Against that backdrop, Artificial Intelligence [AI] is starting to appear more regularly inside local government conversations.
This week’s Property Quorum takes a closer look at what that could mean for the wider property world.
The discussion was prompted by recent reports surrounding Stoke-on-Trent City Council and its growing interest in AI systems. Yet the reality is that Stoke is far from alone. Councils across the country are now exploring different forms of automation and AI-assisted technology, particularly around planning, housing, customer services and document handling.
One of the more interesting parts of the Stoke story is that the council is reportedly looking at using AI to identify tenants who may be at risk of falling into rent arrears, allowing earlier intervention and support before situations become more serious.
In principle, one can understand the thinking behind that.
Many councils are seeing increasing financial pressure placed on households. If systems can help identify warning signs earlier, there may well be opportunities to step in before arrears grow, relationships break down, or tenants find themselves facing much more difficult circumstances later on.
At the same time, it does raise wider questions about how much reliance should be placed on predictive systems and data modelling when dealing with people’s homes and financial situations.
The Government itself has also shown growing interest in AI-assisted planning systems as part of wider ambitions around housing delivery and speeding up decision-making processes.
What makes this especially relevant to the property sector is that conveyancing professionals are already living in a world shaped by information overload.
From my own perspective working closely alongside the conveyancing world, the challenge today is rarely about simply obtaining information. Modern systems are perfectly capable of gathering data quickly. The harder part is refining it, interpreting it, and understanding what genuinely matters to the buyer, seller, developer or lender sitting at the centre of the transaction.
That is where the conversation becomes more interesting.
AI is often presented as a solution to delays and inefficiency. Yet one wonders whether there is also a danger that systems simply produce even more material, more alerts, more automated observations and more layers of data for already stretched professionals to process.
There is also the issue of consistency.
A great deal of local authority information still sits across fragmented systems, older databases, scanned documents and legacy records. Some councils are more digitally advanced than others. Some still rely heavily on experienced officers who understand the history and quirks of their local area.
That local knowledge matters more than many people realise.
Within conveyancing, small local details can completely change the understanding of a property or piece of land. Flood history, planning patterns, historic agreements, road adoption issues, environmental concerns or long-standing local developments are not always obvious from raw data alone.
The property sector has already seen what can happen when too much emphasis is placed on automation without enough interpretation sitting around it. More data does not automatically create better understanding.
As digital systems continue to expand, the number of enquiries, follow-up questions and clarifications has often increased rather than reduced. Software can retrieve information quickly enough. Refining it properly still relies heavily on professional judgement and experience.
Residents dealing with planning disputes, housing issues or property concerns often want reassurance that someone genuinely understands their situation. AI may help process information faster, yet people may still feel uncomfortable if important decisions appear increasingly machine-assisted.
Used carefully, AI may well help reduce repetitive administrative work and assist overwhelmed departments. Yet it would be interesting to know whether local government is at risk of becoming so focused on speed and automation that it gradually loses some of the local understanding and human judgement that people still value most.
For this week’s Property Quorum, Gareth Wax and Hamish McLay will be joined by Silas J Lees to discuss whether councils turning towards AI represents genuine progress, or whether the property industry may simply be entering another phase where information becomes faster, larger, and harder to properly interpret.
Never miss an episode of Spilling the Proper-Tea again, subscribe to our YouTube Channel to catch or watch live:
https://www.youtube.com/@SpillingTheProper-Tea
For content enquiries:
For podcast/media info: