down-valued once when we bought it and again when we tried to sell – I’m terrified the next valuation will come in low too.
They contrast that support with earlier experiences where other agents seemed to disappear the moment a ‘sold’ board went up.
Citizens Advice list examples of people losing money because an estate agent didn’t return a buyer’s deposit properly or sold a property for less than it was worth, leaving the seller out of pocket.
We discovered a possible roof leak in the loft that was never disclosed. We want a price reduction to cover repairs but are worried the seller may withdraw if we push it.
A Hutchins Law review said their sale fell through twice, but the conveyancer stayed patient and supportive all the way through the third attempt until they finally completed.
A buyer says they were only told of major works and a lease extension cost after they were already heavily committed to the purchase.
The previous agent basically disappeared once the ‘sold’ board went up; when the chain broke we had no plan, no updates and no buyer.
They say buyers are rightly cautious, because once you’ve bought in, you’re the one who has to live next to the arguments, noise and parking wars.
They said the constant chain failures were emotionally brutal and made them doubt they’d ever get the move done until one persistent sales progressor dragged it over the line.
We’ve been selling for seven months – the first buyer was dishonest and pulled out after 12 weeks, and now we’re stuck waiting again.
They see more buyers asking whether they can unwind a purchase or claim compensation after discovering undisclosed rows over noise, parking or boundaries.
We later discovered that our solicitor had never sent our formal complaint to the firm’s complaints partner, despite assuring us it was being ‘reviewed’. Months were wasted before we went to the Ombudsman.
We had buyers drop out because they couldn’t secure finance, then more issues in the chain during Covid; our Yopa agent kept replacing them until it finally completed.
The agent never called back, never answered emails, and we only found out the house had sold when the listing changed online.
We watched our first sale die, then finally got the keys to a different home months later, but the journey there was far more stressful than it needed to be.
Our solicitor and the agent both stayed oddly quiet about why the previous sale had fallen through; later we discovered the survey had raised subsidence concerns.
We were eight weeks into selling and buying when our buyer’s personal situation changed and they pulled out; the house we wanted to buy won’t wait for us.
We’d planned everything around beating the stamp duty deadline, then watched the whole chain implode with no explanation and no compensation for the money we’d already spent.
I read everyone’s else’s review and just wonder why I never checked this before going with them! I’ve missed out on a house because of them.
They gave us incorrect information about when searches were returned. When we asked for evidence, they admitted they had never opened the results.
App chat was useless and the phone system kept looping with no way to reach a person. Getting anything resolved felt impossible.
One r/HousingUK poster said they lost out on their ‘dream property’ after a chain collapse and now feel numb every time a new listing appears, expecting it to fall through again.
Our mortgage offer expired just before exchange because someone in the chain didn’t keep an eye on the dates – now the lender doesn’t have to honour it.
Our solicitor waited until the day before exchange to tell us they had not yet received replies to enquiries they had never actually sent. We lost our removal booking and had to rearrange everything.
Cold call about “your life insurance” without clearly identifying themselves—unwanted and intrusive.
The reviewer says the agent kept them calm during the collapse and guided them through the process of finding a new buyer so the chain could be rebuilt.
Repeated delays, unanswered emails and rude reception staff meant our buyer lost patience and walked away from the purchase.
We’ve now had two purchases fall through, each costing around £2–3k in fees – £5,000 gone and a year of our lives wasted.
Our conveyancer barely replied to anyone; agents and the other side complained they couldn’t get answers, and eventually the buyers walked.
Commenters advise setting money aside for disputed charges, because until the account is settled, buyers and their solicitors may simply walk away.
The seller’s solicitor says ‘we don’t do phone calls’. That is helpful when the chain is shaky and you don’t know what’s going on.
Property was down-valued by £22k for no clear reason, causing immediate mortgage headaches and stalling the next steps.
We had an offer accepted at £220k, then the lender’s valuation came back at £200k – £20,000 less than we’d agreed to pay.
The solicitor acting for us forgot to send the leasehold enquiries to the seller’s solicitor. This added nearly three weeks to the process and pushed us into penalty fees with our landlord.
“This is holding up the sale… I am worried they may withdraw.”
Carter Bells Solicitors say neighbour rows are more common than people think and can take ‘an age’ to resolve, meaning sellers often have to move while the dispute is still live.
The Guardian reports shared-ownership leaseholders facing service charges up to £8,000 a year, leaving many trapped in homes they can’t easily sell.
They say even the broker got involved to chase the solicitor, but it still felt impossible to get straight answers or timely action.
They’re worried about paying so much for communal services that don’t necessarily add value when it’s time to resell.
They say buyers too often assume the offer will be extended automatically, only to discover the lender has changed its criteria or rates.
They note that if rates have risen or your circumstances have changed, you might not even qualify for the same deal again.
The conveyancer changed fee-earner three times without telling us. Each new person claimed they ‘weren’t familiar with the file’, and basic questions had to be answered over and over again.
Local plan showed a new road behind the garden. Not mentioned anywhere in the listing or documentation.
Avoid at all cost! … valued my property nil, completely sabotaged my application.
The boundary issue was fixed last year but Land Registry delays meant I couldn’t switch to a cheaper fixed deal for months.
Iv been waiting nearly 8 months now to complete a simple… house purchase. Awful communication… constantly lied too
Complaint that the firm is slow, hard to reach, and blocks a purchase because nobody responds.
We eventually learned we didn’t legally own half the garden despite the agent advertising it that way; by the time the paperwork was fixed, our buyer had disappeared.
Myerson’s guidance for sellers bluntly says that if you omit key details on the TA6, a buyer could both refuse to complete and sue for losses.
Seller describes repeated fall-throughs: each restart means more delay, more cost, and more stress.
They’d spent money on searches and a survey, only to be told the bank wouldn’t lend enough, leaving them with no realistic way to rescue the deal.
We tried to shield the children from the stress but they’ve noticed we don’t have our own home any more. We’re sleeping in a friend’s spare room because our Butterworths / PM Law solicitor closed days before completion.
Buyer alleges weeks were lost because the firm delayed basic admin tasks like logging documents and updating the portal.
Everyone says flats are cheaper, but with service charges climbing every year they’re actually getting harder and harder to sell on.
They’re frustrated watching deadlines slip while the other side gives no clear explanation for the hold-ups.
A conveyancing blog from a solicitor explained how poor block management and high or unpredictable service charges can make flats very difficult to sell because buyers don’t want to inherit those problems.
Our purchase was delayed repeatedly because the panel solicitor wouldn’t respond to the mortgage lender’s queries in a timely manner.
I’m terrified of putting the house back on the market because the last two buyers have walked away after survey – I’m just waiting to be ‘shafted’ again.
They also highlight slow solicitors and local authority searches as classic deal-killers – by the time results arrive, some buyers have simply lost patience.
In ‘Completion date changed’, another MSE user says they had a written completion date agreed for their purchase, only for the seller’s side to suddenly move it two weeks later.
We learned the hard way that arranging buildings insurance from exchange is our responsibility; a mix-up over dates nearly derailed completion.
By the time we discovered the boundary fence had been in dispute with next door for years, we’d already spent hundreds on surveys and had no appetite for a legal fight.
We had to cancel our survey when the seller accepted a higher offer; our so-called ‘best and final’ offer clearly meant nothing.
House sale fell through because an enquiry took six weeks to get a reply.
They claimed these tenants had the best credit checks they had ever seen, but they did not do proper due diligence.
A leaseholder claims basic issues and complaints were met with silence, feeding delays and stress for everyone involved.
They highlight common issues like not keeping clients informed, not replying and letting matters drift for weeks.
They had all our personal financial details but could not be bothered to acknowledge us or give any update.
Confusion over who was insuring the property between exchange and completion created weeks of delay and nearly derailed the move.
They’ve slashed the asking price far below what they paid, but buyers are scared off as soon as they see the yearly heating and management bills.
Leaseholders in one block face cladding and repair bills running into tens of thousands, on top of big service charges they never expected.
The stress came from silence more than anything else in the whole process.
A reviewer says they ‘agreed and lost three buyers’ over nearly two years because their solicitors repeatedly failed to communicate or progress the sale properly.
Our adviser repeatedly failed to respond to calls or emails. We got no updates and had to chase endlessly just to find out what was happening.
Paid service charges, then received large late fees and admin charges during a period of hardship—felt punitive and disproportionate.
Our first buyer vanished the day before exchange; the agent shrugged and immediately relisted without offering much explanation or support.
Twice now, our purchase has died at the survey stage. It makes you feel like every property is a ticking time bomb once a surveyor gets involved.
We found a more expensive property after the first sale fell through but had no idea whether the bank would increase the loan or force us to reapply from scratch at different rates.
A follow-up investigation accuses housing associations of mis-selling ‘affordable’ homes where service charges later rise by hundreds of percent.
Many can’t sell because lenders won’t touch the building while fire risks, mould and unfinished remedial work hang over the whole development.
We’ve spent thousands on surveys, searches and removals over those failed attempts – our savings are disappearing while we still live in the same house.
They describe expired offers as a ‘domino effect’ risk – one missed deadline can destabilise everyone up and down the chain.
One leaseholder forum user reports a sudden £6,000 heating and gas bill on top of day-to-day service charges, with little explanation from the managing agent.
A buyer even knocked on our door to complain that the agent had lied to them as well as us.
Seller says their sale fell through because the estate agent was ‘useless’ and is asking about the ombudsman.
A reviewer says emails and complaints weren’t handled properly, and they felt forced to change managing agent due to ongoing issues.
Buyer says they paid for a level three survey that missed a collapsed drain causing subsidence and feels they wasted money on a report that failed to spot obvious structural issues.
The Times reported families losing tens of thousands trying to sell retirement flats – high service charges and exit fees mean years of council tax and charges on empty properties.
The sale of our property just nearly fell through due to a Connells survey.
Willans cite cases where sellers ticked ‘no’ to neighbour disputes on the TA6 even though there was a long history of rows – buyers later claimed compensation for misrepresentation.
We discovered late in the day that the property relied on a ‘flying freehold’ over next door; our lender’s underwriters were deeply uncomfortable.
We’d already moved out when our sale collapsed and ended up paying mortgage and rent on two properties while trying to find another buyer.
An MSE poster worries that their perpetually loud, rude neighbours are putting viewers off and says the house will only sell at a hefty discount.
I was only weeks away from completing on my first home when my seller’s solicitor, part of the PM Law group, suddenly collapsed. Months of work, money and planning are all hanging in the balance because the firm vanished without any proper handover.
“Unclear and slow communication… Doesn’t seem to actually read emails.”
Our mortgage offer expired mid-purchase and we had to scramble for a new deal at higher rates, all because the legal work took too long.
We’re three months in and still waiting on local authority searches. Our buyer keeps asking what’s going on and I’ve got no idea what to tell them apart from ‘the council is slow’.
They say if your solicitor doesn’t answer complaints within eight weeks, you can escalate, especially where conveyancing delays or silence are causing stress.
The buyers kept changing and we had repeated collapses before a competent conveyancer and better communication finally got us across the line.
Our estate agent admitted they didn’t know why the previous sale fell through, which didn’t inspire confidence that anyone was actually managing the process.
“Offered £50 compensation… adds salt to the injury.”
Our chain broke after the buyer decided they didn’t want a leasehold house, even though that was obvious from the listing; their mortgage offer expiry became the excuse.
We lost two properties because our adviser was too slow to place offers and too slow replying. We were constantly chasing while houses sold to others.
Marketing listing quality issues (poor photos, no video as promised) risking damage to letting/sale prospects.
They talked about feeling trapped – unable to sell, yet watching costs rise each year with no realistic exit route.
We were charged £300 for 'expedited completion' even though the delay was entirely caused by the solicitor failing to review the contract pack for three weeks.
Felt strung along mid-transaction with repeated hold-ups and vague explanations; confidence in the solicitor disappeared fast.
Every time we chased, we were told ‘the pack is being prepared’ while our buyer threatened to walk away.
On MSE, a first-time seller worries about how to answer the TA6 neighbour dispute question, torn between being totally open and not scaring buyers away.
We were left stressed after an undervaluation during our purchase, causing delays and wasted time arguing it through.
Our buyer’s solicitor requested the leasehold pack three times and the managing agent still dragged their feet; by the time it arrived, the buyer had gone.
A mortgage broker’s Trustpilot reviews mention chains taking over five months to complete, even when the mortgage side ran smoothly, because of slow legal work further along the chain.
One buyer on Yelp said their agent simply ‘forgot’ to tell them when a sale fell through, and they only found out later that their house had been back on the market without them knowing.
We asked an online group about a flat with a £2,400 service charge and ground rent. Loads of people warned it would be hard to sell on later.
Our house sale in Scotland fell apart, but at least we received a £10,000 settlement; the downside was having to sell for less in a rush the second time.
The solicitor still wanted nearly the full fee after the sale fell through, even though the collapse was caused by their slow responses.
They’d booked removals, changed addresses and taken time off work, only to be told at the last moment that the buyers weren’t going ahead.
Our sale fell days behind because the solicitor forgot to request the redemption statement from our lender. They only admitted the oversight when we asked the bank to confirm when the figures had been issued.
“Poor communication, slow process… very frustrating to deal with.”
Sent trust documents/certified copies but struggled to get them returned or acknowledged.
The stress from our house sale falling through has wrecked my sleep and my mood; I feel like I’ve been living in limbo for months.
We only learned the lease was under 80 years after our offer was accepted – that should have been made clear from the start.
We were charged for search fees twice because the solicitor misplaced the initial results. The firm refused a refund, claiming it was an 'administrative mishap'.
Leasehold clauses and rising charges have made it so hard to sell that we feel in financial limbo, waiting on reforms that keep getting delayed.
They say even the estate agent struggled to get updates, and the buyer became ‘very unhappy’ because the solicitor wasn’t responding to calls.
The report says almost one in three transactions fail, often months after an offer is accepted, due to surveys, delays and seller withdrawals – leaving buyers with average losses well over £1,000 each.
“Our case was held for 30 days… no communication with the vendor’s solicitors.”
They say the firm didn’t answer emails, the portal wasn’t updated, and they had to chase by phone constantly while the sale went nowhere.
Our buyer’s mortgage fell through after they’d already had an offer; two weeks later the agent still hadn’t given us a clear explanation of what went wrong.
Our solicitor explained that once you’ve exchanged, a failed completion is technically a breach of contract – but that doesn’t magically undo the stress of being left in limbo on moving day.
We are buying a rural property with a non compliant shared septic tank and expected to install our own treatment plant, but our lender will not proceed because the UK lenders handbook says septic tanks must have a certificate of compliance. We are struggling to get a standard mortgage at all.
A consultation found only about 35% of property listings contained adequate material information. We were the ones missing the 65%.
Buyer says their mortgage valuation came in twenty thousand lower than the agreed price, the survey listed damp and roof issues, but the seller refused to negotiate at all and the estate agent just told them to find more money.
By contrast, our previous agent had basically left us drifting when the first buyer walked away, with no clear plan to get things moving again.
You don’t forget the feeling of signing everything, then being told the sale you relied on has vanished overnight.
They described spending money on multiple surveys and solicitors only to be sent back to Rightmove, emotionally and financially drained.
If I answer ‘yes’ to having subsidence or insurance refusals I can’t even get online quotes, but if I answer ‘no’ I’m terrified a future claim will be rejected for non-disclosure.
Two weeks after my sale fell through the ‘sold’ board was still outside and Yopa still hadn’t taken it down, which summed up how poor their communication had been from day one.
A seller says the agent provided little proactive marketing and appeared to demand extra money for basic follow-through.
A surveyor spent only minutes inside, refused to properly inspect key areas, then reported serious damp issues anyway.
Our chain has collapsed four times now. One buyer changed their mind, another had a mortgage offer expire, and another just disappeared.
A Trustpilot reviewer for Agent & Homes said their first sale collapsed with a different agent who had simply stuck it on Rightmove, but the new agent stepped in and actually drove the deal through.
A high flood-risk rating sent our insurance quote through the roof and we realised we couldn’t afford the combined mortgage and premium, so we pulled out.
The survey flagged aluminium wiring and an ancient consumer unit as safety issues; the sellers refused any concession and we weren’t prepared to move in with two small kids.
Property purchase was undervalued by around £12k, wasting time and creating stress with mortgage affordability and deposit calculations.
“Waiting nearly 8 months to complete a simple house purchase.”
We lined up our sale and purchase to complete on the same day. The sale money is with a PM Law firm that’s now closed, so we’ve handed over our keys and don’t have a new home to go to.
“No one knew the complaints process.”
The flat is lovely but I’m worried I’ve basically bought something that will be hard to shift because of the rising charges in the small print.
The agent claimed the flat's heating and boiler were fine, but after moving in we discovered neither worked.
Another lender guide says if your offer expires before completion, you could face extra legal and valuation costs on top of a higher interest rate.
They’re seeing more buyers asking if they can claim back losses after discovering undisclosed rows about noise, parking or boundaries.
A single missed signature at the last minute caused our buyer’s solicitor to postpone exchange, and the whole fragile chain fell apart.
On another thread, a seller said the buyers’ solicitor constantly delayed answering simple enquiries until the buyers gave up and the whole transaction collapsed.
They say the agent applied heavy pressure to complete quickly, chased them daily, and the purchase collapsed after they’d already given notice to their landlord — creating immediate housing pressure.
This company should be shut down… nearly 8 months… no problems purchase.
SearchFlow says property searches can take anywhere from a few days to six months depending on the council – long enough for a nervous buyer to walk away.
Bettermove’s guide says high service charges shrink your buyer pool because people compare total monthly outgoings, not just the purchase price.
We’ve reported serious disrepair and mould for years and nothing’s been done. The house is barely habitable, but councils almost never prosecute landlords so they just carry on.
Our property still isn’t registered years after purchase. We’re now facing more delays and stress because the conveyancer didn’t finish the job.
Reviews alleging organised scamming and attempts to remove genuine negative reviews.
The seller was stunned at how much power one valuation report had over the buyer’s ability to proceed.
On another forum, a seller describes feeling ‘so stressed’ after their sale collapsed, wondering whether to relist, rent or abandon the move entirely.
We were eight weeks into selling and buying when our buyer pulled out for ‘personal reasons’; the agent on our onward purchase gave us two weeks to find someone new.
I would give zero stars if I could.
You assume the agent will weed out time-wasters, but in reality you can get a long way down the road with buyers who haven’t thought through basics like parking.
Our buyers pulled out after their survey flagged old subsidence, even though previous reports and insurance showed it had been resolved.
The agent probably over-priced it and it needs rewiring and other work. Buyers seem unwilling to take on a ‘doer-upper’ at that level.
By the time the lender deadline hit, we’d paid for searches, surveys and legal work – and suddenly had to start again from scratch with a new buyer.
Buyer’s sale collapsed; they felt their solicitors kept cashing cheques while knowing their own sale hadn’t completed.
A JustAnswer user describes challenging a block’s service charges and then waiting six months with no reply, not even to their formal complaint.
Our conveyancer seemed out of their depth and avoided our calls; by the time they acted, the chain had already collapsed.
Because completion was pushed back, we had to pay extra for movers, storage and unpaid leave.
Government is talking about digitising property data because the current system is so slow. Buyers are routinely waiting many weeks just for basic information.
Repeated delays and constant chasing nearly caused the flat purchase to fall through.
Citizens Advice couldn’t really help; they just confirmed buyers can walk away before exchange and leave you to swallow all the costs.
Our buyers changed their minds after six weeks, refused to give any reason and just disappeared, leaving us to start again from scratch.
A Latimer Lee review simply says the sale fell through because the buyer’s solicitor couldn’t get answers from them and the buyers lost patience waiting.
A HousingUK thread asked buyers and sellers what caused their sale to fall through; one replied that the first deal died because there weren’t enough engineers to issue an EWS1 cladding certificate in time.
The housing minister called property management a wild west where leaseholders face unfair charges.
Even after making a small test transfer and confirming receipt, the main completion funds became unaccounted for—nightmare scenario.
In one Ombudsman case the buyers’ first purchase fell through, then they tried to port their mortgage to another property and ended up in a dispute over whether the lender had agreed to it at all.
“For the first month my case was passed around… no communication why.”
“No communication at all… relentlessly chase my solicitor for updates.”
They are terrible: they ignored my complaint and could not even follow their own complaints procedure.
Another Guardian story said some shared-ownership buyers saw service charges jump by hundreds of percent, turning ‘affordable’ homes into serious financial liabilities.
Another poster describes being due to complete when their buyer’s mortgage offer expired, forcing them to ask if the lender would extend so the sale could continue.
They said having an agent who actually picked up the phone and calmed them down made a huge difference compared with previous experiences.
Paid premium package (£1,499); later told it only covered six months and had expired after buyer issues.
On Trustpilot, a Pattinson customer said their initial buyer dropped out and they felt pushed into an auction at a heavily discounted reserve, only for that route to fail as well.
Slow, understaffed and liars. Estate agents and other law firms actually hate working with this company.
A buyer described being stuck for weeks because the other side’s conveyancer wouldn’t respond properly, forcing repeated chases.
Commenters reply that buyers are understandably wary of taking on a flat where service charges can jump by thousands in a single year.
Survey report allegedly undervalued a home substantially after a very short visit, causing mortgage problems.
Management company response feels automated; nobody takes ownership or fixes the underlying issues.
I turned up at my local Butterworths office in Kendal expecting to progress my conveyancing only to find a sign on the door saying they could no longer trade due to regulatory issues. There’d been no warning email, no phone call, nothing.
A conveyancing client says they lost both the property they were buying and selling because their solicitor delayed responding, first losing their buyer and then their seller withdrawing.
Seller felt the listing and pricing guidance was mishandled, undermining interest and adding unnecessary time on the market.
Some say their flats are basically unsellable because buyers and mortgage lenders walk away as soon as they see the service-charge schedule.
They say they constantly have to chase the firm to get even basic work done, feeling the team shows little concern or engagement with the case.
SharedOwnershipResources warns that estate service charges can make a supposedly affordable home hard to sell later, especially when the lease flags future charge risk.
We were told… smooth process if using their mortgage advisor and solicitors.
Homeowners are told to check listings carefully and insist missing material information is provided before they even book a viewing.
Our sale collapsed because the deeds plan didn’t match the actual garden; nobody noticed the error until the buyers’ solicitor dug into it.
They argue this is quietly forcing sellers to reduce prices or accept repeated fall-throughs.
The same poster says they only now realise how much that fixed monthly charge changes affordability once you come to resell.
A Daily Mirror case shared on Facebook features a couple who say their home has become ‘impossible to sell’ after service charges rocketed to £7,500 a year.
Appalling communication and customer service… we're currently a month delayed.
A HousingUK user said endless chain collapses had left them ‘exhausted and heartbroken’ after losing their dream property multiple times in a row.
For that client, having a proactive solicitor was the difference between yet another collapse and finally getting over the line after months of setbacks.
The advice seems to boil down to ‘hope the lender plays ball’, which doesn’t feel like much protection with a legally binding contract hanging over us.
A Mumsnet buyer asks if it’s realistic to complete within two weeks before their mortgage offer runs out, complaining everyone involved is ‘non-committal’ about dates.
Buyer alleges they were effectively forced into an in-house mortgage appointment to be taken seriously on an offer.
They warn that fall-throughs don’t just waste money, they also destroy confidence in the process and make people more reluctant to try again.
We’ve had two buyers pull out at late stages; each time we find a new one, it feels harder to believe the sale will actually happen this time.
The first sale fell apart, but the new agent we instructed actually marketed the house properly and found a replacement buyer before our mortgage offer expired.
Their broker even suggests not telling the agent that part of the deposit depends on a separate sale, highlighting how fragile the whole set-up can be.
A landlord complains of being billed heavily for routine paperwork, calling the charges disproportionate.
In the end it wasn’t a single big problem, just a thousand tiny delays from different firms that pushed us past our mortgage expiry date.
We were told our complaint would be handled under the firm's internal procedure and that someone would respond within 28 days. Three months later nothing had happened, and we had to escalate straight to the Ombudsman.
Buyer says lack of urgency and unclear next steps made the whole purchase feel out of control.
Paid for a straightforward search and received nothing; no response to emails.
Our sale fell through more than once but Watson Ramsbottom still managed to get our eventual move completed quickly once everything lined up.
The seller contrasts this with previous experiences where agents did little more than stick the listing online and hope for the best.
One Trustpilot reviewer says they had first tried an online agent that changed staff frequently and knew little about the area, with no success.
A previous sale of our house fell through with another agent. After that bad experience we switched to Agents4U, who actually communicated and got it sold efficiently.
We have a mortgaged house with no insurance and untreated subsidence. Every insurer we approach refuses cover and I don’t see how we can ever sell in this state.
Vendor says service was worse than expected: poor handling, poor communication, and extra costs later.
“Panicking because this is my life savings… solicitors denying what they told me.”
Our sale is ready but the conveyancer says they are onboarding our vendor. Four weeks wasted and counting.
JBear Properties wrote that unsafe cladding, unknown remedial costs and rising service charges are turning many leasehold flats into ‘hard to sell’ units that only cash buyers will touch.
In a first-time buyer Facebook group, one flat owner says they were misled about charges going from £60 to around £180 a month; they now worry they’ll have to sell at a loss to escape.
They described it as a nightmare maze of complaints and delays just to get the bank to offer a workable alternative after the collapsed sale.
Their clerk scanned our ID incorrectly twice, delaying our AML verification. Only after escalating did the firm admit it was human error.
“Took forever to chase up issues… ignored instructions… cost us money.”
On JustAnswer, a seller was told that even a ‘resolved’ driveway dispute might still need to be disclosed because it created a formal record with the council.
Our house has been on the market a year in a street where homes usually sell in days. We’ve reduced the price twice and still can’t shift it.
“Unresponsive solicitors… you need people you can trust.”
never answers the phone number assigned
An MSE user planning to rely on their parents’ house sale for a deposit worries that if that sale falls through, they’ll have to retract their own offer and disappoint everyone up the chain.
Our bank pulled the mortgage after all the searches and surveys were done. Someone in the group said banks shouldn’t be allowed to do that without at least covering buyers’ expenses.
A mortgage guide explains that once an offer expires, the lender is no longer obliged to lend – you might have to start a fresh application from scratch.
A first-time buyer says an estate agent suggested paying a £1,000 “reservation fee” so somebody else doesn’t take the property — but when they later couldn’t secure a mortgage, the contract said the fee was non-refundable.
The initial deal collapsed because the previous solicitor had let deadlines drift and never properly explained issues to either side.
Sale fell through due to having no sign off from local building control for an extension.
The amount of delays, no communication and me chasing them is utterly unacceptable!
“Slow, understaffed and liars… I was told this… as soon as people knew who I was using.”
Even though the sellers’ solicitor already had the contract pack ready from a previous buyer, it still took far longer than expected to send anything across.
A seller blames slow replies and high fees for losing their sale, describing the arrangement as exploitative.
Our solicitor sent the wrong property address in correspondence twice. The buyer became suspicious and nearly pulled out due to the incompetence.
A long, invasive survey ended with our renovated home valued far under the accepted offer, jeopardising the mortgage.
A paid survey booking was changed and then effectively wasn’t honoured, causing last-minute chaos, wasted time, and reshuffling around mortgage deadlines.
On our new build estate the property management company first said we would not pay until the site was in good condition, then later restarted some work in June but has now issued bills for last year when they did nothing plus the whole of next year. It feels like they are trying to overcharge us and we are being asked for almost 700 pounds just before Christmas.
SmoothSale reviews include people whose original sale fell through, threatening their whole chain, until the company re-listed and sold again within a week.
Our sale fell through after six months because the buyers suddenly didn’t like the garage arrangement, even though it was on the deeds from day one.
They highlight case studies where a lack of clear updates on delays left buyers and sellers blindsided when transactions failed or costs escalated.
Offer accepted on our purchase late May ... our mortgage offer expires in mid December
Only thing stopping completion was the management pack — everyone chased and still nothing.
The report contained multiple factual errors about safety features and basic details, which we then had to spend time disproving.
Our first buyer walked because they couldn’t get searches back in time; the local authority was quoting 10–12 weeks and their rate was about to end.
We lost our buyer because the freeholder’s management company ignored emails and phone calls for weeks, so the solicitors couldn’t get the information needed to proceed.
It made us realise how little control you actually have – one cautious valuer can halt a whole chain regardless of what everyone else thinks the property is worth.
The house we are buying is riddled with asbestos, there was no TA6 form, the seller's information form did not ask about asbestos, we have twice been denied access to the detached garage and the property was advertised as freehold but is actually being put through as leasehold.
Posters warn that even if the annual ground rent looks small, its review pattern can make a home un-mortgageable over time.
A Times report highlights an ‘unprecedented’ glut of complaints to the Solicitors Regulation Authority, with residential property work among the pressure points.
Customer said banks keep allocating the same valuers, leaving no choice. They felt the system encourages down-valuations that derail deals.
Every week they rang their solicitor demanding completion, not understanding that local authority searches were still outstanding.
We waited months while the chain above us kept falling apart due to solar panels, non-standard construction and someone losing their job; by the third collapse we gave up.
Our solicitor explained that false answers on the TA6 can amount to misrepresentation, but that doesn’t undo the stress of living next to a hostile neighbour.
A first-time buyer group post says the service charge on their flat tripled from £60 to £180 a month – far more than they understood when they bought.
Other posters say they’ve had buyers vanish with vague excuses, leaving them to guess whether surveys, mortgages or sheer cold feet were to blame.
The solicitor never properly told us we had to insure from exchange; the lender spotted the gap at the last minute and temporarily withheld funds.
Our flat sale collapsed when we found out, just before exchange, that the managing agent had invalidated all EWS1 forms and the buyer’s lender refused to proceed.
Other posters say lack of communication is so common it’s practically a cliché, even when thousands of pounds and a family’s future home are on the line.
I’ve spent money on surveys, searches and removals only to be right back at square one because the buyers walked away before exchange.
Cost me thousands of pounds, sale fell through, they kept the deposit from the buyer.
I only spoke to receptionists and secretaries for months; I didn’t actually speak to the solicitor dealing with my sale until after it had fallen through.
We paid a broker fee, then were effectively ghosted; we got the mortgage sorted elsewhere in days.
Reading other people’s house-sale nightmares made me realise the stress isn’t just me; the whole buying system feels broken and nobody seems able to organise something better.
Solicitor instructed junior staff to handle the case, resulting in mistakes and lost emails.
“I am extremely disappointed… purchase attempt that fell apart due to a lack of critical information disclosed upfront.”
I had my offer accepted in early July. I have still not completed the purchase. I have been passed to 3 different solicitors due to restructures.
We were repeatedly reassured that our solicitor was 'waiting on Land Registry'. When we checked, the application had only been lodged weeks after completion, contrary to what we had been told.
“Thirteen days of delay and losing money in interest.”
They’ve paid for surveys, mortgage fees and legal work multiple times and say they ‘don’t know how many more hits’ they can take before giving up.
My £50,000 deposit is currently sitting with a PM Law brand that no longer exists in practice. The regulator just tells me to ‘wait for updates’ while my completion date comes and goes.
Our buyer’s mortgage was pulled after a change in their circumstances, and we were left out of pocket for legal work that had already been done.
We were pressured into meeting an in-house mortgage advisor and it felt like a condition of being taken seriously rather than an optional service.
Dreadful. Our buyers are using this shambolic firm we now in month 6 of a simple convayncing empty house no chain
Investors now specialise in buying ‘hard to sell’ flats hit by cladding, insurance spikes and inflated charges – the things that scare off normal buyers and lenders.
After four separate chains collapsed for reasons beyond our control, we’ve spent years in limbo, paying fees over and over with nothing to show for it.
Our chain collapsed, and when I tried to understand what went wrong, everyone pointed fingers at someone else; there was no single person in charge of the move.
NatWest required their valuation: the lead time was long and, on the day, they made minimal effort to contact us when access was blocked.
“Buying and selling should take 3–4 months. 12 months for ours.”
“Only the seller pulled out… they aren’t giving me my money back.”
We spent thousands on a deed of variation but our ground rent issue still threatens to collapse the sale.
After our third chain collapse in two years, each for a different reason further up the ladder, we’d spent more on fees than we’d saved for furniture.
“The sale could have been finalised before the end of February.”
We’re now desperately exploring things like buy-to-let mortgages just to avoid losing the property we’re trying to buy after our sale collapsed.
The solicitor failed to disclose to us that the seller had refused to answer certain enquiries. We only learned this when we reviewed the file with a new firm after the deal collapsed.
This company should be shut down. Iv been waiting nearly 8 months now to complete a simple, no problems house purchase.
We had to abandon the purchase when home insurance quotes came back sky-high due to flood risk that nobody had warned us about at viewing stage.
Every time I call they say the same: “We’re just waiting on the other side”. My removal van is booked and I’m stressed sick.
Our buyers disappeared after their insurer asked questions about historic flood events; nobody had mentioned the river bursting its banks a few years back.
The buyer’s solicitor warned that if replies didn’t arrive soon, their client would start looking at other properties.
In ‘Neighbour threatening to try and complicate sale’, a seller feels their neighbour is almost blackmailing them by threatening to complain to the council if they don’t get their way.
Ground rent clauses spooked our lender at the last minute — it had escalator terms deep in the contract we didn’t see until late.
A guidance article explains that boundary disputes usually hinder sales and that it’s best to resolve or at least properly disclose them, otherwise buyers will either walk away or demand a big discount.
We keep being told the hold-up is with the management company and their solicitor. Meanwhile our purchase is now two months behind.
They say they don’t know what they’re doing and want guidance/reassurance, but the lack of response makes them fear the transaction could collapse again.
On Trustpilot, a review of The Mortgage Lender describes an urgent deadline to get a mortgage offer issued before a chain collapsed, with the case handler turning it around in two days.
Our sale didn’t complete on the day it was supposed to – we sat surrounded by boxes while the chain quietly died in the background.
The reviewer says that while their individual lawyer was good, the firm’s systems and responsiveness left a lot to be desired.
“Property had structural issues… promised to refund… now refusing to.”
They add that modern estate agency feels formulaic and impersonal, and that good communication only kicked in when the situation became critical.
Chain collapsed after eight months when a buyer finally pulled out, and the poster blames constant solicitor delays, repeated unanswered enquiries and nobody taking ownership of the process.
They say they’re trying not to panic, but every day of silence makes them more worried the sale will collapse at the last minute.
A separate Times article reports that average transaction times are now close to 200 days and that many buyers describe the legal process as confusing and slow, with solicitors hard to reach.
In another MSE thread, someone said their sale fell through after survey and they were left deciding whether to fix issues or accept a lower offer from the next buyer.
Our buyers’ buyer fell through, then a roof problem scared off the next one, then another; nearly a year of viewings and disappointments before anything moved again.
As buyers we started avoiding listings with certain online agents. We had heard too many stories about poor communication and chains collapsing because the agent did not progress the sale.
They were furious that the only thing they got from the buyer’s buyer’s solicitor was an email ending with a casual ‘sorry’ after months of work.
“They delayed booking for viewing… different story every day.”
On LegalAdviceUK, a seller asked if they had to pay their conveyancing bill when the sale fell through and they believed the poor service was partly to blame.
They pointed out that service-charge inflation and higher insurance costs on some blocks are widening the gap between what houses and flats can sell for.
Estate agent mis-selling: brochure didn’t state key information we needed — “as seen” listing lacked detail about construction type and risks.
One reviewer says their high street estate agent did nothing for six months – no real progression, no updates – and they only realised how bad it was after switching to a different company.
They’ve dropped the asking price by tens of thousands but say no buyer wants to take on such eye-watering annual costs.
Unacceptable delays, inaccurate paperwork, slow follow-ups, no sense of urgency
“They had to change banks in November… CHAPS payment is nowhere to be seen.”
Action Fraud Alert says payment diversion fraud is rising and often involves criminals impersonating solicitors or estate agents to intercept deposits and completion funds at the most time-pressured stage.
One forum user said service charges on their flat rose from £60 to £180 a month, and they now worry it will be very hard to sell without taking a big hit on price.
One star says all you need to know.
On r/HousingUK, another thread titled ‘Why are conveyancers so slow?’ has buyers complaining that even straightforward queries seem to take weeks to answer.
Another Redditor did a same-day exchange and completion because their mortgage offer expired that day; they said they’d spent the entire weekend feeling sick with fear.
Our broker still wanted their full fee even though the sale collapsed, turning an already stressful experience into an argument about money.
Buyer alleges poor professionalism from a panel surveyor led to delays and raised doubts about due diligence.
Multiple days to a week to reply to emails. My solicitor says they’re very busy but I feel totally ignored.
A chain-management article says the best way to reduce the risk of collapse is constant communication – but most consumers complain that solicitors and agents barely speak to each other.
Material information requirements extended by government – yet still many listings omit key facts. We fell into one of those omissions.
Our buyer vanished after seven weeks, right after the survey, and refused to give any reason; we can only assume they got cold feet about becoming landlords.
Once the first sale collapsed we changed agents and suddenly got regular updates, calls and actual effort to move things forward, which just highlighted how poor the first agent had been.
Sale fell through after E&M took ~6 weeks to reply to an enquiry needed to proceed.
They point out nobody in the chain seemed to be watching the expiry date, even though every other link depended on that offer being valid.
We were told our lender had approved the valuation. Three weeks later they said it hadn’t even been reviewed. Chain collapsed.
We had a previous sale fall through because the vendor became ill and decided to pull out two weeks before exchange after months of pushing the process along.
We’d already paid for underpinning years ago, but buyers struggled to find insurance and the whole chain collapsed over something we thought was ‘fixed’.
They felt their own conveyancer had been asleep at the wheel, failing to chase the other side and allowing months to drift by while costs mounted.
A seller says their house sale fell through for the second time ‘inches from completion’ and blames the estate agent for telling them the buyer’s mortgage was sorted when it wasn’t.
NetLawman explains neighbour disputes cover noise, boundary rows and anti-social behaviour – all of which must be declared when you sell.
Another poster said their solicitor never chased anything and rarely answered calls; eventually the buyers just stopped responding and the transaction quietly died.
No communication with myself or vendor's Solicitors at all. No work done on the file.
The seller’s solicitor hid the fact that a prior sale collapsed over title problems; when our own lawyer uncovered them, we immediately pulled out.
They say the lack of clarity and unanswered questions created unnecessary delays and left them with a ‘50/50 chance’ of losing their purchase.
My purchaser used these guys. Slow and misinformation to say the least.
We were stunned that in the 21st century the legal process was still so slow and paper-based; those delays played a big part in our sale falling through.
We had a horrendous buyer, a collapsed sale and then a bill that looked more like a penalty than a fair reflection of work done.
If anyone wants to DESTROY their transaction… AVOID.
Our buyers became increasingly aggressive over minor defects, sending long, hostile emails via their solicitor until our own lawyer advised us to walk away.
Waiting months for a certificate needed to complete a sale.
The constant ultimatums from the other side left us feeling bullied; our own solicitor seemed unwilling to push back, so we withdrew the property from sale.
The conveyancer assured us the property was freehold, but it was actually leasehold with 63 years remaining. The oversight meant we had to withdraw, losing survey and legal fees.
They say many deals either collapse or have to be painfully renegotiated once the surveyor’s number doesn’t match what the estate agent promised.
I’m starting to think the service charge is putting everyone off – once buyers realise it’s nearly £300 a month, the viewing goes quiet and you never hear from them again.
I completed on my house in June 2021 but Land Registry still does not show me as the owner. The conveyancer keeps blaming a backlog and says it has been expedited, but almost four years later it still is not updated.
One MSE user had their dream home down-valued by £20,000 in the survey – they were shocked that a seven percent difference could derail the purchase.
I paid them the upfront fee and then they decided that they couldn't act for me... confirmed a refund.
“Completion… April 2025… multiple emails not responded to… many chasers.”
A Trustpilot reviewer says their buyer pulled out because progress was too slow and communication was so poor that even the buyer’s solicitors struggled to get anything back.
HomeSellingExpert estimates that around 30% of UK property sales collapse, and many buyers only find out what happens to their mortgage offer after their sale has already fallen through.
“Our sale and purchase at risk because nobody will reply.”
They’ve booked removals and time off work and now face extra costs and stress because nobody can give a firm completion date anymore.
We had estate agents valuing around £400k, but Connells knocked £50k off simply because they claimed they couldn’t find comparable sales.
They admit they didn’t fully grasp the leasehold pack at purchase and now feel misinformed about what the charges would become.
They describe doing everything on time with their solicitor, but still losing the property because the ‘reservation’ didn’t actually force the seller to complete.
They see buyers who moved in, discovered serious neighbour problems and only then learned the seller had ticked ‘no disputes’.
Two prospective buyers withdrew immediately after witnessing the behaviour, saying they didn’t want to live next to constant drama.
The article warns that overpricing leads to properties sitting on the market for months, with sellers eventually needing steep price cuts to get any interest.
Our buyer pulled out of our flat sale right before exchange and we have had to put it back on the market.
Buyer can’t get hold of their conveyancer by phone or email the week they hoped to exchange.
We had to go back to the market twice after buyers pulled out, and the whole process was so stressful it made us consider giving up on moving altogether.
Estate management delays and fees left people ‘stuck’ waiting, unable to progress sale timelines.
The broker stresses how close the chain came to failure purely because the lender’s timescales and the solicitors’ pace didn’t match up.
Our estate agent said we’re not the only family with children now technically ‘between homes’ because of this collapse. Some have already moved in with grandparents, others are paying for Airbnbs just to keep a roof over their kids’ heads.
VERY POOR SERVICE DO NOT USE, WE BEEN IN THE PROCESS BUYING A HOUSE…
Their reports were described as factually wrong often enough that we’re escalating complaints to professional bodies.
Another reviewer calls the Ombudsman ‘a complete waste of time’, feeling the body tends to side with agents and surveyors despite evidence from consumers.
The surveyor’s report read like a horror story, and the buyers demanded a huge price cut we simply couldn’t afford to accept.
Stuck waiting on management-company solicitors, and our purchase is now eight weeks behind schedule.
They were also dual-listed with a big name high street brand and felt the smaller firm actually did more to keep finding new buyers when the chain kept breaking.
The stress was unreal – I’d packed up my life, lined up removals and now I’m back to living out of boxes with no idea when I’ll get to move.
A Which? piece says one of the biggest reasons sales fall through is buyers changing their minds after survey, often with almost no explanation to the seller.
Massively undervalued the property I am purchasing by £12k which caused a lot of stress, and wasted time.
The first buyer pulled out at the last minute but our conveyancer kept us updated and helped salvage things with new purchasers who were much harder work.
Our process was ‘very painful’ – in 19 months we had three collapsed chains before finally getting to completion.
Buyer says a straightforward empty property still turned into delays after the offer was submitted.
The first conveyancer didn’t understand the quirks of our lease and the buyer walked away; the second firm had to unpick a lot of previous mistakes.
We’d checked comparison sites ourselves but didn’t realise underwriters might still refuse or load the premium based on their own flood maps.
We’ve been trying to buy a no-chain property with PM Property Lawyers since mid-2025. Now, just as we thought we were nearing the end, the firm has collapsed and our agent says the chain could still fall apart.
They are torn between appealing, starting again with a new lender or walking away and losing the money they’ve already spent.
Our first sale fell through and the information we got about why was vague at best; the buyers ghosted us for ages and only later blamed ‘pressure from the agent’ even though that came after they disappeared.
Seller withdrew during completion; company then used excuses and loopholes to avoid refunding payment.
Very little interaction… emailed everyone involved…
Weeks of silence: complaints unanswered, calls go nowhere, and the move is stuck waiting for responses.
“Letter delivered about a charging order… still registered in previous owner’s name.”
Our entire chain depends on a PM Law group firm that has suddenly closed. Estate agents and other solicitors can’t get any answers, and everyone is scared the chain will collapse.
I'm so stressed out, I don't know who to believe, and I'm on such a tight deadline to move.
A buyer complains that their solicitor didn't check a crucial covenant that prohibits renting, discovered only after exchange.
“Paid a £3,000 ‘refundable’ Buyer’s Premium… undisclosed leasehold complications… unmortgageable.”
“We are midway… edging closer to September… no one is contactable.”
The seller has painted over damp and mould after my survey, clearly trying to mislead the surveyor and hide issues. I know I can try to renegotiate but I want to know how much pressure I can put on them and whether there is any realistic claim for time wasting and survey costs.
We are buying a flat and only recently learned that each owner must pay about 4500 pounds for fire safety improvements in January, without clear information on what the work involves. The flat already needs major refurbishment and we are unsure how much reduction to request without risking the sale collapsing.
They say clients are left chasing updates and get hit with unexpected costs, even when the deal eventually goes through.
One older forum thread describes a home where the mortgage valuation came back £50,000 lower than the agreed price, leaving the buyers scrambling to plug the gap.
Our landlord tried to sell with a sitting tenant but the buyer pulled out when they saw how weak the existing tenancy agreement was.
We knew the charge was ‘a bit high’ when we moved in, but it’s only now we’re trying to sell that we realise how much of a deterrent it is.
In Scotland our sale fell through after the buyers lied about their position, and we later discovered they’d misled us about what they were actually doing with the property.
Expedited Land Registry title still stuck months later, threatening the sale.
No one at the firm seemed to take ownership; every message went unanswered for weeks.
My leasehold has turned into a financial drain – between service costs and restrictions, it feels like we never saw the full picture upfront.
The whole process of buying a house has been painful and this is largely down to our solicitor.
Agent & Homes were only instructed after the first sale fell through with another agent who’d done very little beyond sticking it online.
Our agent told us there’s nothing they can do because HGA Conveyancing, part of the PM Law group, has shut and nobody is picking up the file.
A buyer’s forum post says the flat they want has a £190 per month service charge – by their maths, that extra cost could instead fund a larger freehold house.
A reviewer says they paid for a document and received nothing, then struggled to get help or resolution.
The constant uncertainty around our rental sale meant we couldn’t plan repairs or new investments. Everything hinged on buyers we’d never even met.
They answered eventually but never actually addressed the questions I had sent.
Hosted viewings sold as add-on but organisational failures meant vendor had to do viewings themselves.
We had two buyers in a row pull out after seeing the lease only had 71 years remaining; no one had mentioned how expensive extending it could be.
We’ve been trying to sell for months but buyers either cannot get comfortable with the lease terms or are scared by the prospect of more cost hikes in future.
We lost our sale purely because nobody at the firm picked up the phone or answered emails in time for the chain to hold together.
On MoneySavingExpert, someone explains a whole chain was put at risk when a first-time buyer’s mortgage offer quietly expired just before exchange.
Buyer says their purchase has dragged on for months with repeated chasing because messages and calls routinely went unanswered.
The solicitor failed to send the contract pack to the buyer’s side for over 18 days. The estate agent only found out when the buyer threatened to walk away.
We only discovered right before exchange that the seller’s ongoing dispute with the freeholder hadn’t been disclosed; we walked away.
Our friend’s entire chain collapsed because a single buyer’s mortgage offer expired right before exchange and the lender refused an extension.
Four chains in a row fell apart for different reasons, from mortgage problems to leasehold worries; each time we paid for new searches and surveys.
Poor communication, slow process. We didn't feel any confidence in their capability and definitely didn't feel listened to.
We’d lost and then re-gained the same house twice; by the time the chain finally collapsed again, we were just exhausted and fed up with the whole system.
An advice site warns that a history of subsidence makes it harder for buyers to get buildings insurance, which in turn can wreck mortgage applications at the last moment.
fell apart due to a lack of critical information being disclosed upfront.
They warn others to ‘avoid like the plague’ if they want an efficient conveyancing firm.
Our solicitor incorrectly claimed our new-build warranty was invalid. The builder confirmed it was fine, meaning the solicitor had confused our case with another client’s.
“Delay is built into the system… within a day the whole chain collapsed.”
They advise keeping a detailed record of every call and email because you may need evidence if you escalate to the Legal Ombudsman.
Offer accepted at the end of November and by July we still hadn’t exchanged. The whole chain has been held hostage by delays.
We knew the charge was ‘a bit high’ when we moved in, but it’s only now we’re trying to sell that we realise how much of a deterrent it is.
I’m being pushed to renegotiate mid-process because everyone’s terrified the whole chain will collapse if completion slips by a few weeks.
Potential buyers walk away as soon as they learn service charges are higher than the council tax; we’ve had offers collapse for that reason alone.
A mortgage guide explains that once an offer expires, the lender is no longer obliged to lend – you might have to start a fresh application from scratch.
Weeks of chasing and still no meaningful progress from the conveyancer; the whole chain felt stalled by sheer inactivity.
Someone using Bates Solicitors to deal with a family estate says nearly three years of handling has been ‘painful’, citing lack of communication, delays on simple tasks and calculation errors.
In ‘Seeking advice on financing for new house purchase’, a seller says their buyer pulled out on the day they were supposed to exchange, after they’d already paid for upgrades on a new-build.
“No sense of urgency… forced to chase all the time.”
With our first estate agent, communication basically stopped once the ‘sold’ board went up. Four months later the sale collapsed and we had to start again.
Like many others, we found out the hard way that one in three transactions can collapse, taking thousands in sunk costs with them.
They increasingly advise buyers who only discover the dispute after completion and want to know if they can claim back losses.
The surveyor recommended expensive chemical damp treatment and the buyers bailed. A second opinion said the house was fine for its age, but by then the deal was dead.
The sale fell through because the seller hadn’t disclosed past flood damage; once the survey and insurance checks revealed it, we no longer felt safe buying there.
On Trustpilot, a Hodders client says they suffered three collapsed chains over nineteen months and describes the overall process as ‘very painful’.
Another adviser says that if your mortgage offer expires because conveyancing drags on, you’re usually forced through a fresh application – more paperwork, more fees, more stress.
We’re devastated – unless a miracle buyer appears almost instantly, we’ll lose the home we were trying to buy as well.
New build warranty complaint: ‘reason for everything not to cover you’ — claim refusals blamed on loopholes.
It took them 5 months after instruction to send initial enquiries.
Another Trustpilot reviewer says they pulled out on the day they were due to exchange because the search pack revealed high flood risk only at the last minute, even though the firm had held the results for weeks.
Our house sale fell through, through no fault of the agent, and the chain was at risk. They had us back on the market immediately and found new buyers within days.
It feels like we’ve done everything right and still risk losing the house or paying hundreds more a month because the process moved too slowly.
They say leaving messages didn’t help and they received no explanation, calling it rude and unprofessional when you’re trying to sell such a major asset.
Some sellers in our chain have already used sale proceeds to commit to new-build purchases. With their funds stuck in PM Law accounts, they’re at risk of defaulting on those contracts too.
Buyers are questioning the boundaries... we pay a service charge... buyers need to think about whether they want to proceed.
Worst legal firm... so slow and not responsive to chasing things up.
On a forum someone said council flats are notoriously hard to sell on – people buy them for security, not because they’re easy to move on later.
One seller says their first house sale fell through, so they switched to a different branch who actually chased the chain and gave proper advice about the offers.
We chose a 'panel' conveyancer recommended by the agent and regretted it; they were slow, unreachable and seemed to make the fall-through more likely, not less.
We’re offering on a flat that was previously under offer and fell through; it’s now back on at a higher guide price and the agent still hasn’t bothered to respond to our offer.
Some clients in the PM Law victims group say they’ve already had removal vans booked and children taken out of school, only to find out days before moving that their solicitor has shut and no keys will be handed over.
A buyer complains their solicitor was so slow on a deed of variation that they had to phone management companies themselves to get answers ‘in a 10-minute conversation’.
Reallymoving advise buyers to scrutinise the TA6 for any disclosed disputes or complaints, and say unresolved neighbour issues are a valid reason to walk away.
The house had already fallen through once with a cash buyer, and they felt fobbed off with vague excuses about the other side’s solicitor being slow.
Buyers complain their solicitors take days or weeks to reply, leaving them in the dark about progress.
“The entire process took more than 15 months. It should have taken a few.”
Mortgage was declined over a small bounced bill and the broker said they’d appeal, then went quiet. Extremely stressful when you’re buying alone.
Reviewer warns against the company and alleges dubious sales tactics, referencing a BBC Panorama investigation.
They describe waiting up to 45 minutes on the phone, dealing with a rude receptionist and getting almost no replies to emails until the buyer walked away.
Our solicitor misplaced the signed TR1 form and asked us to sign again the week before exchange. The buyer grew nervous and nearly pulled out.
A buyer on r/HousingUK describes being pitched ‘guaranteed exchange in a month’ packages by online conveyancers who then threaten to hold up the chain unless others pay to expedite.
They say their solicitor chased the buyer’s solicitor six times with no response, and even when the buyer chased them it took days to hear back.
Buyer notes last-minute disruption close to exchange — conditional mortgage discovered too late.
The ‘automated updates’ never matched what was actually happening; messages felt generic and didn’t answer the real questions.
They ended up questioning whether the valuation reflected the actual house at all, or simply a tick-box exercise.
The Guardian reported shared-ownership residents facing service charges up to £8,000 a year, leaving some homes effectively impossible to sell on the open market.
We ended up abandoning the purchase after months of waiting because it felt like nobody involved was in any hurry to get us to exchange.
On r/HousingUK, a buyer said their house purchase ‘fell through and I want to cry’ after the lender withdrew at the last minute due to stricter affordability checks.
Even though our initial sale fell through, the law firm still charged the full quoted fee and didn’t reduce anything despite the extra time and stress we went through.
Seller says their buyer’s solicitors struggled to get any response, causing the buyer to pull out after long delays.
Our solicitor missed a clear clause requiring a deed of variation for the lease. The lender rejected the entire application and we had to switch banks at additional cost.
Buyers pulled out after a survey described as inaccurate and alarmist. The seller said it nearly destroyed the sale for no good reason.
LawHive warns that if a seller lies on the TA6 about neighbour disputes, it can amount to misrepresentation because the form becomes part of the contract.
A buyer says their purchase is stalling because the vendor’s estate agent won’t reply, and getting basic information about a management pack is ‘like getting blood out of a stone’.
House sale fell through because the company took six weeks to answer a solicitor’s enquiry.
Buyer says they were mis sold a house after discovering a long standing rat infestation and a neighbour dispute that were never disclosed, and now feels financially ruined with no help from their conveyancer.
They failed to chase missing replies to enquiries, claiming the seller was slow. The estate agent confirmed the solicitor had never requested them in the first place.
A buyer describes a terrifying near-completion payment issue and worries about potential fraud or negligence.
Our sale fell through around six weeks in, just after survey, and the buyers wouldn’t give any reason – we assume they over-offered and panicked.
We viewed with a large online agent and it felt like dealing with a call centre. The person on the phone knew nothing about the property and the local rep never called back.
The Legal Ombudsman’s residential conveyancing report notes that delay and poor cost information together account for a large share of complaints they see.
the mortgage offer that his broker had got from Halifax to buy ours was conditional
The sale took so long that our mortgage product expired; with higher rates we could no longer afford the same property and had to walk away.
They’d already navigated a complex situation for us once, and when the first purchase collapsed they calmly rebuilt the mortgage for attempt number two.
They warn that reapplying mid-chain can delay completion, change affordability and, in the worst case, collapse the whole sequence of linked sales.
A reviewer says poor communication and service left them regretting the choice of branch.
The Legal Ombudsman’s conveyancing work shows many complaints centre on poor communication and delay – buyers left chasing solicitors who don’t reply for weeks.
We had a mortgage offer on a house but the vendor’s sale fell apart higher up the chain, so the whole thing died and I’m now being told my ‘six-month’ offer might not actually be honoured for the next place.
A mortgage broker article warned that if your mortgage offer expires before completion, it can effectively stop your purchase and force you back to square one with a fresh application.
The piece warned that doubling ground rents and steep service charges can put buyers off and even make mortgages harder to obtain on some flats.
Several prospective buyers said point-blank that the service fee made the numbers unworkable compared with similar flats, so they walked away.
We only found out the flat had no valid EWS1 form when the lender refused to issue a mortgage offer – the agent had listed it like any normal property.
Santander reckons more than half a million transactions collapse in England and Wales every year thanks to our antiquated homebuying process.
Totally incompetent - they should pay me
“Forced into visiting their in-house mortgage advisor.”
The sellers are supposedly ‘motivated’ but you can feel everyone treading carefully after one failed sale already – nobody wants this chain to collapse twice.
They stress that full disclosure of right-of-way issues is essential, because if buyers discover hidden problems later they could sue or even try to unwind the sale.
A buyer describes nearly losing a six-figure deposit right before completion after an email containing solicitor bank details was allegedly intercepted and swapped for scam details.
Solicitor gave wrong advice about lease extensions and nearly caused the purchase to fall through.
They call it ‘a huge con’, saying the money has been ‘spaffed up the wall’ and that late fees and debt collectors loom if they challenge the bill.
We were due to exchange today, with Butterworths / PM Law handling both our sale and purchase, and have just been told the firm has been shut down. Everything is on hold and we don’t even know who has our money.
I’ve missed out on a house because of them.
Harassing, rude, and overbearing behaviour during viewing and buying enquiries.
Trading standards guidance lists specific points – tenure, ground rent, council tax, utilities, and more – that agents must disclose clearly.
Service charge demands and threats create stress while people are mid-move and trying to complete.
The seller’s solicitor insisted on posting documents instead of using email, which added weeks to an already stressful timeline and cost us our buyer.
I am selling a flat and the managing agent is delaying answers to the buyer's solicitor. Four answers are still outstanding and it has been two months with no progress despite repeated chasers. My buyer says they will pull out if this continues.
They said having someone who actually ‘always had the answers’ made a stressful cross-border move slightly less terrifying after the collapse.
Our purchase fell through one day before exchange and I’m still over a thousand pounds out of pocket from surveys, searches and broker fees.
We’d been told exchange meant it was ‘all locked in’, then discovered that if the funds aren’t actually in place, the whole thing can still blow up.
We want to buy a property with an annex where the main house is used as a holiday rental with bookings for another year. It is on crown estate land with other farm buildings and our mortgage broker is struggling to find a lender who will accept the setup.
Our solicitor forgot to request the redemption statement from our lender. Completion had to be postponed, and we paid a full extra month of mortgage interest.
A resident says they were chasing proof of building insurance and couldn’t obtain it, creating serious risk and disruption.
We feel misled – the property was marketed as a quiet family home, but we’re stuck in constant noise and now looking at legal options.
We picked this company on price alone and soon found we'd made a terrible mistake! …We never heard from them.
It felt like nobody read our messages; we were never told what was happening.
Their property manager almost never replied. Issues dragged on for weeks with nothing but generic emails saying they were working on it.
User recounts their estate agent letting a sale get close to completion twice before collapsing, leaving them furious and exhausted.
One buyer said the chain was ‘not straightforward’ but the team kept everyone updated and calm – proof that decent communication often prevents a sale from collapsing.
The chain broke twice on our commercial sale and by the time a serious buyer came along, our original mortgage offer had long since expired.
We paid for two valuations and the reports were nearly identical and full of basic errors, which didn’t justify the price at all.
Our sale fell through seven months ago and the house has sat unsold since; we’ve already lost one new-build reservation twice because our buyer vanished.
Their valuation ignored obvious upgrades and still came in low, putting remortgage plans under pressure.
We are being forced to pay our agents Yopa even though they did not sell our property. I did the viewing, sold the property myself and we lost the original sale because the house was listed incorrectly and key material information was missing.
The seller refused to budge on price after a down-valuation, even though the lender would only advance against the lower figure; in the end we had to walk.
Feedback was always that buyers loved the house but were put off by being next to flats and the parking situation, even at a price below recent comparables.
Chasing my conveyancer daily; still waiting for basic paperwork to begin. 12-week target shot.
Our London flat has no soundproofing, the bath waste pipe is open and not connected to drainage, the kitchen sink drains into an exposed hall area, and there are ventilation leaks. The management company and council refuse to help or even inspect, and we are concerned for our family's safety.
Another Guardian piece reports leaseholders accusing housing associations of ‘mis-selling’, saying the true level of service charges only emerged after they moved in.
Mumsnet has posts from people saying their flat is ‘impossible to sell’ because abnormally high service charges scare buyers off the moment they read the figures.
A buyer walked away after long delays and no traction; it felt like the conveyancer was a bottleneck for everyone else in the chain.
My experience with Conveyancing Direct has been dreadful, unhelpful, and depressing.
Once a specialist looked at the lease, they explained clearly what needed fixing and we finally had a chance of selling without frightening off every buyer.
Five months in and they still hadn’t sent initial enquiries.
Seller says their solicitor lost the signed TR1 form and blamed the postal service despite never having posted it.
A NetLawman guide on gazundering explains that while the tactic feels unfair, it’s not illegal because buyers aren’t bound to their offer until contracts are exchanged.
The buyer's solicitor kept raising the same enquiry four times, even though the managing agent had already provided clear written answers. Each repetition delayed things and made the buyer think we were hiding something.
This is the third time our house sale has collapsed right before completion – every time a different link in the chain breaks and we’re back to square one.
They felt trapped paying legal bills for a failed sale largely caused by the firm’s own delays and lack of updates.
They say moving house is one of the most stressful life events and I agree. Trying to get solicitors to actually do what they are paid for is horrendous; if I behaved like them I would be sacked.
They say if they’d had any idea charges would reach those levels, they would never have bought the flat in the first place.
BLB Solicitors remind sellers that any neighbour dispute – even historic – must be disclosed, because buyers will understandably think twice about living next to trouble.
Buying delayed around 15 weeks due to Land Registry/title boundary mismatch concerns.
Solicitor repeatedly loses documents, forcing the buyer to resend the same ID and bank statements several times.
We’ve had a notice to complete served, our lender has already released the mortgage funds, and we’ve paid our deposit. Because PM Law shut overnight, the money is in limbo and we could be in breach of contract through no fault of our own.
A homeowner describes spending significant money on advice and letters while the situation escalated and dragged on.
Another poster in the same thread described two sales collapsing before they finally found a buyer, saying they had ‘no idea how people cope’ with the stress.
Lease extension: paid a non-returnable deposit with an expected timeline, but progress afterwards felt unclear and slow.
Local agents reportedly tell them houses and low-charge properties still shift, while high-fee flats struggle to attract serious buyers or achieve asking price.
Our agent never explained why the previous sale had fallen through; only later did we learn about serious issues that should have been disclosed from the outset.
“Land Registry can take time… should she be worried?”
They clearly don't care whether you sell or not as the get paid either way.
One commenter said they’d only touch a flat where service charges are low and stable – anything else risks trapping you in a property with a shrinking buyer pool.
Sam Conveyancing warns that mortgage offers often last around six months and can be withdrawn if they expire before completion unless the lender grants an extension.
At 73 I found myself effectively homeless because my buyers’ solicitors disappeared; the sale collapsed and I’d already moved out of my home.
A resident claims mismanagement led to buildings being left uninsured and describes major worry and knock-on consequences.
They failed to submit our signed mortgage deed for over a week and blamed the lender for not receiving it. We later learned it had never been posted.
When our sale fell through after six months, we weren’t just losing a buyer – we were losing the house we’d set our hearts on and a chunk of our savings.
I thought I was just paying normal conveyancing fees – nobody clearly explained that part of the bill was for ‘failed sale’ insurance I never really wanted.
On r/HousingUK, someone calls a £4,300 London service charge ‘unregulated and vile’, claiming a colleague’s flat became unsellable after charges hit £10,000 a year.
Very poor communication; messages, emails and even letters received no response.
Formal complaints go nowhere; they reply when they want and don’t resolve anything.
I’m now facing the risk of incurring unnecessary stamp duty costs...
I had to push them to negotiate properly instead of just telling me to accept a rock-bottom offer so they could bank their commission and move on.
A seller claims an estate agent misrepresented an offer and then used aggressive pressure around fees and an abortive sale, leaving them feeling forced into a bad position.
Our purchase fell through and the solicitor later sent an invoice that was higher than expected. We asked for an itemised bill immediately and chased twice but they have not replied. We are worried they will try to charge interest even though they have not explained their fees.
Expensive and happily miss deadlines
A Prince Evans client switched to them after a previous sale had fallen through because of messy leasehold issues – the new firm quickly got to grips with the complex lease and saw the next sale through.
Sale marketing ‘nothing done at all’ then refund chase — vendor warns not to pay upfront.
The mortgage lender’s own staff gave us contradictory answers about the interest rate change date—nobody seemed to know the policy.
A Legal Ombudsman report on residential conveyancing highlights cases where delays and hidden costs left customers losing the home they wanted or facing large unexpected bills.
Consumers say they struggle to get straight answers on timescales or costs, especially on property transactions that drag on for months.
We now have formal complaint letters and council reports that should clearly have been disclosed before we committed our life savings.
Our buyer walked away when they discovered informal parking arrangements; there was no legal right over the driveway we’d used for years.
A buyer says they couldn’t get through to a human and the lack of response stalled their purchase.
Legal Futures reports the Ombudsman describing some lawyers as showing ‘no empathy’ when clients complain, especially around conveyancing delays and poor updates.
Our sale fell through after the buyer’s survey flagged ‘rising damp everywhere’. We’ve lived here ten years with no issues and it still killed the deal instantly.
Email responses were so slow I started wondering if this was normal for solicitors.
They note that even ‘resolved’ disputes can scare buyers if there’s a recorded history with the council or police.
The estate agent never mentioned a previous collapsed sale over access rights, which understandably scared off our new buyers.
Complaints data shows poor communication is one of the most common issues in conveyancing.
It shows how often deals fail for reasons outside the agent’s control – but also how crucial fast remarketing is if you want to keep moving.
On Mumsnet, one buyer said their solicitor still hadn’t returned their deposit seven weeks after a purchase fell through, despite repeated chasing.
Never received first invoice; then a letter with fines added — aggressive escalation for tiny sums.
We would never have offered on the house if we’d known it had flooded twice in the last decade, but the agent breezily called it ‘a bit of surface water’.
Another leaseholder says they feel ripped off by a £4,300 London service charge – and that a colleague’s £10k bill has made their place practically unsellable.
Sale hindered because seller’s side couldn’t get timely replies from buyer’s conveyancer to keep deadlines.
One reply bluntly suggests that if the noise bothers them that much, the only realistic option might be to sell and move on – but that means declaring the problem to the next buyer.
As soon as I refused to use their expensive mortgage broker I was brushed off and wasnt allowed to view properties or put offers forward.
Lawyers commenting on the PM Law collapse warn of ‘chaos’ for clients about to complete their house moves, with chains at risk and no clear plan for an orderly wind-down.
The auction service recommended by our agent left us out of pocket when the sale collapsed and we were still charged hefty fees.
We have been in the process for 8 months because our solicitor is dragging his feet. Enquiries sent to him in June still are not properly answered and everyone involved is complaining he never replies.
A buyer says the vendor’s solicitor won’t answer the final outstanding enquiries, and they’re being pushed towards either proceeding with missing info or risking the whole purchase collapsing.
We’d been on the market a year, changed agents, cut the price and finally got a cash buyer – only to watch the deal evaporate at the last minute.
A seller says their flat sale fell through because the buyer’s lender refused to lend without an EWS1 form, even though the building has no cladding.
Described as unethical/incompetent with poor communication and high charges.
Seller says a house sale was held up for around ten weeks waiting for a management pack, with slow email replies and no phone support.
We bid on a house believing it was freehold. Later we found it was leasehold with escalating charges written into the contract we didn’t see until after exchange.
The buyer pulled out once they realised the cladding and safety works would be passed onto leaseholders through service charges; nobody had explained that clearly at viewing.
They rarely replied, missed key dates and left me completely in the dark.
Avoid like the plague! Very poor competence and communication. Dragged out the whole conveyancing process…
the chaos they caused was the reason our property sale fell through in the end.
Every update was just 'waiting on the other side' with no meaningful detail.
The same page also highlights a review praising another agent as an example of what an estate agent should be – knowledgeable, responsive and proactive, by contrast.
Leasehold sale stuck: management pack delays and high fees stall transactions even when everyone is chasing.
We pulled out when our solicitor explained the lease wouldn’t let us keep a dog or even hang washing on the balcony; it felt like a legal straightjacket.
Another article notes it’s a legal requirement to disclose neighbour disputes on the TA6 form, and failing to do so can lead to a sale being unwound or damages being claimed later.
We are near the end of enquiries on both our sale and purchase but our buyers’ solicitors want the original Section 106 agreement from when our house was built in 1997. Our solicitors asked the council four weeks ago to confirm the obligations were met, have chased three times, and I have chased twice, but nobody is responding. The online portal for these documents is down, so I cannot access anything myself and I am at my wits’ end.
Can't give zero otherwise I would... we were ready to complete the sale after 8 weeks.
Online agents often vanish once an offer is agreed. No calls, no chasing solicitors and no sales progression. I have seen chains collapse because the agent simply stopped doing anything.
We paid for photos but the agent had no shop, no board, and almost no visible marketing of our property.
So slow we lost our buyer.
We thought we were on the verge of exchange weeks ago, but the date keeps getting pushed back for ‘one reason or another’.
An MSE thread warns that invoice/PDF interception scams often target house buyers by hijacking an email and replacing solicitor bank details to divert deposits.
Our buyers walked away the day before exchange – one email and six months of planning, packing and paying fees just evaporated.
Either the survey will be fine and it goes ahead, or it will uncover something grim and the buyers will back out – there’s not much middle ground.
A Times report described a man whose neighbour sent misleading emails to potential buyers about a strip of land, effectively blackmailing him and making his multimillion-pound home unsellable for a period.
They feel pulled in two directions as their own agent says wait, while their onward seller’s agent insists they should put the property straight back on the market.
There’s nothing wrong with the flat, just timewasters – but each collapse knocks her confidence and adds more months of limbo.
Leaseholders describe paying huge sums for service charges and legal fees they never agreed to and cannot challenge.
Buyer said Nationwide-appointed surveyor valued the property at £0 and ruined the mortgage application. They felt the process was sabotaged.
Another MSE seller says a buyer walked away after their surveyor reported dry rot in the loft – but a second survey later found no rot at all.
They expected a reduction after the collapse, but instead got a bill that didn’t reflect the stress or the fact the sale never actually completed.
Property marketing failed: sign/visibility issues and poor follow-up meant wasted time and lost momentum.
Seller warned leasehold sale costs and packs piled up to thousands over months.
Nightmare - Stay away. Made the sale so stressful and drawn out…
Our buyers disappeared after their surveyor mentioned subsidence; no one came back to renegotiate, they just vanished and left us with the bill.
Posters argue that without proper due diligence on service charges and ground rent, buyers can end up stuck with a flat they can’t afford.
Dawn Solicitors say failing to reveal neighbour disputes or serious defects can be property misrepresentation, especially if buyers relied on the false reassurance when deciding to proceed.
The solicitor never made it clear that completion funds had to arrive with them early in the day. Our bank transfer arrived too late, the move slipped to the following week and we had to pay for extra storage and accommodation.
Despite repeated requests, the conveyancer didn’t flag a restrictive covenant on the title. We only discovered it after completion, when we received a legal threat from a neighbour.
“Management pack… my solicitor has chased… estate agents have chased… sellers solicitor has chased.”
If we tried to sell a place with issues like this, buyers would run a mile. But as tenants we just live with it because enforcement is so weak.
The Ombudsman criticised the firm for failing to keep the seller informed, leaving them confused and out of pocket once the transaction collapsed.
One owner said every prospective buyer vanished as soon as their solicitor saw the service charge schedule in the management pack.
The whole idea that searches can be ‘sold on’ between buyers just underlines how messy and confusing the conveyancing process is in England.
One poster said their sale fell through twice due to coronavirus disruption before they finally managed to move; it took a huge toll on them.
Our agent did nothing apart from list the house online and put up a sign. They never followed up leads and ignored emails for weeks while the property sat empty.
Our first buyer pulled out, the second couldn’t get a mortgage, and the third tried to gazunder us at the last minute; every step felt fragile.
Our survey flagged two red issues that could cost thousands to repair, and the sellers have refused to pay for a detailed investigation or reduce the price any further, saying that accepting 2% under asking is enough.
A Trustpilot review for Sharman Quinney says the agency showed poor communication and lacked proactive engagement, leaving the client doing most of the chasing.
The message is always the same: if you don’t check the lease and charges carefully, you risk owning something buyers will keep walking away from.
A seller says they were charged a large fee just to respond to standard enquiries during a leasehold sale.
On Mumsnet, a buyer says their homebuyer survey valued a £680,000 house at £615,000 – the lender would still lend, but they suddenly felt like they were overpaying massively.
We were not told about viewings being cancelled; buyers just stopped appearing.
On another MSE thread, posters discuss buying the previous buyer’s searches and survey after a fall-through to avoid paying again for the same checks.
This company should be shut down. Iv been waiting nearly 8 months now to complete a simple, no problems house purchase.
Overstated value to win instruction, then kept pushing reductions with poor follow-through.
Someone on the forum said they’d been reading HousingUK threads where people’s house sales collapsed, and you could just feel how extreme the stress levels were.
Our original buyer pulled out and the agent suggested selling them our searches to claw back a bit of money, which shows how wasteful the system can be.
They stress that the TA6 is part of the contract, so glossing over noise, harassment or boundary rows can end in costly legal battles.
A Times story described a family who’ve spent over £43,000 on service charges and council tax trying for years to sell their late mother’s retirement flat.
We’re currently living in one hotel room with our two kids because our sale proceeds are locked in a PM Law client account. The purchase can’t complete and we can’t go back to the house we sold.
What was sold to us as a quick, clean purchase turned into a long chain with constant changes and delays.
The cost of repeated surveys and legal checks has been huge – we’re haemorrhaging money without moving anywhere.
Another buyer discovered their seller had a habit of offering on places and backing out just before survey – they’d done it ‘for years’, leaving a trail of collapsed chains behind.
Complaints partially upheld: delays sending a conveyancing quote and failure to call during the process.
Families were watching inheritance eaten away year after year by charges on empty flats they couldn’t shift, even after large price cuts.
They changed fee earner without telling us and never kept us properly updated.
We were recommended an ‘integrated’ mortgage service and sent all documents, then the adviser disappeared entirely. After weeks of silence we had to start again elsewhere.
We’re racing the clock before our fixed-rate with consent to let ends – if we can’t sell, we’re stuck with a rental that barely covers the costs.
We were repeatedly told our solicitor was ‘waiting on searches’, but when we checked with the local authority, no search request had ever been submitted.
The trade-off was a lower price in return for certainty, but it says a lot that people are willing to sacrifice equity just to finally move.
“Our buyer withdrew within a day of the chain collapsing. Nightmare.”
Bettermove say you *can* sell with a neighbour dispute, but buyers often demand a hefty discount or walk away once they see the history of complaints.
The sale fell through and the buyer promised to share the survey report, but it never appeared; I’m now stuck trying to complain about a surveyor whose work I haven’t even seen.
“장umping is alive and well… avoid at all cost.”
It took them 5 months after instruction to send initial enquiries.
Seller reports being within a day of chain collapse due to slow progress and lack of access to an actual solicitor.
The house we were buying was taken off the market just days before completion, leaving us back at square one and unable to move as planned.
After my first purchase fell through I used the same surveyor again, but this time he kept rearranging and going quiet for weeks, leaving the whole purchase in limbo.
The agent had a long sole-agency tie-in and we felt trapped with a team who hadn’t managed to get the first sale over the line.
We were warned by our solicitor that if the money stuck with PM Law isn’t released promptly, the seller could serve a notice to complete and then keep our deposit if we can’t perform.
The valuation came in well below the agreed price and the buyer’s broker said the only option was a big reduction; when we said no, they walked away.
Told it was a scam: documents not delivered and refund requests ignored; no phone number.
Seller says a survey report spooked their buyer, who backed out after reading it, despite the seller disputing the findings.
In one brutal month I had a miscarriage, my husband wrote off the car, then our house sale collapsed on top of everything else. It was overwhelming.
PM Property Lawyers have made our flat purchase unbearable: constant delays, no communication and we’re terrified of losing the property because they just don’t move things along.
My conveyancer advised me the property was not registered in my name, rather the owner before.
A seller says they were bullied and spoken to aggressively throughout the instruction, making the process stressful.
They warn that these issues quickly turn into missed deadlines, frustrated clients and sometimes failed sales when chains lose patience.
A poster on Digital Spy said they were ‘so stressed’ after their house sale fell through on the day they were expecting to complete, leaving them with removals booked and nowhere to go.
Very poor service… did not chase the chain, keep us upated, return calls… provided incorrect advice…
One buyer in the legal section said the sellers pulled out days before exchange, after months of obstructing survey access and being vague about their mortgage situation.
Our buyer’s solicitor insisted on waiting for a full local search instead of using search insurance; by the time it finally came back, they’d changed their mind about the house.
Gaddes Noble admitted in an email that they failed to answer Land Registry requisitions, causing our application to be cancelled and resubmitted, with months of extra delay and stress.
Everyone told us ‘it should be fine’, but if the offer lapses we’ll be legally committed to buy without any guaranteed finance in place.
They say too many firms still fail to explain costs clearly or manage expectations, especially when third-party delays threaten a purchase deadline.
General complaint: ‘unethical and incompetent’ behaviour (no specifics provided in snippet).
A Homeselling Expert guide says estate agents must tell you honestly why a sale has fallen through – hiding the reason is treated as omitting material information.
On a London subreddit, a leaseholder reported a £5,500 annual service charge for a one-bed flat and said residents were furious and struggling to afford it.
Three different sales collapsed because of issues further up the chain; each time we paid for fresh searches and legal work.
Case studies include owners whose lives and retirement plans are derailed because they can’t afford to extend leases or escape toxic contracts.
This has to be the most unprofessional company ever! ... lost numerous important documentation.
We’d booked removals, taken time off work and lined everything up, then were told completion ‘wasn’t happening today’ with no real explanation.
They took £2,222.0 from my account for a property i never view.
They warned others that if your buyer’s mortgage offer runs out, you can easily lose not just the buyer but your onward purchase and all your upfront fees.
Locked into a long contract while service felt slow and unprofessional; increased stress during sale.
my apartment sale is about to fall through for the second time because of this and I could cry
On an auction-fees thread, posters say big reservation fees (e.g. £5k+) are split between the auctioneer and the estate agent, which is why the method is sometimes pushed hard.
The solicitor failed to explain that the 'flying freehold' element of the property could cause remortgage problems. Our next lender refused the security and we faced extra legal costs to resolve it.
The redress scheme says clearer material information means happier consumers and fewer disputes for agents and developers.
We’d been on the market a year, changed agents and dropped the price repeatedly. We finally found a cash buyer who didn’t even want a survey, then he still pulled out.
A PistonHeads thread about down valuations includes someone who says the surveyor ‘missed a lot of things and added things that didn’t exist’, leaving both sides confused and angry.
Our chain-free sale dragged on for months; the conveyancers were so slow and unresponsive that the buyer eventually pulled out altogether.
Our sale didn’t complete on the agreed day because the buyers simply failed to transfer funds. We’d booked removals and time off work and ended up sat in a packed house waiting for a call that never came.
Replies point out that formal complaints and council records definitely count as disputes and must be revealed on the TA6, however inconvenient that is for a sale.
Sale attempted but fell apart due to critical information not being disclosed upfront.
HousePriceCrash posters complain that surveyors are routinely down-valuing homes in some areas, effectively preventing buyers from borrowing enough to pay the agreed price.
Conveyancing is driving me crazy: we’re at month six and still chasing updates. We’re told “next week” every week.
A poster described their chain falling apart on the day of exchange; they had completion dates booked, boxes packed, and then everything stopped in one email.
We realised how badly our first estate agent had overvalued the house when we had to relist with a national firm at only 72% of the original asking price after a failed sale.
Slow slow and slow.
Another Guardian piece accuses some housing associations of mis-selling by underplaying service charges, which later jumped by hundreds of percent after people moved in.
A buyer’s forum post says the flat they want has a £190 per month service charge – by their maths, that extra cost could instead fund a larger freehold house.
After four collapsed chains in a row, I feel like the English system encourages people to make promises they can walk away from without consequence.
A Russell-Cooke client describes switching to them after ‘unnecessary delays’ with a previous solicitor, saying the old firm risked them missing a stamp duty deadline.
The solicitor failed to recognise a shared drive maintenance agreement was missing. The lender demanded it at the last minute, delaying the entire chain while a deed was drafted.
Seller reports their sale collapsed because the buyer s solicitor repeatedly failed to send a simple redemption statement for weeks, while the estate agent just kept saying it was with the lawyers.
The article says too many clients feel left in the dark during key stages, especially when deadlines linked to tax changes or mortgage offers are looming.
They felt the agent was more interested in pushing them into a quick disposal than in getting a fair price, especially after the first sale collapsed.
Our 2009 sewage treatment plant was installed with building control approval and complies with regulations, but the buyer's solicitor keeps raising additional queries. We are worried this will delay or jeopardise the sale.
The conveyancer missed a clear right-of-way issue shown on the title plan. Only when our neighbour objected after completion did we realise our access was legally disputed.
Our buyers pulled out claiming they were uncomfortable with the speed; in reality our solicitor had been slow and unresponsive from the start.
One star says all you need to know. Awful experience.
Another thread, ‘Sale fell through because of tenant next door’, describes party noise, rubbish and barking dogs that put buyers off completely.
the lender has not yet come back with a reply since two weeks now and our solicitor seems least intrested
Very disappointed with the whole sales process... the papers we were sent for signing had the wrong address for the property we were selling.
SmoothSale reviewers describe hitting a ‘rough spot’ in a five-person chain where a previous sale fell through and they needed someone to step in fast to stop the rest unravelling.
My conveyancer stopped answering calls close to exchange which was terrifying.
The chain collapsed three days before completion; in Scotland that meant no penalties, but months of stress and starting over with a new buyer.
Seller says lack of updates and replies dragged out the process and threatened the whole chain.
A Sheffield Forum thread on gazumping notes that the only real ‘protection’ is to keep bidding or move on – until exchange, both sides are exposed to last-minute changes.
Our buyer pulled out after three months and we still received a solicitor bill for over £1,000.
Other Connells reviewers complain that surveyors lack local knowledge and that low valuations have wrecked their purchase or remortgage plans.
Our whole move depends on the bank extending an offer – one hiccup from a third-party management company and the chain could collapse completely.
They promised a fixed price but once the initial buyer dropped out, they still billed for every extra letter and call linked to the failed sale.
Campaigners accuse some housing associations of mis-selling by downplaying future costs, leaving owners stuck in homes that are hard to sell on.
Analysts say these rising charges are slowing down flat sales because buyers factor the annual bill into affordability and often walk away.
the property was not registered in my name, rather the owner before
One Trustpilot review for DSB Estate Agents said their sale fell through three times before it finally completed on the fourth attempt because buyers kept changing their minds.
A reviewer says a non-official ‘Land Registry’ site charged far more than the government service for the same document.
As a first-time buyer, a lender-commissioned valuation through Connells became a stressful blocker in the purchase.
They openly say the sale can fall through purely because an offer clock runs out – nothing to do with the buyers’ intentions, just the time it takes the system to grind along.
They said lenders refused to proceed without the cladding sign-off, so they had no choice but to watch the sale collapse and hope the next buyer would be a cash purchaser.
The buyer's solicitor refused to take a phone call to resolve a simple misunderstanding about fixtures and fittings. Instead, they insisted on writing formal letters back and forth, wasting over a week on something that could have been cleared in minutes.
They advise buyers to keep all marketing, TA6 answers and emails, because those documents often prove what was promised when a chain later collapses over hidden issues.
Hundreds of us have joined support groups because we’re effectively homeless in the middle of a transaction – our old homes gone, our new homes blocked, and nobody giving clear answers.
We only discovered an EWS1 was needed once the lender refused to issue a mortgage offer, by which point we’d all sunk money into legals and surveys.
They’d already paid for legal work and paperwork and were left none the wiser about what scared the buyer off in the report.
My buyer has suddenly requested a survey right before exchange. We were expecting to exchange this week and I am really worried about losing our onward purchase because of the delay.
They’d already spent hundreds on legal work and surveys and were left wondering if they could face the process again.
It then took weeks for them to finally admit they couldn’t proceed, by which point we’d already wasted time and money keeping everything ready to go.
Our buyer had the draft contract for nearly two weeks then suddenly told the estate agent he didn’t want the house anymore, no explanation, and didn’t even bother telling our solicitor until the next day.
They suddenly had to choose between overpaying, renegotiating or walking away and losing the money already spent on legals and surveys.
Selling process described as ‘appalling’ with zero ownership — different person each call and no resolution.
A seller describes long Land Registry timescales and the domino effect: buyer loss, onward purchase loss, and money down the drain.
I feel like I’m one admin error away from homelessness. My tenancy is ending, my purchase is frozen with a PM Law brand, and nobody can tell me when I’ll actually have a home to move into.
My own solicitor never warned me that the doubling ground rent could devalue the house and make it borderline unsellable.
Our conveyancer ignored emails from the developer’s solicitor, causing us to lose our reserved new-build plot. The builder refused to extend the deadline.
BLB Solicitors warn that sellers must disclose any neighbour dispute – even historic – and that buyers’ enthusiasm often evaporates once they hear about a ‘troublesome’ neighbour.
Our sale fell through and even the Citizens Advice adviser said they weren’t sure how to untangle who was at fault between agent, solicitor and lender.
One MSE user said they’d advised clients with riverside flats that high service charges made them hard to sell and kept prices lagging behind other blocks without such expensive upkeep.
They estimate the wider economic cost of failed sales at around £1.5bn a year, with buyers typically losing over a thousand pounds each time a purchase falls through.
One review mentioned that buyers hadn’t been properly vetted, leading to failed finance and wasted weeks for everyone else in the chain.
They’re left trying to decide whether to relist immediately or pause, knowing they’ll have to start the whole chain-building process all over again.
We sent several small transfers thinking they were to our solicitor. They were all going to scammers.
“Constant delays and stress… truly awful experience.”
Purchase derailed by missing upfront disclosures; buyer says the transaction became impossible to progress.
Our conveyancer repeatedly sent documents with incorrect names and dates. Each correction added another week of delay, and our mortgage offer expired mid-transaction.
Our buyers have had the survey done; the agent took my number in case it falls through, which makes you realise even at that stage nothing is guaranteed.
Upfront material information is pitched as a win-win: agents avoid fall-throughs, buyers avoid nasty surprises later.
The chain collapsed when one seller refused to fix a dangerous boiler; their attitude was ‘take it or leave it’ so the buyers left it.
A first-time buyer says they’re stuck in ‘limbo’ because the vendor’s onward purchase is delayed, nobody will explain why, and they have no timescale despite Christmas approaching.
After we complained, our conveyancer admitted they’d mixed our file up with another client’s and had to redo several documents from scratch.
Another post in The Vault community shows a buyer being turned down for a flat because the service charge was more than 1% of the property’s value each year.
In ‘Sellers’ solicitors are moving slow’, a buyer says their own lawyer is fast and responsive, but the seller’s solicitors are dragging things out and risking the deal.
We’ve been gazumped once already and know from experience how quickly months of conveyancing and all the associated costs can vanish overnight.
They warned that taking buyers to court is stressful, slow and far from guaranteed – but sometimes it’s the only way to claw back anything after a last-minute collapse.
Seller says a chain-free sale still took many months, with minimal progress and repeated excuses.
Client claims solicitor failed to act on a query from the buyer’s solicitor for nearly a month.
They say buyers are understandably wary of inheriting a feud, and some will simply walk away or demand a hefty discount.
They claimed I had a life insurance policy issue and rang almost daily—felt like a scam attempt to fish for information.
The conveyancer couldn’t explain clearly which fees were recoverable if the sale collapsed; unsurprisingly, when it did collapse, we recovered nothing.
We were told the lease was ‘straightforward’, then half-way through the process we discovered ground rent doubles every ten years.
A reply warns that many buyers will “run a mile” when they see ‘modern method of auction’, implying it can hinder sales and reduce serious interest.
They say if they’d known the reason the last sale collapsed, they would have walked away before spending money and getting emotionally committed.
We paid PM Property Lawyers an upfront fee, then they suddenly decided they couldn’t act. Despite promising to refund us, weeks of chasing later we still hadn’t seen our money back.
They couldn't be any worse if they tried.
Restrictive covenant discovered on the eve of exchange. We were told the garden was 'private' but found out access rights were shared.
A solicitor allegedly sent the wrong contract pack twice, delaying the entire chain by weeks.
Our buyer pulled out citing ‘personal circumstances’ and that was that. The vendors of the house we were buying immediately put theirs back on the market and reduced the price.
A seller disputes owing fees after claiming an agent promised viewings and a sale that never happened, alongside “lack of contact”, and says their property was taken off the market without clear warning about charges.
They warn that trying to hide rows with neighbours can be treated as misrepresentation, leaving sellers facing legal claims long after completion.
Our solicitor assured us that a long-running neighbour dispute was 'historic' and nothing to worry about. The first thing that happened after we moved in was a new solicitor's letter from next door.
A PM Law / PM Property Lawyers client says even the complaints team showed ‘prolonged delays, lack of communication and repeated errors’, and that they waited weeks just to get their completion statement and money back.
On a first-time buyer group someone said their previous sale fell through and they squarely blamed the panel solicitor recommended by the agent for being slow and unresponsive.
We were offered no-sale-no-fee, declined it, and when the buyer pulled out the conveyancer still chased us aggressively for their full bill.
We have lost our buyer and want to offer them the survey report we paid for to our seller instead. We are not sure whether to go through the estate agent or the seller's solicitor.
Scam warning: misleading promises about refunds and overvaluations; buyer urged to read before paying.
Deed of variation promised ‘shortly’, then slow follow-ups with repeated chasing required.
We’re staying in short-term accommodation while we wait for a new firm to be appointed. The whole point of lining up sale and purchase for the same day was to avoid this exact ‘between homes’ situation.
They declared a property ‘unmortgageable’ due to communal areas, which stalled progress and felt like self-protection over accuracy.
A thread lists ‘classic estate agent lines’ like downplaying service charges and insisting the last sale fell through because of the buyer — implying the real reason can be hidden.
They describe clients who struggled to get basic answers about what stage their purchase had reached, or why nothing seemed to be happening for weeks.
Our mortgage broker submitted the application with the wrong income figures; when the lender double-checked, the offer was pulled and the chain collapsed.
The estate agent was insistent that we speak to their in-house mortgage advisor. It didn’t feel like guidance — it felt like coercion.
ABSolicitors point out that TA6 question 2 directly asks about disputes; failing to answer honestly can put you in serious trouble later.
Totally incompetent - they should pay me. Expensive and happily miss deadlines.
One adviser in the FCA’s Financial Lives survey said they’d been told they could change the property address on their mortgage if the first purchase fell through, only to find the lender wouldn’t honour that when it actually happened.
Shocked to be basically 'scammed' by this firm… I have now received an invoice to open the file.
They pointed out that communal heating rolled into the service charge is especially unpopular since energy prices spiked, putting off both buyers and lenders.
They’d been told the buyer’s mortgage was approved and everything was ‘on track’, and were devastated to lose both the sale and their upfront costs.
“Offer accepted… middle of April… edging closer to September… no idea where the sale is.”
Our conveyancer took ten days to answer simple enquiries; the chain above us grew impatient and found a different buyer who could move faster.
AVOID, AVOID AVOID!!!! No communication with myself or vendor's Solicitors at all. No work done on the file.
Seller’s house sale fell through near completion; they believe the other side’s solicitor mishandled things.
A Smoothsale reviewer says they only turned to a quick-sale company because their original buyer pulled out, putting the entire chain at risk and leaving them panicking about losing their onward purchase.
Valuation was completed, but the lender still hadn’t reviewed it. The broker was told it could take up to 10 working days, delaying everything.
A MoneySavingExpert user said their buyer’s mortgage offer expired after months of delays, forcing everyone to sit and hope while a new lender was found.
The agent pushed us toward a house-buying company that offered far below market value after our open-market sale fell apart.
Endless delays, lies and inefficiencies... asked to review documents they have not sent.
Felt like nobody owned the case; delays and little response led to missing out on a property.
The Guardian reported shared-ownership residents whose ‘affordable’ homes now have service charges up to £8,000 a year, making them nearly impossible to sell.
Another MSE user said they’d walked away from a flat purchase after discovering the service charge could be increased at the freeholder’s discretion with no meaningful limit.
My partner is moving in with me but the house is in my name. I know I need to notify the council about losing the single person discount, but I do not know who else I must inform and whether the lender or insurer needs to be told.
The judge said her behaviour crossed into harassment and blackmail because she was trying to sabotage every attempted sale until he paid her off.
PropertyInvestmentsUK notes that fall-throughs often happen because surveys or searches reveal structural issues, rot or title problems that buyers weren’t warned about earlier.
An Action Fraud/NCA/Law Society leaflet claims victims can lose their entire deposit or purchase money, and includes a case study where a buyer lost £640,000 after spoofed solicitor emails led to a payment diversion and the purchase collapsed.
They list real court cases where buyers successfully claimed thousands because key issues like flooding or neighbour trouble were glossed over.
Citizens Advice highlight complaints where estate agents didn’t return deposits promptly or failed to pass money on correctly when a sale fell through.
We discovered by accident that our buyer had already withdrawn when we saw our own house listed as ‘available’ again on a portal before the agent even called us.
A seller says their sale collapsed at the last minute for the second time and they blame the estate agent for repeatedly saying the buyer’s mortgage was sorted when it wasn’t.
They said Taylor Rose repeatedly sent paperwork to the wrong firm, ignored emails for weeks and left everyone blaming each other while the transaction slowly died.
Our buyers took offence when we said we’d be taking the relatively new fridge; they said it made us seem greedy and pulled out rather than negotiate.
If they’d been honest from the start the whole saga could have been avoided – instead we wasted months and legal fees on a deal that was never real.
One family’s inheritance has been eroded by roughly £43,000 while they wait for a buyer, watching the flat sit on the market despite big price cuts.
“Communication… had to chase for updates and time frames.”
A buyer says the estate agent handling a previously failed sale “blatantly lied” and they only discovered late on that the extension had no building control sign-off — the reason the earlier sale collapsed.
We’re on our second failed sale due to survey ‘issues’. It feels like surveyors are covering themselves by flagging everything, and buyers just panic and pull out.
We believe our details were shared without consent during the process, which then harmed the application. Felt unsafe and unprofessional.
Buyer in a chain says progress stalled because others were still waiting on local authority searches, with uncertainty around timescales.
We were warned that if we didn’t find a new buyer in two weeks, we’d lose our onward purchase and thousands in fees we’d already paid.
Posters warned that such high, inflation-linked charges will only rise, turning a seemingly nice flat into a long-term financial trap.
Agent allegedly ignored emails and didn’t push buyers for updates; seller felt they were doing all the chasing.
Our mortgage offer runs out in under two weeks and the sellers keep delaying; if we miss the deadline, the replacement deal will cost about £5,400 more.
Our sale fell through after the solicitor sent the wrong draft contract twice and then went on holiday without telling anyone.
Citizens Advice more or less confirmed there was nothing we could do – until exchange, buyers can just walk away and you’re left out of pocket.
We were due to complete with a PM Law firm acting in our chain and now everything has stalled. Agents, buyers and sellers are all waiting on news about files and funds that are locked behind closed offices and an ongoing investigation.
On MoneySavingExpert, one poster says their conveyancer turned the transaction into a ‘black hole’ – weeks of silence where they had no idea what was going on.
We spent months on a shared-ownership flat before being told the legal title wasn’t in order; our buyers’ lender refused to proceed and they pulled out.
The whole process of buying a house has been painful and this is largely down to our solicitor.
Solicitor failed to notice a restrictive covenant preventing driveway changes, leaving new owner facing enforcement.
Our buyers walked away after their solicitor warned them about ongoing neighbour disputes over access; it was the first we’d heard that this could scare people off.
Ten days of trying to contact them: no phone answers, no email replies, no progress updates.
After the survey, the valuation came back tens of thousands lower than expected and flagged issues we’d never been told about, creating panic late in the process.
The flat we are buying has no easement of access in the lease, electricity is supplied only by the freeholder, and there is no regular service charge, only ad hoc demands. We are concerned these issues may cause serious complications in the future.
They stress that being upfront about disputes is essential, even though doing so may slow the sale or reduce the price.
Our buyers suddenly pulled out because they were worried about a separate garage on the deeds, even though it had always been part of the property.
The reviewer said calls and emails weren’t returned, and then extra money was demanded for paperwork, adding insult to injury after the deal died.
The seller admits they just ‘lost interest’ in the house because nothing seemed to improve with the neighbour, so they put it up for sale.
They list failures such as not explaining who is dealing with the file, not setting expectations, and promising progress that never materialises.
The reviewer said a competent progressor made all the difference when it came to keeping the subsequent chain from collapsing again.
Very disappointed and feeling scammed… promised refund if the sale fell through.
They explain that unresolved rows with neighbours can directly lower the value and make a property much harder to shift.
As first-time buyers we’re watching our mortgage offer tick towards expiry while our PM Law conveyancer has gone and the replacement firm hasn’t even received our file yet.
We’re the second buyers on a house; the first sale fell through over the summer and now our survey has found more issues that weren’t mentioned before.
They added that while everyone technically knows what they’re signing up to as leaseholders, the way some landlords try to change the deal mid-way feels like a breach of trust.
The valuer did a very quick walk-through, didn’t check all rooms, and then undervalued—creating stress and delays for our deal.
Our chain is hanging by a thread – we sold in September, but third parties keep dragging their feet and it feels like any tiny wobble could bring the whole thing down.
City of London Police reported 143 conveyancing-fraud cases to Action Fraud (Apr 2024–Mar 2025) with £11.7m in losses, highlighting how big these scams can be during property transactions.
you have to chase them by phone because they do not answer emails.
Our sale fell through around six weeks in; the first-time buyers stopped answering calls and we eventually heard they’d decided the house was ‘too much work’.
Construction delays mean a 300 mile weekly commute and hundreds of pounds extra in fuel and childcare.
A seller claims they were promised a strong outcome at valuation but saw little traction and felt misled about performance.
The broker took weeks to submit our full mortgage application, and by the time it was assessed the lender’s product had been withdrawn.
The property we would like to buy has had building works done before 1995 and not all of the certificates are available. We want to know if the sale can still go ahead and whether we can get building control in to make sure it is safe.
Buyer’s purchase nearly lost because the solicitor’s delays and silence put the deal at risk.
A seller reviewing Avenue Road said their first sale fell through, but the agent had the property back on the market immediately and resold it within two days.
Our sale was delayed for months because the buyers’ broker had put them with a lender that wouldn’t accept the flat’s construction type.
Buyer complains both their solicitor and estate agent couldn’t contact the other side’s lawyer for a week, stalling an exchange they thought was imminent.
Reallymoving’s guide says neighbour issues should show up on the TA6 form, but if they weren’t disclosed and you only discover them after moving in, you may need legal advice.
Our lender would have extended the offer if the solicitor had sent a simple letter in time, but they sat on it and blamed ‘the system’ when it lapsed.
Within those cases, common themes include delay, failure to progress and poor communication – exactly the issues home movers complain about online.
Our buyers pulled out eight weeks in, citing a ‘personal issue’. We’d already packed, paid for searches and now have to start again from scratch.
They thought they were relocating with a portable deal, but after repeated fall-throughs and missed payments they ended up being ‘dumped’ by their lender completely.
On another thread, a seller said their buyers pulled out just after survey with no explanation and stopped answering calls, leaving the house back on the market with zero warning.
purchase attempt that fell apart due to a lack of critical information being disclosed upfront
Our housing association massively underestimated future service charges, so when bills quadrupled we found ourselves stuck with a home we couldn’t sell.
Buyer says their purchase fell apart when the vendor let the place instead, and now refuses further viewings until after notice to the tenant.
my phone kept ringing... rather calling 10 times.
A HousingUK buyer said the seller ticked ‘no disputes’ on the TA6, but they later learned of repeated complaints and issues with the houses next door.
We have had a terrible experience with a bills management company called The Bunch, who are supposed to collect money from us and pass it to suppliers. They have taken money but not paid the suppliers, sent random extra charges and demanded ridiculous sums, and overall it has been the worst time dealing with them.
The constant fear that another sale will fall through is the main thing stopping us from trying again; we just can’t face paying all those upfront costs once more.
We gave up on a purchase after two different surveyors came back with totally conflicting views, leaving us no idea who to trust.
The buyer’s lender refused the mortgage because the lease banned pets and they already had a dog; the whole chain collapsed over a clause we’d never noticed.
Estate agent and we both called the seller’s solicitor. They said they’d ‘try to call back’ and then vanished. The chain collapsed two days later.
We lost our buyer because we couldn’t afford to replace old electrics up-front and their lender wouldn’t release funds until the work was done.
Felt the whole purchase was made painful by slow responses and constant delaying.
Campaigners accuse housing associations of mis-selling by massively under-estimating future charges, leaving owners stuck in properties they can’t sell or afford long-term.
When we tried to resurrect the purchase a few months later, we were told the original mortgage offer had expired and we’d have to start again from scratch.
They praised the conveyancer for sticking with them through months of extra work and continually chasing others when the process kept grinding to a halt.
The seller tried to charge extra for built-in white goods and even the garden shed; that petty behaviour made us question what else we’d have to fight over.
Left without progress for weeks; needed to review paperwork but it wasn’t provided.
We had our sale and onward purchase both with the same PM Law brand. Overnight closure means both transactions are frozen, movers booked, and we’re looking at the real prospect of having no home to go to.
A Financial Ombudsman case study shows an insurer rejecting a subsidence claim by arguing the damage happened before the policy started, leaving the homeowner with a damaged house and no payout.
Our house sale fell through at the very last minute, but the Yopa team had new viewers booked within days and managed to secure another buyer before the chain collapsed completely.
A housepricecrash.co.uk thread bluntly says ‘service charges will make your flat hard to impossible to sell’ and calls leasehold a scam.
The phone goes unanswered and emails sit in my inbox for days. My solicitor says ‘we’ll reply next week’ every week.
One JustAnswer question comes from a seller who filled in the TA6 with ‘no disputes’, then later had to complain about a neighbour using their driveway.
Sorting out the garden title took so long that our mortgage offer expired and the solicitors stopped returning calls, leaving the whole move in tatters.
Our buyers walked away the day before exchange – one email and six months of planning, packing and paying fees just evaporated.
We’ve got a notice to complete, our solicitor has already sent the mortgage funds to a PM Law firm, but no keys have been released. Every day that passes increases the risk of us being in breach of contract.
Conveyancers say they’re still in the dark about how material information rules will work in practice, leaving sellers confused too.
We lost money when the estate agent held onto our deposit after the sale collapsed and we had to fight to get it back.
We’ve been told the SRA now controls client accounts, but as sellers we still don’t know where our completion monies are or how to get them.
Our mortgage offer expired just before exchange because someone in the chain didn’t keep an eye on the dates – now the lender doesn’t have to honour it.
The chain wasn’t even that big, but we were told a mortgage offer had a hard expiry date, so everyone rushed and still nearly missed it.
Seller reports their solicitor failed to request signed documents from a joint owner, delaying progress for weeks.
My new-build completion has been delayed for months. I am paying for an Airbnb and storage every week.
The idea that you might have to take over the right to manage just to make your flat saleable shows how broken some managing agents have allowed things to become.
Our buyer’s buyer has pulled out and we are desperate not to lose the house we are buying. We absolutely love it and are even considering putting a stakeholder deposit with our solicitor as reassurance to the seller that we will not pull out. Our solicitor says she has never done this before and does not have a suitable contract, so we feel very exposed and unsure how to keep our purchase together.
The HomeOwners Alliance says rising legal complaints often relate to slow updates, lost documents and clients only discovering problems once their sale collapses.
We’ve been trying to sell our tenanted leasehold flat on and off since 2021. High service charges and a saturated local market mean almost no serious interest.
They feel misled by the original figures and trapped in a place where rising charges and a nasty lease clause could scare off any future buyer.
On a flat-owners’ thread, someone said council flats are famously hard to sell on; most people they know who bought theirs plan to stay for life because there isn’t really a resale market.
The agent never mentioned the house had subsidence or that a previous sale collapsed over it. Buyers can easily waste £500–£1,000 on surveys before discovering what the seller already knows.
Our solicitor repeatedly missed calls and emails from the lender requesting clarification on the title plan. The mortgage offer was suspended until we escalated the issue.
Another contributor said their agent had over-valued the property to win the instruction, then shrugged when the first sale collapsed and showed little urgency finding a new buyer.
Now facing the risk of incurring unnecessary stamp duty costs.
Our sale fell through a week before exchange when the buyer suddenly ‘changed their mind’ – no real reason given, just months of stress down the drain.
My flat has been on the market since April. I paid £280k for this new build but listed it for £270k as it had already lost value, then dropped to £260k in July and have only had two viewers all year. I am wondering whether to take it off the market until after Christmas or drop to £250k.
Posters said sellers often blame ‘flaky buyers’, but usually it’s something real: finance issues, survey results or information that should have been clear earlier.
They worry that any formal complaint could scare buyers off or trigger awkward disclosures when they fill in the property information forms.
Seller claims their solicitor forgot to order indemnity insurance that the buyer required and only admitted it when chased.
We now have to choose between overpaying, begging family for extra deposit or letting go of the only place we’ve really wanted.
They’re watching neighbouring houses sell while their high-fee flat sits, because anyone who can do the maths realises the charges kill affordability.
Four months after accepting an offer, our buyer's mortgage lender has suddenly requested a radon report before issuing the offer. The rest of the chain is ready to exchange.
Buyer alleges they paid an upfront fee and were later told the firm could not act, then struggled to get the refund.
The solicitor never clearly told us we needed buildings insurance from exchange, which caused confusion with the lender and delayed completion.
They said people in the block couldn’t sell because buyers were immediately put off by the fees, leaving owners financially trapped.
British Homebuyers are praised by one reviewer for stepping in after their first sale fell through, re-marketing fast and keeping them updated throughout.
Our solicitor recommended an online conveyancing outfit that turned out to be painfully slow; the buyers almost gave up on us entirely.
The agent and sellers were aware of a major issue with the property but did not disclose it. We discovered it later from their social media and had to fight to recover our costs.
Bettermove explain that high service charges make flats harder to sell because buyers don’t just compare asking prices – they factor in years of expensive running costs.
The emotional crash when the buyers pulled out just before we expected to move was awful. I didn’t sleep properly for weeks afterwards.
It feels like the lender can change the rules halfway through; the sale fell through for reasons totally beyond my control and yet I’m the one worrying my mortgage deal might vanish.
They’re unsure whether they’ve already signed anything that legally locks them into buying and what penalties they might face if they walk away.
After the fourth chain collapse in two years I’m exhausted and heartbroken; this time the buyer at the bottom said a surprise bill meant they couldn’t afford to continue.
Poster says their agent was poor at handling basics, kept them out of the loop and communicated badly throughout the sale.
Surveyor arrived far earlier than agreed, rushed through the visit, and it felt like the report couldn’t possibly reflect a proper inspection.
They tried to challenge what they saw as obvious errors but were effectively told only the lender could complain, leaving them feeling fobbed off and powerless.
Nearly at completion, a buyer sent a large transfer and then discovered the payment was missing—creating panic and immediate risk.
The flat’s sale history showed previous attempts falling through over service charge concerns; our surveyor flagged the same risks and we pulled out too.
They’ve seen lots of cases where poor block management and opaque costs scare buyers away, forcing existing owners to drop their asking prices or stay stuck.
Nobody had mentioned the flood history in the listing and it wasn’t obvious until we paid for environmental reports.
Several recent court cases show how boundary disputes can completely destroy people’s finances – one pensioner was ordered to sell her home to cover over £100k in legal costs after a fence row.
7 days before completion… seller couldn’t move out because the next property was tenanted.
Our adviser from the estate agent’s panel was aggressive and kept pushing their life-insurance add-ons before even fixing the mortgage.
Our first buyer’s sale fell through because of leasehold issues in their flat, so we ended up selling separately and storing all our furniture for weeks.
A separate Ombudsman insight piece again names poor communication and delay as the most commonly upheld complaints, ahead of issues like costs or failure to advise.
They felt that without a specialist chain-rescue option, they’d have lost the house they were buying and wasted everything they’d spent on legal fees.
Our sale and purchase were both being handled by one of the PM Law brands. We were close to exchange when the closure hit. Now our lender, estate agent and new solicitor are all trying to work out where our paperwork and money are, but nobody can get a clear answer.
Homesellingexpert explains that under consumer protection rules, agents shouldn’t hide why a previous sale fell through when this would be important for a new buyer to know.
“There was a complete lack of communication… My buyer pulled out because of the time taken.”
We’d had a good relationship with our landlord for years but lately he’s making everything difficult – constant texts, unannounced visits, pushing us out because he wants to sell.
It says flat owners vent on forums about being stuck with homes that won’t shift unless they slash the asking price to offset ongoing charges and risks.
They report having to resend important paperwork multiple times because the firm either misplaced it or asked for duplicates they’d already received.
We feel trapped in a property that lenders increasingly don’t like and buyers don’t understand until their lawyer explains the small print.
A Movuno reviewer describes being with another agent who vanished once the ‘sold’ board went up; after four months that sale collapsed and they had to start over.
Our solicitor refused to communicate with the estate agent, slowing everything down. Basic updates took days because they would not speak to anyone but us directly.
The insurance broker couldn’t place the risk at a sensible price, so our lender refused to proceed and the purchase fell through.
A seller says a ‘reservation agreement’ product was sold as protection against buyers pulling out, but they call it ‘a complete scam and unfit for purpose’ after their experience.
One Trustpilot reviewer said their original agent did almost no marketing and relied entirely on Rightmove; once the first sale fell through, they switched to Agent & Homes instead.
The mortgage experience was so bad the lender agreed to compensation. The customer said they’d leave as soon as the fixed period ends.
We’ve had sales fall through over everything from survey results to mortgage problems and gazumping; each time we lose thousands in costs and months of our lives.
My solicitor went silent for three weeks with no updates, despite holding all documents needed to exchange. The estate agent confirmed the delay was entirely on their side.
Lloyds Bank say conveyancing fraud cases have jumped by nearly 30 percent with victims losing huge sums.
My lodger’s new-build flat was finished months late and she only completed two days before her mortgage offer expired; one more delay and the sale would have collapsed.
By the time we finally moved, we’d paid for two aborted purchases and one failed sale; we felt like we’d funded the entire industry except ourselves.
Being told to slash the price again after already listing way under market value felt like desperation tactics rather than proper advice.
They entered my rented home using a spare key with no notice from the agency. I felt completely unsafe and violated.
Seller claims they lost two separate sales after the same surveyor’s reports, and struggled to get clear explanations.
Down-valued the property by a huge amount during a remortgage despite other indicators being much higher. It derailed borrowing plans.
Another advice site explains that if your mortgage offer expires before completion, you might need a full new application and face higher monthly repayments.
Reading through other clients’ experiences is terrifying. Some of us have sent completion funds, some have drawn down mortgage money, others are getting notices to complete, and a few may now be stuck paying two mortgages because their PM Law firm folded mid-transaction.
Property118 features a landlord shocked by a hefty increase in maintenance and service charges, being told tribunal action is their only route to challenge reasonableness.
The same report includes examples where solicitors failed to follow instructions or give proper advice, causing serious financial loss and long-running disputes.
Our buyer pulled out after discovering shared access rights they hadn’t expected — the listing didn't mention the easement.
Seller withdrew during completion; the firm then fought hard to keep the buyer’s funds.
Felt ‘scammed’ after receiving an invoice to open a file despite only requesting quotes via a third party.
A conveyancing blog stresses that poor communication from solicitors is a major cause of delay, saying clients often wait too long for basic progress updates.
They admitted they accepted slightly less than they’d hoped in return for certainty and speed, because another collapse would have finished them off emotionally.
Eventually in August, I got the call I knew was coming. The buyers had lost faith and withdrew their offer.
Chain-free purchase dragging for months with little action; feels like constant chasing with minimal progress.
Our chain involves three families with children and one link used a PM Law firm. Everyone has either moved out or given notice and the agents say if replacement solicitors can’t pick this up quickly some of us could be left without a home.
Estate agents have had to issue special guidance to sellers and buyers whose files were with PM Law firms, because so many chains are now frozen.
We spent over fifteen hundred pounds on survey and legal work before discovering the chain had been misrepresented by the agent.
They list classic causes – buyer cold feet, slow solicitors, mortgage refusals and survey problems – the usual chain of events that leave sellers back at square one.
I completed on a property at the start of October and only now have my solicitors sent a mortgage deed for me to sign. I have already raised several errors with them and from what I can see this deed should have been signed before completion.
The same buyer says completion has needed to be by the end of next month for ages, but the vendor has ‘no sense of urgency’ and it’s putting the whole transaction at risk.
We lost thousands in survey, legal and mortgage fees when our sale fell through, with no way to recover the money or the months we wasted.
In the process of my moving and buying I was asked to send a copy of my trust documents... I have sent numerous...
I sent trust documents several times and still heard nothing back for weeks.
they kept the deposit from the buyer
“Most incompetent surveyors… error on report resulted in the sale falling through.”
Kept being told to chase by phone because email responses were rare; portal felt out of date.
Our sale fell through and now the conveyancing firm is chasing us for a hefty fee, even though their poor service was one of the reasons the buyer walked away.
They say many clients only realise things have stalled when they start chasing, because nobody has proactively explained the reasons for the delay.
Our first buyer pulled out over financing after all the conveyancing was done, leaving us racing against our own mortgage expiry with a new buyer.
I’ve seen countless posts where people’s house sales collapsed right before completion; it’s made me realise just how fragile the system is.
Seller refused to fix a lease issue where ground rent over £250 could trigger extra risks – something we only discovered during conveyancing.
In ‘Why is my buyer’s mortgage offer taking so long?’, an MSE seller says they’ve heard “it should be out tomorrow” repeated for weeks while the lender keeps asking for more documents.
By the time they understood there were cheaper, quicker options, the transaction had already fallen apart and they’d incurred avoidable costs.
They’re furious that the freeholder expects buyers to absorb hundreds extra per month on top of a mortgage and normal bills.
I had my offer accepted in early July. I have still not completed the purchase.
We had multiple false starts with buyers, but our conveyancer continued to chase the other solicitors and keep us updated so the third attempt finally completed.
They warned that even if buyers like the flat, they back off when they see big annual service charges and no clear cap on future increases.
They list dishonesty, discrimination and serious breaches of rules as reasons to escalate beyond an internal complaint when a firm’s behaviour crosses the line.
They talk about buyers forced to take drastic steps to rescue deals and others left out of pocket after months of legal work that led nowhere.
A second valuation came back £30k lower than an earlier one, risking the deal. The buyer said it created problems they didn’t need.
Kensington’s communication was described as dreadful during the mortgage journey. Felt like shouting into the void when trying to progress the case.
Another seller explains they tried to sell through a traditional agent but saw no progress at all, which pushed them to use an alternative firm instead.
I transferred my whole deposit to a PM Law firm a week before completion. Since the shutdown nobody can tell me where that money actually is or when it will be released.
Our buyers chose a PM Law group firm because it was on an online panel. After the shutdown there’s nobody to answer enquiries and we’re now stuck paying a mortgage on an empty house while we wait.
A whole chain collapsed when one buyer let their mortgage offer expire, proving how fragile everything is when lenders set tight deadlines.
Our estate agent says several buyers and sellers are now ‘between houses’ because their completions involved Butterworths and can’t go ahead. People have moved out, but they haven’t been able to move in anywhere.
Our first buyer backed out after five months. We held an open day, got three offers, then the second buyer also pulled out just before exchange.
Our sale stalled because the solicitor failed to respond to a simple enquiry about a historical indemnity policy. They later admitted it was 'buried in their inbox.'
After all the stress of one failed sale, having a company that simply got it done felt like a relief, even if we took a hit on the price.
Another Trustpilot review says the seller endured a year of chain collapses and frustration with other agents before finally completing with an agent who actively managed the chain.
Conveyancing dragged on with weak competence and communication, frustrating both the lender and the other side’s solicitor.
Getting mortgage documents was painful: no easy export, requests via a web form, and then waiting for documents by post. That added days of delay.
Interest rates jumped twice while we waited for the chain to sort itself out; by the time we were ready to exchange, the payments were no longer affordable and we had to walk away.
Residents complain about vague bills and unexplained hikes from managing agents, with potential buyers walking away once they see the paperwork.
Chains involving certain online agents kept failing due to badly put together sales and lack of regulation.
Seller says a required management pack for the sale was chased for roughly two months with little help or updates.
In a broader leasehold reform piece, the HomeOwners Alliance warns that rising and opaque charges are putting buyers off flats and slowing sales.
Our buyer was relying on a gifted deposit from parents, who changed their minds halfway through; the agent only told us when the chain had already collapsed.
My solicitor says the buyer’s solicitor hasn’t even contacted Barclays yet
They point out that enthusiasm for a house often plummets once a buyer hears there’s been a long-running row across the fence.
One buyer wrote on r/HousingUK that their purchase fell through because the lender’s surveyor down-valued the property and the seller refused to budge on price.
On another MSE thread ‘Pulling out of a house sale’, a first-time buyer wants to end their relationship and asks how late they can cancel the purchase.
A quote request turned into persistent badgering via email/text/calls.
This must be the worst legal firm in the country... They are so slow and not responsive to chasing things up.
Solicitor said they would act for me on conveyencing. I paid them the upfron fee and then they decided that they couldn't act for me.
We’re now into month six. Our solicitor keeps saying they’re ‘waiting on the other side’ but can’t give any sort of timeline.
The surveyor valued the property far below what we’d agreed to pay; our mortgage offer was cut and we couldn’t make up the difference, so the purchase collapsed.
I completed on the sale of my house, but PM Law never redeemed my mortgage. I’m now technically on the hook for a loan on a property I no longer own and a new mortgage on the place I’ve moved to.
Conveyancer forgot to request a management pack on a leasehold property until the buyer chased repeatedly.
Our landlord moved abroad and the house sale they were relying on fell through; we were suddenly told we might need to move out with very little notice.
My retired parents’ buyers pulled out at the last minute, putting their dream new-build at risk and leaving them facing the loss of all the fees they’d already paid.
They warn that failing to mention formal complaints or letters can give a buyer grounds to undo the deal later.
Our chain broke after nearly a year of stress; the buyers at the bottom walked away over a roof issue and our dream house went back on the market on Christmas Eve.
Reported aggressive chasing from a branch after using another agent; felt harassed.
On r/HousingUK someone wrote that their seller used Taylor Rose and the conveyancing was so chaotic and unresponsive that they were actually relieved when the sale fell through.
Flat purchase felt close to collapsing due to repeated delays and constant chasing for updates.
On MoneySavingExpert a poster says a friend’s entire chain collapsed because one person’s mortgage offer expired and the lender wouldn’t extend it.
A long-running forum post advises buyers to use independent verification tools and phone checks when transferring large sums, warning that ‘fraudulent solicitors’ and intercepted transactions can wipe you out.
Our sale fell through twice for different reasons, and the final sale was plagued by leasehold problems. Thankfully our solicitor stayed patient and kept pushing it along.
Voicemails, emails, nothing was replied to despite it being an urgent stage.
We’re in a leasehold block with endless management issues – missed maintenance, unanswered emails, random extra charges. Our solicitor warned it could put buyers off completely when we come to sell.
We instructed an online-only agent who were great at listing the house but useless once we went ‘under offer’ – no chain chasing, no updates, nothing.
I’m selling my flat largely to escape ever-increasing service charges; in the end it’s the building that’s trapping me, not the mortgage.
Buyer alleges poor confidentiality and unprofessional calls created mistrust during an active transaction.
Some shared-ownership residents report service charges of up to £8,000 a year, far higher than what they were originally told to expect.
On LegalAdviceUK, someone was told that once you’ve reported a neighbour to the police, that dispute has ‘crystallised’ and has to be declared on the TA6 when you sell.
A friend waited five months for her seller to find somewhere. In the end the vendor just decided not to move and the whole sale collapsed anyway.
Every time a surveyor knocks it down, another buyer disappears and we’re left wondering if the price will ever be ‘good enough’.
People on the forum said they’d avoid our block entirely; between charges and insurance, it’s the sort of flat that only cash buyers will touch.
They warn that if an agent won’t explain what went wrong, you can’t fix the issue or properly prepare for the next buyer.
We were four weeks from completion when our sellers simply changed their minds about moving. It was our fourth collapsed chain and we’re completely exhausted by this process.
Our potential new build was down-valued by the mortgage provider; I’m gutted and worried the vendor won’t meet us anywhere near the survey figure.
A first-time buyer described the process as far slower than expected, with long waits, stress, and minimal proactive communication.
A leaseholder describes being ignored across email and phone, resulting in prolonged uncertainty and stress.
We’re told that high service charges are now normal for newer developments, but buyers won’t pay the same price for a flat with huge annual costs, so our sale keeps failing.
They cause so much stress! You have been warned!
A property litigation firm says they’re increasingly helping buyers sue for property misrepresentation after sellers or agents glossed over serious defects or disputes.
Our sale went quickly, but the buyers’ solicitor still hasn’t got the LPE1 from the management company and it’s holding everything up.
The solicitor incorrectly advised us that planning permission wasn't required for a rear extension noted on the property. After exchange, the council issued an enforcement notice.
Posters pointed out that hundreds of pounds from that ‘abortive’ bill likely went straight back to the estate agent as a referral fee, even though the sale never completed.
The estate agent used WhatsApp to tell us a random completion date that our solicitor had never heard of. It caused chaos with removals and time off work.
We listed with a national agent and didn’t realise our flat had a sky-high service charge until buyers kept pulling out at the last minute.
My house sale in Scotland fell through after months of waiting. I’d been told to start packing, then suddenly it was all off and I felt physically sick.
They warn that stubborn pricing on either side often ends with the buyer walking away and the home going back on the market.
A Mumsnet thread listed all the classic points where sales fall through – survey, mortgage application, searches – basically any stage where new bad news can surface.
Our sale fell through and now the solicitor is chasing us for a big conveyancing bill even though we never got to completion and their service was terrible.
The buyer’s mortgage offer was due to expire and with no completion date in sight, everyone up the chain ended up back at square one.
I keep refreshing my email waiting for the solicitor to confirm exchange before the offer runs out – it feels like the entire move hangs on a single date.
Commenters tell them they’ve already lost time and money and probably need to cut their losses and find a seller who is not so unreliable.
They suggest keeping a close eye on the expiry date and pushing everyone in the chain to work towards it, rather than assuming it can be extended easily.
Average service charges hit around £2,300 a year, with some owners paying more in service charge than council tax.
A law firm warns that down-valuations and buyers’ mortgage issues are increasingly common reasons for sales to collapse or be painfully renegotiated at the last minute.
The reviewer describes an in-house adviser as making misleading assurances and then going quiet once fees were paid.
Buyer says they were effectively forced to see the in-house mortgage adviser to have a better chance of purchasing.
“They even failed to complete on the day agreed because of ‘ticking boxes’.”
I asked for a completion date, they told me ‘TBC’. Two hours later they emailed saying they’d booked next week. Then they cancelled without notifying us.
Absolutely appalling customer service and lack of knowledge as to what they offer.
I actually pulled out of the purchase on the day I was due to exchange… high risk flood area… same day.
A buyer says their solicitor flagged a ground rent clause that doubles every 25 years, warning it could be considered unreasonable and could cause lending problems.
A seller says a searches/title issue about land ownership triggered an adverse possession application, and they already lost one buyer and wasted fees on a property they wanted.
Today’s Conveyancer highlights a ‘significant rise’ in demand for help with conveyancing complaints, again pointing to poor communication and delays as the main themes.
Conveyancer promised weekly updates but I only heard anything when I chased repeatedly.
The broker miscalculated the rental stress test and only spotted it after valuation; the deal fell through and we were still billed for their fee.
I only found out later that the previous sale on the house had collapsed over serious issues, but the agent spun a totally different story to get us to offer.
I had the same experience as a buyer. Sale collapsed and the solicitor still invoiced me £1,000.
A Bishopsgate Law client calls them ‘the absolute worst law firm’, saying they’ve been dragging their feet for over a year on a simple lease extension while asking for more money and failing to liaise properly with the other side.
The Housing Ombudsman found dozens of complaints about inaccurate or unclear service charge estimates in shared-ownership schemes.
Our flat is in a popular, expensive city but the yearly service charge is so high that potential buyers walk away as soon as they see the figures.
I put my well maintained 1930s family home on the market and accepted a full asking price offer within two weeks, but since then the buyer's solicitors have been bullying, questioning a new boiler and new insured windows, and demanding indemnity policies. I have pulled out because the stress has become unacceptable.
They said the idea of starting again with a new offer and higher rates was terrifying, and they felt powerless to speed up solicitors or the vendor.
An architect and builder came to look at a house we are buying, said our original plan might not work, and have basically ghosted us since. If it can't be done we can't buy, but we are stuck because we don't own the house yet.
Buyers on Reddit have posted about mortgage offers expiring while they wait for searches and chains, saying they feel sick at the thought of their purchase collapsing after months of paperwork.
noone knew the complaints process.
Our mortgage offer was already in place when the original purchase fell through; the lender would only consider porting it if we jumped through more hoops and the new place met all their criteria again.
Paid a non-returnable lease-extension deposit, then the process didn’t complete in the agreed timeframe.
The same piece highlights confusion around the Building Safety Act, saying around 20% of conveyancers refuse to handle some flat sales because of cladding risks.
Our buyer pulled out because of a boundary dispute we inherited from the previous owner – a hedge encroaching a few inches suddenly became a deal-breaker.
Our sale fell through the day before exchange; the buyers suddenly decided they didn’t want to proceed without giving any clear reason.
British Homebuyers have reviews from sellers whose first sale with a local agent fell through; once they moved, BHB quickly found another buyer and kept the deal together.
They review the TA6, marketing and correspondence to show how misleading statements lured buyers into chains that later collapsed or left them out of pocket.
A r/HousingUK commenter says their colleague’s flat service charge shot up to £10,000 a year and is now basically unsellable without slashing the price.
AVOID, AVOID AVOID!!!! No communication… No work done on the file.
They describe the leasehold system as ‘unregulated and vile’, with no real way out once the annual costs have spiralled.
Warned site is not the official Land Registry; says search ads led them there and they were overcharged.
Later buyers tried to pressure us into exchanging with no firm completion date, which our solicitor warned could leave us badly exposed if anything went wrong again.
On a Trustpilot review, a seller said their first sale fell through but SmoothSale stepped in, put the property back out to their network and got it sold again quickly so the chain didn’t die.
As a cash buyer we felt misled and pushed away, which wasted time and forced us to look elsewhere.
Our previous mortgage was never redeemed before the PM Law collapse, but we’ve already completed our onward purchase. We’re now being chased on a loan secured against a property we’ve sold, while also paying the new mortgage.
They’re torn between giving their buyers time to find a new purchaser and rushing back to market so they don’t lose the home they’re trying to buy.
Seller says promises were made at valuation but marketing and updates were poor, leaving them stuck with little interest.
They felt they’d paid for a job that hadn’t been completed, on top of having to start all over again with new buyers and more costs.
Campaigners say many leaseholders were tempted in by low initial estimates without clear warning that charges could later soar.
They call the system ‘unregulated and vile’, saying leaseholders are trapped by rising charges and buyers run a mile as soon as they see the figures.
The hardest part isn’t just losing the sale, it’s mentally gearing up to relist and go through the whole rollercoaster again.
Our first-time buyer walked away after eight months because the managing agent took four months to produce a service charge pack and nobody chased them.
We walked away having burned cash on valuation, broker fees and searches for a property we never moved into.
They say buyers too often assume the offer will be extended automatically, only to discover the lender has changed its criteria or rates.
Another estate agent review describes a sale falling through, only for the branch to line up seven more viewings the following Saturday and achieve a higher offer.
Chain-free sale waited ~180 days with little progress; buyer pulled out after repeated chasing.
After five years of a boundary dispute over about a foot of land, an elderly homeowner has been ordered to sell her bungalow just to pay the six-figure legal bill.
Our mortgage offer is due to expire before completion because the legal work has dragged on for months; the broker says we might have to reapply on worse rates if we miss the deadline.
We had a rental property sale fall through twice. The buyers’ circumstances kept changing and every time we thought we were close, it collapsed again.
“We feel there’s no point re-listing until this is rectified.”
Their management service seems designed to do the bare minimum while letting others bear the cost.
We offered in early summer and were told conveyancing would take 12 weeks. We’re double that and still no exchange in sight.
Buyer says their solicitor forgot to request the EPC until very late, delaying completion unnecessarily.
Having an agent who spoke directly to the buyers and explained each step took a lot of stress out of the process after the earlier collapse.
Our agent put the house on the market with 'no onward chain' even though the vendor did have an onward purchase.
When the first sale fell through after months, we expected the agent to lose interest. Instead, they lined up a second sale and got it over the line in ten weeks.
City of London Police warns that criminals exploit trust and urgency during property transactions, with large sums diverted after fraudsters infiltrate email chains and issue convincing payment requests.
We contacted building control and were told the foundations are adequate, but insurers still won’t touch us after previous subsidence issues. I’ve no idea what to declare when we try to move.
They explain that if you think an estate agent’s actions have cost you money – like under-selling your property or misplacing a deposit – you might have to take formal action.
Our buyers backed out when their lender refused to lend on a pre-fab construction – something nobody flagged when the property was first marketed.
They were told that three months to get from offer to completion is ‘standard’ now, unless everyone is very motivated or paperwork already exists from a previous collapsed sale.
We started to wonder if we needed to change agents because nothing was happening and feedback was minimal.
After being burned once, just having an agent who picked up the phone and actually explained what was going on made a huge difference.
On MSE, a seller says their buyer’s buyer pulled out a week before exchange, and the agent immediately suggested relisting because their onward seller was unlikely to wait.
A Screwfix community thread has a seller whose 150-year-old home was hit with a long list of issues and a down-valuation after the buyer’s homebuyer survey.
A poster said their buyers gave no real reason for backing out; the solicitor just emailed that they were withdrawing and signed off with a casual ‘sorry’.
We were about to put in an offer on another property when our buyer backed out after four weeks, leaving us completely gutted and back at square one.
A Parkers Tilehurst review says their original sale fell through ‘through no fault of theirs’, but the agent got the property back on the market quickly and kept the chain moving.
We walked away when the gas engineer condemned the boiler; the sellers wouldn’t budge on price and we didn’t want to move children into a risky home.
In a Mumsnet thread, someone said their vendors pulled out after months, just as they were about to exchange, because they ‘no longer fancied moving’ and wanted more time.
After losing that buyer we’re back to square one, exhausted and wondering if we should just give up moving altogether.
The buyer used the survey as an excuse to walk away with no explanation, and we were left with all the legal and survey costs.
We were renting in a new area, paying a mortgage on an empty house and a huge removals bill, all because the sale collapsed after we’d already left.
The chain broke twice and we still had to complete our sale, putting our belongings into storage while we waited for a new purchase to go through.
This is holding up the sale of my property
A seller claims they lost multiple sales because the management company didn’t send required information to solicitors.
Result is the entire deal is dead, we have the legal fees, around £2,700 to pay our lawyers
Despite big price cuts, the flat is still unsold, and exit fees mean they’ll lose a chunk of the inheritance even if a buyer eventually appears.
National Trading Standards says improving material information in listings should lead to fewer complaints and faster transactions.
Fall-throughs in 2025 have cost UK movers an estimated £275 million so far.
Poor communication, slow process. Very frustrating to deal with
They describe being stuck because the lender may also refuse to proceed without the information, so the sale can’t move forward either way.
Countrywide estate agents run Bridgfords in York… Poor communication. Money grabbing. Blame everyone but themselves.
We thought the buyers were chain-free but later discovered they were relying on a sale that kept collapsing; every time we got close to exchange, something else went wrong.
“Sale fell through… cost me thousands… they kept the deposit from the buyer.”
A Mumsnet user said their house sale has fallen through three times because buyers weren’t sure what they wanted – she begged people not to offer unless they’re genuinely committed.
They highlighted that poor communication and delay are still the most common issues in property work, years after reforms were promised.
They emphasise that complaints to the council or police create a paper trail buyers can uncover, even if sellers try to gloss over the history.
Ten days of no answers to calls/emails/chats while midway through a sale/purchase situation.
They say if your solicitor doesn’t answer complaints within eight weeks, you can escalate, especially where conveyancing delays or silence are causing stress.
The sellers tried to charge extra for basic appliances and then insisted on removal fees when we declined, which was the final straw in an already fraught purchase.
Homebuilding & Renovating magazine notes that a third of Legal Ombudsman complaints relate to conveyancing, with poor communication and slow progress the main reasons.
My house sale fell through and the place I was buying was taken off the market a week before completion – I’m stuck in a home I was mentally already leaving.
There were 78,855 fall-throughs in Q1 2025 costing buyers and sellers an average of £3,493 each.
Agent ignored emails for days even when offers and deadlines were on the table.
A Trustpilot review for Conveyancing Direct says they were ‘so slow we lost our buyer’, with the sale of a chain-free home still not completed after 180 days.
They praised being given clear options and timelines instead of vague reassurances, which helped them make decisions before the chain collapsed completely.
We almost completed without anyone checking building regs for the loft conversion; when the lender asked for paperwork that didn’t exist, the buyers walked.
Cost me thousands of pounds, sale fell through
We had to decide whether to swallow the higher payment, renegotiate the price or walk away after spending over £1,000 on fees.
A different Reddit user asks if they’re ‘overreacting’ to their solicitor’s delays, saying the lack of updates is causing serious stress during their first home purchase.
ONP Solicitors warn that choosing the wrong conveyancer can lead to delays, poor communication and nasty surprises later in the transaction.
Solicitor delayed exchange by refusing to send the replies to enquiries until the following Monday for ‘administrative reasons’.
Three failed sales over ~11 months; review blames mis-management and poor communication during marketing and progression.
Our solicitor vanished off the radar just when we needed to complete before the mortgage deadline, and we nearly lost the house as a result.
Our sale fell through after the buyer’s surveyor flagged ‘damp issues’ everywhere. It feels like surveyors go nuclear so buyers panic and walk rather than negotiate.
Our house sale fell through while we were on holiday; we came back to an email saying the buyers had changed their minds.
Home mover complains they have been waiting many months for Land Registry to update their title and that their conveyancer just blames the backlog without giving any timeline or real help.
We tried to sell our old survey to another buyer after the mortgage fell through, just to recoup a fraction of what we’d lost.
Buyer says the process became an emotional grind because basic actions took too long and nobody owned it.
A MoneySavingExpert poster ranted that their estate agent overvalued the house, barely generated any interest, then the eventual buyer still backed out and they had to relist at a lower price.
“I’ve just had a breakdown of the conveyancer fees… pay a fee for every single element.”
After exchange, our buyer’s insurer withdrew cover because of historic subsidence; suddenly completion was at risk and nobody seemed to know what to do.
Our current agent is fine at sticking things on Rightmove, but not proactive enough to drum up the viewings we need to rescue the chain in time.
My main issue was communication. Lack of updates. Agreements to call back and then hearing nothing.
We exchanged on a new build knowing the mortgage offer would run out before the developer’s completion date – now we’re panicking that the lender might refuse to extend.
Buyer claims the file was reassigned multiple times and progress stalled each time, with key steps repeatedly restarted.
Daylight robbery! Connells have taken my money for several valuations during the past year.
Our new solicitor barely returned emails and escalations were ignored as well.
Buyer pulled out due to long timescales and difficulty getting responses between firms.
Our housing association flat has become a financial trap; rising service charges and lease clauses mean every sale attempt either collapses or never gets off the ground.
Even after heavy price drops, the flat still hasn’t sold, and exit fees mean they’ll lose another chunk of value when it finally does.
The solicitor told us they were waiting on the management company, but the company confirmed they had never been contacted. Three weeks were wasted unnecessarily.
Our buyer pulled out after a survey that felt wildly inaccurate, including basic safety items allegedly missing that were plainly there.
Our buyers kept sending increasingly aggressive emails demanding last-minute discounts, threatening to pull out every few days until we finally told them to forget it.
I’m mid-purchase with one of the PM Law conveyancing brands and can’t reach anyone about my client funds or documents. The SRA statement so far is just a holding message, with no meaningful reassurance for those of us stuck in transactions that are now in limbo.
The second buyers turned out to be awkward and slow, buying via a SIPP. By the time it finally completed, we were exhausted by the process.
The insurer quietly excluded subsidence from our renewal; when the buyer’s solicitor looked at our policy they insisted on expensive new cover before completion.
Ombudsman data shows frequent disputes over missing service charge and ground rent details that buyers only uncover late in the process.
“Huge amount of stress… delaying the sale and causing uncertainty.”
New build warranty feels pointless: ‘always on your own’ when defects appear and claims rejected.
The Guardian reports that average service charges for leasehold flats in England and Wales have risen to around £2,300 a year – up 11% in a single year.
Solicitor repeatedly promised to ‘send enquiries today’ but didn’t do so for almost three weeks.
My solicitor said the buyer’s solicitor were 'wide-boys' and couldn’t get straight answers from them; it ended up taking eight months before the whole thing finally fell apart.
They had five days left on their mortgage offer and were begging solicitors and the other side to hurry up to avoid the deal collapsing completely.
A seller says their own solicitors were “painfully slow” and they felt they were doing more chasing than the professionals — and now they fear the buyer will pull out before exchange.
Holding deposit paid, then extra guarantor requirements and demands for more upfront money.
We’re devastated – unless a miracle buyer appears almost instantly, we’ll lose the home we were trying to buy as well.
I came away feeling they were more interested in a quick fee than in getting a fair price for us after the first buyer pulled out.
Our letting agent's 'management' consisted of ignoring problems and hoping tenants and landlords would sort it out themselves.
The surveyor left without even saying they were finished—basic professionalism missing, and it made the whole process harder.
Another MSE user says their buyer pulled out due to ‘personal circumstances’ the day before exchange, and their dream home immediately went back on the market at a lower price.
Buyer claims the lender became frustrated at the slow pace and threatened to withdraw the offer.
After over 180 days of waiting for CDPLL to process the sale of our chain free home our buyer finally pulled out.
On HousePriceCrash, posters say central London flats with £2,000-a-year service charges and big council tax bills are just sitting unsold while houses still move.
We accepted a bit less on price because after one failed sale we just couldn’t face going through months of uncertainty again.
Our buyers' inexperience and choice of Countrywide brought us to within a day of the whole chain collapsing.
We’ve had three buyers pull out after survey on the same house; each report threw up slightly different issues and now nobody trusts any of them.
They felt the broker was more focused on cross-selling life cover than actually finding the right mortgage for their circumstances.
We were told nothing could be done when the offer lapsed, even though it was delays higher up the chain that caused the problem in the first place.
Our buyer pulled out after the managing agent took over six weeks to answer a basic enquiry from our solicitor, stalling everything until they lost patience.
Our buyers’ solicitor has been ‘reviewing paperwork’ for over eight weeks. We’re scared they’ll just walk away from the sale.
They say some buyers only realise at resale that lenders and purchasers treat uncapped estate charges as a major red flag.
We were ready to exchange on a flat and then discovered a five-figure annual service charge buried in the small print for heat network and concierge; the sums no longer worked.
A leaseholder on Reddit said insurers still treated their block as high-risk after cladding works, sending premiums sky-high and making it very hard to sell because lenders were nervous.
Our sale fell through on the Thursday, but Parkers had it back on the market the next day and got a full asking price offer by Saturday.
We were left with our belongings in boxes and nowhere to go when the seller pulled their property from the market a week before exchange.
I’ve got a mortgage offer that’s valid for six months on a house that’s now fallen through; I’m being told the lender may not honour it for the next place.
Our buyer’s lender suddenly demanded a full structural engineer’s report on top of the survey; the extra cost and delay pushed them to abandon the purchase.
By the time anyone reacted to the emerging problems, the buyers had lost patience. It was hard not to feel that better conveyancing could have saved the sale.
Buyer says the agent heavily pressured them to use an in-house mortgage adviser, making the buying process feel coercive.
Commenters replied that between cladding, insurance and service-charge hikes, they’d avoid that development entirely – it looked like a flat you could buy but struggle to sell.
They’ve cut the price but buyers still balk when they see the annual bill before even stepping through the door.
They warn that when a sale falls through, both buyers and sellers can lose thousands in fees and deposits, and sometimes have to fight just to get their own money back.
A complainant describes feeling unsupported by the complaint process after incurring significant costs due to misleading chain information.
A PistonHeads user says their daughter is being chased for an old service charge overspend from before she owned the flat, with the managing agent ignoring her explanations.
We were weeks from completion when the sellers decided they no longer wanted to move. After three previous failed chains, it was soul-destroying.
We’d been on the market a year, switched agents, dropped the price several times, finally got a cash buyer… and then the sale still fell through at the last minute.
A lender-recommended survey dragged on for months, with poor updates and slow movement that blocked the mortgage and delayed everything else.
A reviewer warns that a similarly named site is not the official Land Registry and charges a premium for basic documents.
2 of them have been quite insistent on starting the deed of variation now but our freeholder is charging everyone different amounts, its not consistent.
One Trustpilot reviewer for a conveyancing firm said their chain collapsed twice, but the solicitors stayed supportive and kept pushing, showing how much difference good communication can make.
Buyer anxious mid-purchase because management pack is the only blocker — repeated chasing proves pointless.
Slow, understaffed and liars.
We sold last September and put an offer in straight away on our next place; months later the chain is still crawling along and now our buyer’s mortgage offer is about to expire.
The estate agent kept telling us ‘it’s all with the solicitors’ while our buyers’ searches hadn’t even been ordered.
They describe owners as ‘trapped’, stuck between unaffordable charges and a market that doesn’t want flats with such high running costs.
We finally sold on the third attempt after two buyers dropped out at the last minute, each time leaving us with survey and legal costs we couldn’t recover.
Our previous sale collapsed and I still blame the solicitor for never chasing anything; now I’m wondering whether to complain formally about them.
Nearly lost a flat purchase due to slow progress and lack of meaningful communication.
Waiting months for a certificate needed to complete the sale of an apartment.
Residents in ‘affordable’ housing say they were sold on low service charges, only to see them jump to unaffordable levels within a few years.
They warn that hiding the problem is likely to backfire: if the buyer later finds out, they might sue or try to unravel the deal completely.
Our chain collapsed even after we’d exchanged – the buyer at the bottom couldn’t complete and suddenly everyone above was scrambling to see who would cover whose costs.
The valuer behaved like they were rushing for overtime, then downvalued and mocked the property—felt deeply unprofessional.
A homeowner in a boundary dispute says delays and poor communications around paperwork have made the property feel difficult to sell.
Our house sale fell through after six months because the buyers got spooked about a garage that’s clearly on the title. Citizens Advice basically shrugged and said buyers can walk away.
On two occasions we have been told things have been done (over the phone) when in fact several days later we get the notification to tell us they have only just been completed.
Guidance article cites cases where failure to disclose key ‘material information’ led to complaints, delays and collapsed transactions.
I asked whether their finances were solid and was reassured, only to find out much later they never had a proper agreement in principle.
The landlord has decided to sell and we’re getting multiple viewings a week. I’ve been kicked out of my own home so strangers can look round and it feels like harassment at this point.
Land Registry told us fixing the title problem could take up to a year because of a queue of older applications, so any hope of salvaging the original sale vanished instantly.
BLB Solicitors emphasise that the TA6 requires sellers to disclose complaints or anything that might lead to a future neighbour dispute, not just full-blown court cases.
They say around a quarter of those complaints are about poor communication specifically – clients who feel kept in the dark.
They also note sellers who believe their agent undersold the property, leaving them worse off financially and fuelling disputes after completion.
A thread titled ‘Selling house/searches’ has posters explaining they delay searches until after the survey so they don’t waste hundreds of pounds if the buyer pulls out at survey stage.
A conveyancing blog summarises multiple surveys showing nearly half of home movers felt poor solicitor communication prolonged their move.
We’ve had to pay for emergency storage and last-minute removals twice now because completion dates kept slipping and then our PM Law firm collapsed entirely.
A reviewer of GD Property Solicitors says communication was poor, with emails going unanswered or being replied to only after long delays, leaving them unsure what stage their case had reached.
Our buyer backed out after their solicitor highlighted historic neighbour complaints about noise and parking that the agent had never mentioned.
Our searches show public sewers in the street but nothing within the property boundaries, yet we have a manhole and several inspection hatches in the garden. We need to understand what they are before adding an extension and are concerned the searches missed something.
I am slowly accepting the reality that my mortgage offer will expire 22nd September
As first-time sellers we were shocked how quickly a buyer could walk away with no penalty, leaving us with nothing but survey and solicitor bills.
Down-valuations have made it almost impossible for my clients to proceed; one deal died when the surveyor knocked 15% off the price.
Our solicitor mixed up email threads from two different transactions and sent us another client's correspondence by mistake. It was a serious data breach and completely destroyed our confidence in the firm.
Official statistics regularly highlight communication problems as a key driver of complaints.
the mortgage offer that his broker had got from Halifax to buy ours was conditional on him being released from his brothers mortgage.
Found out through someone else that the chain had collapsed; the lack of transparency meant weeks of wasted time and momentum.
They explained that if you can’t get an extension, you may be left reapplying at worse rates, which can make the numbers no longer stack up for the house you wanted.
Automated responses discouraged follow-up while issues remained unresolved; felt like deliberate slow-walking.
Townends Estate Agents are called ‘the worst agent ever’ in one Trustpilot review, with the reviewer complaining about rudeness and very poor communication from staff.
HSBC instructed a mortgage valuation which came back at £0 and ‘not habitable’ despite another valuation already existing.
We were buying a house where the previous sale had collapsed due to the survey, and spent ages agonising over whether to risk offering on it ourselves.
Another Reddit post, ‘Delay on completion, no communication from buyers’, shows a first-time seller stuck in limbo waiting for their buyer’s side to give any firm date.
Our chain collapsed because someone further up pulled out, and we still had to pay for surveys and searches on a house we never got.
The solicitor misinterpreted a clause about drainage easements, which later caused our insurer to increase our premiums due to 'unknown liability risk'.
Citizens Advice list examples where buyers and sellers lose money when a sale falls through – from deposits mishandled by agents to conveyancers charging full fees despite poor service.
Emails often went unanswered for days and nobody explained what was going on.
Our estate agent says they can’t contact the other side’s solicitor. We’re stuck with zero updates yet all parties know the chain is wobbling.
After three months of delays… told the purchase required full cash due to missing certifications.
Our conveyancer never clearly explained our responsibilities after exchange; we only discovered we should have insured the house from that date by chance.
The seller worries whether to wait for their buyers to find someone new or immediately relist to avoid losing the house they’re trying to purchase.
After documenting over £2,000 in direct costs... they initially offered... £250 compensation
A complainant says a property was marketed as ‘no onward chain’, but later events meant the buyer had already spent on survey and conveyancing unnecessarily.
They note that many clients only discover things have stalled when they start chasing, because nobody has proactively explained the cause of the holdup.
On MoneySavingExpert, a seller says their buyers’ solicitors passed the file around the firm and went two months with no work done at all, until everyone was ready to exchange – then the buyer simply vanished.
A reviewer says a site’s ‘Land Registry’ positioning caused them to overpay for something available cheaply via government.
Relatives say they feel trapped between dumping the flat at a huge loss or continuing to bleed money on charges for an empty property.
We found out our sale had fallen through while we were on holiday; there’s nothing like checking your email poolside and discovering you no longer have a buyer.
A seller on a UK forum says they want to exchange and complete on the same day for personal reasons, but they’re worried about bank transfer timing and what happens if completion fails.
Seller says the firm repeatedly requested the same information as if the file hadn’t been read.
The agency turned complaints back on me and gaslighted me instead of accepting any responsibility.
A seller says their flat sale collapsed after the company took weeks to answer a key enquiry needed to proceed.
Management pack needed for a sale chased for two months, with advisors hanging up.
A forum user describes paying an invoice that later turned out to have been intercepted and altered with different bank details — a reminder of how easily ‘trusted’ payments get diverted.
Poster explains their sale collapsed when the buyer’s buyer pulled out the day after the stamp duty holiday ended.
They highlight an industry short of conveyancers, with fewer lawyers handling more work and little incentive to innovate for ordinary home movers.
It’s been 15 months since we started the process. The conveyancing and the follow-up with Land Registry have both been painfully slow.
They even say their estate agent was lied to about having spoken to them, and a formal email complaint initially got no response.
We were desperate to move closer to friends after a bereavement, but repeated fall-throughs and slow conveyancing left us stuck where we were.
“Incompetent… poor attitude… One the worse maintained estates in Cardiff.”
Owners now find their supposedly ‘affordable’ flats incredibly hard to sell, because prospective buyers baulk at the current charges and the risk of future hikes.
Seller says their house sale fell through twice; each time buyers suddenly went quiet for weeks before admitting they couldn’t proceed.
We were hit with an HMO ‘zero value’ type outcome repeatedly and had to switch approach to keep deals moving.
Our house sale fell through twice but luckily the bungalow we were buying stayed available for us; not everyone is that fortunate.
Chasing the solicitor became a full-time job; voicemails, emails, nothing answered, and in the end the buyers assumed we weren’t serious and dropped out.
As a first-time buyer, I was left panicking because the lender didn’t confirm the valuation and nobody could tell me what was happening.
If we have to reapply, the new rate will cost thousands more over the fixed term – all because the process drifted and nobody took responsibility.
Another leasehold flat owner says high service charges and an oversupplied local market mean they’ve been trying to sell on and off since 2021 with almost no progress.
A reviewer warns that a ‘Land Registry searches’ site appeared official, took payment, and they say the requested information didn’t arrive.
Guidance for Part A material information makes it clear that key facts must be provided in listings, not left for buyers to find later.
Countrywide kept cold-calling even after we told them we’d booked another survey; blocking numbers didn’t stop it.
Reallymoving tell buyers to comb the TA6 form for past or ongoing neighbour rows; if anything looks worrying or vague, they say buyers are right to consider walking away.
Buyer says the only thing holding up their purchase was a management pack, despite chases from multiple parties.
Case study: buyers withdrew after discovering a major nearby development that the estate agent hadn’t mentioned, even though it was known locally.
I incurred huge financial and emotional cost because the letting agent did not vet tenants properly.
We were billed for everything short of the tea bags even though the transaction never reached exchange; there was no goodwill at all from the solicitor.
Our sale fell through after six months because the buyer’s lender decided the flat was ‘unmortgageable’ due to cladding, something nobody mentioned at viewing stage.
The EPC and reality didn’t match — heating bills would have crippled us. Listing showed ‘pending upgrade’ but lacked detail.
Now today 9 month after the sale it has came to light they haven’t updated the land registry which is now affecting my ability to let the properly out.
A Times report says nearly 60% of leaseholders struggle to sell because of punitive clauses and rising charges, leaving many in ‘financial limbo’.
On an MSE thread about service charges, someone said flats in their block were now hard to sell and lagged behind neighbouring properties because the charges had crept so high.
Our chain collapsed because one solicitor refused to pick up the phone; everything had to be done by old-fashioned letters, which kept going missing.
First-time buyer feels their solicitor is slow and uncommunicative, with the estate agent chasing too.
I honestly don’t know how many more times we can pick ourselves up after a chain collapse – it feels like the system is designed to let people walk away with zero consequences.
A seller says they’re blocked from selling because the buyer’s mortgage company insists on an EWS1 despite the block being under 18m and reportedly having no cladding.
A Sun article features a couple whose service charges rose from under £3,000 to £7,500 a year, making their leasehold flat effectively unsellable despite big price cuts.
Butterworths were acting on our purchase when we turned up to find the office closed and a notice in the window. We were days away from exchanging contracts and now the move has just stopped.
Our initial sale fell through but the conveyancing firm didn’t adjust their charges, even though we had to start again from scratch with new buyers.
Our estate agent says several sales and purchases with Butterworths have all been frozen at once. Everyone in the chains is panicking that the deals will fall through before new solicitors can step in.
We were days away from completing on our house when PM Law closed without warning. Our sale proceeds and purchase funds are now stuck in their client account and nobody can tell us when we’ll actually move.
After months of slow progress on a chain-free sale, the buyer eventually walked away; the reviewer says they had to chase constantly and got little back.
Subletting fee demand described as unreasonable and hard to dispute due to poor access to support.
The process was described as painfully slow and frustrating for something as time-critical as getting offers issued.
The agent never checked basic details with the seller and we constantly got conflicting information.
The Ombudsman says typical subsidence complaints include claims being rejected, repairs taking too long, poor communication and homeowners being unhappy with the standard of remedial work.
We ended up frantically shopping around for a specialist insurer just to keep the chain from collapsing.
One buyer on HousingUK said their house sale took eight months and then fell through because the first-time buyer at the bottom of the chain simply backed out.
Survey valuation came in significantly low versus expectations, causing stress, renegotiation pressure, and wasted weeks in limbo.
Buyer complains their solicitor never warned them that spray foam insulation in the roof could make the house unmortgageable and only found out when the lender refused to lend after valuation.
Our lender’s surveyor slashed the value and the broker admitted down-valuations were becoming common; without extra cash we had to abandon the purchase.
They’d paid for legal work and were left completely in the dark about what in the survey scared the buyers off so badly.
After the first collapse we had to endure more viewings, more negotiations and more paperwork. It felt like living through the same nightmare twice.
Action Fraud describes one case where a first-time buyer transferred tens of thousands to fraudsters after receiving a convincing email directing funds to an alternative account.
They worry these shock bills and opaque accounts will scare off any future buyer and keep them stuck in the flat.
I paid a £3,000 “refundable” Buyer’s Premium… sale did not proceed.
Our managing agent suddenly slapped an extra charge on the account while we were in the middle of selling; that was enough to scare off our buyer.
Our surveyor wildly overestimated the cost of some minor damp and movement; the buyers panicked and demanded a huge discount we simply couldn’t afford.
The high street agent did very little beyond sticking it online; we had to chase for every tiny update.
Leaseholder alleges they were overcharged for works that weren’t carried out and felt costs were presented in a misleading way.
We lost our dream home because the conveyancer delayed ordering searches for weeks, blaming a mysterious backlog.
A Sun article followed a couple whose service charge rocketed from under £3,000 to £7,500 a year; they’ve slashed the asking price but still struggle to find a buyer.
Our solicitor submitted the wrong version of the TR1 form to the other side, resulting in the need for new signatures and delaying completion by over a week.
Try to get you to pay extra £500 commission as an 'incentive' for them to do their job.
I’m buying a house and the seller’s solicitor is part of the PM Law group. Since the collapse nobody can give us any information. My own solicitors don’t know what’s happening with the other side and the whole transaction is frozen.
When developers pulled out of the deal, my conveyancer still billed almost the full fee despite us never getting to completion.
We moved into a house in April 2024 and have now discovered there is foam in the cavity walls so the government scheme installers could not proceed. Their supervisor advised me to contact the conveyancing solicitor because the foam may cause damage and was never mentioned when we bought.
After our buyer walked away, the agent suggested we strip the house bare to attract ‘serious’ buyers, which felt like terrible advice.
NetLawman’s guide on neighbour disputes makes it clear you must disclose both resolved and ongoing disputes on the TA6 when selling your home.
I was repeatedly told by the Yopa agent that my listing would be on a no sale, no fee basis, but when I called head office two weeks after going live they said it was actually a pay-later contract. I only signed up because the agent talked me through it over the phone and kept reassuring me it was no sale, no fee. Viewings have been cancelled, feedback is poor, and when a colleague tried to book a viewing they were told there were no slots, which was not true. My house has been on the market for two months and I feel completely misled.
The panel conveyancer insisted they ‘don’t do’ phone calls and only respond via an online portal; the other side’s lawyer simply stopped engaging.
They’re racing against their fixed-rate mortgage ending, desperate not to be left with a buy-to-let they can neither afford nor easily sell.
I had just got my mortgage offer when the house sale fell through; now I’m trying to work out if I can transfer it to a new property or whether I’ve got to start again from scratch.
We’re a young family with two kids. We handed back the keys to our rented house because Butterworths told us we were all set to complete. The next thing we knew there was a sign on the door saying they had closed and we had nowhere to go that night.
If the agent had been upfront about the lack of sign-off, we’d never have spent hundreds getting that far into the process.
Completion has been ‘next week’ for ages. Our conveyancer hardly answers calls or emails and I’m terrified the purchase will fall through.
the mortgage lender to him and his brother refused to release him, killing the entire transaction
A Trustpilot reviewer for British Homebuyers said they turned to them after a ‘sale’ fell through with a local agent – the new firm got a quick offer and held the chain together.
Another Mumsnet poster wrote that their sale has fallen through for the third time and they’ve lost the dream home they were hoping to buy as a result.
Our sale became a nightmare because the agent was slow, ignored emails, and didn’t chase the buyer for updates.
Leaseholders report being billed thousands for repair works they never approved or even knew about.
Weeks passed with no updates, leaving the buyer worried the deal would collapse; they felt ignored unless they escalated aggressively.
Says communication is ‘mail only’ with short office hours, making progress feel intentionally slowed.
A MoneySavingExpert poster said clients with riverside flats were already struggling to sell a decade ago because service charges got so high that buyers simply weren’t interested.
Our buyers are using this shambolic firm we now in month 6 of a simple convayncing empty house no chain
We felt the surveyor decided it was a problem before even looking properly, then rushed, leaving us stuck mid-transaction.
They’d already paid thousands in fees and were told there was nothing they could do because nothing is binding until exchange.
They argue that better updates alone would ease much of the anxiety that currently pushes people to complain about their conveyancer.
Our buyers got cold feet when they saw how high the service charge could go in future; their solicitor advised them to pull out.
The homebuyer report read like a shopping list of problems, from roof issues to electrics, and our lender insisted on retention conditions we couldn’t meet.
They say they repeatedly had to prompt the firm to send documents and then struggled to get any response about refunding a deposit.
We used John M Lewis & Co for conveyancing before they were linked in news reports to the PM Law group. When our first solicitor mishandled things we almost lodged a formal complaint before another stepped in to sort it out.
Iv been waiting nearly 8 months now to complete... Awful communication, constantly lied too.
Broker was dismissive and refused to help, then we later passed affordability with a different broker. We’re also concerned our details were shared onward without consent.
Our mortgage offer expired because the conveyancers and Land Registry issues dragged on; by the time things were resolved, the lender refused to extend and the deal was dead.
Developer solicitor delays meant we paid months of extra rent and storage fees before completion.
Never believe or trust… they took £700… after few weeks I didn’t have a mortgage.
JBear Properties note that average service charges on flats rose about 11% in a year to around £2,300, widening the price gap between houses and high-fee apartments.
Our sale collapsed on the day of exchange because the buyer’s solicitor suddenly noticed the leasehold interest wasn’t properly registered on the freehold title, something nobody had picked up in months of conveyancing.
“After over 180 days… the buyer finally pulled out.”
Buyer says their previous conveyancer failed to complete title registration promptly, complicating a later transaction.
A Camden leaseholder forum thread discusses actual service charge bills arriving higher than estimates, with residents shocked at the final totals.
Tried to get a mortgage redemption statement online but kept getting logged out and the process was unusable. What should be simple turned into a time-waster.
We took our house off the market for months after the buyers pulled out; the whole experience was so draining we couldn’t face starting again straight away.
“Electronic transfer fee… source of funds verification fee… already stressed.”
An MSE user says they were gazundered when a buyer cut their offer by £10,000 days before exchange and they had to decide whether to cave in or walk away.
Leaseholder complains that getting a signed deed of variation took weeks beyond a promised timeframe with minimal updates.
Another poster’s buyer withdrew when their surveyor recommended a re-roof. They couldn’t afford the works or a big price cut, so the chain collapsed.
Buying a property was blocked by ‘no response’ behaviour when documents were needed to proceed.
We’d had twelve months of stressful selling and one failed sale before using a quick-sale company just to get the move done.
A Trustpilot review of Connells Survey & Valuation warns people to ‘avoid unless you want your property down-valued’, saying the surveyors ignored local evidence and cost them a deal.
Buyer says the agent failed to call back after an offer and then the property was marked as having an offer accepted.
One commenter says being gazumped feels brutal but is legal until contracts are exchanged, and warns ‘nothing is definite until you get the keys’.
My solicitor really good we were ready to complete the sale after 8 weeks But pm property lawyers started to find lots of different things to querie
Our solicitor strongly advised us to pull out; we lost money on fees but dodged what would have become an unsellable flat.
I’ve read so many threads where sales fall apart because of high service charges that I now assume flats are harder to sell if the numbers look steep.
Survey caused the sale to almost fall through after marking lots of items as ‘serious’ despite no clear evidence given in the report.
They were first-time buyers and we think they just got carried away and offered more than they were comfortable with, then panicked and walked away.
A Simply Adverse client says their house sale fell through three times while trying to port their mortgage, leaving them with mounting debts and a damaged credit file.
They say it was incredibly stressful to discover everything was off track after months of preparation, and they lost out on the house they’d hoped to buy.
We sold our family home and moved out with the children expecting to complete on the new place the same day. Because our conveyancer was one of the PM Law firms, completion never happened and we’re now sharing one room in a relative’s house.
The whole transaction left such a bad taste that I’m scared to move again; it felt like everyone got paid except us, even though nothing completed.
Broker bundled mortgage + insurance and the insurance wasn’t actually put in place properly. A basic admin mistake caused stress and extra chasing.
We were already on our second mortgage offer extension because of slow conveyancing, and now the PM Law collapse might push us past the lender’s final deadline. If that happens we’ll lose the house completely.
NetLawman reiterates that neighbour rows over noise, access or boundaries must be declared on the TA6 – hiding them risks the buyer pulling out or suing later.
A ReviewSolicitors entry for AVRillo notes that the other side’s solicitor was ‘vague and slow’ in their replies, using a different excuse each week to delay exchanging contracts.
I was told lies from the very start of the sale process and had to chase constantly for any information.
A Financial Times piece on house prices says many UK sellers overestimate the value of their homes, sometimes encouraged by over-optimistic estate agent valuations designed to win instructions.
Our buyers pulled out after six months in the chain, saying the whole thing was taking too long – we’d already mentally moved out and then had to start from zero again.
Another MSE user says their house sale fell through the day after the stamp duty holiday ended because their buyer’s buyer pulled out without explanation.
We used Valerie Holmes Law for our purchase and only learned about the PM group closure from social media. We’ve heard nothing directly and completion is off.
One seller said their buyers pulled out after survey because of ‘damp and movement’ even though the house had stood for over a century with no problems.
My house has had five offers from five viewings in just two weeks, but several offers are the same price. All buyers are first time buyers. I do not know how to choose between multiple identical offers.
Our mortgage offer expires in five days and we still haven’t exchanged – if this drags on any longer the lender can just walk away.
A homeowner describes trying to claim for damage they believed was covered and feeling the process failed homeowners.
A follow-up investigation accuses housing associations of mis-selling ‘affordable’ homes where service charges later rise by hundreds of percent.
Reading the lease pack now, I’m scared future buyers will run when they see how fast charges have risen, leaving me stuck with something that’s hard to sell.
My purchase fell through the day before exchange and I’m about a thousand pounds out of pocket on surveys and legal work because the seller just panicked and pulled out.
Poster describes a house sale falling through twice and being left hugely out of pocket through no fault of their own.
I’ve missed out on a house because of them.
Shocked to be basically 'scammed'... received an invoice to open the file.
They switched to other agents and immediately got more viewings, confirming their suspicion that the first agent’s ‘ambitious’ pricing had badly hindered the sale.
They couldn’t understand why, if the previous sale had already progressed, the legal pack wasn’t ready to go the moment a fresh offer was accepted.
We moved out of our old house ready to complete on the new one when our PM Law firm suddenly closed. All our belongings are in storage and we have no permanent place to stay until someone sorts the mess out.
Propertymark says the sector needs clearer, enforceable standards on material information so buyers can trust what they see on portals and agent sites.
We were even looking at school waiting lists for our planned move, but when the house sale fell through the whole relocation – and the school plans – just stopped.
A Trustpilot reviewer calls Pinnacle Surveyors ‘the worst surveyors you’re likely to meet’, saying their valuation and service left them out of pocket and set their purchase back significantly.
Our conveyancer sent confidential bank details in an unsecured email without any warning about fraud. We later learned the regulator had issued multiple alerts about this exact risk.
The first buyer pulled out just before exchange, claiming their circumstances had changed; the agent gave us almost no detail about what went wrong.
The seller says the buyer isn’t responding much and their estate agent ‘is not helpful’, so it feels like the sale is being sabotaged by silence.
We moved from a new build into a 1970s home and are finding problem after problem. Asbestos in ceilings, doors and windows that do not shut properly, a loose kitchen with exposed wires, a leaking bedroom ceiling caused by a botched job, and even large wasp nests. We thought there would not be much to do and now worry we made a mistake.
We’re sleeping in a spare room at my parents’ place with the kids because our PM Property Lawyers firm shut just before completion. All we can do is wait for a new solicitor while living out of suitcases.
We were forced to find a new solicitor in the middle of exchange week. The new firm has to re-do ID checks and re-review the file, costing us more fees on top of the money already paid to the collapsed firm.
Bettermove’s guide on neighbour rows says you *can* sell with a dispute, but many buyers will either walk away or push for a much lower price once they know.
Owners on the same thread said they pay around £180 a month service charge and still worry buyers will balk at the running costs when they eventually sell.
We’re stuck between pushing the sellers to hurry up or accepting that we’ll pay higher monthly payments for the exact same house.
A buyer thought they were getting a bargain flat, but rising service charges and future works have turned it into a long-term liability.
Nobody had explained that the historic claim would keep causing problems every time someone tried to get a mortgage on the house.
Mid-sale, reviewer couldn’t get through for days and considered withdrawing because nobody responded.
Promised regular updates but didn’t receive them; says buyers went cold and seller pulled out.
Paid money upfront to a mortgage advisor and then waited months with no meaningful progress, forced to keep chasing for answers.
Slow, understaffed and liars. Estate agents and other law firms actually hate working with this company.
Our whole chain depended on PM Law. Overnight their offices shut, staff were locked out, and nobody can contact them. They’re holding mortgage money in their client account and it feels like chains across the country are about to fall apart because of this.
They highlight buyers changing their minds, slow legal work and down-valuations as the most common reasons for deals collapsing after offers are agreed.
One poster said their vendor became seriously ill and pulled out just two weeks before exchange after five months of pushing the sale along.
Upfront fee… property didn’t sell.
Our solicitor repeatedly told us they were waiting on 'the other side', but when the estate agent intervened it turned out they had not replied to simple enquiries for nearly three weeks. The buyer began looking at other properties as a result.
Our flat sale fell through because the buyer’s solicitor raised concerns about the lease. We had to change solicitors to someone who actually understood the problem.
A missing completion certificate for historic work meant additional indemnity policies and delays; the buyer lost patience and pulled out.
First time buyer describes paying hundreds of pounds in fees only for the chain to collapse when searches finally revealed a non compliant septic tank that their lender would not accept.
Our estate agent has had to publish special guidance because so many of their buyers and sellers are stuck with PM Law group firms. Chains are paused while everyone waits to see when files and funds will be released.
Our move was days away when Butterworths Solicitors in Cumbria suddenly closed under the PM Law group. We only found out from a notice on the door.
Buyer says solicitor did not disclose a pending planning application next door, even though it was visible on searches.
First buyers were self-employed and couldn’t borrow enough, but they sat on that information for weeks while everyone else carried on paying fees.
Halifax refused our buyer’s mortgage without an EWS1 form, the sale collapsed and we’ve been stuck trying to find anyone willing to lend.
We found out our sale had fallen through while we were on holiday; there’s nothing like checking your email poolside and discovering you no longer have a buyer.
We have done everything we need to do... but also no one seems to have any idea when these may be resolved and I have zero idea of a timescale.
Service described as ‘appalling’; slow chasing, ignored instructions, and it cost them money.
I am keen to buy a house with a single-storey extension built in 2004 that has planning permission but no building regulations sign-off. I want to add another storey and am worried I might have to bring the whole 20-year-old extension up to modern standards before I can extend, which could make it cheaper to demolish and rebuild. It is incredibly frustrating that people do not spend a few hundred pounds to get all the certificates before marketing, and it is no wonder so many buyers pull out.
I was left stressed and unsure because emails and calls were ignored for long periods.
The same piece quotes Hamptons saying rising service charges are now a major factor slowing sales of leasehold flats.
We discovered the extension at our property had no planning permissions and instead had indemnity insurance. Worse, the indemnity policy was only put in place weeks after we completed, meaning we owned the property with no insurance in place at completion. We were never told about this.
Seller claims slow replies and a lack of phone access made a time-sensitive sale process stressful and expensive.
We were stunned to learn that the average person who has a sale fall through loses nearly three thousand pounds in sunk costs, with no compensation.
I really regret choosing Yopa, a waste of 6 ...
Mortgage valuation visit lasted minutes, then the property was declared unmortgageable because communal areas were ‘poor’. Buyer felt it was absurd.
Nobody had mentioned it during viewings and we only found out because the solicitor flagged it in the title documents.
Our conveyancer failed to advise that the private drainage system was unregistered and non-compliant. We only found out when a specialist quoted thousands for emergency work.
A HousingUK user said their service charge doubled in a year on a tiny studio; they’re now seriously worried the flat will be hard to sell because the fees look outrageous on paper.
One day we thought we were completing, the next day the agent called to say the buyers had changed their minds – no warning, no explanation.
Our management company demanded over £400 for a basic leasehold information pack and then took a month to produce it, nearly killing the sale.
Buyer alleges key information withheld and sale collapsed late; refund battles added insult to injury.
Our shared-ownership flat hasn’t sold because buyers are put off by opaque service charges and complicated leases; the whole leasehold system feels stacked against us.
They now feel they’ve moved into a street with problems that were deliberately glossed over, and are considering whether there’s any comeback.
The agent never told us the buyers were using a specialist lender that was notorious for down-valuations; when the valuation came in low, everyone acted surprised.
Conveyancing dragged so much the seller threatened to pull out just to get movement; only formal complaining brought any resolution.
Booked several viewings as a cash buyer and the estate agent never turned up or called. I had to chase them and was told it was a mix-up.
In a BBC-style case shared via social media, a couple said service charges had soared to £7,500 a year, making their home ‘impossible to sell’.
Conveyancing fraud has left families unable to complete while still being liable for rent and fees.
The ground rent doubles roughly every 20 years; it didn’t look serious in the listing, but the long-term cost is eye-watering.
“My mortgage offer expired… Absolutely no communication… Got a local solicitor.”
The quality-branded solicitors were anything but: slow, uncontactable and vague, and we nearly lost the house because of them.
Butterworths were acting for my buyer and every question took a week to relay. In a fragile chain where quick answers were crucial, they caused needless delay and stress.
Our conveyancer at Proddow Mackay (Conveyancing) Limited closed overnight. We turned up to sign papers and found a ‘CLOSED’ notice on the door.
This company exploits both sellers and buyers its own selfish gain.
Repeated chasing needed; lack of urgency and updates created risk of losing the purchase.
Both buyer and seller were told they would have to pay a marketing fee if the house did not sell. Months later the property was still unsold and they were still being chased for payment.
Six months later the buyers walked away and we were left wondering why nobody had been honest about the lack of progress.
Conveyancing dragged out so badly it enraged the lender and the other side’s solicitor.
They say the whole transaction is on the edge of collapse because lenders won’t accept certain ground rent clauses and the fix takes time.
Persistent Failure to Communicate: Numerous emails and telephone calls have gone unanswered over unreasonable periods of time.
They’d already spent money on surveys and legals and were now begging the developer not to put their reserved new-build back on the open market.
One poster points out that while searches can sometimes be reassigned, buyers usually still foot repeated legal bills every time a transaction collapses.
More than half of leaseholders now pay more in service charges than in council tax.
Non-stop calling even after blocking numbers and explicitly telling them to stop contacting me.
They felt the buyers had wasted everyone’s time by not paying attention at viewing, and blamed the agent for not filtering out such poorly prepared applicants.
After our buyer pulled out, another buyer was lined up and the original seller accepted a higher offer; it felt like we were being punished for something we didn’t cause.
An Avenue Road review mentions how stressful it was when their first sale fell through, and how vital it was having someone on the phone to calmly explain the next steps.
They felt stuck between walking away and losing money, or continuing with a conveyancer they’d already lost confidence in.
Our conveyancer failed to advise us that the seller had not provided proof of building regulations for a loft conversion. We only found out when our insurer refused cover after completion.
Our solicitor was so uncontactable that I never spoke to them directly until after the sale had already fallen through.
A buyer pulled out after a survey report that the seller believes contained major inaccuracies and alarming claims that didn’t match reality.
They now have tenants in situ and a property thousands of miles away, all because one buyer backed out at the last minute.
Another MSE user says their buyer reached the point of exchange and then decided the house was ‘too small’, forcing the seller to relist and pray their chain would wait.
One poster describes being first in a new build with a very long lease but still facing ongoing ground rent they hadn’t fully appreciated.
Another leaseholder says they feel ripped off by a £4,300 London service charge – and that a colleague’s £10k bill has made their place practically unsellable.
We’re devastated – there’s virtually no chance of getting a new offer that fast and it feels like we’re about to lose the house we were buying.
They feel powerless watching the deal edge towards collapse just because nobody can get the solicitor to pick up the phone.
Our mortgage broker passed us between multiple handlers. No one knew the case history, so documents kept getting ‘lost’.
“Communication was very frustrating… multiple emails not responded to.”
We had two purchases fall through when the developers changed their minds about selling, leaving us with nothing but legal bills.
A survey that should have been straightforward became a mess after we felt mis-sold on what we were actually buying.
Hounded by phone calls; argumentative service when trying to discuss — stressful and relentless.
Our previous sale fell through and we turned to SmoothSale; they got it back on the market quickly and resold it before the whole chain imploded.
A purchase timeline ballooned from months into half a year because buyers repeatedly pulled out; the chain felt permanently unstable.
Sales tactics and pressure felt relentless; communication was poor and it added stress at every stage of what should be a simple process.
Service charges on flats have jumped sharply and many leaseholders say the rising fees are making their homes harder to sell.
Our buyers pulled out after discovering Japanese knotweed two doors down; their lender insisted on a management plan and nobody wanted to pay for it.
My leasehold property is sold subject to contract and the buyers have completed searches and valuation but are still waiting for mortgage approval. I want to understand how far along the selling and buying process we actually are.
So slow we lost our buyer after 180+ days — had to chase constantly and portal never updated.
We now have no fixed address: sold our house, can’t complete the purchase, and the only reason is that our conveyancing firm closed its doors overnight without warning.
After my partner died I just wanted to move closer to friends, but repeated fall-throughs and slow solicitors left me stuck in the same house and emotionally drained.
Straightforward no-chain sale stuck for months, with messages ignored and progress unclear.
The Guardian reported average service charges for leasehold flats have climbed to around £2,300 a year, piling extra pressure on owners trying to sell.
I tried to reuse Angela Viney after a previous transaction but after two weeks and several emails they still hadn’t replied, so I gave up and went elsewhere.
Lease length and charges unclear — we had to renegotiate late when we discovered short lease and rising charges.
Useless staff… Phone calls and emails were not returned.
The app is poorly designed... no correspondence was received from them. I had to do a lot of chasing.
How long is it currently taking Land Registry? I bought my house 15 weeks ago and my title still has not been updated. It was a straightforward purchase with no complications, so I do not understand why it is taking so long.
Our chain collapsed because one buyer couldn’t get buildings insurance due to historic flooding – the risk only came to light when their solicitor checked the searches.
I’m going to incur significant costs if the sale falls through
LandlordZONE reports landlords stuck with ‘unsaleable’ leasehold flats as management charges pass £2,000 a year and average flat service charges hit £2,300 in 2024.
Their report says delays, seller withdrawals and bad survey results routinely kill deals after buyers have already spent over a thousand pounds on costs.
“The seller eventually withdrew… They refused the refund… submitted a TPO complaint.”
The HomeOwners Alliance lists ‘delayed or unclear communication’ as one of the most common reasons people end up formally complaining about their conveyancer.
Spent ages feeding all our details, then it turned into a hard sell for life insurance. Felt like a waste of time rather than real mortgage advice.
Interest rate lock expired while waiting for lender review. Adviser admitted they forgot to request an extension.
The solicitor warned us that ongoing rows over service charges would put buyers off; sure enough, the first sale collapsed as soon as the dispute came up.
Extra requirements kept appearing and it delayed the mortgage offer. When it finally came, sending it by post caused more avoidable delay.
Our sale fell through once already, and now the vendor is asking us to lower our offer just to get everything through quickly before the chain wobbles again.
Offer accepted but completion still not happening; case passed between multiple solicitors after internal changes.
Our solicitor never explained what ‘subject to contract’ really meant; we assumed it was all done, then watched the buyers walk away with no penalty.
A Yopa review site lists repeated complaints like ‘house sale fell through’, buyers that weren’t properly checked out and poor advice on which solicitors to use.
I had an offer accepted on an empty property and then learned about council tax premiums for long term empty homes. I do not know how long the house has been empty or whether I will be liable for a premium.
Leasehold campaigners in a Facebook group describe having a sale collapse days before exchange when the managing agent invalidated all the EWS1 cladding certificates for the block.
I moved out to help my buyers complete before their mortgage expired, then the law firm acting for them went AWOL and left us in limbo.
The seller refused to budge, so we walked away having spent hundreds on fees just to learn the true condition.
our buyers buyer pulled out, no one told us, lost our onward purchase
We were the buyers at the bottom and nobody bothered to check our funding properly; weeks later the chain collapsed when our lender refused the application.
I purchased a flat in London in 2013 with 103 years left on the lease and proper title deeds. It has now been announced that I only have 71 years left instead of 92. I feel completely shocked and do not know what to do or how this can be right, and I am starting to feel that even Land Registry is biased.
I’ve seen so many leaseholders online saying high service charges and opaque costs are making their flats almost unsellable.
We are days away from exchanging and our sellers are avoiding answering a question about a new gate that has appeared in a boundary fence over land that will be ours. There is nothing on the deeds about a right of way and they do not seem to want to explain it.
Client reports their solicitor ignored multiple urgent emails about completion funds until the last minute, causing near-collapse of the sale.
Our buyers’ surveyor literally valued my mother-in-law’s flat at £0 because she’d mixed it up with a totally different new-build block next door. She still argued and the sale died.
They’d already paid survey, searches and legal fees and felt that, for that much money, someone should at least tell them what actually went wrong.
With our first agent, once the ‘sold’ board went up we barely heard from them. After four months the sale collapsed and we had to start again with someone else.
Some owners only discover near lease expiry that renewing could cost tens or even hundreds of thousands of pounds.
The solicitor acting for our buyer did not read the management company’s accounts properly and missed serious reserve fund shortfalls. The buyer pulled out when their broker spotted it late in the process.
A buyer says they demanded the service charge in writing before offering, were quoted about £1,064, then discovered it was actually around £3,600 — and they wouldn’t have offered if told the truth.
Fraudulent Business Practices & Scam Warning
The agent pushed hard to win the instruction, then key updates weren’t passed on and it cost the seller their onward purchase.
Our conveyancer vanished for three weeks right before exchange; no replies to emails, no returned calls, nothing.
We were pressured to accept an offer from a buyer who hadn’t even listed their own property – nine weeks later they still hadn’t sold and the whole chain collapsed.
Railroaded into some 3rd party digital ID process… felt uncomfortable.
Believes they were convinced to pay ground rent based on wrong information and then refused a refund.
I got one email after weeks of silence despite repeated calls and messages.
On another page of that thread, a commenter said their own sale fell through several times due to Covid disruption before they finally managed to complete.
The neighbour stormed over during a viewing to shout about the shared drive; the buyers left halfway through and never came back.
The freeholder wanted nearly £500 just to answer basic pre-sale enquiries; the buyers saw that as a red flag and decided not to proceed.
They worry these shock bills and opaque accounts will scare off any future buyer and keep them stuck in the flat.
A law firm notes that if a new-build is delayed past your mortgage expiry date, you may have to reapply and pay extra application fees just to keep the purchase alive.
They’d spent half a year progressing the sale and suddenly had two weeks to find a new buyer or lose the house they were supposed to be buying.
With the lease extension and major works now disclosed, we’re worried we’ve made a huge financial mistake buying this place.
Our chain collapsed after six months when someone above us pulled out. Michael Poole were the only ones who kept us sane and quickly found a new buyer who actually completed.
We’re home sellers in a chain where the buyer’s conveyancer is one of the PM Law firms. Estate agents have told us several related transactions may now collapse if replacement solicitors can’t be found quickly.
They contrasted the experience with the previous agent, who they felt had just put it online and hoped for the best rather than actively managing the sale.
It’s maddening that a freeholder’s slow response to basic questions can destroy a sale and leave the owners out of pocket through no fault of their own.
We were executors selling a retirement flat. After a failed sale we started looking at auction because the property was clearly overpriced and needed work.
Several reviewers say they tried multiple agents for months or years with no luck, then had their property sold in weeks once proper marketing and communication started.
They warn that failing to disclose important facts can be treated as a ‘misleading omission’ under consumer law, putting agents at risk of enforcement action.
A homeowner says an assessor acknowledged a standards issue, but the claim outcome still left them without the protection they expected.
A conveyancing complaints guide lists big red flags: slow responses, difficulty getting hold of anyone and reviews mentioning constant delays and errors.
Our mortgage offer runs out in under two weeks and the sellers keep delaying; if we miss the deadline, the replacement deal will cost about £5,400 more.
Guides warn that high service charges shrink your buyer pool because people look beyond price and fixate on the ongoing cost of running the flat.
They suggest checking exactly what was ticked on the TA6 and then getting specialist legal advice if you’ve effectively been sold a house with a built-in neighbour dispute.
Buyer complains their solicitor ignored issues flagged in the survey, including damp and structural movement.
Buyer alleges constant delays and poor updates put their mortgage offer at risk and nearly cost them the property.
Management pack needed for sale chased for ~2 months; says calls ended abruptly and no progress.
The estate agent’s recommended conveyancing factory was slow and chaotic; we only saved the chain by speaking directly to everyone ourselves.
Our buyer’s solicitor is one of the PM Law brands and we are already under notice to complete. The funds have supposedly gone out but no keys have been released and no one can explain what’s happening.
“Do Not Use Conveyancing Direct… completion… didn’t occur until April 2025!”
They note that the burden on sellers is higher than before – you’re expected to answer everything as fully and honestly as you reasonably can.
On a retirement-flat thread, families say they’ve cut the price again and again yet still can’t sell, because the service charges and exit fees scare off almost every buyer.
We’re stuck with an agent who hasn’t generated enough viewings, but changing now feels risky when our whole chain is hanging by a thread.
“We pay significant service charges… poor service… negligent and actively endangers residents.”
We were advised to buy ‘sale fail’ insurance only after our first buyers had already pulled out, which was exactly when we needed it but no longer qualified.
One resident in that block says they feel trapped by huge remediation costs and lenders refusing to touch flats with unresolved cladding problems.
They say the file was put ‘on hold’ and no legal work would be done until tasks they had already completed were done again.
Transaction dragged on so long the buyer pulled out; emails ignored and no urgency at all.
One commenter said they’d only touch a leasehold flat if the service charge was low and stable; anything else is just asking to be stuck with a hard-to-sell asset.
Our broker was unreachable for days at a time while the lender kept asking for urgent responses. We nearly missed the exchange deadline.
Chasing for responses became a full-time job; important stages seemed to move without anyone clearly explaining what had happened.
My experience of YOPA was that they were a complete chaotic shambles from the outset
Our rental property sale collapsed twice and every time we’d already paid solicitors and had our tenants lined up to move, only for the buyers to disappear.
They encourage sellers to explain honestly why a previous sale collapsed, because hiding it just makes new buyers more suspicious when they inevitably find out.
Home movers already stressed by fragile chains feel dismissed when firms brush off concerns instead of explaining what’s happening and why.
A ‘fast’ sale dragged on because key steps weren’t managed; it felt like nobody owned the file and the seller was left hanging.
Lack of updates. Agreements to call back never happened. Documents not read. Horrendous experience.
Our buyer’s lender refused to accept the cladding paperwork, so they pulled out and we were left with yet another unsellable leasehold flat.
A different Trustpilot review says a conveyancer ignored emails for weeks and the whole experience was ‘really frustrating and stressful’, despite being recommended by a high street agent.
They now specifically target these problem blocks as cash buyers, because so many leaseholders are stuck with homes they can’t shift through a normal estate agent.
A chain-collapse article described a family who lost their buyer after a single missed deadline in a fragile chain, leaving them unsure whether to relist or give up moving entirely.
Leasehold reform articles talk about how opaque service charges and ground rents have left millions of flat owners feeling trapped and worried their homes will be hard to sell on.
The sale eventually completed, but only after extra months of delay and a lot of unnecessary stress.
A MoneySavingExpert poster said their riverside flat became hard to sell because the service charge got so high that buyers looked elsewhere, and even years later the prices still lagged behind similar blocks.
The solicitor simply stopped responding to emails from both us and the estate agent for days at a time. When pressed, the firm admitted they were 'understaffed' and several residential files were waiting in a backlog.
Our buyers’ solicitor was so slow that my agent warned the sale might fall through – months passed before they sent even basic enquiries across.
The communication was so bad I felt they didn’t care whether my house actually sold or not – they’d been paid anyway, even though the sale had collapsed.
Client discovered their solicitor submitted the wrong title number to the Land Registry, causing major delays.
Was passed from team to team and due to their incompetence my buyer pulled out
A simple query regarding a restrictive covenant sat unanswered in the solicitor’s inbox for over two weeks. Once escalated, they admitted they had not checked the title documents properly.
A seller says their property sale fell through again and they no longer trust the estate agent, after paying upfront and believing the sale would go through smoothly.
Another leaseholder post talks about ‘annual service charges making my flat impossible to sell’, with prospective buyers and lenders alike backing off once they see the numbers.
They warn that failing to mention a serious dispute can be treated as misrepresentation, giving the buyer grounds to claim compensation later.
Our sale didn’t complete on the agreed day and we had removals booked, annual leave taken, everything. Now our solicitor is talking about claiming damages from the buyer for breach of contract.
We only found out our sale had fallen through because the buyer’s solicitor finally admitted there was no building control sign-off for a recent extension – something the agent never mentioned when we offered.
They say they only learned the truth via solicitor contact late in the process and feel the estate agent’s updates were misleading throughout.
The freeholder’s managing agent took months to answer basic questions about works and charges, and the buyer eventually walked away rather than wait any longer.
They note that in some developments, service charges have become higher than council tax, contributing to flat values stagnating or falling behind houses.
We paid for a level 3 survey and an extra valuation. The surveyor simply agreed with the price we were paying even though there are very few comparable properties and the house needs a lot of work. We now feel we overpaid and the valuation was meaningless.
When the deal collapsed they were still quick to chase their money, despite months of poor updates and me feeling completely in the dark throughout.
Seller says their conveyancer repeatedly sent incorrect contract papers, missed key lender conditions and had to redo work several times, causing the buyer to lose patience and almost pull out of the purchase.
One MSE user said their flat is ‘impossible to sell’ because annual service charges have jumped so high that buyers walk away as soon as they see the figures.
My mortgage offer expired… absolutely no communication.
An estate agent is accused of pressuring the buyer to use an in-house mortgage adviser as a condition of being taken seriously.
We had to pull out when the seller accepted a private offer from a friend after we’d already committed to surveys and legal fees, effectively using us as a stalking horse.
“Over four and a half months… still not completed… due to ‘searches’.”
Vickery Holman explain that you technically can sell with a boundary dispute, but hiding it is risky – if buyers later find out, they can claim misrepresentation.
My buyer has pulled out after 6 months. Their solicitor has been slow from the start. I have spent hundreds on legals for both my sale and onward purchase which now probably will not go ahead.
Not even 1 star but there is no option for that.
We were warned that some online agents often let chains fall apart because of no communication and poor due diligence.
When the sale died, I realised I’d never once had a proactive update from the solicitor – I always had to chase, and half the time nobody knew what was going on.
They’ve slashed the price but the combination of age restrictions, high service charges and exit fees has made the flat incredibly hard to sell.
Our solicitor assured us everything was ready for exchange, but on the day they admitted the mortgage deed had never been sent to the lender for approval. We lost our booked removals and had to negotiate a new completion date with the whole chain.
Residents say they were given very low initial estimates; once the true costs emerged, lenders and buyers wanted nothing to do with the developments.
Our buyers asked for a huge reduction the day before exchange, threatening to walk away; we refused on principle and they actually did walk.
One first-time buyer group member says they were completely misinformed about how high the service charge would be after the first year.
Homebuilding & Renovating highlighted flat-owners whose service charges now exceed their mortgage payments, leaving them struggling to sell or even stay afloat.
A seller says repeated non-responses made their transaction drag and created avoidable delays during conveyancing.
After reading the report from a buyer, it felt like the house had been unnecessarily condemned, risking a collapsed sale.
We lost count of how many times the conveyancers sent the wrong version of the contract; simple admin mistakes added weeks until the buyers finally gave up.
We are close to exchange and completion and are wondering whether we should wait for the November budget. Does anything change after signing contracts or are we already committed?
I was warned that the recommended conveyancers rarely picked up the phone.
We thought we were on a genuine no-move-no-fee deal but still had to pay for searches and extras when the chain fell apart, which no one had clearly explained.
Adviser filled in our application wrongly—entered incorrect income and deposit. Lender declined and we had to restart the whole process.
A commenter jokes that ‘the previous sale fell through’ is often spun as buyer fault, and not because of ‘surprise extra costs’ that appear later in the process.
The sale took ten months with two failed buyers; our conveyancer was at least good at communicating, but the constant fall-throughs were exhausting.
Our chain has six properties and one link used a PM Law brand. All six families now face the risk of being homeless or losing deposits if contracts can’t be honoured in time.
A Victorian house sale collapsed after the buyers’ survey flagged ‘damp’ everywhere, even though the sellers had lived there a decade with no actual problems.
Our lender wouldn’t extend our mortgage offer after delays in the chain, so even though everyone was finally ready, we no longer had the funding to complete.
The sale nearly fell through because the report flagged severe issues that weren’t backed up with proper evidence, causing panic and delays.
I sent my deposit and the lender’s money to PM Law, we had already exchanged and were due to complete yesterday. I woke up to discover their phones were disconnected and completion wasn’t happening. I’ve got all my money tied up and no idea what happens next.
our solicitor is not responding with an answer
I was told last week by my conveyancer ... but today, the sellers solicitor said it was applied for on 26th feb 2025.
YesCanDo Money explain that if you can’t complete before your offer ends, you may have to reapply at worse rates, which can kill a purchase that just about worked before.
A Trustpilot review of The Property Ombudsman says the service took nearly a year to look at a landlord’s complaint about an agent, only to dismiss it and ask for even more information.
Our first sale fell through and the estate agent’s contract was ending; we wanted to switch agents but weren’t sure if we’d be charged twice.
It’s a simple no-chain flat purchase, but the conveyancing alone has dragged on for more than four months and I’m losing rental income.
Our sale nearly collapsed because the solicitor forgot to request a simple indemnity policy that had been agreed at the very start. The insurer issued it within hours once it was finally requested.
We were FTBs and thought we’d done everything right, but our seller’s onward purchase collapsed and after months of waiting we simply gave up and stayed renting.
Our selling agent gave us almost no communication at all and left our onward purchase agent to do the chasing.
That article also highlights confusion around the Building Safety Act, saying some conveyancers now refuse to act on certain flat sales because of cladding and liability concerns.
Buyer says they were switched between teams and could not get consistent answers on what was outstanding.
The Law Society explains that the Legal Ombudsman mainly deals with poor service such as delayed or unclear communication, billing problems and lost documents.
The agent’s follow-up was so poor that offers and viewings felt mishandled, adding friction and delays that would scare buyers off.
Seller says the buyer’s solicitor went on holiday without warning, stalling completion for almost a month.
One London leaseholder pays £5,500 a year in service charges for a one-bed; they say residents are furious and many feel unable to sell because buyers balk at the fees.
Our solicitor sat on the local search request for weeks; by the time it finally came back, the sellers had lost patience and put the house back on the market.
They waited until they had every search, mortgage offer and document before contacting anyone, which meant two months of silence and panic on our side.
We had buyers pull out because of their job situation, another over survey worries, and another who simply got cold feet. After the third time we were broken.
The lender’s appointed surveyor refused to value the flat due to cosmetic repairs, even though it was currently occupied and safe.
They love the property but feel trapped between their heart and the cold numbers in the valuation report.
A Digital Spy poster described being ‘so stressed’ when their sale fell through, saying they had no idea you could get that close to moving and still lose everything.
“This company should be shut down… nearly 8 months… simple house purchase.”
Broker miscalculated affordability, telling us we qualified for a higher mortgage. Lender rejected and we lost our dream home.
The reviewer says emails were ignored, the online portal was useless and they had to chase constantly by phone while nothing seemed to move forward.
It’s heartbreaking that the house we hoped to buy could be lost because one buyer in the chain changed their mind.
It feels like I did nothing wrong but still risk losing a decent rate because a seller changed their mind higher up the chain.
They say if they’d known earlier, they would never have proceeded, but now they’re financially and emotionally invested and trying to work out next steps.
I was ready to pull out because I genuinely thought my solicitor had vanished.
‘Aggressive, lazy, uncommunicative’ — seller says the whole experience was awful to deal with.
Agent failed to send the conveyancing quote on time and ignored follow up calls.
“I was promised an excellent service… I would avoid the entire firm.”
We never received the fortnightly reviews we were sold on, and the communication from YOPA was painfully slow.
Many negligence claims against conveyancers involve delays and failure to keep clients informed.
They describe feeling stuck in a property nobody wants, with their lives effectively on pause while those charges keep climbing.
General complaint of being slow/understaffed and giving misleading updates; others warned to avoid.
Site described as ‘not the official Land Registry’ with extra fees added beyond the headline price.
A MoneySavingExpert user wrote that their leasehold flat had sat on the market for years with no sale, mainly due to high service charges and nervous buyers.
Too many people are just told ‘it didn’t work out’, when they actually need detailed reasons to avoid repeating the same nightmare on the next attempt.
So slow we lost our buyer.
Client claims their solicitor repeatedly sent documents with names spelled incorrectly, delaying mortgage approval.
Another estate agent review article mentions sellers who only got two viewings in five weeks with a ‘reputable’ agent before switching to a different company in frustration.
Our file changed fee-earner three times and each new person claimed they 'weren't familiar with the background'. Basic questions had to be answered again and again, and every change added another week to the timeline.
Every time I called, the receptionist said the solicitor was out or in a meeting; by the time they finally rang me, the buyer had withdrawn.
The collapse of our completion left us technically in breach of contract; instead of celebrating moving day, we were on the phone to solicitors arguing about liability.
Communication from Angela Viney was awful. I was told my deeds had arrived and would be sent, but even after repeated chasing weeks later nothing turned up.
Action Fraud warns criminals hack email chains between buyers/sellers and solicitors/agents and send spoof emails on completion day claiming bank details have changed.
We were due to exchange this week, with completion set for Friday. Instead we’ve learned via social media that our conveyancing firm has closed and we’re facing the real possibility of the buyer walking away.
On Gransnet, one seller said their sale had fallen through a couple of times during Covid; by the time a reliable buyer came along, they were exhausted by solicitors ‘mucking about’.
A review of exp UK on Trustpilot complains they couldn’t even get basic communication, with one prospective customer saying the valuer simply never turned up to the appointment.
Solicitors say you’ll have to mention any boundary rows on the TA6 form anyway, so hoping buyers never find out is not a realistic option.
Our tenant is refusing access for viewings and the managing agent seems to side with them. I’m trying to sell but they’re using every excuse not to cooperate and I’m stuck paying the mortgage.
HRD Ventnor office refused to release OUR lifetime legal check which we paid £80 ?
A Waterstone Legal article lists causes of slow conveyancing including overworked law firms, unmotivated sellers and simple lack of communication between parties.
They highlighted how lenders demand EWS1 forms and more paperwork, which slows sales, blocks mortgages and traps owners in buildings with ongoing safety concerns.
They describe the whole experience as ‘no communication, no service, completely unprofessional’, feeling like they were being sold to rather than properly helped onto the ladder.
They describe being threatened with significant fees and being chased by solicitors, while also facing ongoing mortgage and council tax on an empty property.
Not even 1 star but there is no option for that. Absolute ridiculous service.
Offer accepted over four months ago, chain cleared, but our conveyancer still hasn’t sent draft contract. Retirement-stress mounting.
Half the house had been remodelled without sign-off and our solicitor made it clear we’d be inheriting the headache, so we scrapped the purchase.
We’re over five months in and still haven’t completed. Every week our conveyancer promises ‘next week’ and nothing happens.
An MSE thread titled ‘Buyer taking too long with conveyancing’ describes 14 weeks of queries from the buyer’s solicitor and a lender using its own lawyer, generating even more requirements.
A second valuation demanded by the lender came back radically lower than the first, causing our mortgage rate to jump significantly.
A reviewer says they paid before realising it wasn’t the government service and felt the branding was misleading.
“They purposely told me information late… rushed into purchasing it.”
My experience… complete chaotic shambles… 16 months involvement.
We joined a Facebook support group for PM Property Lawyers victims. Hundreds of people say they were days from moving when everything stopped.
They say many complaints they see are about basic customer care – silence, little explanation and no clear roadmap for getting to exchange and completion.
Appalling communication and customer service... we're currently a month delayed... a week to "process" documents.
Survey-style due diligence felt like a tick-box exercise with little real advice on tricky points.
Analysis in another article showed average service charges for flats rising 11% in a year to around £2,300, with high charges making many leasehold properties much harder to sell.
The lender placed our case ‘under manual review’ with no timescale. We waited 23 days while the seller threatened to remarket.
The mortgage broker kept changing lenders mid-process as products were withdrawn, and eventually the buyers just gave up after the third failed application.
A long consultation turned into heavy pressure to buy insurance products, which felt like a sales ambush.
They said having someone who actually understood the lease and could explain it to buyers stopped the flat from becoming a permanent fall-through story.
Paid and got nothing; now trying a bank chargeback because the firm won’t engage.
Offer accepted… estate agents said prior fall-through was “personal reasons”…
I’d already paid for searches on one house when that purchase collapsed. Now I’m buying nearby and the reports look generic, so I’m tempted not to pay for new ones.
Our buyer’s solicitor waited until the day of exchange to say the leasehold wasn’t properly registered, so the whole sale died on the spot.
We were told to be ready to move, so we booked removals and vacated on the assumption funds would be sent. Then we discovered the firm handling our completion had been shut down and we had no house to go to that night.
A Reddit buyer complains their conveyancing solicitor ‘never gives any updates’ and that they have no idea if searches have even been requested months into the process.
Reallymoving advises buyers to scan the TA6 carefully for any hint of neighbour trouble and to walk away if the seller seems evasive.
In another complaint, a client said they could never get hold of their conveyancer, weren’t told who to contact when she was away, and only found out things had stalled when the sale collapsed.
The estate agent had been talking about survey quotes for weeks but nobody had even asked us to fill in the property information form, which shows how disjointed the whole process can be.
Move stalled for weeks waiting for a response; even formal complaint routes went unanswered.
They wonder whether the broker should have foreseen the lender’s reaction and whether they have any recourse for the wasted fees.
A reviewer said they turned to a quick-sale company after a failed attempt with a local agent, simply because they couldn’t face risking another collapse.
The fixtures and fittings list tried to charge an eye-watering amount for an old shed, then threatened to bill us to remove it; that row was one of several reasons the sale collapsed.
Rising dissatisfaction means people are more willing to challenge poor conveyancing service rather than simply accept slow, opaque processes.
Weeks passed without an update; I felt completely in the dark about everything.
One leaseholder described being billed over a hundred pounds for simple jobs like changing light bulbs, saying inflated charges and slow repairs were turning their home into a financial trap.
We were told completion funds had been sent, but the bank confirmed nothing had been transferred. The solicitor later admitted they had forgotten to authorise the payment.
“Both transactions at risk… cannot proceed without input from their team.”
We felt we were paying almost full fees for a transaction that never reached exchange, on top of the cost of trying again with another buyer.
We lost our buyer when the survey highlighted significant damp and potential structural movement; even a small price reduction wasn’t enough to reassure them.
Estate sale paperwork reportedly mishandled with important documents lost, requiring resubmission.
The muddle over who actually managed the block left the buyer worried about future repairs and charges, so they pulled out.
Our buyers completed on their sale but can’t complete on ours because their solicitor is one of the PM Law firms. The agent has warned that they’ll have nowhere to live if this isn’t fixed quickly.
They explain that until the legal ownership is sorted out, buyers and lenders tend to avoid the block, leaving existing leaseholders stuck with rising charges and no way out.
The whole experience of having a sale fall through has made us wary of the entire system; we’re putting off moving again for as long as we can.
They admit the flat itself is fine, but the rising charges feel like a trap that future buyers will see straight away in the management pack.
A MoneySavingExpert poster says their flat’s service charge is just under £300 a month and they’re starting to suspect it’s the main reason it won’t sell.
We've just had buyers pull out on the basis of survey from this company.
We are mid property transaction and the service is worse than useless. Endless delays, lies and inefficiencies.
Mortgage offer expired while they only managed to order searches and stayed unresponsive.
The actual Conveyancer was very pleasant and helpful but lost steam as time went well passed original completion date. Went on holiday without telling me.
They described themselves as ‘totally broken’ by a system where your entire year can vanish into dead chains and sunk costs.
Our solicitor did not explain how the Help to Buy equity loan interacted with the sale timetable. We nearly missed the redemption deadline and had to rush to get paperwork signed under intense pressure.
One commenter said their clients ‘found it hard to sell’ because many buyers just won’t shoulder big, open-ended service charges on top of a mortgage.
Even when agents answer, it’s often something woolly like ‘buyer’s situation changed’, which doesn’t help you judge whether there’s a real problem with the property.
We are part exchanging with a new build and are meant to exchange on 28 November, but there has been no response to searches for the new build and no enquiries on our property from the developer's solicitors. We are worried we will miss the timeline and our children will lose their new school place.
The first sale fell through after our solicitor took weeks to answer emails and a full month to send the report once searches were back.
On our lender’s panel, but the experience felt negligent and unprofessional—made a stressful mortgage stage even worse.
A Reddit post titled ‘Down valued house at a bit of a loss’ describes two purchases falling through, £5,000 wasted and a year completely lost to the housing market.
We bailed on a purchase when we heard the sellers were in an ongoing row with the downstairs neighbour about noise; we didn’t want to inherit that stress.
The Times reports a family who have spent £43,000 on service charges and council tax while failing for five years to sell a retirement flat.
We begged the agent to find out the real reason our buyers walked, but all we got back was a vague line about ‘issues with the management fees’.
It’s a horrible choice: stay put and live with the neighbour, or be honest on the forms and risk the buyer walking away when they see there’s an ongoing dispute.
I sold my flat last month using a PM Law firm. The collapse has left me worrying that the money isn’t safe and that the purchase I was about to make could fall through if I can’t access the proceeds.
Santander’s research says more than half a million property transactions collapse every year in England and Wales because of our outdated home-buying system.
The whole process feels like a lottery – you can do everything right and still lose the sale because someone else in the chain panics or can’t get a mortgage.
Slow, understaffed and liars.
My buyers solicitor doesn't appear to have done a single thing.
Our original sale fell through and the auction service an agent pushed us into wanted the reserve set 20% below market value, which felt like fire-selling our home out of desperation.
We felt helpless watching a perfectly good offer slip away thanks to a backlog at the council.
The solicitor acting for us failed to spot that the block had no formal fire risk assessment on file, despite clear guidance on this for flats. Our insurer later required costly retrospective checks and upgrades.
We were interested in buying with tenants in situ but the lack of proper inventory and deposit protection made it feel like a legal minefield, so we walked away.
One commenter points out that if the buyer later discovers you lied about a dispute, you could face a claim for compensation on top of losing goodwill.
A more recent data release for 2024/25 again shows residential conveyancing topping the tables for poor complaint handling rates compared with other areas of law.
Still no mortgage offer issued
I physically moved out of my property on the assumption completion money would move the same day. The PM Law shutdown means the funds are trapped and I’m sofa-surfing with all my belongings in storage.
Another agent advised to get indemnity insurance although this does not protect us against every lender
So slow we lost our buyer… our buyer finally pulled out…
We discovered after exchange that our solicitor never checked the seller’s planning permissions for an extension. The council’s enforcement action caused months of disruption.
We’ve now had two purchases collapse, each costing a couple of thousand in fees. Nearly a year of trying to buy and we’re about £5,000 down with nothing to show.
A Mumsnet poster said their sale fell through after developers pulled out because they couldn’t get planning permission – and the conveyancer still tried to bill almost the full fee.
Our conveyancer sent our mortgage deed to the wrong address and insisted we pay for a courier to send a replacement urgently. Their mistake cost us extra fees and delays.
After seven months of conveyancing our buyers decided it was just taking too long and pulled out, leaving us emotionally exhausted.
Was passed from team to team and due to their incompetence my buyer pulled out.
The vendor’s agent never told us their purchase had fallen through until we chased; by that point we’d wasted months and had to look elsewhere.
Another broker warns that solicitor delays, chain problems and new-build hold-ups are all common reasons mortgage offers expire before completion.
The deposit wasn’t properly handled when the sale fell through and we spent months chasing the agent to get our money back.
The agent overpriced our house and then went quiet when it stuck. Emails ignored, no strategy, just silence while the listing went stale.
Our buyer pulled out when their solicitor explained how high and unpredictable the service charges could become on our leasehold flat.
Seller reports that their agent listed the property with key material information missing, leading to a buyer pulling out on survey and the seller still being chased for the full fee despite getting no completed sale.
I watched the chain implode when a lender refused to renew an offer that had quietly expired while the solicitors were still sending paper forms around.
They’re now stuck with the same lawyer on their new purchase and feel like everything is dragging because emails take weeks to get answered.
Total garbage... only got us a single viewing in 6 months.
Our chain nearly fell apart because the buyers at the bottom didn’t realise how long searches can take – they assumed it was like ordering a credit check.
Everything took so long that a chain-free buyer eventually pulled out; emails weren’t answered and updates were impossible to get.
They argue that starting searches earlier is vital, because the longer you wait, the more likely it is a nervous buyer or seller will pull the plug.
A first-time buyer group post says the service charge on their flat tripled from £60 to £180 a month – far more than they understood when they bought.
our mortgage offer expires in mid December
They are an organised group of scammers.
BLB Solicitors say you must disclose any neighbour dispute – even historic – and admit most buyers lose enthusiasm once they hear about a ‘troublesome’ neighbour.
The buyers walked away just before exchange and we were left paying legal fees with nothing to show for it.
Service charges rose 11% — we hadn’t budgeted for that level because nothing in the listing mentioned the historic increases.
Terrible communication from the solicitor meant nobody realised the mortgage offer was about to expire until it was too late.
Buyer claims their conveyancer refuses to explain the local search results and simply says ‘it’s fine’ without clarification.
Long investigation backlogs mean unhappy home movers may wait months just to get an answer about poor conveyancing service.
A buyer says they waited with little clarity and felt the handling was disorganised and difficult to progress.
Completion itself reportedly delayed, leaving buyers unable to get into the house for hours after contract time.
Seller says they were pushed toward an auction route that later fell through, costing time and momentum.
With lenders refusing to lend on the flats, owners were told their only realistic option was to find cash buyers or wait years for remediation.
Our buyers’ conveyancer delayed things so badly that my purchase almost fell through. Their inactivity has had knock-on effects up the chain.
We felt completely stuck in limbo because our agent gave us no clear plan or communication about the sale.
After our sale fell through, we found out we could buy indemnity insurance for missing paperwork instead of doing expensive remedial works no one had explained properly.
Because I was misled about why the last buyers walked away, I ended up hundreds of pounds out of pocket when we had to pull out too.
My service charge doubled last year and I’m terrified that if I ever need to sell, buyers will take one look at the fees and run a mile.
Our house sale collapsed the day after the stamp duty holiday ended because our buyer’s buyer pulled out with a one-line ‘sorry’ from their solicitor.
We are considering suing them.
Overcharging for works never done; ‘expected’ charges then later surprises — feels sneaky.
Santander estimate more than half a million transactions collapse each year because of our antiquated homebuying system.
LawHive explain that if a seller lies about neighbours on the TA6, it can amount to misrepresentation and give buyers grounds to claim losses later.
Fast forward to now, April 2025... I am now in arrears of £3232.55... they had a missing letter in my email.
They now find that potential buyers are scared off by the possibility of further hikes, leaving them stuck with homes that don’t feel affordable at all.
Our conveyancer did not explain how the complex ground rent review worked in the lease. When a broker later reviewed it, they warned that future rises could make the flat effectively unmortgageable.
A buyer on r/HousingUK says their solicitor ‘never gives any updates’ – emails go unanswered and they have no idea if searches have even been requested.
A second set of buyers then dropped out just days before exchange, citing devastating work news – we felt like the rug had been pulled twice.
Our buyer was gazumped after months of waiting, so not only did the sale fall through but the money we’d spent on legal work was wasted.
My flat sale fell through just days after my mortgage offer was approved, and now I’m stuck wondering whether to cancel it or try to re-use it on another place.
Received an unexpected invoice just to ‘open a file’ after requesting quotes elsewhere; it felt like a surprise charge trap.
They say they constantly have to chase to get even basic work done, and feel the firm shows little care or engagement with the case.
They worry potential buyers will run a mile once they see how high the charges are for such a modest building.
“Overcharged… constant communication via post… letters not received… told them to email.”
They warn that buyers increasingly rely on TA6 answers and are willing to sue if they discover the truth only after completion.
We tried challenging the service charge but were warned that tribunal action might scare off buyers, so we stayed quiet and watched another sale fall through.
Shocked to be basically 'scammed' by this firm.
Another British Homebuyers reviewer said their earlier chain collapsed and they’d almost given up hope until the new firm stepped in, bought quickly and rescued their onward move.
“We’re now in month 6… simple conveyancing… empty house… no chain.”
They described spending on surveys and legals again and again, only to be flung back to scrolling listings, too drained to get excited about anything new.
Felt like a lengthy inspection ended in a low valuation with little transparency, producing major disruption right near the finish line.
Our agent was happy to recommend a high commission when the first offer came in over asking, but once that sale fell through they suddenly thought £45k under asking was ‘reasonable’.
The Times reports a family who have spent £43,000 on service charges and council tax while failing for five years to sell a retirement flat.
Our mortgage offer expires in a few weeks and the replacement firm still doesn’t have our file from PM Law. If we have to reapply at today’s rates we simply can’t afford the same home.
We were not told our rising ground rent could make the flat unmortgageable for buyers.
Currently delayed because the buyer’s lawyers take a week to ‘process’ every document.
The damp specialist said it mostly needed ventilation and a dehumidifier, but the damage to buyer confidence was done and they’d already walked away.
The Advisory’s guide on conveyancing complaints is full of examples where consumers feel abandoned mid-transaction and forced to chase updates themselves.
We discovered after completion that the solicitor had never checked whether the solar panel lease met our lender's requirements. The bank later queried the documentation and we had to pay for additional legal work to satisfy them.
‘Checks’ and investor packs claimed, but buyer says crucial info wasn’t disclosed upfront and deal collapsed.
Our landlord ignored repeated reports of mould and damp; when we tried to buy the place using right to buy, the surveyor’s report was so bad our mortgage was declined.
Bettermove’s guide on selling with neighbour disputes explains you must declare ongoing rows on the TA6 and that hiding them can backfire badly later.
The Leasehold Advisory Service warns that service charges can rise without a fixed cap, and buyers need to understand not just today’s bill but likely future costs.
Looking back, we entered into a leasehold agreement that leaves us paying more and more every year while the flat’s resale appeal lags far behind other properties nearby.
A buyer says their conveyancer told them their email had been intercepted and scammers swapped bank details; the fake email and letter looked totally convincing and they nearly lost a six-figure sum.
We listed our new barn conversion with an independent estate agent because the valuation seemed more realistic, but after two viewings we have no meaningful feedback and little interest. We are unsure whether the lack of viewings is caused by using an independent agent or whether we should drop the price.
Our mortgage application stalled because the surveyor deemed the property ‘unsellable’ based on its status, leaving us stuck and uncertain.
On a house price forum someone noted that in central London you can easily see flats with £2,000+ yearly service charge and big council tax, and they’re just sitting because nobody wants them.
“File opening fee… ID check fee… source of funds verification fee… and like 6 others.”
Our mortgage offer expired after six months of conveyancing; four weeks later the chain collapsed and we were back to renting with no house and no offer.
Buyer claims their solicitor was unaware of basic Help-to-Buy requirements, leading to avoidable delays.
After over 180 days... our buyer finally pulled out.
I am being told that a deed of variation is required
Poor communication, all words no action… had to beg for viewers…
When our first sale collapsed, Gillian at Yopa had new viewers in within days and found another buyer so fast that the rest of the chain didn’t fall apart.
The Law Society’s guidance on complaining about a solicitor says the Legal Ombudsman mainly deals with poor service such as delayed or unclear communication, lost documents and billing issues.
In a purchase, the only remaining item was the management pack — every party chased with no result.
They say buyers can justifiably walk away or seek compensation if they later discover a paper trail of complaints that wasn’t mentioned.
A guide for first-time buyers points out that delays often happen purely because solicitors are slow to communicate and don’t keep clients updated in plain English.
We have spent thousands on rent and surveys and still do not have a house purchase secured.
Countrywide Home Surveys reviewers accuse the firm of ‘down-valuing and practically ridiculing’ properties, saying their reports have blocked further borrowing or stalled moves.
A broker article says if your mortgage offer expires before completion, the lender isn’t obliged to lend and you may have to start again with a full new application.
We were meant to exchange last week with PM Property Lawyers handling everything; now we’ve no idea who has our money or documents.
They suggested that in badly managed blocks, flats often take much longer to sell or only shift at discounted prices because of the perceived risk.
We only found out critical information because the agent chased, not our solicitor.
It’s maddening that you can do everything right and still have someone vanish after spending their money on surveys and legals.
The conveyancer seemed overwhelmed and disorganised; by the time they got round to raising basic enquiries, the other side had lost patience and pulled out.
Buyer pulled out after being passed from team to team and feeling the conveyancing was mishandled.
Our buyer pulled out after their mortgage offer expired while waiting for the chain to inch forward – nobody warned us that offer dates could literally kill a sale.
Citizens Advice more or less shrugged and said buyers can change their mind right up to exchange, which is maddening when you’ve spent months cooperating in good faith.
I’ve seen several deals die at the last hurdle because buyers can’t bridge the gap between down-valued mortgages and stubborn asking prices.
They warn that reapplying mid-chain can destabilise every linked sale, especially if affordability has tightened since the first offer.
Buyer says they were asked to review documents that had not actually been sent, adding avoidable weeks.
Our sale fell through several times with a previous solicitor and housing association. It was only when Watson Ramsbottom took over that things finally moved.
We’ve had a year of chain collapses and wasted time with other agents; every time someone above us pulled out, the whole process reset.
Two houses we tried to buy went straight back on the market the day the sales collapsed, with the agents brushing off the stress they’d caused us.
The conveyancer used a generic template report on title that did not refer to several obvious issues specific to our property. A second opinion highlighted missing explanations about covenants, access and service charge exposure.
MSE users describe flats where annual charges reached £3,000–£6,000; every time a buyer’s solicitor saw the schedule, the sale stalled or fell through.
Before we switched agents we’d had a year of chains falling apart and feeling like nobody was really steering things or keeping us updated.
“Completed our sale and purchase after 13 months.”
The firm scores only 12% on ‘would you recommend this firm?’, suggesting many clients feel deeply unhappy with the service received.
A William H Brown reviewer says when they rang about viewing a bungalow, staff were more interested in booking a valuation on their own house and pushing an in-house mortgage broker than arranging the viewing.
They’ve slashed the asking price by tens of thousands, but high charges and exit fees make buyers wary and the flat still hasn’t sold.
Our solicitor sent purchase monies to a PM Law firm on completion day, but the sellers didn’t get confirmation, the agent had no key release, and we spent the day sitting in a van with our belongings waiting for an update that never came.
A Reddit post titled ‘Frustrated with UK conveyancing delays’ describes a supposedly simple, no-chain purchase dragging past four and a half months because of ‘searches’.
Months of delay before a solicitor was even assigned; the buyer felt the firm wasn’t set up to handle UK conveyancing competently.
Potential buyers lose interest the moment they see our annual service charge is more than the council tax; we feel like prisoners in our own flat.
The conveyancer failed to order searches for more than a month after receiving funds. This pushed us past the mortgage offer expiry date, costing us a re-application fee.
Our sale collapsed the day after the stamp duty holiday ended because our buyer’s buyer pulled out. Nobody would tell us why – just a short email and that was it.
Now those same charges are scaring off every buyer and slicing thousands off what we might get back.
A buyer on HousingUK said they’ve now had two purchases fall through, losing around £5,000 on surveys, valuations and legal fees with nothing to show for it.
Our original buyer changed their mind just before exchange, saying they’d found another property; we never got any more explanation than that.
A home-selling guide says surveys and down-valuations are now one of the top reasons sales collapse – buyers use the report to walk away or renegotiate, and many sellers just give up.
On their case-study hub, the Ombudsman lists common themes in conveyancing complaints: poor communication, delay, weak advice and unexpected costs.
Despite repeated regulatory warnings about email payment fraud, our conveyancer sent our bank details without any security checks or verbal confirmation step. We later learned those basic safeguards are now widely recommended good practice.
Buyer’s perspective: viewings botched and no end-to-end accountability — classic ‘everyone blames someone else’.
Our mortgage broker admitted the process had dragged on so long that several of their clients’ deals had fallen through purely due to offer expiry.
The sellers pulled out days before exchange, after I’d flown back to the UK and paid for a survey that even missed obvious cracks I’d filmed at the viewing.
Our house sale fell through and with it we lost the bungalow we’d set our hearts on; we’re devastated and feel too exhausted to start over.
They say pulling out would still cost them hundreds in legal fees, but carrying on could trap them with unaffordable charges and rising costs.
Our purchase was undervalued by the lender’s surveyor, forcing stressful renegotiations and wasting weeks.
After buying a repossessed property, the new owner got a charging order letter in the old owner’s name, creating fear of legal fallout.
A Mumsnet user with a London flat reports annual service charges of £3,000–£6,000, one year hitting £10,000, and says the property is practically impossible to sell.
They highlight how often buyers first learn of historic feuds only after they’ve moved in and started receiving aggressive letters or noise complaints.
Someone forgot to register my name on the deeds... for the last 3 months I am in no mans land with my mortgage.
My flat sale fell through, my first purchase fell through, and only the third attempt actually completed – the emotional toll was horrendous.
Citizens Advice say people often lose money when a sale or purchase collapses, for example if a buyer’s deposit isn’t returned properly or the agent mishandles client funds.
No complaints or bad experiences match the current filters
Try broadening the categories, tags or sources, clearing the search or resetting back to the full wall.
Complaints by category
Which broad complaint categories dominate the current filtered set.
Complaints by source type
Which source types appear most often in the current complaints shown.
Complaints over time
Visible trend based on the available month and year data.
County / area pressure points
Click any hotspot card to filter the wall and map by that county / area.
Submission intelligence
These views surface the richer structured fields collected from direct submissions, helping journalists, researchers and consumers spot how issues escalate, who they are reported to, and what damage they cause.
Reported to bodies
Where people say they escalated the issue externally.
Outcome status
Whether reports were resolved, unresolved or still under investigation.
Transaction stage
At what point in the journey the issue was experienced.
Most responsible party
Who complainants say was most responsible for the problem.
Consequences
Whether the issue caused delays, a fall-through, both, or neither.
Evidence available
How many complainants say they hold documents or evidence.
Financial loss reported
Whether complainants say the issue led to direct financial loss.
UK complaints and bad experiences map
Map results are grouped at county / area level by default so the UK view stays readable. Click a hotspot card or map marker to filter to that area, then clear the map filter to return to the full national picture.
Loading map…